Lowercase sigmabot III (talk | contribs) m Archiving 1 discussion(s) to User talk:Arjayay/Archive 20) (bot |
Alpha rows (talk | contribs) →Name dispute: Requested to add missing information. Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit |
||
Line 194: | Line 194: | ||
If you still want clarifications then please read article and wiki information of this page completely. [[User:SachCreation|SachCreation]] ([[User talk:SachCreation|talk]]) 13:10, 20 January 2020 (UTC) |
If you still want clarifications then please read article and wiki information of this page completely. [[User:SachCreation|SachCreation]] ([[User talk:SachCreation|talk]]) 13:10, 20 January 2020 (UTC) |
||
:[[User:SachCreation|SachCreation]] - This has been repeatedly discussed at [[Talk:Belgaum]] and the consensus is to keep it as Belgaum as per [[WP:COMMONNAME]], If you wish to re-open the discussion, please do so at [[Talk:Belgaum]], but do NOT change it until there is an agreed consensus to do so. Furthermore, please STOP adding indic script to our articles, as this contravenes [[WP:NOINDICSCRIPT]] - as I have already explained at your talk page. - Thank you - [[User:Arjayay|Arjayay]] ([[User talk:Arjayay#top|talk]]) 13:44, 20 January 2020 (UTC) |
:[[User:SachCreation|SachCreation]] - This has been repeatedly discussed at [[Talk:Belgaum]] and the consensus is to keep it as Belgaum as per [[WP:COMMONNAME]], If you wish to re-open the discussion, please do so at [[Talk:Belgaum]], but do NOT change it until there is an agreed consensus to do so. Furthermore, please STOP adding indic script to our articles, as this contravenes [[WP:NOINDICSCRIPT]] - as I have already explained at your talk page. - Thank you - [[User:Arjayay|Arjayay]] ([[User talk:Arjayay#top|talk]]) 13:44, 20 January 2020 (UTC) |
||
==Informations missing== |
|||
Hi, I want to draw your attention towards one of wikipedia article which is named as [[Shamsheer Vayalil]]. In this article bio infobox some important parameters are missing such as ''Nationality'', ''Title'' and ''degrees'' (in alma mater coulmn). Could you help in adding these information? I have seen that you have contributed in many Indian billionaires article. I could have done this myself only but I had joined wikipedia one day ago and I'm incapable in adding these |
|||
bio infobox parameters. |
|||
Thanks. [[User:Alpha rows|Alpha rows]] ([[User talk:Alpha rows|talk]]) 22:15, 21 January 2020 (UTC) |
Revision as of 22:15, 21 January 2020
Index |
This page has archives. Sections older than 30 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 4 sections are present. |
E-mails
You can use "Email this user" in the panel on the left, but I will probably reply on your talk page, or the article talk page, as discussions should be open and on the record.
I have experienced problems with e-mails not being delivered, so please leave me a message on this page if I have not replied within 48 hours.
Broadcasted
The Wiktionary definition of Broadcasted states the use is proscribed, so it should not be used. The word also appears on Wikipedia:Lists_of_common_misspellings/B
Broadcasted appears in some dictionaries, but others, e.g. Chambers state "Sorry, no entries for Broadcasted were found".
Broadcast appears in all dictionaries, and should be used as COMMONALITY - "Wikipedia tries to find words that are common to all varieties of English".
A July 2019 search for Broadcast gave over 200,000 uses, compared with a search for Broadcasted which gave just 74.
Of these 74, 15 are redirects to "Broadcast" articles, 16 refer to a Canadian TV award and 5 relate to a 1924 cartoon. The rest are quotations.
