→Page issue for Zee Keralam: new section Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit |
Sammi Brie (talk | contribs) →Mexican State Public Broadcasting System: new section |
||
Line 354: | Line 354: | ||
Hi I am ZaxoteZ. Move this page from Zee 24 Gantalu to Zee Keralam. Zee 24 Gantalu was shut down long time ago & now this licence is used for Zee Keralam. |
Hi I am ZaxoteZ. Move this page from Zee 24 Gantalu to Zee Keralam. Zee 24 Gantalu was shut down long time ago & now this licence is used for Zee Keralam. |
||
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Zee_24_Gantalu [[User:ZaxoteZ|ZaxoteZ]] ([[User talk:ZaxoteZ|talk]]) 19:24, 18 February 2019 (UTC) |
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Zee_24_Gantalu [[User:ZaxoteZ|ZaxoteZ]] ([[User talk:ZaxoteZ|talk]]) 19:24, 18 February 2019 (UTC) |
||
== [[Mexican State Public Broadcasting System]] == |
|||
Hey, I'm just writing to say I kind of vehemently disagree with your recent move of Sistema Público de Radiodifusión del Estado Mexicano to [[Mexican State Public Broadcasting System]]. |
|||
In my opinion, English-language usage is nonexistent for the translated term outside of some academic applications. I searched for "State Public Broadcasting System" and got no results other than the recently removed page that actually pertain to the SPR. Granted, this organization has only had its current name for less than five years, but the lone mention of it in ''Variety'' uses the acronym "SPR". [[WP:UE]] states that "If there are too few reliable English-language sources to constitute an established usage, follow the conventions of the language appropriate to the subject (German for German politicians, Portuguese for Brazilian towns, and so on)." The only other hits I get for "Mexican State Public Broadcasting System" are translated versions of Mexican law and translations of Mexican works on the subject that cite that law. The translated acronym "MSPBS" gets absolutely no relevant hits. |
|||
I would much prefer to see the move reverted along with some of the related changes that went as far as to remove the "SPR" acronym from the article, and I'd like to hear what you have to say on the topic. [[User:Raymie|Raymie]] ([[User talk:Raymie|t]] • [[Special:Contributions/Raymie|c]]) 06:55, 11 March 2019 (UTC) |
Revision as of 06:55, 11 March 2019
April 2014
Hello, I'm EvergreenFir. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Gravity Falls, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. EvergreenFir (talk) 03:17, 1 April 2014 (UTC)
Sourcing
Hi, if you're going to add sources to articles, and you should, you should first read Referencing for Beginners. The references you are adding in these edits [1][2] are insuffcient, since what's coming out of them is this postage stamp image that doesn't explain or bolster anything, and there is no context in the image to suggest what YEAR the event happened, or what the event was, specifically. Your plea, "Stop reverting my contrs. I'm trying to help here" is understood, but since you aren't providing adequate sources, your contributions are not coming through as constructive. What would be ideal, is that you find reliable sources that are independent of the subject. If you're going to use a primary source, you should at the very least point to the web page, i.e. this site which at least provides SOME context. Otherwise, repeatedly submitting the same problematic content isn't helpful. Thanks, Cyphoidbomb (talk) 04:52, 13 January 2015 (UTC)
- So, if you're gonna erase the JTS UK original date, which in Wikipedia is stated with no references as 4th April, fine. But erase it, because it's not helpful and doesn't have any webpage which can prove its truth. When I find the original Jetix ad for Jimmy Two-Shoes, I'll put again the real premiere date with the link to the ad, but please, erase the UK dates. -Bankster1 (talk) 05:24, 13 January 2015 (UTC)
- I'm having difficulty understanding you. If you want to use this page as your reference, I won't stand in your way, so long as you link to the page, and not the postage stamp image. And if you can find a better source, that would be appreciated, since this reference only suggests that the series was intended to air on April 18, 2009. For all we know, it could have been delayed. A site that confirms it did air, would be ideal. Thanks. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 20:06, 14 January 2015 (UTC)
- It's not necessary to use this page (which is a banner-recolector), because one of the admins of the stuff have sent me (via outlook.com) the video which states the real date when the show was broadcasted on that channel. The postage stamp image was just a screenshot of the clip. I'm gonna send it to you later. -Bankster1 (talk) 20:42, 14 January 2015 (UTC)
- How do you propose to reference a video that you have in your possession, but that doesn't exist elsewhere? That would constitute original research. The content needs to be verifiable without having to contact the primary source, and the website should be sufficient for our purposes. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 20:43, 14 January 2015 (UTC)
