Dev Team 6 (talk | contribs) |
Bladesmulti (talk | contribs) →A barnstar for you!: new WikiLove message Tag: wikilove |
||
Line 155: | Line 155: | ||
:Part of the problem is that you are a new editor and your only interest thus far seems to be in the Gray article. The article's history is one of [[WP:SPA]]s editing the article from opposing and non-neutral viewpoints, meaning that one SPA likes Gray and tries to remove anything negative about him and another dislikes Gray and tries to add negative material. This kind of editing is unhealthy and disruptive to Wikipedia, and it's my role to prevent it. What's your interest in the article?--[[User:Bbb23|Bbb23]] ([[User talk:Bbb23#top|talk]]) 05:16, 14 October 2014 (UTC) |
:Part of the problem is that you are a new editor and your only interest thus far seems to be in the Gray article. The article's history is one of [[WP:SPA]]s editing the article from opposing and non-neutral viewpoints, meaning that one SPA likes Gray and tries to remove anything negative about him and another dislikes Gray and tries to add negative material. This kind of editing is unhealthy and disruptive to Wikipedia, and it's my role to prevent it. What's your interest in the article?--[[User:Bbb23|Bbb23]] ([[User talk:Bbb23#top|talk]]) 05:16, 14 October 2014 (UTC) |
||
::I am interested in the article because it is relevant to where I live, and I am a student studying political science and the use of online media. I believe using Wikipedia as a repository of negative articles about people some editor's do not like is not the purpose nor the spirit of the site. As it stands the page in question has been used to report quite literally the only 2 or 3 negative news stories that exist on the internet about this person. If you don't believe me I invite you to do a quick search. This is obviously what the previous editor has used the page for. There also happen to be numerous positive stories about this person, which I summarized and referenced from legitimate news sources. I do understand your choice to restore the "negative material", but if the page can be used to post negative stories, surely it can also be used to post stories that happen to be positive as well? I have made another attempt to edit the page taking your concerns into account. Please let me know what can be improved. <small><span class="autosigned">— Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:Dev Team 6|Dev Team 6]] ([[User talk:Dev Team 6|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Dev Team 6|contribs]]) 05:25, 14 October 2014 (UTC)</span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> |
::I am interested in the article because it is relevant to where I live, and I am a student studying political science and the use of online media. I believe using Wikipedia as a repository of negative articles about people some editor's do not like is not the purpose nor the spirit of the site. As it stands the page in question has been used to report quite literally the only 2 or 3 negative news stories that exist on the internet about this person. If you don't believe me I invite you to do a quick search. This is obviously what the previous editor has used the page for. There also happen to be numerous positive stories about this person, which I summarized and referenced from legitimate news sources. I do understand your choice to restore the "negative material", but if the page can be used to post negative stories, surely it can also be used to post stories that happen to be positive as well? I have made another attempt to edit the page taking your concerns into account. Please let me know what can be improved. <small><span class="autosigned">— Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:Dev Team 6|Dev Team 6]] ([[User talk:Dev Team 6|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Dev Team 6|contribs]]) 05:25, 14 October 2014 (UTC)</span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> |
||
== A barnstar for you! == |
|||
{| style="background-color: #fdffe7; border: 1px solid #fceb92;" |
|||
|rowspan="2" style="vertical-align: middle; padding: 5px;" | [[File:Administrator Barnstar Hires.png|100px]] |
|||
|style="font-size: x-large; padding: 3px 3px 0 3px; height: 1.5em;" | '''The Admin's Barnstar''' |
|||
|- |
|||
|style="vertical-align: middle; padding: 3px;" | For so many years, you are making good decisions and running all administrator boards. You really deserve this! [[User:Bladesmulti|Bladesmulti]] ([[User talk:Bladesmulti|talk]]) 07:56, 14 October 2014 (UTC) |
|||
|} |
Revision as of 07:56, 14 October 2014
Deletion
Hello. This is Jayson37373737. you deleted my page for no reason. That was my loveliest work! For this, I am going to try to delete my account and start a new website. Thank you. Jayson3737373737 11:08, 17 August 2014 (GMC)
WP:MRMPS