Seabees
I am going to ask your help in creating consistency across some articles. The Navy has Naval Mobile Construction Battalions and Amphibious CBs. Four of the battalions have article titles that use the Arabic number: 5, 11, 25 and 133. Five use the written number: One, Two, Three, and Four. Could you change them all to use the Arabic number and create a redirect for the written form. Thank you
- Amphibious Construction Battalion One (ACB-1)
- Amphibious Construction Battalion TWO (ACB-2)
- Naval Mobile Construction Battalion One (NMCB 1)
- Naval Mobile Construction Battalion Three (NMCB 2)
- Naval Mobile Construction Battalion Four
- Naval Mobile Construction Battalion 5
- Naval Mobile Construction Battalion 11
- Naval Mobile Construction Battalion 25
- Naval Mobile Construction Battalion 133
Mcb133aco (talk)mcb133acoMcb133aco (talk)
ANOTHER EDITOR MADE THE REQUESTED EDITS. THANK YOU Mcb133aco (talk)mcb133acoMcb133aco (talk)
The Knowledge Academy
Why you think it not natural I have seen other educational institution they have the same details as awards and accredited by. That why I think that institute not have and then I searched on google and find the details of that company and also added all the sources where I got the information. please check new horizons computer learning centres. they also have awards and recognition. this institute did not have that why I choose this institution as my first Wikipedia editing article. @Arjayay: S9urav (talk) 06:59, 22 November 2019 (UTC)
- Hi S9urav, firstly, please sign all posts on talk pages with 4 tildes ( ~~~~ ) which will add your signature and a timestamp.
Secondly, I did not revert either of your edits to The Knowledge Academy - I did delete an addition by 94.207.190.143 (talk · contribs · WHOIS) - an editor based in Dubai. If that was also by you, please do not use both an account and an IP to edit the same article.
Those additions were blatantly promotional describing the KA as the "world's leading Association for training professionals" - as per WP:EXTRAORDINARY "Any exceptional claim requires multiple high-quality sources." but there were no reliable, WP:Independent sources. That addition also claimed (in screaming bold) that the Academy provided training across 221 countries - The UN only has 193 member states, two observer states and 11 other states - a total of 206, thus disproving the claim.
As for other articles, as explained at WP:Other stuff exists, there are lots of things in our articles that shouldn't be there, but we do not accept this as a rationale for adding more things that shouldn't be there, as we aim to improve our articles, not steadily make them worse, Best wishes Arjayay (talk) 16:39, 21 November 2019 (UTC)
Hi Arjayay, Thank you for letting me know we can add our sign by {S9urav (talk) 07:17, 22 November 2019 (UTC)}. I got your point the introduction lines not have good source. Because that was my first line I ever add in Wikipedia. After that, I researched all other educational institutions that are in the same category. And find Knowledge Academy(KA) did not have awards and recognition but others have. so I decided to add in(KA). it will take my whole day to research about all valid source. and I didn't know about we can bold the thing it looks like promotional. Can you please add awards and recognition and clients heading that I was updated. you can check all source. if you think anyone line which not have a valid source you have definitely delete them but not others which have.
It's very demotivating me that the first article I choose not approved. If you add that two headings so I will choose the next educational institute. and I also want to update revenue of KA according to 2019 and I had all valid source(companieshouse.gov.uk).
Thank you for guiding me. Please do not think the pay me any money. It's my personal interest because I'm good at find thing on the internet and after that, I choose the QA and another institute. S9urav (talk) 07:17, 22 November 2019 (UTC)
Hi Please revert back @Arjayay:. if I am wrong in above. otherwise, give me permission to update the article again. S9urav (talk) 13:21, 25 November 2019 (UTC)
Can you please revert back.@Arjayay: S9urav (talk) 11:15, 28 November 2019 (UTC)
- No S9urav, as explained above "Those additions were blatantly promotional" so I will not reinstate them, and will remove them again if someone else re-adds them.
