Justanother (talk | contribs) →Personal attack on BabyDweezil: Smee, what is with you? Mommy Mommy justanother said a bad word |
|||
Line 81: | Line 81: | ||
{{{{{subst|}}}#if:{{{1|}}}|With regards to your comments on [[:{{{1}}}]]: }}Please see Wikipedia's [[Wikipedia:No personal attacks|no personal attacks]] policy. Comment on ''content'', not on contributors; personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Note that continued personal attacks may lead to [[Wikipedia:Blocking policy|blocks]] for disruption. Please [[Wikipedia:Staying cool when the editing gets hot|stay cool]] and keep this in mind while editing. Thank you. <!-- Template:No personal attacks (npa2) --> Accusing BabyDweezil of editing in bad faith; see [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk%3ABarbara_Schwarz&diff=112430056&oldid=112429152 this diff]. --[[User:Justanother|Justanother]] 16:34, 4 March 2007 (UTC) |
{{{{{subst|}}}#if:{{{1|}}}|With regards to your comments on [[:{{{1}}}]]: }}Please see Wikipedia's [[Wikipedia:No personal attacks|no personal attacks]] policy. Comment on ''content'', not on contributors; personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Note that continued personal attacks may lead to [[Wikipedia:Blocking policy|blocks]] for disruption. Please [[Wikipedia:Staying cool when the editing gets hot|stay cool]] and keep this in mind while editing. Thank you. <!-- Template:No personal attacks (npa2) --> Accusing BabyDweezil of editing in bad faith; see [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk%3ABarbara_Schwarz&diff=112430056&oldid=112429152 this diff]. --[[User:Justanother|Justanother]] 16:34, 4 March 2007 (UTC) |
||
:No, that does not sound like a personal attack at all, but rather [[User:BabyDweezil]]'s prior comments about editors in general certainly do. [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Barbara_Schwarz&diff=112432085&oldid=112430056 This use] of "they" to avoid looking like he was personally attacking any particular editor specifically is reprehensible. And then [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk%3AJustanother&diff=112581790&oldid=112535926 this comment] by [[User:Justanother]] most certainly looks like a personal attack on ''you'', after your attempt at being polite. Yowsers! What a wicked use of foul language. [[Wikipedia:What is a troll|Sounds like a troll]]... [[User:Smeelgova|Smee]] 20:47, 4 March 2007 (UTC). |
:No, that does not sound like a personal attack at all, but rather [[User:BabyDweezil]]'s prior comments about editors in general certainly do. [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Barbara_Schwarz&diff=112432085&oldid=112430056 This use] of "they" to avoid looking like he was personally attacking any particular editor specifically is reprehensible. And then [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk%3AJustanother&diff=112581790&oldid=112535926 this comment] by [[User:Justanother]] most certainly looks like a personal attack on ''you'', after your attempt at being polite. Yowsers! What a wicked use of foul language. [[Wikipedia:What is a troll|Sounds like a troll]]... [[User:Smeelgova|Smee]] 20:47, 4 March 2007 (UTC). |
||
::Ha ha ha Smee. I see that you do not want to miss any opportunity to interject yourself in the affairs of others. Accusing another editor of editing in bad faith is a PA. End of story. And OH MY GAWD, justanother used a bad word. You just wait til I tell Mom! --[[User:Justanother|Justanother]] 22:16, 4 March 2007 (UTC) |
Revision as of 22:16, 4 March 2007
Welcome!
Hello, Anynobody, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:
- The five pillars of Wikipedia
- How to edit a page
- Help pages
- Tutorial
- How to write a great article
- Manual of Style
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}}
on your talk page and ask your question there. Again, welcome! TomStar81 (Talk) 01:14, 5 January 2007 (UTC)
Hi, Anynobody. In regards to my inquiry about Sylvia Browne's about solving "case after case", a recent exposé on Browne done on Anderson Cooper 360 mentions a few that were sent to the show from Browne's own office. Even her official 'hits' are questionable, one can completely be dismissed. I'd appreciate your input and how best to add this new information to Browne's article.
and part two
- Throw 02:06, 1 February 2007 (UTC)
- I appreciate the links Throw, to be honest I was actually trying to figure a way to work them in myself. Cooper's report was great, but the sad thing is he isn't the first person to do a really great job exposing her as either a deluded moron or conniving fraud. Along those lines I got to thinking maybe the article needs a bit more emphasis on her felony guilty plea for securities fraud. She later claimed that she had not used her "psychic" powers to endorse a married couple and some guy into each investing $20,000 in her and her ex's gold mine.
