BracketBot (talk | contribs) Bot: Notice of potential markup breaking |
|||
Line 96: | Line 96: | ||
*<nowiki>* 1</nowiki>{{red|''')'''}}<nowiki> The IPA ɡ is U+0261 from the IPA Extensions, not the g from the ISO basic Latin alphabet.</nowiki> |
*<nowiki>* 1</nowiki>{{red|''')'''}}<nowiki> The IPA ɡ is U+0261 from the IPA Extensions, not the g from the ISO basic Latin alphabet.</nowiki> |
||
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow [[User:BracketBot#Opting out|these opt-out instructions]]. Thanks, <!-- (-1, 0, 0, 0) --><!-- User:BracketBot/inform -->[[User:BracketBot|BracketBot]] ([[User talk:BracketBot|talk]]) 20:26, 4 May 2014 (UTC) |
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow [[User:BracketBot#Opting out|these opt-out instructions]]. Thanks, <!-- (-1, 0, 0, 0) --><!-- User:BracketBot/inform -->[[User:BracketBot|BracketBot]] ([[User talk:BracketBot|talk]]) 20:26, 4 May 2014 (UTC) |
||
==[[ISO basic Latin alphabet]]== |
|||
Thank you for experimenting with the page [[:ISO basic Latin alphabet]] on Wikipedia. Your test worked, and it has been [[Help:Reverting|reverted]] or removed. Please use [[Wikipedia:Sandbox|the sandbox]] for any other tests you may want to do. Take a look at the [[Wikipedia:Introduction|welcome page]] to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia.<!-- Template:Test (first level warning) --><!--Template:uw-test1--><!--Template:uw-huggle1--> -- [[User:AnonMoos|AnonMoos]] ([[User talk:AnonMoos|talk]]) 07:59, 5 May 2014 (UTC) |
Revision as of 07:59, 5 May 2014
Welcome!
Hello, ArmijaDonetsk, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions.
I noticed that one of the first articles you edited was 2014 pro-Russian protests in Ukraine, which appears to be dealing with a topic with which you may have a conflict of interest. In other words, you may find it difficult to write about that topic in a neutral and objective way, because you are, work for, or represent, the subject of that article. Your recent contributions may have already been undone for this very reason.
To reduce the chances of your contributions being undone, you might like to draft your revised article before submission, and then ask me or any other editor to proofread it. See our help page on userspace drafts for more details. If the page you created has already been deleted from Wikipedia, but you want to save the content from it to use for that draft, don't hesitate to ask anyone from this list and they will copy it to your user page.
One firm rule we do have in connection with conflicts of interest is that accounts used by more than one person will unfortunately be blocked from editing. Wikipedia generally does not allow editors to have usernames which imply that the account belongs to a company or corporation. If you have a username like this, you should request a change of username or create a new account. (A name that identifies the user as an individual within a given organization may be OK.)
Here are some pages that you might find helpful:
- The plain and simple conflict of interest guide
- The five pillars of Wikipedia
- Tutorial
- How to edit a page and How to develop articles
- How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
- Simplified Manual of Style
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{Help me}}
before the question. Again, welcome! RGloucester — ☎ 17:51, 13 April 2014 (UTC)
You violated process for link deletion [1] and reported me/my name behind my back [2]. Also you make allegations without providing evidence. ArmijaDonetsk (talk) 18:21, 13 April 2014 (UTC)
- I have suspicions. The administrators will establish whether they are warranted or not. That's the point of the noticeboard. RGloucester — ☎ 21:22, 13 April 2014 (UTC)
ArmijaDonetsk, you are invited to the Teahouse
![]() |
Hi ArmijaDonetsk! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. |
April 2014
Please do not attack other editors, as you did on User talk:RGloucester. Comment on content, not on contributors. Personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Please stay cool and keep this in mind while editing. Thank you. RGloucester — ☎ 16:02, 17 April 2014 (UTC)
- HYPOCRITE! See, how you attacked me "I noticed that one of the first articles you edited was 2014 pro-Russian protests in Ukraine, which appears to be dealing with a topic with which you may have a conflict of interest.". ArmijaDonetsk (talk) 16:13, 17 April 2014 (UTC)
- That isn't an attack. I have nothing against you. However, policy says that usernames can't give the impression that one is editing as an organisation. Yours does, however, you were cleared in that regard, so there is nothing to worry about. RGloucester — ☎ 16:15, 17 April 2014 (UTC)
- I also "have nothing against you". If a name that may represent a group is not allowed, why was I allowed to keep it? Random policy implementation? What about "RGloucester" - could also be a group, maybe a hip-hop music group. ArmijaDonetsk (talk) 16:23, 17 April 2014 (UTC)
- That isn't an attack. I have nothing against you. However, policy says that usernames can't give the impression that one is editing as an organisation. Yours does, however, you were cleared in that regard, so there is nothing to worry about. RGloucester — ☎ 16:15, 17 April 2014 (UTC)
ANI notice
There is currently a discussion at WP:AN/I regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. —RGloucester — ☎ 16:35, 17 April 2014 (UTC)
Warning
Your edits at Annexation of Crimea by the Russian Federation have been quite unacceptably tendentious. Moreover, you have been revert-warring to keep them in the article, instead of discussing.
