Archive 1, Archive 2, Archive 3, Archive 4, Archive 5, Archive 6, Archive 7, Archive 8
Re:Translation
Pomnik odslonieto 19 czerwca 2005 r.w 800-lecie bitwy pod Zawichostem. Fundatorem pomnika poswieconego pamieci ofiar bitwy i majacego godzic oba narody polski i ukrainski byla Gmina Zawichost w imieniu mieszkanców Gminy.
Monument was unveiled on 19 June 2005 on the 800-year anniversairy of the battle of Zawhichost. The momunment decicated to the fallen and bringing together both the Polish and Ukrainian nations was the Zawichost Gmina in the name of its inhabitants.
Religious quote follows (z 2 listu sw.Pawla do Efezjan, wers 13-14. = from the 2nd letter of St. Paul to Ephesians(?), lines 13 and 14).
Hope it helps.-- Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus | talk 04:54, 14 October 2007 (UTC)
- I am sure that Biblical stuff like that quote is easy to find and in better translation than mine.-- Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus | talk 17:03, 14 October 2007 (UTC)
GA sweep: Stephen V Báthory GA status on hold
I have reassessed Stephen V Báthory as part of Wikipedia:WikiProject Good articles/Project quality task force. We are currently revisiting all listed Good articles in an effort to ensure that they continue to meet the Good article criteria.
In reviewing the article, I came across some issues that may need to be addressed; I have left a detailed summary on the article's talk page. As a result I have put Stephen V Báthory's GA status on hold. This will remain in place for a week or so before a final decision is taken as to the article's status.
I have left this message because, from the article history, you have been a significant contributor. If you no longer edit this article, please accept my apologies, but I don't like to do this without trying to notify potentially interested editors ;)
All the best, EyeSereneTALK 13:02, 14 October 2007 (UTC)
WPMILHIST Romanian task force
Hi Anittas, i'm trying to create the Romanian Military History task force on the Military History WikiProject, and I need some volunteers which will be the future members of the task force. The RO task force will be most probably created after this Polish task force model. Would you be interested in this? I'm sure that the Romanian history deserves it! --Eurocopter tigre 18:41, 15 October 2007 (UTC)
- As the task force is on its way to be created soon, would you be able to find an icon, which will stay along its name in all the RO task force assessed article. I initially thought that the Romanian Armed Forces emblem would be ok, but maybe you have better ideas. Cheers, --Eurocopter tigre 15:45, 16 October 2007 (UTC)
- The task force has been created. Could you please sign up here and have a look on it? Lot of help is needed! --Eurocopter tigre 12:02, 17 October 2007 (UTC)
Re: GA sweep: Stephen V Báthory
Thanks for the feedback. I have (hopefully) explained myself better on the article talk page. Regards, EyeSereneTALK 17:48, 15 October 2007 (UTC)
O mica rugaminte
Salut. Mai demult ai postat pe illyria forums o chestie care ma chiar interesa si de care am nevoie acum, dar a fost stearsa. Il citai pe un german care mentiona originile noastre daco-romane cu mult inainte ca Scoala Ardeleana sa "elaboreze" aceasta "teorie". Am nevoie de acel citat. De aceea te-as ruga frumos sa il mai postezi inca odata aici la discussion. Multumesc. --Diurpaneu 17:03, 17 October 2007 (UTC)
- Din pacate nu mai tin minte cum il cheama si nu stiu despre ce sa caut ca sa-l gasesc. Dar oricum, el a trait in perioada renesantie, deci nu era in acea perioada mai veche. Eu normal pastrez informatii despre sursele care ma intereseaza, dar cat despre originea romanilor in Ardeal, subiectul e prea larg si contine prea multe opinii. Mai bine citesti sursele contemporare. Eu le-am inclus in articolul despre originea romanilor iar daca apesi pe "footnote" iti arata sursa originala cum era scrisa in limba latina. --Thus Spake Anittas 17:38, 17 October 2007 (UTC)
- Multumesc pentru raspuns :) --Diurpaneu 18:37, 21 October 2007 (UTC)
re
Ardeal, tu? --Eurocopter tigre 17:14, 18 October 2007 (UTC)
- Jud. Botosani. Pentru Anonimu: m-am mutat in Danemarca, la 25km de Copenhaga. --Thus Spake Anittas 17:20, 18 October 2007 (UTC)
- So now you're living in Dacia... great!Anonimu 17:22, 18 October 2007 (UTC)
- Dania or Dacia, it surely feels more like home. :) --Thus Spake Anittas 17:37, 18 October 2007 (UTC)