- The content is not mine. The site is not mine. I asked the stuff for those videos, which I'm uploading to an account now. They were directly ripped from TV, and I *highly* doubt if you could think I've made those videos. JETIX UK TVRIP-Bankster1 (talk) 20:56, 14 January 2015 (UTC)
- And I've had to refuse it, since there is no clear indication that you have a legal right to post those videos. We do not link to potential copyright violations. There's also no confirmation that the series actually premiered on that date, only that it was planned to premiere on that date. As I've previously mentioned, and urged, your better choice is to link the the website since that is the strongest and least controversial source you have. And even if you could demonstrate that you had a legal right to post those videos, the production company's website is still a better source for that content, since it could also be assumed that you were trying to drive traffic to your personal Youtube page, even though I do not think that's what you are intending. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 04:10, 15 January 2015 (UTC)
- How am I gonna find another website in which states JTS UK date exactly as the following video? You're missunderstanding everything. I don't want any traffic to my personal YouTube page. I wanted to prove you the exact premiere date when the cartoon was first broadcasted. As far as I concerned, when a show is planned to premiere in a date, it actually premieres. You won't find 2000s cartoons whose planned premiere date was on an specific day, you'll only find, without references, the exact day those cartoons where first broadcasted for the first time in a country. I don't have a legal right to post these videos, but neither I've monetized them and I won't do that. If you don't believe in a premiere date a TV station states for a show, by certain logic, you won't believe anything about premiere dates on any TV stuff. Am I right, sir? -Bankster1 (talk) 05:44, 15 January 2015 (UTC)
- You keep missing my point. Both this website and the video tell us that the show was planned to air April 18, 2009. The website is sufficient for this purpose. The Youtube video is not, since it presents a potential copyright violation. If this was on the production company's official Youtube channel, the copyright problem would be null, but it would still be a reference of about the same value. This website is just as good as a video promo for the purposes of verifiability. The only reason why we are having this discussion, is because you were linking to a tiny picture, instead of to the website that contains the tiny picture. Ideally, a source, like a book on TV shows that includes premiere dates should be used, because we would trust a published source to tell us when something actually aired, as opposed to when it was planned to be broadcast. But until we have such a source, use the website as the reference. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 17:54, 15 January 2015 (UTC)
- First you said the stamp was not a source, then I showed you the page. Then you said it wasn't reliable, so I asked the page's admin to give me the videos from his website to prove the original premiere date. And now, you say that the previous website I showed you was enough. I don't understand you. Even more, in older editions of the article, like this, it clearly shows up the exact date Jetix UK premiere it. Coincidence? -Bankster1 (talk) 21:38, 15 January 2015 (UTC)
- Read my first two posts again. "If you're going to use a primary source, you should at the very least point to the web page, i.e. this site" and "If you want to use this page as your reference, I won't stand in your way, so long as you link to the page, and not the postage stamp image." I don't know what is confusing about that. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 00:12, 16 January 2015 (UTC)
- First you said the stamp was not a source, then I showed you the page. Then you said it wasn't reliable, so I asked the page's admin to give me the videos from his website to prove the original premiere date. And now, you say that the previous website I showed you was enough. I don't understand you. Even more, in older editions of the article, like this, it clearly shows up the exact date Jetix UK premiere it. Coincidence? -Bankster1 (talk) 21:38, 15 January 2015 (UTC)