Despite your claims to have no connection with the Knowledge Academy, you clearly stated above "Thank you for letting me know we can add our sign" {my bold)
Furthermore, you are continuing to pester about this, both here and at User talk:MrOllie, whilst your edit history shows that yours is a Wikipedia:Single-purpose account - which indicates that you have a WP:Conflict of interest. Arjayay (talk) 11:33, 28 November 2019 (UTC)
Hi @Arjayay:, Thank you for guiding me. Can you please guide me which information can I update. So it will help me to update other educational institution article also. Can I update the company latest revenue as it seem it's shown 2017 data. I have valid source beta.companieshouse.gov.uk. Please let me know which type of information I will update. It really help me a lot to update other article. S9urav (talk) 05:35, 2 December 2019 (UTC) Hi @Arjayay:, Can you please reply to me? it will really help me a lot. S9urav (talk) 07:14, 12 December 2019 (UTC)
Hi@Arjayay:, i want to update the company revenue can you help me how can I add source in the above section. I have pdf how can i do this can you help me. https://beta.companieshouse.gov.uk/company/06865896/filing-history from document 'Full accounts made up to 31 March 2019' page 10. S9urav (talk) 14:36, 25 December 2019 (UTC)
- S9urav you have been repeatedly warned not to re-add those promotional edits. As a COI editor you should not be editing the article. Please follow Wikipedia:Conflict of interest - there is a simple version at Wikipedia:Plain and simple conflict of interest guide - and propose changes on the article's talk page. Please do not waste your, and other editor's, time by proposing the same, promotional additions that keep being deleted. - Arjayay (talk) 18:17, 25 December 2019 (UTC)
Arjayay I am just fed up. why you think it's promotional. I had just add the section which i found on other article. Can you help me what type of information i can add into this type of article. it really help me a lot. It really confusing me now. can you also answer my question above. Because I believe Wikipedia need update information, if the information is very less or old how it can help users who read this article. It have very less information. Please reply me, Thank you. S9urav (talk) 16:06, 26 December 2019 (UTC)
Can you please answer my below questions.
1) New Horizons Computer Learning Centers article have awards section. so why no one remove that section?
2) Coursera article have Business model section under product and services section. I believe that was i another level of promotion.
3) Uadacity article have free courses, Enrollment, Certification, Awards, Spin-off company section is they not promotional.
4) Edx and futurelearn have Functionality, courses section.
5) Alison (company) article have Business model, Courses, Accreditation, Reception section.
Can you please let me know what you think about these sections which i have mentioned above. I really want to know your opinion. I have checked all article and find that this article have very less content compare to other article that why i start adding section into this article not because of they paid me. this is a uk company and i'm from dubai. I choose section from above article which already in wikipedia and no one remove. I'm not just choose this section by myself. Please answer my above question. Otherwise it seem like no new user can add anything to Wikipedia or you have any specific reason that's why you not want this article to be update or more informative.
I am looking forward to hear from you.Arjayay S9urav (talk) 07:48, 27 December 2019 (UTC)
Arjayay Hi, Can you please revert back to my message above. Thank you. 08:12, 28 December 2019 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by S9urav (talk • contribs)
Arjayay Hi, if you can't reply then how can understand your point of view. please give me favor and reply me. S9urav (talk) 14:02, 30 December 2019 (UTC)
Hi @Arjayay:, why not you reply. I am waiting your reply. Arjayay S9urav (talk) 16:50, 14 January 2020 (UTC)
Cheers and Apologies
Happy Holidays! Your message on the talk page is much appreciate and I apologize on behalf of the person who made the change apparently without thinking. This IP adress was in fact shared in an office space. For the future, I'd like to ask if there's any way to claim the IP address as part of an account protected by credentials in order to prevent such accidental edits from happening from this IP address in the future. Thanks again for the message on the talk page and for the reversion of the improper edit. Cheers! - (user from 71.183.120.129) (talk)71.183.120.129 (talk) 16:35, 24 December 2019 (UTC)
- Hello IP from Brooklyn NY, using a Verizon Fios Business account - thanks for your message.