- So now you're living in Dacia... great!Anonimu 17:22, 18 October 2007 (UTC)
Scania ;).Anonimu 17:17, 18 October 2007 (UTC)
Deletion nom
I'd be happy to help you, but what is it you need help with? I find Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Protochronism to be as blue a link as bluelinks get, and the notice is properly placed on the article. Seraphimblade Talk to me 09:05, 19 October 2007 (UTC)
- Lol. Nu vreau, dar multumesc prieten meu :D - Francis Tyers · 16:04, 19 October 2007 (UTC)
Dc76 on Moldova
some discussion time could be avoided if you also look at the info in the ongoing dispute resolution at Talk:Bălţi.:Dc76\talk 14:51, 23 October 2007 (UTC)
- Shit, I don't need to deal with yet another nut. --Thus Spake Anittas 14:59, 23 October 2007 (UTC)
Anittas, imi pare rau, dar trebuie sa ti-o spun direct. Un moldovean adevarat nu loveste in alt moldovean. Si tu ai fost primul care a inceput-o, nu de azi-de ieri. Faptul ca alti moldoveni sar in aparare este natural si trebuia sa te astepti. Folosind fraze de gen "catea" tu lovesti in noi, fiindca ne prezinti la lume ca pe niste inculti. Cand careva dintre noi avea probleme, cand articolele la care noi contribuiam erau distruse si se introduceau tot felul de inventii sovietice, tu niciodata nu ne-ai venit in ajutor. La Biruitorul ai tipat ca e pro-sarb si pro-slav si tot felul de alte lucruri pentru ca a schimbat doua vorbe cu un sarb inteligent si educat. Da tu nu vorbsti cu alti slavi? Mai bine uite cat de cinstiti si civilizati sunt cei cu care umbli tu. Daca mai incepi povestea cu dezbinarea, vezi sa nu te fac eu tatar (o sa vin sa te iau cu avionul si te duc direct la lipnic sa inveti ce inseamna a fi moldovean). Si nu te uita, te rog, urat la mine. Biruitorul, in afara de faptul ca este in general moldovean-ardelean, este 1/4 din neam de razasi, arcasi de-ai nostri. Inca nu se stie din ce fel de argati se trag unii "moldoveni".:Dc76\talk 20:51, 29 October 2007 (UTC)
- Unde am lovit eu in alt moldovean? Voi ati lovit in mine si eu incerc sa ma apar. Discutia aia de pe RfC-ul lui Anonimu ai inceputo ca sa ma provoci si nici nu stiu de ce. Dintro data ai aparut din cerul liber si m-ai atacat, dar habar nu am de ce. --Thus Spake Anittas 21:03, 29 October 2007 (UTC)
- Anittas, Trebuie sa-ti explic mai pe larg unele detalii (asa cum le vad eu din punctul meu de vedere; poate grasesc) si cu parere de rau acum nu am suficient timp. Dar iti promit ca iti ofer explicatia, eventul prin email. Daca vei constata ca reactia mea a fost nepotrivita cu cauza, te rog de pe acum sa ma ierti, sincer. Pentru a nu periclita activitatea noastra pe viitor, in cele cu urmeaza o sa plec de la premiza ca incidentul este epuizat. Daca explicatia mea nu o vei considera suficienta, sunt absolut gata sa redeschidem discutia pentru a inlatura neintelegerea. :Dc76\talk 17:49, 1 November 2007 (UTC)
- Astept emailul cu explicatia. --Thus Spake Anittas 18:05, 1 November 2007 (UTC)
- Anittas, Trebuie sa-ti explic mai pe larg unele detalii (asa cum le vad eu din punctul meu de vedere; poate grasesc) si cu parere de rau acum nu am suficient timp. Dar iti promit ca iti ofer explicatia, eventul prin email. Daca vei constata ca reactia mea a fost nepotrivita cu cauza, te rog de pe acum sa ma ierti, sincer. Pentru a nu periclita activitatea noastra pe viitor, in cele cu urmeaza o sa plec de la premiza ca incidentul este epuizat. Daca explicatia mea nu o vei considera suficienta, sunt absolut gata sa redeschidem discutia pentru a inlatura neintelegerea. :Dc76\talk 17:49, 1 November 2007 (UTC)
Help needed
Would you help me here? Dpotop 20:52, 24 October 2007 (UTC)
Bulgaria
Hey man, you know that plan of a dynastic union between Romania and Bulgaria? Here's something better: Romania and Turkey made plans to partition Bulgaria around 1903. :)Anonimu 21:48, 24 October 2007 (UTC)
- Do you have a source? Too bad the chubby dude closed Illyria. --Thus Spake Anittas 21:54, 24 October 2007 (UTC)
- Zheko POPOV (Institute of History), THE BULGARIAN ISSUE IN ROMANIA’S EARLY 20TH CENTURY BALKAN POLICY UNTIL 1912, ÉTUDES BALKANIQUES, 2002, No 4. Note: The article's tone is pretty nationalistic, so this may be just propaganda.Anonimu 22:05, 24 October 2007 (UTC)