- You keep missing my point. Both this website and the video tell us that the show was planned to air April 18, 2009. The website is sufficient for this purpose. The Youtube video is not, since it presents a potential copyright violation. If this was on the production company's official Youtube channel, the copyright problem would be null, but it would still be a reference of about the same value. This website is just as good as a video promo for the purposes of verifiability. The only reason why we are having this discussion, is because you were linking to a tiny picture, instead of to the website that contains the tiny picture. Ideally, a source, like a book on TV shows that includes premiere dates should be used, because we would trust a published source to tell us when something actually aired, as opposed to when it was planned to be broadcast. But until we have such a source, use the website as the reference. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 17:54, 15 January 2015 (UTC)
- How am I gonna find another website in which states JTS UK date exactly as the following video? You're missunderstanding everything. I don't want any traffic to my personal YouTube page. I wanted to prove you the exact premiere date when the cartoon was first broadcasted. As far as I concerned, when a show is planned to premiere in a date, it actually premieres. You won't find 2000s cartoons whose planned premiere date was on an specific day, you'll only find, without references, the exact day those cartoons where first broadcasted for the first time in a country. I don't have a legal right to post these videos, but neither I've monetized them and I won't do that. If you don't believe in a premiere date a TV station states for a show, by certain logic, you won't believe anything about premiere dates on any TV stuff. Am I right, sir? -Bankster1 (talk) 05:44, 15 January 2015 (UTC)
- And I've had to refuse it, since there is no clear indication that you have a legal right to post those videos. We do not link to potential copyright violations. There's also no confirmation that the series actually premiered on that date, only that it was planned to premiere on that date. As I've previously mentioned, and urged, your better choice is to link the the website since that is the strongest and least controversial source you have. And even if you could demonstrate that you had a legal right to post those videos, the production company's website is still a better source for that content, since it could also be assumed that you were trying to drive traffic to your personal Youtube page, even though I do not think that's what you are intending. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 04:10, 15 January 2015 (UTC)
- The content is not mine. The site is not mine. I asked the stuff for those videos, which I'm uploading to an account now. They were directly ripped from TV, and I *highly* doubt if you could think I've made those videos. JETIX UK TVRIP-Bankster1 (talk) 20:56, 14 January 2015 (UTC)
- How do you propose to reference a video that you have in your possession, but that doesn't exist elsewhere? That would constitute original research. The content needs to be verifiable without having to contact the primary source, and the website should be sufficient for our purposes. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 20:43, 14 January 2015 (UTC)
- It's not necessary to use this page (which is a banner-recolector), because one of the admins of the stuff have sent me (via outlook.com) the video which states the real date when the show was broadcasted on that channel. The postage stamp image was just a screenshot of the clip. I'm gonna send it to you later. -Bankster1 (talk) 20:42, 14 January 2015 (UTC)
- I'm having difficulty understanding you. If you want to use this page as your reference, I won't stand in your way, so long as you link to the page, and not the postage stamp image. And if you can find a better source, that would be appreciated, since this reference only suggests that the series was intended to air on April 18, 2009. For all we know, it could have been delayed. A site that confirms it did air, would be ideal. Thanks. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 20:06, 14 January 2015 (UTC)
February 2015
Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you get reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.
Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 03:20, 26 February 2015 (UTC)
- I did sent a message to him on its talk page, but he insisted and there you go. I've only tried to fix this article with real facts from friends I have on international cartoon forums (I sourced well-known news pages), but he insisted to revert my editions. He's known to be confrontal and to try move the main Disney XD article from a US-localised to an International one sometime (I revised the article's history), something many users didn't accept and rejected its project. What can I do?-Bankster1 (talk) 04:08, 26 February 2015 (UTC)
Declined speedy
I recently declined your request for WP:speedy deletion of Disney XD (Ukraine) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views), since it did not cite a valid criterion for the deletion of a redirect. Please consider instead listing it at Redirects for Discussion. LFaraone 01:43, 2 March 2015 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:05, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!