Please familiarise yourself with the information page at Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee/Discretionary sanctions, with the appropriate sections of Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee/Procedures, and with the case decision page before making any further edits to the pages in question. This notice is given by an uninvolved administrator and will be logged on the case decision, pursuant to the conditions of the Arbitration Committee's discretionary sanctions system.
Fut.Perf. ☼ 16:48, 22 April 2014 (UTC)
Re-Warning: User:Future Perfect at Sunrise - You are not saying the truth. I have been discussing, see the talk page of that article. ArmijaDonetsk (talk) 18:08, 22 April 2014 (UTC)
![](https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/thumb/2/28/Information.svg/48px-Information.svg.png)
A tag has been placed on Charta of the United Nations, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a redirect from an implausible typo, or other unlikely search term.
Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. If you believe that there is a reason to keep the redirect, you can request that administrators wait a while before deleting it. To do this, affix the template {{hangon}}
to the page and state your intention on the article's talk page. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Toddy1 (talk) 20:10, 24 April 2014 (UTC)
Please do not recreate typographical errors. Charta is a typographic error. The word is Charter.--Toddy1 (talk) 08:28, 25 April 2014 (UTC)
Hello,
I have restored the redirect per WP:REDUNDANTFORK. The best way to describe the formal legal process of Crimea's transition from the Ukraine to Russia is in a section of an already existing article such as Annexation _of_Crimea_by_the_Russian_Federation#Admission_treaty_and_aftermath or Political_status_of_Crimea_and_Sevastopol#Stances. Cheers, walk victor falk talk 22:36, 24 April 2014 (UTC)
- Talk:Accession_of_Crimea_to_the_Russian_Federation ArmijaDonetsk (talk) 22:46, 24 April 2014 (UTC)
- First, a point of process: it is considered bad etiquette to edit other editors' comments [3] per WP:REFACTOR. To the matter itself: attempts at circumventing the result of the WP:RM won't succeed. You are wasting your efforts, this is hardly the first that wikipedia encounters highly politicised editing, and one of the first things any self-respecting editor should do is respect WP:Consensus. Please try to build consensus for your point of view, and do not engage in creating wp:povforks.
- Regards, walk victor falk talk 23:09, 24 April 2014 (UTC)
- Talk:Accession_of_Crimea_to_the_Russian_Federation ArmijaDonetsk (talk) 22:46, 24 April 2014 (UTC)
Hello, ArmijaDonetsk. I wanted to let you know that I’m proposing an article that you started, Flag of the Donetsk People's Republic, for deletion because I don't think it meets our criteria for inclusion. If you don't want the article deleted:
- remove the text that looks like this: {{proposed deletion/dated...}}
- save the page
Also, be sure to explain why you think the article should be kept in your edit summary or on the article's talk page. If you don't do so, it may be deleted later anyway.
You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Dudel250 (talk) 03:32, 25 April 2014 (UTC)
Nomination of Flag of the Donetsk People's Republic for deletion
![](https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/thumb/5/5f/Ambox_warning_orange.svg/48px-Ambox_warning_orange.svg.png)
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Flag of the Donetsk People's Republic is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Flag of the Donetsk People's Republic until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Martin Berka (talk) 18:30, 29 April 2014 (UTC)
May 2014
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Unish may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on .
- List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
- * 1) The IPA ɡ is U+0261 from the IPA Extensions, not the g from the ISO basic Latin alphabet.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 20:26, 4 May 2014 (UTC)
Thank you for experimenting with the page ISO basic Latin alphabet on Wikipedia. Your test worked, and it has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you may want to do. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. -- AnonMoos (talk) 07:59, 5 May 2014 (UTC)