- Funny, I just went to download it, but it said I already did; and they were right. I just never got around to read the whole article. Well, the article mentions only one sentence about partitioning Bulgaria, but I think they mean that only parts of it would be taken away: southern Dobrogea would go to Ro and Thrace to Turkey. There is no way they could divide the whole country. I have a bunch of articles from CEEOL. Let me know if you want me to email them to you. --Thus Spake Anittas 22:22, 24 October 2007 (UTC)
- Romania could have got the Vidin region, while Turkey the overwhelmingly turkish eastern bulgaria. Anyway, both countries had administered territories with a foreign majority in the past, so it wasn't a problem to divide the whole region. Neah, i was just browsing for articles bout romania's imperialistic policy in dobruja. However, if you have somethin related to Dobrudja and Budjak you could send em.Anonimu 22:40, 24 October 2007 (UTC)
- I don't have your email, anymore. I once had it when I won that bet and you surrendered your account on the first forum. --Thus Spake Anittas 23:00, 24 October 2007 (UTC)
- Romania could have got the Vidin region, while Turkey the overwhelmingly turkish eastern bulgaria. Anyway, both countries had administered territories with a foreign majority in the past, so it wasn't a problem to divide the whole region. Neah, i was just browsing for articles bout romania's imperialistic policy in dobruja. However, if you have somethin related to Dobrudja and Budjak you could send em.Anonimu 22:40, 24 October 2007 (UTC)
- Funny, I just went to download it, but it said I already did; and they were right. I just never got around to read the whole article. Well, the article mentions only one sentence about partitioning Bulgaria, but I think they mean that only parts of it would be taken away: southern Dobrogea would go to Ro and Thrace to Turkey. There is no way they could divide the whole country. I have a bunch of articles from CEEOL. Let me know if you want me to email them to you. --Thus Spake Anittas 22:22, 24 October 2007 (UTC)
- Zheko POPOV (Institute of History), THE BULGARIAN ISSUE IN ROMANIA’S EARLY 20TH CENTURY BALKAN POLICY UNTIL 1912, ÉTUDES BALKANIQUES, 2002, No 4. Note: The article's tone is pretty nationalistic, so this may be just propaganda.Anonimu 22:05, 24 October 2007 (UTC)
Merge proposal for List of Ottoman Empire dominated territories
If you're interested, please comment here. — AjaxSmack 05:42, 26 October 2007 (UTC)
Support
Where? Dahn 21:45, 29 October 2007 (UTC)
Dux Bellorum
I've responded to your question on my own talk page, but I thought it best to bring it here was well. The "Dux Bellorum" article said "Dux Bellorum (Duke of Battles) was a Roman military title awarded by the Emperor to great Roman generals." This is not true, nor is it supported by the reference. Dux was a Roman military title. Dux bellorum, which nobody is disputing was applied to Arthur in the Historia Britonnum, is just a phrase. I have redirected the article to Dux and added a note there about Arthur. --Nicknack009 23:18, 30 October 2007 (UTC)
Stop man
or you'll get blocked for 3RR.Anonimu 10:43, 1 November 2007 (UTC)
- I only made 3, so far. He adds material which is unsourced and removes material which is sourced. --Thus Spake Anittas 10:51, 1 November 2007 (UTC)
::My material was sourced, you are shamelessly lying Anittas. By clicking on the links I have provided to support my argument, you are redirected directly to the government portal with the updated legislation, where you see the famous law of 1989 on functionning of languageS in Moldova. However, Anittas, I have seen no source from your part stating that there is only one official language in Moldova, and that it is called Romanian in plus. (please, don't delete my comments or explain why you do so) Moldopodo 18:38, 1 November 2007 (UTC)Moldopodo
- Actually.. neah, let's say you're right. And the "sourced" material you defend is actually contradicted by the source.Anonimu 14:35, 1 November 2007 (UTC)
- What do you mean? The source doesn't support the material? And since when is Russian, Ukranian, and Gagauz official languages of Moldova? Whenever I read such stupidities, I feel like Dorothy in the land of Oz. --Thus Spake Anittas 14:37, 1 November 2007 (UTC)
- I only commented on your version. The constitution doesn't mention Romanian as official.Anonimu 14:58, 1 November 2007 (UTC)
- They said that some other legislation, which is supposed to be applicable, mentions Ro as official. --Thus Spake Anittas 14:59, 1 November 2007 (UTC)
