Content deleted Content added
Antifinnugor~enwiki (talk | contribs) the emperor is naked. |
M. Dingemanse (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Hi, and thank you for registering. I had to revert [[Finno-Ugric languages]] to the previous version since your version did not mention any academic sources. Furthermore, I must say I have some trouble with the way you are participating in the ongoing discussion on the Talk page. Please adress the serious doubts that are raised, instead of repeating the same questions. [[User:Mark Dingemanse|<nowiki> </nowiki>]]— [[User:Mark Dingemanse| |
Hi, and thank you for registering. I had to revert [[Finno-Ugric languages]] to the previous version since your version did not mention any academic sources. Furthermore, I must say I have some trouble with the way you are participating in the ongoing discussion on the Talk page. Please adress the serious doubts that are raised, instead of repeating the same questions. [[User:Mark Dingemanse|<nowiki> </nowiki>]]— [[User:Mark Dingemanse|mark]] [[User Talk:Mark Dingemanse|✎]] 20:55, 17 Nov 2004 (UTC) |
||
:I think, your reverting is absolutely not correct. My serious doubts in the existence of the group are compressed in those two simple questions. Our brain is there, that we use it. I repeat the simple questions, because they are the absolutely key thing for the existence or non-existence of this artificial mini-group. Please think about this. As soon as anybody can satisfactory answer them I will stop asking them. So simple is that. Does it irritate you so much, that the emperor is naked, that you call other "trolls" for not thinking the false way? Thanks, [[User:Antifinnugor|Antifinnugor]] 20:12, 18 Nov 2004 (UTC) |
:I think, your reverting is absolutely not correct. My serious doubts in the existence of the group are compressed in those two simple questions. Our brain is there, that we use it. I repeat the simple questions, because they are the absolutely key thing for the existence or non-existence of this artificial mini-group. Please think about this. As soon as anybody can satisfactory answer them I will stop asking them. So simple is that. Does it irritate you so much, that the emperor is naked, that you call other "trolls" for not thinking the false way? Thanks, [[User:Antifinnugor|Antifinnugor]] 20:12, 18 Nov 2004 (UTC) |
||
::Dear Antifinnugor, your questions have to come in the second place. First you have to understand and appreciate how Wikipedia works. To produce articles of encyclopedic quality, contributors have to provide reliable sources. To be honest, the matter does not irritate me. I am not a Finno-Ugricist. I'm am just a linguist and a Wikipedian concerned with the quality of Wikipedia. On a sidenote, I do not think your assertions are correct: your simple questions are not 'the absolutely key thing' for the existence or non-existence or this grouping. But it is better to continue that discussion on [[Talk:Finno-Ugric languages]]. [[User:Mark Dingemanse|<nowiki> </nowiki>]]— [[User:Mark Dingemanse|mark]] [[User Talk:Mark Dingemanse|✎]] 10:14, 19 Nov 2004 (UTC) |
Revision as of 10:14, 19 November 2004
Hi, and thank you for registering. I had to revert Finno-Ugric languages to the previous version since your version did not mention any academic sources. Furthermore, I must say I have some trouble with the way you are participating in the ongoing discussion on the Talk page. Please adress the serious doubts that are raised, instead of repeating the same questions. — mark ✎ 20:55, 17 Nov 2004 (UTC)
- I think, your reverting is absolutely not correct. My serious doubts in the existence of the group are compressed in those two simple questions. Our brain is there, that we use it. I repeat the simple questions, because they are the absolutely key thing for the existence or non-existence of this artificial mini-group. Please think about this. As soon as anybody can satisfactory answer them I will stop asking them. So simple is that. Does it irritate you so much, that the emperor is naked, that you call other "trolls" for not thinking the false way? Thanks, Antifinnugor 20:12, 18 Nov 2004 (UTC)
- Dear Antifinnugor, your questions have to come in the second place. First you have to understand and appreciate how Wikipedia works. To produce articles of encyclopedic quality, contributors have to provide reliable sources. To be honest, the matter does not irritate me. I am not a Finno-Ugricist. I'm am just a linguist and a Wikipedian concerned with the quality of Wikipedia. On a sidenote, I do not think your assertions are correct: your simple questions are not 'the absolutely key thing' for the existence or non-existence or this grouping. But it is better to continue that discussion on Talk:Finno-Ugric languages. — mark ✎ 10:14, 19 Nov 2004 (UTC)