AnmaFinotera (talk | contribs) →June 2010: what part of stay off my talk page do you not et? |
AnmaFinotera (talk | contribs) →Apology: removing - if you are sincere then actually do as I asked and stay off my talk page period |
||
Line 59: | Line 59: | ||
:::::I have apologized below for that. [[User:Taric25|Taric25]] ([[User talk:Taric25|talk]]) 18:06, 21 June 2010 (UTC) |
:::::I have apologized below for that. [[User:Taric25|Taric25]] ([[User talk:Taric25|talk]]) 18:06, 21 June 2010 (UTC) |
||
:::::Further, Anma has the right to remove your templates from her own talk page- you linked to the policy, but apparently missed "Policy does not prohibit users, including both registered and anonymous users, from removing comments from their own talk pages, although archiving is preferred." And as to "BS" being foul language? Really? [[User:Courcelles|Courcelles]] ([[User talk:Courcelles|talk]]) 17:43, 21 June 2010 (UTC) |
:::::Further, Anma has the right to remove your templates from her own talk page- you linked to the policy, but apparently missed "Policy does not prohibit users, including both registered and anonymous users, from removing comments from their own talk pages, although archiving is preferred." And as to "BS" being foul language? Really? [[User:Courcelles|Courcelles]] ([[User talk:Courcelles|talk]]) 17:43, 21 June 2010 (UTC) |
||
== Apology == |
|||
I would like to apologize for leaving so many templates on your talk page as well as my unawareness that users may refactor or blank others’ talk page comments, not just attacks, since I had neither read [[Wikipedia:Don't template the regulars]] nor understood [[Wikipedia:User pages]] meant that until [[User:Courcelles]] explained both of those to me. Without commenting on anything other than my use of templates or asking you not to blank my templates on your talk page, please let us put this behind us as I offer my apology for those two things. Thank you. [[User:Taric25|Taric25]] ([[User talk:Taric25|talk]]) 18:03, 21 June 2010 (UTC) |
Revision as of 18:24, 21 June 2010
So you know...
User:Lionkingfan3. I seen him post this on the Ice Age: Continental Drift redirect talk page, and assumed good faith—until I saw this. Lol. I don't know what "Scratte" user name is, so I'm not sure how to sock tag him. Mike Allen 23:43, 18 June 2010 (UTC)
- Alexcas11 (talk · contribs) -- AnmaFinotera (talk · contribs) 05:19, 19 June 2010 (UTC)
- I tagged him and he's been blocked. CSD tagged the pages he made as well. Can do an SPI if want to see if there are any sleepers, but don't think they can range block since he's using a mobile connection if I remember correctly. New cases go on the main page rather than the archive. He's had a few other ones lately, so let me find those to add to it right quick. -- AnmaFinotera (talk · contribs) 05:32, 19 June 2010 (UTC)
- Great! Now that I've seen how to do it (and where to do it), I shouldn't have to bother you every time I spot one. :-P I think this is beyond insane that nothing can really done, other than a weekly tag and block. How did bambifan get this kid involved and where does one find other Disney obsessed guys---is there a forum for that? lol. Mike Allen 05:51, 19 June 2010 (UTC)
- Alexcas11 was at this already, doing fake sequels and what not. As best we can figure, they apparently admire one another and/or have managed to hook up off wiki and are buddies, so they enjoy spoofing each other and crap, in hopes of making it more difficult to identify and deal with them. -- AnmaFinotera (talk · contribs) 05:53, 19 June 2010 (UTC)
- Yep...you'd think after what, 2-3 years now one of them would grow up, get a life or something.-- AnmaFinotera (talk · contribs) 06:16, 19 June 2010 (UTC)
Re: Public Domain
Interestingly enough... the photo (File:Harland 01.jpg) can be found in her cookbook—definitely PD-1923. I have uploaded the larger image (as well as more more detailed and larger ones to Commons) and corrected the information. I never thought she wrote cookbooks from reading her son's article... Jappalang (talk) 05:22, 19 June 2010 (UTC)
- Cool, and yeah, I've been working on her article offline and she is a fascinating woman. She wrote over 50 books, and a huge number of articles, from fiction to cooking/domestic stuff, to biography and Southern history. She began writing on a professional level at just 14, and even after she went blind she wrote up until she died! -- AnmaFinotera (talk · contribs) 05:26, 19 June 2010 (UTC)