- The constitution declares void any law contradicting it.Anonimu 15:05, 1 November 2007 (UTC)
- I'm not a legal expert, so I cannot interpret what kind of laws apply, and when; or if any exceptions are to be made. --Thus Spake Anittas 15:10, 1 November 2007 (UTC)
- The constitution declares void any law contradicting it.Anonimu 15:05, 1 November 2007 (UTC)
- They said that some other legislation, which is supposed to be applicable, mentions Ro as official. --Thus Spake Anittas 14:59, 1 November 2007 (UTC)
- I only commented on your version. The constitution doesn't mention Romanian as official.Anonimu 14:58, 1 November 2007 (UTC)
- What do you mean? The source doesn't support the material? And since when is Russian, Ukranian, and Gagauz official languages of Moldova? Whenever I read such stupidities, I feel like Dorothy in the land of Oz. --Thus Spake Anittas 14:37, 1 November 2007 (UTC)
- Actually.. neah, let's say you're right. And the "sourced" material you defend is actually contradicted by the source.Anonimu 14:35, 1 November 2007 (UTC)
He has awaken the wrath of Bonny. --Thus Spake Anittas 17:47, 1 November 2007 (UTC)
- Moldovan legislation does not legislate upon the name of the language, but about the fact which language is official. according to all three of them - declaration of Independence, Constitution, and Language Law, Moldavian/Romanian is the official language of Moldova. No other nation-wide official languages. The question of how to call the language is not a legal one, and the law does not attempt to infer anything is that regard. There is never a mention like "The official language of Moldova shall be called Moldavian". But there is always "The official language of Moldova is Moldavian/Romanian [varrying from text to text]". The famous anti-Romanian State Concept of Moldova is the only document that says that although Moldavian and Romanian are identical, the name Moldavian is politically preferred, as omonimous to the name of the country. The question of how to call the language can be solved very easily on WP: Moldavian/Romanian. And bye bye all politics.:Dc76\talk 17:56, 1 November 2007 (UTC)
- The official language is a matter of politics. Since the supreme law of Moldova decided it's language is called "Moldovan", then Wikipedia should respect the laws of this memeber of the UN.Anonimu 18:02, 1 November 2007 (UTC)
- Exactly, the laws of a UN member should be respected. So, let's stop introducing Russian, Ukrainian and Gagauzian as official for Balti. About how the language is called, the Moldavian law does say anything about that: it says which (the native language of ethnic Moldavians), not how to call (ethnic Moldavians sometimes, quite often, call it Romanian).:Dc76\talk 19:41, 1 November 2007 (UTC)
- The official language is a matter of politics. Since the supreme law of Moldova decided it's language is called "Moldovan", then Wikipedia should respect the laws of this memeber of the UN.Anonimu 18:02, 1 November 2007 (UTC)
- Moldovan legislation does not legislate upon the name of the language, but about the fact which language is official. according to all three of them - declaration of Independence, Constitution, and Language Law, Moldavian/Romanian is the official language of Moldova. No other nation-wide official languages. The question of how to call the language is not a legal one, and the law does not attempt to infer anything is that regard. There is never a mention like "The official language of Moldova shall be called Moldavian". But there is always "The official language of Moldova is Moldavian/Romanian [varrying from text to text]". The famous anti-Romanian State Concept of Moldova is the only document that says that although Moldavian and Romanian are identical, the name Moldavian is politically preferred, as omonimous to the name of the country. The question of how to call the language can be solved very easily on WP: Moldavian/Romanian. And bye bye all politics.:Dc76\talk 17:56, 1 November 2007 (UTC)
In the declaration of independence it doesn't mention Moldovan language but only Romanian language. This is an important thing that communists like Voronin couldn't changed.--Moldorubo 18:03, 1 November 2007 (UTC)
Please don't delete important messages
Please be advised that I placed a report on you for violation of the 3-revert rule
You can find it here [1]