The warnings were issued in July 2018 + July 2019, so are quite old. No. there is no way to "claim the IP address as part of an account protected by credentials" - it is an IP, and although these are often blocked, it is only for a limited amount of time. If you wish to avoid such messages, and ensure that your edits are not confused with a random IP, you need to WP:Create an account - Best wishes - Arjayay (talk) 20:19, 24 December 2019 (UTC)
EMT Article Edits
Hello,
I would like to discuss changes to the EMT article. Please reach out to me at benjamin.asack@gmail.com
Thank you B46778848 (talk) 18:59, 28 December 2019 (UTC)
- Hi B46778848
As explained above, I think discussions should be on the record, so I will not be e-mailing you, please explain what you want to discuss here.
Your edits keep being reverted because they are not sourced to reliable, independent sources - Arjayay (talk) 19:06, 28 December 2019 (UTC)
Regarding removal of my addition.
Please let me know why are you keep on removing my additions on the page intended for basti district.
Please allow me additions on basti district page Aman88779255 (talk) 16:53, 30 December 2019 (UTC)
- Hi Aman88779255 - as explained on your talk page, your addition was removed because that school does not have an article on the English Wikipedia.
If you want the school included on that list, you need to WP:Write the article first, and it can then be included, and linked to. However, writing an acceptable article is not as easy as many people think it is, so many articles have to be deleted, which causes further annoyance. - Arjayay (talk) 16:58, 30 December 2019 (UTC)
A barnstar for you!
The Special Barnstar | |
Happy New Year, Arjayay! You are receiving this barnstar because, according to this Wikipedia database query, you were the #1 most thanked Wikipedian of 2019, with 2592 entries in Special:Log/thanks during 2019. Congratulations, and, well, thank you for your contributions! Cheers to 2020. Mz7 (talk) 01:08, 1 January 2020 (UTC) |
Happy New Year, Arjayay!
Arjayay,
Have a prosperous, productive and enjoyable New Year, and thanks for your contributions to Wikipedia.
Fylindfotberserk (talk) 10:16, 1 January 2020 (UTC)
Send New Year cheer by adding {{subst:Happy New Year fireworks}} to user talk pages.
Your removal of my wikipedia edit in the word 'Abuja'
I did an edit to a page called 'Abuja'. Abuja is the town I live in. It is the capital of Nigeria. The edit was adding a reference to the page as wikipedia showed a warning that the page has no reference. I thought i was doing the right thing by adding the reference. However i see that you have reversed the edit. Please could you tell me what was wrong with the edit. i am a reasonable new editor and does not understand all the rules. i see that you are a grand master editor and will like to tap from your knowledge. Obihoja
- Hi Obihoja
Receptor modeling of atmospheric aerosols in Federal Capital Territory (FCT), Nigeria is probably a good reference if we were talking about pollution in the city, but it is not an authoritative reference about the city itself. I am sure that the FCT must have a publication about the layout of the city, which would be appropriate to cite.
I am intrigued why you chose such an obscure reference - did you help write it? - Best wishes - Arjayay (talk) 19:21, 1 January 2020 (UTC)
Hello Arjayay i note the issue you raised about the reference. i should have gotten a reference that is more apt. i must however state that i did not help write the reference for he records. thanks. Obihoja (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 19:37, 1 January 2020 (UTC)
Adding only entries with Articles in Wikipedia English
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Lists_within_articles states that "Sufficient notability to have a separate article is usually not required for a list entry (except for top-level lists written in WP:SUMMARY style, branching to more detailed sub-topical lists). This inclusion of content that is encyclopedically relevant, not just fully notable and already existing as separate WP articles, is one of the principal distinctions between lists and categories."
The entries you removed from the "Agrawal" page were definitely relevant. Being a billionaire or a founder of Indian-Unicorn startups (which are only 27 in India) is a very notable achievement. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 117.211.142.141 (talk) 19:29, 1 January 2020 (UTC)
- Hi IP from Vadodara, Gujarat, you do not appear to be a new editor, so I suspect you may know much of this already.
Wikipedia uses a specific meaning of the word "notable" - which is that the person meets the criteria at WP:Notability, and the generally accepted way to show this, is that they have their own Wikipedia article. Although being a billionaire, indicates that a person may be notable, it is not one of the criteria laid down at WP:GNG, which need to be met before any article can be accepted.