Hi Bbb23 - hope your vacation is going well. Sorry to bother you but I'm maxed out in terms of free time and it's that time of year again the WP:MRMPS needs to be renewed. If you haven't got any free time to do this I'll try to take a look. Given the number of issues relating to that page (topic bans, page protections, 1RR violations) as well as the broader issue concerning reddit and misogyny on WP there are clear reasons why this should be renewed - perhaps making it indefinite could also be considered. If you don't have time let me know and I'll do my best to draft an AN/ANi thread WRT this--Cailil talk 11:24, 7 October 2014 (UTC)
Deletion
Hello. This is Jiten Mehrotra. Just saw you deleted a page made on Kunal Bhardwaj by somebody with A7 (No explanation of significance (real person/animal/organization/web content/organized event) as the reason. I believe there was a proper explanation that its about a real person along with his DOB and achievements as well as proper links. Can you please elaborate on the explanation for deletion? Thank you115.115.222.123 (talk) 10:37, 29 September 2014 (UTC)Jitin
References
- ^ http://www.rediff.com/getahead/slide-show/slide-show-1-books-top-5-romance-novels-by-first-time-authors/20130502.htm#4
- ^ http://yourstory.com/2011/03/kunal-bharadwaj-speaks-about-his-debut-novel-love-was-never-mine/
- ^ http://www.booksclub.in/2011/03/love-was-never-mine-book-launch-by.html
- ^ http://www.prlog.org/11351862-book-launch-of-love-was-never-mine-by-kunal-bhardwaj.html
- ^ http://www.prlog.org/11564852-kunal-bhardwaj-author-of-best-seller-romance-title-love-was-never-mine-talks-about-his-aspiration.html
- (talk page stalker) I made sure the ref links stay in this talkpage section rather than falling to the bottom of the page. DMacks (talk) 17:08, 8 October 2014 (UTC)
- You'll have to log in before I'll revisit the delete. (Thanks, DMacks.) --Bbb23 (talk) 15:03, 10 October 2014 (UTC)
Hello, please can you delete the comment of nha trang at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Karis_McLarty
the comment is offensive to me. he said karis is an energatic self promoter. that means karis wrote all the source and the wiki article? It is not true. Warn that user to be civil while commenting. The wiki article and the discussion can be seen by people from all over the world. It is harasment for us. Delete the whole article or such comments please. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 116.58.205.190 (talk) 03:56, 8 October 2014 (UTC)
- Looks like the phrase was removed, although I'm not sure why you came to me.--Bbb23 (talk) 15:06, 10 October 2014 (UTC)
Advice required
Hi Bbb23
Please could you contact me on the email address below to discuss how this page: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alon_Shtruzman can be edited to meet with Wikipedia's criteria so it go live again?
Best Laura 81.140.40.25 (talk) 15:04, 8 October 2014 (UTC) laura.saunders@keshet-tv.com
- Beware WP:PAID and related policies/guidelines if you have any sort of conflict of interest in this topic. DMacks (talk) 17:06, 8 October 2014 (UTC)
- Sorry, I don't do that, and, as far as I can tell, your editing as an IP is block evasion. As an aside, the article you created was almost empty.--Bbb23 (talk) 15:09, 10 October 2014 (UTC)
Hi!
Hi, how are you? To keep up the good work here. --Allen (talk to me! / ctrb / E-mail me) 05:09, 9 October 2014 (UTC)
Jimjilin
He's already had a DS alert today, yours was the 2nd. Definitely an editor who isn't going to last long if he continues this way. Glad to see you back. Did you see the Syrian Civil war sanctions have been renamed? Dougweller (talk) 20:44, 10 October 2014 (UTC)
- Sigh. After I posted the alert, I also posted a message to Callanecc's talk page (self-explanatory if you want to read it). Regardless of my technical issues, I should've seen the other alert; it certainly wasn't far away. :-) Anyway, I reverted mine. Yes, I noticed the change to the sanctions, although I think the sanctions should have been modified in a different way (I believe there was a suggestion from Phil Knight, but it could have been another administrator). Thanks for watching my back.--Bbb23 (talk) 21:30, 10 October 2014 (UTC)
- No problem. It was HJMitchell who notified Jimjilin. Sorry the sanctions thing happened while you were away - that was too fast IMHO. Dougweller (talk) 13:14, 11 October 2014 (UTC)
What kind of judgment is that? Why should I risk being blocked when it's the IP address who refuses to negotiate? This is the same vandal who refers to me as a rat. Did you even understand what the situation was? Clearly not. Khazar (talk) 03:25, 11 October 2014 (UTC)
- Apparently you ask and respond to your own question, so I suppose you just came here to vent. My warning still stands.--Bbb23 (talk) 05:03, 11 October 2014 (UTC)
- I at least expect you to participate in some form of consensus. If you don't, then your handling of the situation won't be as effective as Alex's. Khazar (talk) 06:48, 11 October 2014 (UTC)
- Another flaw in your petty warning is the fact that the IP will simply revert once the lock is lifted. Afterwards, the IP will see no purpose in using the talk page and will do so only if someone reverts him. With that in mind, how is a fair consensus suppose to be established? In one scenario, the IP gets the desired revision. In the second scenario, the IP will start harassing whoever reverted the edit and claim that the "consensus is impossible" Khazar (talk) 07:02, 11 October 2014 (UTC)
