Alf.laylah.wa.laylah (talk | contribs) |
Serial Number 54129 (talk | contribs) →False accusation: Oh? |
||
Line 114: | Line 114: | ||
::Thanks, that clears that up then. It was a false accusation made with full knowledge of the circumstances. Just be aware that an abusive, confrontational attitude will get you nowhere on this project. You will find it more than outweighs any positive contribution you may make. [[User:Deb|Deb]] ([[User talk:Deb|talk]]) 13:07, 17 February 2014 (UTC) |
::Thanks, that clears that up then. It was a false accusation made with full knowledge of the circumstances. Just be aware that an abusive, confrontational attitude will get you nowhere on this project. You will find it more than outweighs any positive contribution you may make. [[User:Deb|Deb]] ([[User talk:Deb|talk]]) 13:07, 17 February 2014 (UTC) |
||
:::''You'' accusing me of having a confrontational attitude? That's hilarious. Bye.— [[User:Alf.laylah.wa.laylah|alf laylah wa laylah]] ([[User_talk:Alf.laylah.wa.laylah|talk]]) 13:10, 17 February 2014 (UTC) |
:::''You'' accusing me of having a confrontational attitude? That's hilarious. Bye.— [[User:Alf.laylah.wa.laylah|alf laylah wa laylah]] ([[User_talk:Alf.laylah.wa.laylah|talk]]) 13:10, 17 February 2014 (UTC) |
||
::::Interesting, that ''co-conspirators'' may conspire but not in a ''conspiracy''. I think that given the rudeness you demonstrated on her page, she has been remarkably lenient towards you. As you say... Goodbye. [[User:Fortuna Imperatrix Mundi|<sub>'''<font color="green">Fortuna<font color="green"></font></font>'''</sub>]] <sup>'''''[[User talk:Fortuna Imperatrix Mundi|<font color="red">Imperatrix Mundi</font>]]'''''</sup> |
Revision as of 13:30, 17 February 2014
No RfXs since 05:17, 27 May 2024 (UTC).—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online |
|
|||||||
This page has archives. Sections older than 10 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 2 sections are present. |
Notice of Neutral point of view noticeboard discussion
Hello, Alf.laylah.wa.laylah. This message is being sent to inform you that there currently is a discussion at Wikipedia:Neutral point of view/Noticeboard regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.— Preceding unsigned comment added by Alexbook (talk • contribs) 16:18, 4 February 2014 (UTC)
Warning Who is a Jew
WP:BRD is very specific about not restoring reverted edits before you establish consensus. The burden to prove consensus is upon you. Debresser (talk) 19:10, 8 February 2014 (UTC)
- Oh for God's sake, stop with the wikilawyering. One editor made a Bold edit. You reverted it. Then you should have discussed. You did not. Don't pick nits with me, friend, just talk about the material.— alf laylah wa laylah (talk) 19:21, 8 February 2014 (UTC)
- "You are warned."??? You're warning me in edit summaries? What is up with you?— alf laylah wa laylah (talk) 19:22, 8 February 2014 (UTC)
What do you think of these edits? I couldn't help think that it sniffed of meatpuppetry. StAnselm (talk) 10:25, 9 February 2014 (UTC)
- I don't think much of them. It's some kind of puppetry. I believe it's taken care of for now, anyway; see notes on your talk page. I hope you like some of the editing I've done on the article. It's an interesting subject.— alf laylah wa laylah (talk) 17:36, 9 February 2014 (UTC)
Eastside
I agree with you to clean up the Eastside article to be just those neighborhoods East of Downtown LA. However, the information about the Silver Lake Neighborhood council their vote should be included in the article because its relevant. Could you bring it back somehow? Thanks. --Daniel E Romero (talk) 20:43, 9 February 2014 (UTC)
- Yes, it should have a short section at the end of the article. I'll get around to it soon or you can do it, but the important thing is to avoid both recentism and undue weight.— alf laylah wa laylah (talk) 20:47, 9 February 2014 (UTC)
Your RfA vote is malformatted
Hi. Your vote at Piotrus's RfA resets the numbering and I can't figure out how to fix it while retaining your layout. Could you fix it please? --Stfg (talk) 00:53, 10 February 2014 (UTC)
I couldn't fix it when I voted without deleting the quote. Thanks for fixing it. Cheers. --I am One of Many (talk) 01:29, 10 February 2014 (UTC)
- Thanks for letting me know, everyone! I'd file a bug report but (a) I'm too lazy and (b) there is no (b)...— alf laylah wa laylah (talk) 01:33, 10 February 2014 (UTC)
malformed links?
