→88: re |
EnlightenmentNow1792 (talk | contribs) |
||
Line 91: | Line 91: | ||
Thanks for helping out. I was up most of the night with a sick dog and was not feeling especially patient (or smart) this morning. '''<span style="font-family: Arial;">[[User:Acroterion|<span style="color: black;">Acroterion</span>]] <small>[[User talk:Acroterion|<span style="color: gray;">(talk)</span>]]</small></span>''' 22:27, 8 April 2022 (UTC) |
Thanks for helping out. I was up most of the night with a sick dog and was not feeling especially patient (or smart) this morning. '''<span style="font-family: Arial;">[[User:Acroterion|<span style="color: black;">Acroterion</span>]] <small>[[User talk:Acroterion|<span style="color: gray;">(talk)</span>]]</small></span>''' 22:27, 8 April 2022 (UTC) |
||
:You're welcome. I hope your dog is feeling better.--[[User:Bbb23|Bbb23]] ([[User talk:Bbb23#top|talk]]) 22:40, 8 April 2022 (UTC) |
:You're welcome. I hope your dog is feeling better.--[[User:Bbb23|Bbb23]] ([[User talk:Bbb23#top|talk]]) 22:40, 8 April 2022 (UTC) |
||
== User:Berposen reported by User:Aquillion (Result: Blocked one week) == |
|||
I'd just like to enquire as to whether you believe you have made satisfactory use of your admin privileges in this case? I'm only asking as I see you've moved on to making edits on other pages... - [[User:EnlightenmentNow1792|EnlightenmentNow1792]] ([[User talk:EnlightenmentNow1792|talk]]) 23:23, 8 April 2022 (UTC) |
Revision as of 23:23, 8 April 2022
Conversation off ANEW
Why did you move the real conversation about an ANEW out of the thread and onto a third party's Talk page without informing anyone else? Invasive Spices (talk) 25 January 2022 (UTC)
Please provide a reason for deletion so I know what to do, thank you.Greendes (talk) 08:16, 5 April 2022 (UTC)
- The article was tagged as WP:G11 (umambiguously promotional), and I agreed.--Bbb23 (talk) 12:08, 5 April 2022 (UTC)
Block evasion
I am pretty certain that Oraclesegz is a sock of JosephBlakeSmith, whom you blocked on March 15. They're a SPA, created on March 29, and the only edits were to re-create the hoax draft Draft:Joseph Blake Smith. --Drm310 🍁 (talk) 19:08, 5 April 2022 (UTC)
LTA
Please help and look at this Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Dusty8686; this LTA's disruption has increased rapidly in the past few days and it now involves a username w/ a threat to an admin. Thanks. wizzito | say hello! 23:55, 5 April 2022 (UTC)
Manzarene
What I reported is, that the user was blocked for socking for 1 month and is now engaging in socking with IP address. Aman Kumar Goel (Talk) 13:54, 7 April 2022 (UTC)
- You did not list an IP address in the suspected socks section.--Bbb23 (talk) 14:25, 7 April 2022 (UTC)
- My mistake. Can I restore it or you are willing to self-revert? I am online for next hour so I will make the necessary change ASAP. Aman Kumar Goel (Talk) 14:28, 7 April 2022 (UTC)
Administrators' newsletter – April 2022
News and updates for administrators from the past month (March 2022).
- An RfC is open proposing a change to the minimum activity requirements for administrators.
- Access to Special:RevisionDelete has been expanded to include users who have the
deletelogentry
anddeletedhistory
rights. This means that those in the Researcher user group and Checkusers who are not administrators can now access Special:RevisionDelete. The users able to view the special page after this change are the 3 users in the Researcher group, as there are currently no checkusers who are not already administrators. (T301928) - When viewing deleted revisions or diffs on Special:Undelete a back link to the undelete page for the associated page is now present. (T284114)
- Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee/Procedures § Opening of proceedings has been updated to reflect current practice following a motion.
- A arbitration case regarding Skepticism and coordinated editing has been closed.
- A arbitration case regarding WikiProject Tropical Cyclones has been opened.
- Voting for the Universal Code of Conduct Enforcement guidelines has closed, and the results were that 56.98% of voters supported the guidelines. The results of this vote mean the Wikimedia Foundation Board will now review the guidelines.
88
Thanks for helping out. I was up most of the night with a sick dog and was not feeling especially patient (or smart) this morning. Acroterion (talk) 22:27, 8 April 2022 (UTC)
User:Berposen reported by User:Aquillion (Result: Blocked one week)
I'd just like to enquire as to whether you believe you have made satisfactory use of your admin privileges in this case? I'm only asking as I see you've moved on to making edits on other pages... - EnlightenmentNow1792 (talk) 23:23, 8 April 2022 (UTC)