RR Noticeboard
Your attention is requested. [1] Andyvphil (talk) 06:53, 11 October 2014 (UTC)
User:Majidch81 Page Deletion
Hi Bbb23, I am here to ask you the reason for deletion of my user page. I can add the required references to the page. Please let me know if the restoration is possible at this stage or not? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Majidch81 (talk • contribs) 20:14, 11 October 2014 (UTC)
- You're not allowed to have a user page like the one you put up, which was a quasi article and whose only apparent purpose was to promote you. Your user page is for Wikipedia-related information, not a proxy for a website.--Bbb23 (talk) 20:39, 11 October 2014 (UTC)
Ok thank you very much. But can I create my own simple wikipedia profile page or not? --Majid Chaudhry (talk) 12:57, 12 October 2014 (UTC)
- I have a more important question for you. What do you want to do at Wikipedia?--Bbb23 (talk) 13:02, 12 October 2014 (UTC)
Deletion
You deleted my page for no reason it took my an hour to make it! From Itsrandomtime (talk) — Preceding undated comment added 00:33, 12 October 2014 (UTC)
Personal attacks
I can't deal with this anymore. No matter how many times I till this user to stop making personal attacks, assumption against me, and putting words in my mouth he just keep doing it. It has been impossible for this "discussion" to continue when he is doing this. Through this discussion this user has:
- 5. Accused me of being unable to read[10]
- 6. Accused me of putting words in his mouth[11]
- 8. Accusing me of making "fun" of him[15]
- 9. Accusing me of making personal attacks[16]
- 10. Stated that I have no respect.[17]
I gave him one final warning for him to stop today but he choose to ignore it. Pretty much each of his replies have been poor imitation of mine. They did not really contribute much anyway. I would greatly appreciate it if you could please do something about this. AcidSnow (talk) 17:48, 12 October 2014 (UTC)
- I've looked through some of the diffs above and I don't see what I would call personal attacks. Rather, I see a heated content dispute with neither of you happy with the other. If you don't think the other editor is contributing much to the discussion, then stop discussing with them. Nothing compels you to respond just because they say something. If there's a dispute that spills over onto the article, then you need to seek content resolution elsewhere (as I believe has been suggested by others).--Bbb23 (talk) 18:08, 12 October 2014 (UTC)
- Well first I would like to say I am not here to "Wiki lawyer" or anything like that since I don't know a lot about Wikipedias policies. Anyways, according to WP:PERSONAL it states "Do not make personal attacks anywhere in Wikipedia. Comment on content, not on the contributor.". Seeing how he stated I have no respect, have made "fun" of him, accused me of making personal attacks, being unable to read, and that I have lied I would assume take these fall under as such as "remarks about the user" and not "their contributions/content on Wikipedia". Anyways, I have requested an RFC so feel free to drop on in. AcidSnow (talk) 19:24, 12 October 2014 (UTC)
Favour
Can you block this IP sock of Nangperbat please? Darkness Shines (talk) 17:55, 12 October 2014 (UTC)
- DS, sorry, but I need more reminding of who Nangperbat is (and you misspelled the name because there is no account with that name).--Bbb23 (talk) 18:12, 12 October 2014 (UTC)
- Sorry, should be Nangparbat Darkness Shines (talk) 18:18, 12 October 2014 (UTC)
Thanks for taking care of matters on Galerie Gmurzynska.
Given the length of protection, and given that the current state of the article is that the lede is mostly made about talking about them being investigated (and given that the article does discuss the ownership of the Galerie, and thus this becomes a WP:BLP issue), I wonder if it might be wise to cut this down to a stub for now, rather than leaving it in this state. (Please note that I have neither been editing either for the all-promo version or the all-attack version; this isn't so much a WP:WRONGVERSION matter as a BLP concern.) Not being an admin, I cannot make this edit myself. --Nat Gertler (talk) 18:50, 12 October 2014 (UTC)
- Nat, I don't see it as that big a problem that it requires removal. Mostly it's about problems with the gallery rather than the owner. The owner would be posssibly involved by implication. Still, I understand your concern, so I have two suggestions. One is to make an edit request on the talk page and let another admin evaluate it. The other is to take it to BLPN. If there is a consensus for removal, I would be willing to remove it at that point.--Bbb23 (talk) 01:44, 13 October 2014 (UTC)
- Thanks for the recommendation. --Nat Gertler (talk) 05:22, 14 October 2014 (UTC)
Mistake editing template.
