I reduced the plot outline length as directed. Am I allowed to remove the plot tag, as I am the creator of the page, or does that have to be done by someone else?
Thanks,
Talking Skull (talk) 21:52, 18 March 2008 (UTC)
- It's okay if you do it yourself. Thanks for trimming it down. It looks much better now. --Anticipation of a New Lover's Arrival, The 22:11, 18 March 2008 (UTC)
Obvious
What is not obvious in the case? Removal of about 100 articles is not harm? -- Cat chi? 15:15, 21 March 2008 (UTC)
- All removal (by redirection, merging and deletion) is subject to consensus. Assume good faith. --Anticipation of a New Lover's Arrival, The 16:22, 21 March 2008 (UTC)
- None of the removal was based on consensus unless that is we consider meatpuppetary and votestacking consensus.
- 100 articled Oh My Goddess! involvement aside... What about the Admiral rank afd? Porthos AfD? ASALA discussion where Jack was only unhelpful (to put it mildly). His "Depiction of Jesus" involvement, that had taken the cake. There are countless other examples... I am ignoring the fact that he is in the exact same geographic are as well Davenbelle. The area is a non english speaking one mind you. The time frame he edited given the graph...
- Assume good faith on Davenbelle, assume food faith on Moby Dick, assume good faith on Diyarbakir. Now assume good faith on jack Merridew despite the above evidence... What has assuming good faith on these users earn me? More harassment. When did anyone assume good faith in anything I have done? Just take a peak: Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration#Statement by Moreschi 2. This is the treatment I get on a day by day basis because Davenbelle has effectively created that illusion Moreschi talks about.
- Thanks to Davenbelle I have life long arbitration remedies to carry with me while he is free to edit without any of them.
- -- Cat chi? 18:21, 21 March 2008 (UTC)
- If Jack Merridew has used "meatpuppetry" or other illegitimate methods to obtain the semblance of consensus for some edits, present evidence of this to the community and we'll take it from there. --Anticipation of a New Lover's Arrival, The 18:30, 21 March 2008 (UTC)
- I did provide many examples and arbcom promptly ignored it. Feel free to review it at WP:RFAR/Episodes and characters 2/Evidence/by White Cat#Common editing behaviour of some users (Meatpuppetry) -- Cat chi? 19:34, 21 March 2008 (UTC)
- If Jack Merridew has used "meatpuppetry" or other illegitimate methods to obtain the semblance of consensus for some edits, present evidence of this to the community and we'll take it from there. --Anticipation of a New Lover's Arrival, The 18:30, 21 March 2008 (UTC)