Bladesmulti (talk | contribs) →December - 2014: new section |
Bladesmulti (talk | contribs) Tag: contentious topics alert |
||
Line 77: | Line 77: | ||
== December - 2014 == |
== December - 2014 == |
||
{{Ivm|2='''Please carefully read this information:''' |
|||
{{subst:template name|topic=ipa}} |
|||
The Arbitration Committee has authorised [[Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee/Discretionary sanctions|discretionary sanctions]] to be used for pages regarding [[India]], [[Pakistan]], and [[Afghanistan]], a topic which you have edited. The Committee's decision is [[Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/India-Pakistan|here]]. |
|||
Discretionary sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimize disruption to controversial topics. This means [[WP:INVOLVED|uninvolved]] administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to the topic that do not adhere to the [[Wikipedia:Five pillars|purpose of Wikipedia]], our [[:Category:Wikipedia conduct policies|standards of behavior]], or relevant [[Wikipedia:List of policies|policies]]. Administrators may impose sanctions such as [[Wikipedia:Editing restrictions#Types of restrictions|editing restrictions]], [[Wikipedia:Banning policy#Types of bans|bans]], or [[WP:Blocking policy|blocks]]. This message is to notify you sanctions are authorised for the topic you are editing. Before continuing to edit this topic, please familiarise yourself with the discretionary sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions. |
|||
This message is informational only and does not imply misconduct regarding your contributions to date. |
|||
}}{{Z33}}<!-- Derived from Template:Ds/alert --> |
|||
[[User:Bladesmulti|Bladesmulti]] ([[User talk:Bladesmulti|talk]]) 12:23, 15 December 2014 (UTC) |
[[User:Bladesmulti|Bladesmulti]] ([[User talk:Bladesmulti|talk]]) 12:23, 15 December 2014 (UTC) |
Revision as of 12:25, 15 December 2014
Welcome!
Hello, Ankisur2, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:
- Getting started
- Introduction to Wikipedia
- The five pillars of Wikipedia
- How to edit a page and How to develop articles
- How to create your first article
- Simplified Manual of Style
Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{Help me}}
before the question. Again, welcome! —C.Fred (talk) 20:48, 17 May 2014 (UTC)
May 2014
Hello, I'm C.Fred. I noticed that you recently removed some content from Shiva without explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; I restored the removed content. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! —C.Fred (talk) 20:48, 17 May 2014 (UTC)
Your edits
Please use WP:Edit summaries when editing so that people understand what you are doing. If you find others are undoing/reverting your edits, please use the talk page. If you continue to remove text with no explanation someone will block you from editing. Dougweller (talk) 20:54, 17 May 2014 (UTC)
May 2014
Please stop your disruptive editing, as you did at Vishnu. Your edits have been reverted or removed.
- If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
- If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.
Do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive until the dispute is resolved through consensus. Continuing to edit disruptively may result in your being blocked from editing. Joshua Jonathan -Let's talk! 07:57, 18 May 2014 (UTC)
Your recent editing history at Vishnu shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.
To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. See BRD for how this is done. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. —C.Fred (talk) 17:05, 18 May 2014 (UTC)
December 2014
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia, as you did at Sharabha, you may be blocked from editing. Thank you. Redtigerxyz Talk 18:20, 13 December 2014 (UTC)
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Sharabha. See Talk:Sharabha#Removal_of_referenced_content. Redtigerxyz Talk 19:06, 13 December 2014 (UTC)
There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.
You are suspected of sock puppetry, which means that someone suspects you of using multiple Wikipedia accounts for prohibited purposes. Please make yourself familiar with the notes for the suspect, then respond to the evidence at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Ankisur2. Thank you. Redtigerxyz Talk 05:06, 14 December 2014 (UTC)
Blocked
During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. Ricky81682 (talk) 23:12, 13 December 2014 (UTC)
- Your comments at Talk:Sharabha#Removal_of_referenced_content violate our policies against personal attacks. If you believe that the information is "false and inaccurate", then provide a reliable source for your view and it can be discussed. -- Ricky81682 (talk) 23:12, 13 December 2014 (UTC)
December 2014
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Sharabha. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.
Please be particularly aware that Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states:
- Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made.
- Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.
If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. DMacks (talk) 06:53, 15 December 2014 (UTC)
I have raised an issue with the Mediation Committee.How do I check the status of it? Also,in the meantime,can I continue to edit the articles I find in poor taste in the page of disagreement under any circumstances? 07:12, 15 December 2014 (UTC)
- You are welcome to continue discussing on the article talkpage. I recommend not editing the article (or at least not in any way related to this aspect of it). It will help demonstrate good faith that you are willing to discuss and respect others' opinions (even if you disagree with them and even if yours ultimately prevails) during the discussion. You have already seen first-hand the result of the other behavior: you make the same edit again, another editor undoes it again, and you'll get your edit-privilege revoked for edit-warring. I don't know how the Mediation Committee handles themselves, so I'll leave the Helpme active for someone else to respond. DMacks (talk) 08:51, 15 December 2014 (UTC)
- Regarding the mediation case, you can view it at Wikipedia:Requests for mediation/Sharabha. You should fix the redlinks in the fisrt section in order to allow the bot to do its job properly, and to allow the mediators to review the case. Note that the other party (User:Redtigerxyz) will need to accept the case before it can be taken up, so you will need to notify them as well. Yunshui 雲水 09:54, 15 December 2014 (UTC)
Your recent edits
Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either:
- Add four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment; or
- With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button ( or ) located above the edit window.
This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.
Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 07:21, 15 December 2014 (UTC)
Formal mediation has been requested
The Mediation Committee has received a request for formal mediation of the dispute relating to "Sharabha". As an editor concerned in this dispute, you are invited to participate in the mediation. Mediation is a voluntary process which resolves a dispute over article content by facilitation, consensus-building, and compromise among the involved editors. After reviewing the request page, the formal mediation policy, and the guide to formal mediation, please indicate in the "party agreement" section whether you agree to participate. Because requests must be responded to by the Mediation Committee within seven days, please respond to the request by 22 December 2014.
Discussion relating to the mediation request is welcome at the case talk page. Thank you.
Message delivered by MediationBot (talk) on behalf of the Mediation Committee. 11:19, 15 December 2014 (UTC)
December - 2014
The Arbitration Committee has authorised discretionary sanctions to be used for pages regarding India, Pakistan, and Afghanistan, a topic which you have edited. The Committee's decision is here.
Discretionary sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimize disruption to controversial topics. This means uninvolved administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to the topic that do not adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, our standards of behavior, or relevant policies. Administrators may impose sanctions such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks. This message is to notify you sanctions are authorised for the topic you are editing. Before continuing to edit this topic, please familiarise yourself with the discretionary sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions.
This message is informational only and does not imply misconduct regarding your contributions to date.Bladesmulti (talk) 12:23, 15 December 2014 (UTC)