Hello, Bankster1. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of File:Laura Marano Photoshoot 2015.jpg
A tag has been placed on File:Laura Marano Photoshoot 2015.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the file appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted content borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Geraldo Perez (talk) 02:05, 5 December 2016 (UTC)
Disney Channel
English track is the only one available there because dubs started showing only after 2016, and that page hasn't been updated since 2012 as you can see. Also dubs are very rare but they're there, I've even seen them myself, it's one single track because there aren't much dubs to show, same with i.e Tip TV which works the same (most are subtitled but there are dubs as well). I know how multi-subtitled channels work, we have Fox Life or Fox for example, the subtitles are not hardcored and you can switch them in any balkan language and the advertisements are in Serbo-Croatian. But Disney Channel is a separated channel, you can't switch the subs and the ads are in Albanian. They had a YouTube channel but they closed it recently for some reason, I asked them yesterday on facebook why, and they said that because they had a channel for both the Disney Channel and for the Disney theatrical releases, they had to close it and will open a new one separated, only for DisneyChannel. You can't revert edits just like that without any proofs. -- Whoamiwilli (talk) 12:20, 5 March 2017 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for March 10
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Disney XD (Europe, Middle East and Africa), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page CIS. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:28, 10 March 2017 (UTC)
Let It Go (Disney song)
April 2017
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
.During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. Ad Orientem (talk) 22:28, 1 April 2017 (UTC)
Nomination of Disney XD (Europe, Middle East and Africa) for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Disney XD (Europe, Middle East and Africa) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Disney XD (Europe, Middle East and Africa) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. - Notifying you as added this article back to Disney Channel WW navbox. Spshu (talk) 14:02, 23 October 2017 (UTC)
Disney International HD notablity
Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but you recently removed maintenance templates from Disney International HD. When removing maintenance templates, please be sure to either resolve the problem that the template refers to, or give a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Please see Help:Maintenance template removal for further information on when maintenance templates should or should not be removed. If this was a mistake, don't worry, as your removal of this template has been reverted. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. "These are notable references since it proves the actual existence of the channel. Yet, they're being removed with no neutral point of view." The existence of the channel does not grant notability, thus having an article, see WP:N's nutshell: "Wikipedia articles cover notable topics—those that have gained sufficiently significant attention by the world at large and over a period of time, and are not outside the scope of Wikipedia." All source are not from major general purpose media, so has not gain attention from the "world at large. Part of the information that was removed was about Disney Channel and its localized versions of live shows, thus not pertaining to this channel as it is English language. Additional, the shows were removed do to them being sourced by an unreliable source, a TV guide. It was an intermediate edit (as my browser was freezing up). But getting into a discussion over incubating the channel at The Walt Disney Company India, stall said efforts. Spshu (talk) 18:28, 1 November 2017 (UTC)
ArbCom 2017 election voter message
Hello, Bankster. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for December 21
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Pirated movie release types, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages AAC and DVB (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:20, 21 December 2017 (UTC)
Disney Asia
Join the discussion at Talk:Disney Channels Worldwide#Disney Asia. Don't just edit war. As you have not give any sources and actually removed sources. Spshu (talk) 14:09, 5 January 2018 (UTC)
This message is being sent to let you know of a discussion at the Wikipedia:Dispute resolution noticeboard regarding a content dispute discussion you may have participated in. Content disputes can hold up article development and make editing difficult for editors. You are not required to participate, but you are both invited and encouraged to help this dispute come to a resolution. Please join us to help form a consensus. Thank you! User 261115 (talk) 15:49, 12 January 2018 (UTC)
Uruguay
Stop adding the the independence in 1814, there are no serious source for that date. If you keep adding it I must report you for vandalism --Yilku1 (talk) 00:23, 16 March 2018 (UTC)
March 2018
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
. -- ferret (talk) 01:18, 16 March 2018 (UTC)Bankster (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
