Escape Orbit (talk | contribs) →June 2018: inset |
Notice that you are now subject to an arbitration enforcement sanction |
||
Line 56: | Line 56: | ||
:Please remember to sign your talk with four tildes: "<nowiki>~~~~</nowiki>" [[User:Jim1138|Jim1138]] ([[User talk:Jim1138|talk]]) 19:34, 26 June 2018 (UTC) |
:Please remember to sign your talk with four tildes: "<nowiki>~~~~</nowiki>" [[User:Jim1138|Jim1138]] ([[User talk:Jim1138|talk]]) 19:34, 26 June 2018 (UTC) |
||
==Notice that you are now subject to an arbitration enforcement sanction== |
|||
{{Ivmbox |
|||
|2=Commons-emblem-hand.svg |
|||
|imagesize=50px |
|||
|1=The following sanction now applies to you: |
|||
{{Talkquote|1=You have been topic banned from [[Gary Null]] and related pages for two months. Please read [[WP:TBAN]] to see what a topic ban is.}} |
|||
You have been sanctioned for persistent disruptive editing and edit warring. |
|||
This sanction is imposed in my capacity as an [[Wikipedia:Administrators#Involved admins|uninvolved administrator]] under the authority of the [[Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee|Arbitration Committee]]'s decision at [[Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Pseudoscience#Final decision]] and, if applicable, the procedure described at [[Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee/Discretionary sanctions]]. This sanction has been recorded in the [[Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee/Discretionary sanctions/Log/2018|log of sanctions]]. If the sanction includes a ban, please read the [[Wikipedia:Banning policy|banning policy]] to ensure you understand what this means. If you do not comply with this sanction, you may be [[Wikipedia:Blocking policy|blocked]] for an extended period, by way of enforcement of this sanction—and you may also be made subject to further sanctions. |
|||
You may appeal this sanction using the process described [[Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee/Discretionary sanctions#Appeals and modifications|here]]. I recommend that you use the [[Template:Arbitration enforcement appeal#Usage|arbitration enforcement appeals template]] if you wish to submit an appeal to the arbitration enforcement noticeboard. You may also appeal directly to me (on my talk page), before or instead of appealing to the noticeboard. Even if you appeal this sanction, you remain bound by it until you are notified by an uninvolved administrator that the appeal has been successful. You are also free to contact me on my talk page if anything of the above is unclear to you.<!-- Template:AE sanction.--> [[User:Bishonen|Bishonen]] | [[User talk:Bishonen|talk]] 20:49, 26 June 2018 (UTC) |
|||
}} |
Revision as of 20:49, 26 June 2018
|
- I'll also give you a page that sums up the guidelines regarding writing about people you're affiliated with: here's a link. Make sure you give that a good look, as it's relevant to the article you're working on. You can also look at Your first article to get you started.
- If you ever need additional help, you can do one of the following:
- Robert Skyhawk (T C) 23:49, 1 July 2011 (UTC)
Reference errors on 24 January
Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:
- On the Berkshire Hathaway page, your edit caused a broken reference name (help). ( | )
Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can . Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:23, 25 January 2017 (UTC)
June 2018
Your recent editing history at Gary Null shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.
Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Guy (Help!) 18:40, 26 June 2018 (UTC)
- I am aware of the rules... the question is why are 'the powers that be' on wikipedia so adamant about refusing to acknowledge Gary Null's accomplishments? More credibility is given to a figure such as Alex Jones (a known conspiracy theorist). — Preceding unsigned comment added by Anthonyrussano (talk • contribs) 18:47, 26 June 2018 (UTC)
Your edits are clearly not neutral and phrased in a way that promotes Null. They are also full of unsourced claims. Please stop this edit warring. --Escape Orbit (Talk) 20:30, 26 June 2018 (UTC)
NEUTRAL???? ARe you kidding? if you read the article on Gary Null you would never know ANY, i mean ANY of the accomplishments or contributions he has made... So, whoever is the managing editor of his page is clearly NOT NEUTRAL. I am trying to be as unbiased as possible and simply list the man's biographical accomplishments...
- If you'd stop and discuss on the talk page I could point out a number of problems where you are not being neutral. Here's just a few;
- "knowledgeable guests and well-researched scientific information" -in whose opinion?
- "people of remarkable stature" - you seriously think that's a neutral statement?
- "Athletic Career" - he's a professional athlete as well?
- "an award winning director" - we call this peacocking. IMDB is not a reliable source.
- "groundbreaking documentaries" - in whose opinion?
- --Escape Orbit (Talk) 20:39, 26 June 2018 (UTC)
Note
Please carefully read this information:
The Arbitration Committee has authorised discretionary sanctions to be used for pages regarding pseudoscience and fringe science, a topic which you have edited. The Committee's decision is here.
Discretionary sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimize disruption to controversial topics. This means uninvolved administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to the topic that do not adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, our standards of behavior, or relevant policies. Administrators may impose sanctions such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks. This message is to notify you that sanctions are authorised for the topic you are editing. Before continuing to edit this topic, please familiarise yourself with the discretionary sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions.WHERE IS THE PSEUDOSCIENCE???? By who's power do you define who is guilty of practicing pseudoscience? I am an editor. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Anthonyrussano (talk • contribs) 18:52, 26 June 2018 (UTC)
Notice that you are now subject to an arbitration enforcement sanction
The following sanction now applies to you:
You have been topic banned from Gary Null and related pages for two months. Please read WP:TBAN to see what a topic ban is.
You have been sanctioned for persistent disruptive editing and edit warring.
This sanction is imposed in my capacity as an uninvolved administrator under the authority of the Arbitration Committee's decision at Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Pseudoscience#Final decision and, if applicable, the procedure described at Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee/Discretionary sanctions. This sanction has been recorded in the log of sanctions. If the sanction includes a ban, please read the banning policy to ensure you understand what this means. If you do not comply with this sanction, you may be blocked for an extended period, by way of enforcement of this sanction—and you may also be made subject to further sanctions.
You may appeal this sanction using the process described here. I recommend that you use the arbitration enforcement appeals template if you wish to submit an appeal to the arbitration enforcement noticeboard. You may also appeal directly to me (on my talk page), before or instead of appealing to the noticeboard. Even if you appeal this sanction, you remain bound by it until you are notified by an uninvolved administrator that the appeal has been successful. You are also free to contact me on my talk page if anything of the above is unclear to you. Bishonen | talk 20:49, 26 June 2018 (UTC)