Thanks for reverting my mistake.
I really have no idea how I followed the links to filling out a template, and ending up writing over stuff. But thanks for reverting it so quickly.Bob the goodwin (talk) 00:52, 13 October 2014 (UTC)
CSD A1
CSD A1 says that it is applicable to very short articles lacking sufficient text. These 2 articles were only in 1 line and thus i tagged them by this criteria. I have read speedy deletion guidelines of Wikipedia already and you are the only admin that tells me repeatedly not to tag by CSD A1. If i am wrong then tell me why in 'detail'. Owais khursheed (talk) 01:00, 13 October 2014 (UTC)
- I provided you a link to the criterion on your talk page (WP:CSD#A1). It does not say "lacking sufficient text". Why don't you read it again and tell me what you think it means?--Bbb23 (talk) 01:33, 13 October 2014 (UTC)
Accusations by Stoney1976
Hi, Bbb23. You blocked User:Stoney1976. However, there is still problem with some of their comments. Namely, the problematic topic is Talk:Environmental_impact_of_hydraulic_fracturing#Consensus_vs._Meat_Puppetry. This issue was raised at Stoney's talk page and I explained there the background of my communication with user:Alexbrn. However, instead of removing their comment, Stoney1976 repeated this and made a new accusation alleging that me and/or Alexbrn are COI editors. I know that every editor has a quite wide of rights about their talk pages but could you please review and, if possible, remove this section from the article's talk page. I know that after eight years in Wikipedia one should have a quite thick skin, but there are moments when that kind of things feel little bit too much. Beagel (talk) 18:39, 13 October 2014 (UTC)
- I've removed it, but, honestly, I don't see why it bothers everyone so much. Based on what Stoney says, it makes no sense.--Bbb23 (talk) 19:27, 13 October 2014 (UTC)
Deletion Dev Team 6
Bbb23 I saw you just deleted all of the content I added to the page regarding Adam C. Gray. Your explanation was that the information was "excessively promotional" and that "sourced "negative" material was removed. I understand restoring the "negative material", but I fail to see a distinction between a page that promote negative stories about a person (ie the one you restored) vs one that is positive. The only real difference is that the negative stories have been added over the course of a few weeks while I tried to summarize the other stories in one go. Everything I added was legitimately sources from real news organizations, so I failed to see how it does not qualify as legitimate information. If I utilize the stories you restored, but also add back in the parts I wrote, would you be satisfied with the page? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Dev Team 6 (talk • contribs) 04:59, 14 October 2014 (UTC)
- Part of the problem is that you are a new editor and your only interest thus far seems to be in the Gray article. The article's history is one of WP:SPAs editing the article from opposing and non-neutral viewpoints, meaning that one SPA likes Gray and tries to remove anything negative about him and another dislikes Gray and tries to add negative material. This kind of editing is unhealthy and disruptive to Wikipedia, and it's my role to prevent it. What's your interest in the article?--Bbb23 (talk) 05:16, 14 October 2014 (UTC)
- I am interested in the article because it is relevant to where I live, and I am a student studying political science and the use of online media. I believe using Wikipedia as a repository of negative articles about people some editor's do not like is not the purpose nor the spirit of the site. As it stands the page in question has been used to report quite literally the only 2 or 3 negative news stories that exist on the internet about this person. If you don't believe me I invite you to do a quick search. This is obviously what the previous editor has used the page for. There also happen to be numerous positive stories about this person, which I summarized and referenced from legitimate news sources. I do understand your choice to restore the "negative material", but if the page can be used to post negative stories, surely it can also be used to post stories that happen to be positive as well? I have made another attempt to edit the page taking your concerns into account. Please let me know what can be improved. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Dev Team 6 (talk • contribs) 05:25, 14 October 2014 (UTC)
A barnstar for you!
The Admin's Barnstar | |
For so many years, you are making good decisions and running all administrator boards. You really deserve this! Bladesmulti (talk) 07:56, 14 October 2014 (UTC) |