I was blocked for "persistent vandalism" because I kept adding "unsourced information" in Uruguay. First off, the date was stated on the English article before user Yilku1 edited it, so he's removing correct data. He did this while covering the addition of unsourced information about the country's demonym, he also did this on the Spanish wiki but he didn't persist on adding it again after I reverted his edits. Third, I wasn't notified about the noticeboard's mention, so I basically couldn't reply to Ferret's decision, nor Yilku notified me when he must have done it before. I'm calling for my block to be reviewed and, since that I can't report him to the noticeboard, I also ask an admin to block Yilku1 for edit warring. Bankster (talk) 01:35, 16 March 2018 (UTC)
Decline reason:
See WP:NOTTHEM. Edit warring is disruptive even when you're right, and you haven't provided a source to show that you're right. Huon (talk) 01:15, 17 March 2018 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
- I'll leave this for another admin to review my actions. Always open to a second opinion. However, Bankster has left out a detail I found when reviewing this reported issue, which is that the 1814 date was added by an IP in February 2018. Two users, Tonneduroc and Yilku1, have attempted to revert this unsourced addition, with Bankster edit warring to keep it in. -- ferret (talk) 01:45, 16 March 2018 (UTC)
Animax Pakistan
Hello, could you provide a source that actually states that Sony Yay is available in Pakistan? I can't find anything online about that network's availability in any country outside of India. (121.214.113.241 (talk) 07:40, 11 April 2018 (UTC))
Disambiguation link notification for April 12
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited NTN24, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Colombian (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:50, 12 April 2018 (UTC)
Notice of noticeboard discussion
There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. (110.148.113.195 (talk) 00:48, 13 April 2018 (UTC))
Notice of noticeboard discussion
There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. — Maile (talk) 00:55, 13 April 2018 (UTC)
Blocked
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
. This is related to your edits at Animax Pakistan and the related WP:AN discussion: if this IP were engaging in vandalism, stalking, and illegitimate editing of a topic totally unrelated to where he lives, you were too (with the added problem that you demonstrably did not engage in discussion), while if the IP's edits were right, you were seeking sanctions and making accusations about problematic behavior without evidence. One more thing: IPs may remove warnings from their talk pages, but neither an IP nor an account may remove block notices from a talk page until the block expires or is lifted. Nyttend (talk) 11:41, 13 April 2018 (UTC)
Spshu is at it again, can you help? I’m now starting to lose interest in fixing the page. User 261115 (talk) 19:47, 16 April 2018 (UTC)
Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit you made to Disney Channel (India), did not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. You are being disruptive by making WP:CRYSTALBALL predictions about the Indian Disney Channel will be in other nations. "Wikipedia is not a collection of unverifiable speculation. Wikipedia does not predict the future. You are doing so do to just the existence of Disney representatives operating in Sri Lanka on a consumer product and film distribution to claim. That is just speculation, with out a source for said channel or extension of the channel to the other nations no such claims can be made, as WP requiresWP:RELIABLE sources. Spshu (talk) 21:51, 16 April 2018 (UTC)
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Disney International HD. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.
- If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
- If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.
Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continual disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Continually ignoring discussion and playing WP:IDIDNTHEARTHAT with claims that I do not explain my edits, when their are clearly done so in the edit summary. You discontinue discussion once page protections are lifted then attack me for not discussing to get a consensus, when you don't have a consensus either. You also consider person knowledge as given fact, which is improper on WP. Spshu (talk) 15:59, 23 May 2018 (UTC)
Please stop your disruptive editing.
- If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
- If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.
If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Disney International HD, you may be blocked from editing. Spshu (talk) 20:58, 23 May 2018 (UTC)
I think it should stay named as such - WP:NCDAB says that parenthetical disambiguation should avoid proper nouns; "Australia and New Zealand" are proper nouns, but "Australian and New Zealand TV channel" is not. I've included the relevant section:
- Parenthetical disambiguation. A disambiguating word or phrase can be added in parentheses. The word or phrase in parentheses should be:
- the generic class (avoiding proper nouns, as much as possible) that includes the topic, as in Mercury (element), Seal (emblem); or
- the subject or context to which the topic applies, as in Union (set theory), Inflation (cosmology); or
- rarely, an adjective describing the topic can be used, as in Vector (spatial), but it is usually better to rephrase such a title to avoid parentheses (for instance, Vector (spatial) was renamed to Euclidean vector).
