Content deleted Content added
DarknessShines2 (talk | contribs) →RFE: new section |
|||
Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
:Since encyclopedia articles are supposed to be written for a lay person, I think your opinion is more valuable than mine. Plus, since you presumably know the good article criteria, that gives you a distinct advantage in a GA review (as I don't). I was just pointing out flaws that I saw. -[[User:Atmoz|Atmoz]] ([[User talk:Atmoz#top|talk]]) 17:05, 28 April 2010 (UTC) |
:Since encyclopedia articles are supposed to be written for a lay person, I think your opinion is more valuable than mine. Plus, since you presumably know the good article criteria, that gives you a distinct advantage in a GA review (as I don't). I was just pointing out flaws that I saw. -[[User:Atmoz|Atmoz]] ([[User talk:Atmoz#top|talk]]) 17:05, 28 April 2010 (UTC) |
||
::Well, the thing is that I knew there was something wrong, but I couldn't point out succinctly what. The editor wanted specific examples from me, but I am afraid I didn't make much sense to him. But he understood you clearly. I think I will have to fail the article, as the editor suggested, and hope someone more capable that I am comes along. Thanks for your insights. Regards, '''<font color="navy">[[User:Xtzou|Xtzou]]</font>''' ''(<font color="green">[[User talk:Xtzou|Talk]]</font>)'' 18:50, 28 April 2010 (UTC) |
::Well, the thing is that I knew there was something wrong, but I couldn't point out succinctly what. The editor wanted specific examples from me, but I am afraid I didn't make much sense to him. But he understood you clearly. I think I will have to fail the article, as the editor suggested, and hope someone more capable that I am comes along. Thanks for your insights. Regards, '''<font color="navy">[[User:Xtzou|Xtzou]]</font>''' ''(<font color="green">[[User talk:Xtzou|Talk]]</font>)'' 18:50, 28 April 2010 (UTC) |
||
== RFE == |
|||
[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:General_sanctions/Climate_change_probation/Requests_for_enforcement#Atmoz] [[User:Marknutley|mark nutley]] ([[User talk:Marknutley|talk]]) 21:19, 28 April 2010 (UTC) |
Revision as of 21:19, 28 April 2010
NewsStand refs
I added the list of newspaper references and hid the article texts in the footnotes. It ended up being eight refs, not nine. It's ok if you decide not to add these to article right now. I'll get to it later. Cla68 (talk) 04:52, 28 April 2010 (UTC)
- Please see my comment regarding the references. I can't say that i'm impressed. --Kim D. Petersen (talk) 09:21, 28 April 2010 (UTC)
- @Cla68: Thanks. I'll look at them later today. :-) -Atmoz (talk) 17:05, 28 April 2010 (UTC)
Do you want to take over the GA review of the article? I find that, as a lay person, the content of the article is over my head. Otherwise, I will fail the article as User:Thegreatdr suggests, and he can nominated again. Regards, Xtzou (Talk) 14:25, 28 April 2010 (UTC)
- Since encyclopedia articles are supposed to be written for a lay person, I think your opinion is more valuable than mine. Plus, since you presumably know the good article criteria, that gives you a distinct advantage in a GA review (as I don't). I was just pointing out flaws that I saw. -Atmoz (talk) 17:05, 28 April 2010 (UTC)
- Well, the thing is that I knew there was something wrong, but I couldn't point out succinctly what. The editor wanted specific examples from me, but I am afraid I didn't make much sense to him. But he understood you clearly. I think I will have to fail the article, as the editor suggested, and hope someone more capable that I am comes along. Thanks for your insights. Regards, Xtzou (Talk) 18:50, 28 April 2010 (UTC)
RFE
[1] mark nutley (talk) 21:19, 28 April 2010 (UTC)