TheCascadian (talk | contribs) |
→Your rollback request: new section |
||
Line 178: | Line 178: | ||
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these [[User:DPL bot|opt-out instructions]]. Thanks, [[User:DPL bot|DPL bot]] ([[User talk:DPL bot|talk]]) 13:25, 28 June 2012 (UTC) |
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these [[User:DPL bot|opt-out instructions]]. Thanks, [[User:DPL bot|DPL bot]] ([[User talk:DPL bot|talk]]) 13:25, 28 June 2012 (UTC) |
||
:Fixed all <span style="border:2px solid black;background:#006633;">[[User:Athleek123|<font color="white">Athleek</font>]]'''[[User talk:Athleek123|<font color="white">123</font>]]'''</span> 16:55, 28 June 2012 (UTC) |
:Fixed all <span style="border:2px solid black;background:#006633;">[[User:Athleek123|<font color="white">Athleek</font>]]'''[[User talk:Athleek123|<font color="white">123</font>]]'''</span> 16:55, 28 June 2012 (UTC) |
||
== Your rollback request == |
|||
Hi Athleek123, I have granted rollback rights to your account in accordance with your request. Please be aware that rollback should be used to revert vandalism/spam/blatantly unconstructive edits, and that using it to revert anything else (such as by revert-warring or reverting edits you disagree with) can lead to it being removed from your account...sometimes without any warning, depending on the admin who becomes aware of any misuse. If you think an edit should require a reason for reverting, then don't use rollback and instead use a manual edit summary. For practice, you may wish to see [[Wikipedia:New admin school/Rollback]]. Good luck. [[User:Acalamari|Acalamari]] 08:18, 2 July 2012 (UTC) |
Revision as of 08:18, 2 July 2012
|
New Page Patrol
Not really If I check new pages, it's usually at more-or-less random. I don't really make it a point to do NPP... —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 04:44, 13 April 2012 (UTC)
This can be helpful for u in tagging articles and many more: Wikipedia:Twinkle Yasht101 08:50, 14 April 2012 (UTC)
- Hi Yasht, I do know how to use twinkle already, thanks, Athleek123 (talk) 03:02, 15 April 2012 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for April 16
Hi. In your recent article edits, you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
- Cultivation theory (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
- added links pointing to Berger, Chandler, Differential and Michael Hughes
- Pisticci Painter (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
- added links pointing to Boreas, Hermitage and Museum of Fine Arts
- Claire Oboussier (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
- added a link pointing to North Belfast
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:18, 16 April 2012 (UTC)
April 2012 Wikification barnstars.
![]() |
The Iron Wikification Barnstar | |
For wikifying 22 articles during the drive, Athleek123, I award you the Iron Wikification Barnstar!!! Thank you for your contributions!!! :) Like my singing? Ha-la-la-la-la-la-LA-LAAA!!! (talk) 22:01, 4 May 2012 (UTC) |
June 2012 Wikification Drive
Delivered by MessageDeliveryBot on behalf of WikiProject Wikify at 15:02, 26 May 2012 (UTC).
Talkback
![](https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/2/23/Nuvola_apps_edu_languages.svg/40px-Nuvola_apps_edu_languages.svg.png)
Message added 17:08, 12 June 2012 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
AdventurousSquirrel (talk) 17:08, 12 June 2012 (UTC)
Nowikify
Hey, just a reminder to make sure you always substitute the template, otherwise it takes you to the template page. I may see about fixing that later this month. Ryan Vesey Review me! 17:58, 12 June 2012 (UTC)
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping.
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker.
P.S. You received these suggestions because your name was listed on the SuggestBot request page. If this was in error, sorry about the confusion. -- SuggestBot (talk) 01:10, 21 June 2012 (UTC)
An appeal from WikiProject Articles for creation
Articles for creation urgently needs your help!
![]() Articles for creation is desperately short of reviewers! We are looking for urgent help, from experienced editors, in reviewing submissions in the pending submissions queue. There are currently 3307 submissions waiting to be reviewed.
If the answer to these questions is yes, then please read the reviewing instructions and donate a little of your time to helping tackle the backlog. Click here to review a random submission Article selected by erwin85's random article script on toolserver. We would greatly appreciate your help. Currently, only a small handful of users are reviewing articles. Any help, even if it's just a few reviews, would be extremely beneficial. On behalf of WikiProject Articles for creation, |
Callanecc (talk) 03:45, 21 June 2012 (UTC)
Talkback
![](https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/2/23/Nuvola_apps_edu_languages.svg/40px-Nuvola_apps_edu_languages.svg.png)
Message added 06:24, 21 June 2012 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
Callanecc (talk) 06:24, 21 June 2012 (UTC)
You added this template
to the article but didn't offer any explanation. I've removed the template -- please come to the article's discussion page and explain what you think needs to go in the article.
Note that the instructions on using the template require the following:
Please explain your concerns promptly on the article's talk page. If you do not identify the opinions that are missing, then any editor may remove this tag. Tom (North Shoreman) (talk) 00:57, 27 June 2012 (UTC)
A barnstar for you!
![]() |
The Articles for Creation barnstar | |
Thanks for all your work at AfC, where there is always a backlog. Your efforts have not gone unnoticed! —JmaJeremyTALKCONTRIBS 03:02, 28 June 2012 (UTC) |
Disambiguation link notification for June 28
Hi. In your recent article edits, you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
- Alex Bellos (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
- added a link pointing to Protocol
- Dan Sandberg (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
- added a link pointing to TVC
- Joe Fain (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
- added a link pointing to Renton
- Pepsi Next (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
- added a link pointing to G2
- Politics Of Reality – Essays In Feminist Theory (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
- added a link pointing to Subordination
- Taini Morrison (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
- added a link pointing to Maori
- Waste management in Bangladesh (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
- added a link pointing to Drain
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 13:25, 28 June 2012 (UTC)
Your rollback request
Hi Athleek123, I have granted rollback rights to your account in accordance with your request. Please be aware that rollback should be used to revert vandalism/spam/blatantly unconstructive edits, and that using it to revert anything else (such as by revert-warring or reverting edits you disagree with) can lead to it being removed from your account...sometimes without any warning, depending on the admin who becomes aware of any misuse. If you think an edit should require a reason for reverting, then don't use rollback and instead use a manual edit summary. For practice, you may wish to see Wikipedia:New admin school/Rollback. Good luck. Acalamari 08:18, 2 July 2012 (UTC)