Ollieinc (talk) 12:29, 28 April 2018 (UTC)
Adult Swim Edit
Ok that's fine with the time zones but it was NOT necessary to revert ALL of my edits. There are edits to make minor corrections and also pertaining to streaming media in the InfoBox that is appropriate and should be included, therefore I am going to add that back. YborCityJohn (talk) 23:39, 12 June 2018 (UTC)
- Also DON'T put that edit notice on my talk page. It WASN'T A TEST and I WAS NOT experimenting. That should only be used for vandals. I am not a vandal. Look at my user page I hold several Wikipedia rights. I've been editing for a LONG TIME, I KNOW what the hell I am doing when it comes to editing. YborCityJohn (talk) 23:42, 12 June 2018 (UTC)
Just a friendly reminder -- if you're going to undo/revert/rollback changes that are *not* vandalism, you should put a note in the edit summary explaining why you are reverting the edit. This is strongly encouraged by policy and will help to avoid conflicts like the one you find yourself in. Thanks, 青い(Aoi) (talk) 00:31, 13 June 2018 (UTC)
- Just to let you know I re-added at least one warning notice to the page because otherwise you have idiots changing the ownership listing i.e. adding AT&T and WarnerMedia which is redundant, unnecessary and information overkill. I understand why you deleted the second warning but please leave this one in place otherwise you, I and other Wikipedians will have to keep reverting and rolling back which is getting to be a pain in the arse. YborCityJohn (talk) 19:17, 17 June 2018 (UTC)
June 2018
Welcome to Wikipedia, and thank you for your contributions. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, please note that there is a Manual of Style that should be followed to maintain a consistent, encyclopedic appearance. Deviating from this style, as you did in Cartoon Network, disturbs uniformity among articles and may cause readability or accessibility problems. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Also, please do not remove info without deeply explaining why. Bang 🌑 23:34, 17 June 2018 (UTC)
- For your information, your the one being uncivil. You are getting into an editing war with me and other Wikipedians removing something that put there with a purpose to prevent unnecessary additions to the article. Also, Me ZERO Notices and edit blocks, you MULTIPLE notices and edit blocks so whose the uncivil one? It's clear YOU CAN'T PLAY NICE with other Wikipedians. YborCityJohn (talk) 01:14, 18 June 2018 (UTC)
- Please refrain from being rude. For one, I have never edit warned, for two, I have actually never been blocked (lol) and three, I do not like your attitude. Here at Wikipedia, we be nice and help one another, not bash out on everyone. Please refrain from this behavior or you will face the conquesences. Bang 🌑 06:39, 23 June 2018 (UTC)
Just in case...
You didn't get a notification, please see Wikipedia:Administrators'_noticeboard/Incidents#User:_2600:1700:A2A0:FB50:4874:4902:ED4A:3C93_Inappropriate_Behavior. YborCityJohn (talk) 06:25, 22 June 2018 (UTC)
Hemdale
There is no revival of Hemdale. The IP user already made a point. — FilmandTVFan28 (talk) 21:32, 1 July 2018 (UTC)
Your newest edit to Adult Swim...
I decided before I made any changes to your edit on Adult Swim I'd post a message to discuss it with you first. On your edit on 26 July 2018 at 03:01 you changed the wording "American children's cable network Cartoon Network" to "American children's subscription network Cartoon Network" Actually technically speaking neither Cartoon Network nor Adult Swim are considered a subscription service, they are in fact considered to be basic cable network services. Yes you do have to subscribe to a cable service provider such as Cablevision, Charter Spectrum, Comcast etc... to receive them but the channels themselves do not require a subscription and in my opinion putting that it is a subscription service implies you have to pay an additional fee to receive those channel when in fact that it not the case. I'd be interested in hearing your opinion on this. Thanks. YborCityJohn (talk) 04:13, 26 July 2018 (UTC)
Moves
You have turned back several page moves. These moves are all per Wikipedia:NCBC#Channels, so rightly done. These rules are pretty clear. C0re1980 (talk) 07:12, 28 July 2018 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for July 28
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited CNN en Español, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Altice (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:02, 28 July 2018 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for August 6
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited ZooMoo, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page DTT (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:43, 6 August 2018 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for August 15
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Sony Spin, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Locomotion (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:05, 15 August 2018 (UTC)
Discretionary sanctions for American politics
This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.
You have recently shown interest in post-1932 politics of the United States and closely related people. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect: any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or any page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.
For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor. Bishonen | talk 17:20, 16 August 2018 (UTC).
Denied Vandalism
Hi Bankster,
Thanks for your post about I vandalize Wikipedia.
First of all, I don't vandalize Wikipedia. I'm not angry or mad at you and I'm not the one who vandalize Wikipedia, I'm just telling you that it is one of the anonymous users, also known as the hackers, who always edit the articles that they do something bad by using my account. I just receive some alerts about my user account and it needs to change the password that someone just use my user account as they edited the articles that you were reverted it and you receive me a warning on my user talk page that alerted me. I was about to fix my user account so that no one should use my user account and I request denied about vandalism in Wikipedia.
Thank You for your cooperation.
Movies Time (Talk) 05:39, 17 August 2018 (UTC)
P.S. This is a temporary...