- It occurred to me that since she has been in this "field" since around 1974; She was using her "abilities" even if she didn't say so directly to her victims in the 1992 fraud case. If I really believed she was "gifted", the fact that she is in on the deal tells me the mine will pay off! She's a psychic! However if I were skeptical of psychic phenomenon, there is no way I'd fork over $20,000 to invest in a psychic and her husband to do anything. I don't know her personally but something tells me her "gifts" and "powers" would have at least come up in general conversation while in her presence.
- Starting from that, then going through her documented mistakes one by one, and finally working in high profile media stuff. Like the Anderson Cooper report, James Randi's 1,000,000 challenge, and maybe even a bit of Larry King's recent show that she skipped after she was proven wrong again about that missing teenager. (I'm hoping Larry King is realizing that she may have made a fool of him for his support in the past). Anynobody 06:37, 1 February 2007 (UTC)
Your barnstar
I put a well deserved barnstar on your userpage. Let me know if you'd prefer to leave your userpage blank and I'll cut and paste it here :) --Ubiq 01:47, 9 February 2007 (UTC)
- It's just fine, I was afraid I'd actually have to write about myself to get my name to show up as a blue link. This saves me the trouble. Thanks Anynobody 01:56, 9 February 2007 (UTC)
I affirm that I am also commons:User:Anynobody
4.
Help in finding source
I saw an earlier message from you recently regarding the controversial action taken by C.V. in regards to B.S. You mentioned that this was at the request of B.S.'s mother, which would be good information to add to the articles. Where did you find this? -- Antaeus Feldspar 20:35, 22 February 2007 (UTC)
- Off the top of my head I don't remember, but I'll go over my browsers history and find it. It may take a few hours, but I'll post it here when/if I find it. Anynobody 21:16, 22 February 2007 (UTC)
- Now I remember, sorry if I wrote her mother requested it. If you point me to where that is I'll fix it, I actually meant family. Which was an assumption on my part, since reprogrammers tend to want money I assume either her mother or perhaps ex husband (I read in her usenet posts that she used to be married to a guy named Schwarz.) I apologize for any confusion, Anynobody 06:24, 23 February 2007 (UTC)
Thank you
Thank you for your edit here [1]. I commend you for keeping cool headed. Orsini 03:23, 23 February 2007 (UTC)
- Your very welcome, it was no problem. Anynobody 04:36, 23 February 2007 (UTC)
Wiki Wiffle Bat
The Wiki Wiffle Bat | ||
This user has contributed very valuable information and has shown much common sense. Wikidudeman (talk) 06:35, 24 February 2007 (UTC) |
- Wow. I want one of those bats. :-D --WoohookittyWoohoo! 09:12, 25 February 2007 (UTC)
- From what I've seen you don't fit the criteria. Wikipedia:Other awards/Wiffle.Wikidudeman (talk) 10:56, 25 February 2007 (UTC)
Thanks for the heads up
Honestly, I didn't even know that Wikidudeman had responded to me on his talk page. My apologies. Thanks for the heads up. --WoohookittyWoohoo! 09:10, 25 February 2007 (UTC)
- Not a problem, I understand how it can happen. Thanks for the prompt reply. Anynobody 10:32, 25 February 2007 (UTC)
Fair use rationale for Image:Jeff Weise 5th grade.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Jeff Weise 5th grade.jpg. The image description page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.
If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 04:07, 26 February 2007 (UTC)
- This isn't a reply to the bot, but rather anyone following up on it. I didn't upload it originally. The photo was of a portion of a 5th grade yearbook, and another editor was good enough to blank out the names and pixelate the faces of the irrelevant students. For privacy concerns and the benefit of slight reduction in file size the adjustment seems to still fulfill the original intent. Anynobody 04:16, 26 February 2007 (UTC)
Personal attack on BabyDweezil
Please see Wikipedia's no personal attacks policy. Comment on content, not on contributors; personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Note that continued personal attacks may lead to blocks for disruption. Please stay cool and keep this in mind while editing. Thank you. Accusing BabyDweezil of editing in bad faith; see this diff. --Justanother 16:34, 4 March 2007 (UTC)
- No, that does not sound like a personal attack at all, but rather User:BabyDweezil's prior comments about editors in general certainly do. This use of "they" to avoid looking like he was personally attacking any particular editor specifically is reprehensible. And then this comment by User:Justanother most certainly looks like a personal attack on you, after your attempt at being polite. Yowsers! What a wicked use of foul language. Sounds like a troll... Smee 20:47, 4 March 2007 (UTC).
- Ha ha ha Smee. I see that you do not want to miss any opportunity to interject yourself in the affairs of others. Accusing another editor of editing in bad faith is a PA. End of story. And OH MY GAWD, justanother used a bad word. You just wait til I tell Mom! --Justanother 22:16, 4 March 2007 (UTC)