Wetcloth20
FYI User_talk:Wetcloth20#Adminhelp Chzz ► 16:52, 20 June 2010 (UTC)
- Yes, I saw. It was his response after I asked User:B to look at his continued changes against MoS after just coming off a block for the same thing.[1] -- AnmaFinotera (talk · contribs) 16:53, 20 June 2010 (UTC)
- And User_talk:Chzz#Help. Doing what I can. Chzz ► 17:05, 20 June 2010 (UTC)
- Good luck. As for his questioning my edit to the MoS, it was to clarify for him and other new users who didn't get it from the current text, and was done with consensus, just belatedly. We've gotten behind in some updates to the MoS due to our head coordinator's being harassed into leaving due to being threatened off-wiki by some psycho group. Unfortunately, Wetcloth seems to spur a lot of policies and guidelines, such as he repeated uploading of images to the Commons that are clearly non-free advertising images (and if he hasn't already said so, yes I have nom some of them for deletion after coming across them during his previous disruptions that got him blocked). -- AnmaFinotera (talk · contribs) 17:09, 20 June 2010 (UTC)
Well, this is interesting [2]. It's always nice when problems work themselves out. ;) --B (talk) 12:51, 21 June 2010 (UTC)
- Ha, figures! I knew something was off about him, but I don't deal enough in that area to have recognized him. :-P -- AnmaFinotera (talk · contribs) 13:28, 21 June 2010 (UTC)
June 2010
[COMPLETELY INAPPROPRIATE AND INACCURATE WARNINGS REMOVED]]
- Wow. Ever read don't template the regulars? Leaving five templates here in six minutes is the very picture of disruption- please do not do it again. Courcelles (talk) 00:28, 21 June 2010 (UTC)
- I’m sorry; I was unaware of Wikipedia:Don't template the regulars, so I had never read it. Thank you for informing me. Taric25 (talk) 00:42, 21 June 2010 (UTC)
- You may also want to read up on the general guidelines regarding warnings, as all of those were completely BS and you have no business readding a template that was removed, and then falsely template me for "refactoring your comments". I didn't refactor anything, I removed it out right which is fully within my rights. Don't go dropping templates if you don't even understand the basic guidelines of Wikipedia, including WP:User (as in, I can remove anything from my talk page that I want to, including bad warnings). And do not dare accuse me of canvassing for leaving one note at the TV project, whose guidelines you copied for your "essay" after you turned arounded and canvassed those who supported your view. Further, stay of my talk page. Thanks. -- AnmaFinotera (talk · contribs) 05:20, 21 June 2010 (UTC)
- Wow. Ever read don't template the regulars? Leaving five templates here in six minutes is the very picture of disruption- please do not do it again. Courcelles (talk) 00:28, 21 June 2010 (UTC)
[REMOVING]
- Talk page stalking. I don't know what the substance of the dispute is between you, but leaving comments like "This is your final warning" and lofty statements that Anma could be blocked seems to me to be mostly antagonistic. If you're going to try to get Anma blocked for whatever has gone on between you, just report whatever it is wherever you're going to and be done with it. An experienced editor doesn't need vandalism templates (or messages that adopt that sort of language about some other issue) dropped on their talk page. — e. ripley\talk 17:36, 21 June 2010 (UTC)
- I have apologized below for that. Taric25 (talk) 18:06, 21 June 2010 (UTC)
- Further, Anma has the right to remove your templates from her own talk page- you linked to the policy, but apparently missed "Policy does not prohibit users, including both registered and anonymous users, from removing comments from their own talk pages, although archiving is preferred." And as to "BS" being foul language? Really? Courcelles (talk) 17:43, 21 June 2010 (UTC)
- Talk page stalking. I don't know what the substance of the dispute is between you, but leaving comments like "This is your final warning" and lofty statements that Anma could be blocked seems to me to be mostly antagonistic. If you're going to try to get Anma blocked for whatever has gone on between you, just report whatever it is wherever you're going to and be done with it. An experienced editor doesn't need vandalism templates (or messages that adopt that sort of language about some other issue) dropped on their talk page. — e. ripley\talk 17:36, 21 June 2010 (UTC)