Unfree files
Without Google, how can I find the logos? I just take a screenshot of that logo & then reduce it using reduceimages website & then upload it on Commons. U tale me what is wrong in this procedure? Cuty Pie Sweetu (talk) 08:52, 18 August 2018 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for September 13
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Minimax (TV channel), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Yugoslav (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:01, 13 September 2018 (UTC)
September 2018
Your recent editing history at Super RTL shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.
Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. General Ization Talk 00:29, 22 September 2018 (UTC)
Al Jazeera English
None of that is written like a advertisement. Stuff like the launch date and former news centres are station history. Other station pages like BBC World News have them. If anyone is vandalizing it is you. --Mo2010 (talk) 18:12, 1 October 2018 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for October 9
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Syfy (Germany), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page German (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:09, 9 October 2018 (UTC)
October 2018
Hello, I'm Mvcg66b3r. I noticed that you recently removed content from KCIT without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Mvcg66b3r (talk) 17:54, 10 October 2018 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for October 20
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited MTV Germany, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page German (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:05, 20 October 2018 (UTC)
Notice of noticeboard discussion
There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.
OBS Gyeongin TV
Your recent editing history at OBS Gyeongin TV shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.
Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. GiantSnowman 16:57, 30 October 2018 (UTC)
- Why did you remove the ownership and etymology sections from this article? As it was obviously sourced, I've restored it; if you have grounds for re-removing it, please explain at the article's talk page, or here, or at my talk page. Nyttend (talk) 15:04, 31 October 2018 (UTC)
GTV (Indonesia)
GTV ke GTV (Indonesia) 16 th Indonesia 16 Tahun GTV Media MNC yang Jalamt Utara Manysi GTV --N1631 (talk) 14:12, 31 October 2018 (UTC)
Unilateral and undiscussed moves
Why? Where in WP:NC are these moves from? Howard the Duck (talk) 07:52, 4 November 2018 (UTC)
- I have replied to your post on my page. Meanwhile, please stop moving articles without discussion. Thanks.
- You moved Colegio de San Juan de Letran twice. The school itself doesn't use the diacritic on its logo, and all references do not use it either. Why? Where is this is WP:NC? Howard the Duck (talk) 08:14, 4 November 2018 (UTC)
- Again, you edited the Quezon City (perhaps you can't move it?) as if the name with the diacritic is the predominantly used name. Please, stop making such edits. Howard the Duck (talk) 08:22, 4 November 2018 (UTC)
- Just to illustrate, Enyclopedia Britannica's article about this city is at Quezon City. If you are planning to move this article, please don't. Howard the Duck (talk) 08:24, 4 November 2018 (UTC)
- I'd like to reinforce Howard the Duck's point, Bankster. This is en-wiki, not es-wiki. Do not move any other pages against consensus or I'm going to take this issue to a drama board. Chris Troutman (talk) 13:23, 4 November 2018 (UTC)
Generic format
Where was this format established?
Is there consensus for it?
Additionally, specialty channel is a more common term than "pay television channel" (which, to some, may evoke premium services like HBO instead), especially in the Canadian industry and its regulations. ViperSnake151 Talk 19:58, 13 November 2018 (UTC)
Okay, let's try this again.
If there is a non-vandal reason you are reverting numerous constructive edits to BBC Kids, I'm sure the Wikipedia community would like to hear it. Otherwise, this is going straight to Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard. Modernponderer (talk) 20:04, 18 November 2018 (UTC)
- Alright, let's list them then. Your most recent revert there made the following changes (among others):
- Removed an upgraded image
- Changed date format against consensus (you've been warned about this on a very similar article just recently!)
- Violated WP:OVERLINK
- Reintroduced unsourced (and almost certainly false) information about the channel's placement on cable
- Removed reliably sourced channel classification information
- Violated MOS:CITEVAR
- Removed a heading thus completely breaking a list
- Reintroduced completely unsourced dates
- Reintroduced a literal hoax!
- Removed a source and associated upgraded request for citations
- Removed categories sourced in prose
- Let me not mince words here: THAT IS VANDALISM. And unless you explain otherwise (or at least stop reverting), this list will be presented to administrators. Modernponderer (talk) 20:20, 18 November 2018 (UTC)
- No, I am not confusing you with another user. Everything I mentioned was done by you in this single edit: [3]
- And you cannot say "I am not aware" for so many things like that. If you are "not aware" of something you are changing, do not make that edit. Ignorance is no excuse here.