- Wikipedia:Lists within articles, which you referred to above, is an only essay, any one can write an essay expressing their personal views. As it clearly states:-
- "It contains the advice or opinions of one or more Wikipedia contributors. This page is not one of Wikipedia's policies or guidelines, as it has not been thoroughly vetted by the community. Some essays represent widespread norms; others only represent minority viewpoints"
- It is primarily the thoughts of 2 editors, in 2007 and 2015, and has not met general approval, so has not been adopted.
- In terms of actual policies and guidelines please see Wikipedia:Notability (people), Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Lists#Adding individual items to a list, which also relates to Wikipedia:Stand-alone lists and Wikipedia:Notability#Stand-alone lists, you will find that these are not particularly clear, and partially self-contradictory.
- Futhermore, Agrawal comes under our Caste/community rules, which are hidden all over the place, but are usefully summarised at User:Sitush/Common#Castelists; Fundamentally, ONLY people with their own Wikipedia articles, AND a reference from a reliable source that confirms that they are of that caste/community, should be included. Surnames, parentage and places of birth are not acceptable "proof" of caste/community membership. If the person is still alive, you should provide a source where they self-identify as being members, as people who wish to disassociate themselves from the caste/community must NOT be included, as this contravenes WP:BLP.
- If you genuinely believe that the names you have added to Agrawal are notable, then please WP:Write the article first (another essay), before re-adding them. Once an article has been accepted, their notability is accepted, although you should still provide a reference from a reliable source that confirms that they are of that caste/community. Thank you - Arjayay (talk) 13:02, 2 January 2020 (UTC)
Good day, I just noticed that you removed "was been replaced by Verbena" statement to the article I've linked at the top. I want you to know that PAGASA already retired the name Vinta and upon checking on their website, Verbena was officially announced around the first quarter of 2019 (alongside Uwan, which replaced Urduja). If you don't believe me, you should try visiting their official site thru here.
Regards. Hamham31 Hamham31 23:58, 7 January 2020 (UTC)
- Hamham31 I was just trying to change it, so that it made sense in English, you left it saying:-
- "The name “Vinta” has been retired by the PAGASA and was been replaced by Verbena which will expected to be used for 2021." (my bold)
- That has two errors in it, as shown in bold, which I have again tried to correct/
- Please also correct the formatting of your signature, which is over-riding the format of all text added after it, so I had to change it to standard text - Arjayay (talk) 12:07, 8 January 2020 (UTC)
Thanks
The Working Wikipedian's Barnstar | |
A big thanks for your tireless patrolling of articles for typos etc., and your contribution to maintaining Wikipedia's quality. Constantine ✍ 14:16, 16 January 2020 (UTC) |
Name dispute
The official name of Belagavi is Belagavi. Belgaum was its pseudo name by some unknown person. Karnataka government offcially made its name as BELAGAVI. Please consider this and dont change the name to Belgaum. If you still want clarifications then please read article and wiki information of this page completely. SachCreation (talk) 13:10, 20 January 2020 (UTC)
- SachCreation - This has been repeatedly discussed at Talk:Belgaum and the consensus is to keep it as Belgaum as per WP:COMMONNAME, If you wish to re-open the discussion, please do so at Talk:Belgaum, but do NOT change it until there is an agreed consensus to do so. Furthermore, please STOP adding indic script to our articles, as this contravenes WP:NOINDICSCRIPT - as I have already explained at your talk page. - Thank you - Arjayay (talk) 13:44, 20 January 2020 (UTC)
Informations missing
Hi, I want to draw your attention towards one of wikipedia article which is named as Shamsheer Vayalil. In this article bio infobox some important parameters are missing such as Nationality, Title and degrees (in alma mater coulmn). Could you help in adding these information? I have seen that you have contributed in many Indian billionaires article. I could have done this myself only but I had joined wikipedia one day ago and I'm incapable in adding these bio infobox parameters. Thanks. Alpha rows (talk) 22:15, 21 January 2020 (UTC)