- But let's say it was a mistake on your part. If you revert that article again though, I will have to take action. Modernponderer (talk) 20:57, 18 November 2018 (UTC)
- I warned you because you had already damaged the article in [4] and [5]. You made several of the changes on the list in that series of edits. Your most recent revert just made it worse.
- Also I would strongly suggest you refrain from using terms such as "wtf", "lol", and "k" on Wikipedia. It's extremely rude and condescending, and we have a Wikipedia:Civility policy for a reason. Modernponderer (talk) 02:46, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
ArbCom 2018 election voter message
Hello, Bankster. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
Re: "cable, satellite, IPTV, MMDS, UHF television providers" unnecessary specifications - go with "pay television" instead
Regarding your request, the reason why I don't use "pay television" as a descriptor for these networks and instead use "basic/digital cable and satellite television network" to refer to those channels primarily has to do with the complicated nature of what constitutes "pay television". The corresponding Wikipedia article deals with the concept that is commonly referred to alternatively as "premium television". Maybe to limit confusion, a different identifier to refer to channels that are offered to pay television providers without requiring an additional fee could be used, the best I could think of would be to refer to networks like TNT, WGN America, TBS, etc. that are available through basic channel tiers as "multichannel television networks" to make such networks distinct from pay television services along the lines of HBO, Showtime, Cinemax, etc.
To buttress your point, the term "specialty channel" that is used in Canada to refer to cable and satellite networks that are part of standard programming packages offered by multichannel television services would work as a term, if it were used in the United States, since it would be apt in may ways. The lack of use of such a term in the U.S. or other countries makes it so that defining networks akin to those you mentioned as having to change references for kind of limits how you can describe them in a manner that could be agreed upon. TVTonightOKC 15:48, 20 November 2018 (UTC)
I have reverted your article title change. This is standard formatting for all non-English film and TV show titles. There needs to be some form of consensus before making a unilateral change like that. Mvcg66b3r (talk) 14:48, 9 December 2018 (UTC)
December 2018
Your notion that we're supposed to keep the first paragraph of an article free of politics is plucked out of thin air.[6][7] Please don't edit war to force this unusual principle into the article; use the talkpage. Bishonen | talk 12:43, 16 December 2018 (UTC).
Create a page for Zee Malayalam
Zee Keralam, a Malayalam language Indian TV channel, owned & operated by Zee Network, already launched on November, 2018. There are no page for Zee Keralam in Wikipedia. Kindly create this page as soon as possible & help us to know properly about this channel. Thank you. A2Zabcd (talk) 09:40, 12 January 2019 (UTC)
Page issue for Zee Keralam
Hi I am ZaxoteZ. Move this page from Zee 24 Gantalu to Zee Keralam. Zee 24 Gantalu was shut down long time ago & now this licence is used for Zee Keralam. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Zee_24_Gantalu ZaxoteZ (talk) 19:24, 18 February 2019 (UTC)
Hey, I'm just writing to say I kind of vehemently disagree with your recent move of Sistema Público de Radiodifusión del Estado Mexicano to Mexican State Public Broadcasting System.
In my opinion, English-language usage is nonexistent for the translated term outside of some academic applications. I searched for "State Public Broadcasting System" and got no results other than the recently removed page that actually pertain to the SPR. Granted, this organization has only had its current name for less than five years, but the lone mention of it in Variety uses the acronym "SPR". WP:UE states that "If there are too few reliable English-language sources to constitute an established usage, follow the conventions of the language appropriate to the subject (German for German politicians, Portuguese for Brazilian towns, and so on)." The only other hits I get for "Mexican State Public Broadcasting System" are translated versions of Mexican law and translations of Mexican works on the subject that cite that law. The translated acronym "MSPBS" gets absolutely no relevant hits.
I would much prefer to see the move reverted along with some of the related changes that went as far as to remove the "SPR" acronym from the article, and I'd like to hear what you have to say on the topic. Raymie (t • c) 06:55, 11 March 2019 (UTC)