Hi, https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=David_Randall&diff=594942363&oldid=594941489 what was malformed in my edit? Mosfetfaser (talk) 07:20, 11 February 2014 (UTC)
hi again, can you please also reply to my question at https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/David_Randell - Mosfetfaser (talk) 07:25, 11 February 2014 (UTC)
Edit warring
You appear to be edit warring. Please discuss your changes before deciding to revert. --Precision123 (talk) 07:52, 12 February 2014 (UTC)
You appear to be violating the WP:BOLD, revert, discuss cycle. Making bold, small, uncontroversial changes to possibly improve an article is not edit warring. If you had a problem with it, you should not revert. WP:Revert only when necessary: "Even if you find an article was slightly better before an edit, in an area where opinions could differ, you should not revert that edit...." If an editor like myself is trying to aim towards a logical compromise by including the elements you like (e.g., "conclude") and by incorporating the actual words of the text in the conclusion, that is a reasonable edit. You should not revert that. You should address it in talk. Considering you chose not to cooperate in the dispute resolution process (DR noticeboard), reverting a bold edit or improvement without any discussion is probably not the best idea. --Precision123 (talk) 08:22, 12 February 2014 (UTC)
- Thanks for your opinion on that matter. I will certainly take it under consideration.— alf laylah wa laylah (talk) 13:00, 12 February 2014 (UTC)
Some baklava for you!
I am fresh out of wiki kittens; please accept this cake as a thank you for your support and thoughtful comments during my (now withdrawn) RfA. (Also, the poem was a nice touch, too :) ). What doesn't kill me... Cheers, Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 11:25, 12 February 2014 (UTC) |
- Thanks; I'd say "better luck next time," but it seems weirdly dischordant. I'm not sure what to say. This place is sometimes beyond description.— alf laylah wa laylah (talk) 13:03, 12 February 2014 (UTC)
Big Bird
Per your last comment on the Walk of Fame talk page, I agree that your question was a legitimate one, and you didn't embarrass yourself at all. My comment was directed at the nasty responses posted by Christine (who did embarrass herself, though she is doubtless unaware of it), not at you. Cheers, DoctorJoeE review transgressions/talk to me! 16:18, 12 February 2014 (UTC)
- Ah, so sorry for misunderstanding, and thank you for clarifying. You gotta love this place, eh? There's nothing like it.— alf laylah wa laylah (talk) 16:48, 12 February 2014 (UTC)
Disruptive edits ANI
This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. --Precision123 (talk) 22:43, 12 February 2014 (UTC)
disruptive edits and vandalism on Jimmy Henchman page
I have reverted the edits to reflect the closest version to the discussion litigated and commented on with Dennis Brown and the entire WP community. Please do not vandalize this again. The information you're including is inaccurate and misleading. Scholarlyarticles (talk) 21:29, 13 February 2014 (UTC)
- "Litigated"? Are you kidding? And you accuse me of vandalism and disruption? Vandalism? You've got a hard row to hoe ahead of you with that kind of attitude. Why don't you just engage on the article talk page like a human being instead of dropping dire and generic warnings hither and yon?— alf laylah wa laylah (talk) 21:32, 13 February 2014 (UTC)
Changes revisions to own, without justification.
Why do you continue to edit pages back to your revisions without comment when the revisions were fully documented? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 209.12.83.254 (talk) 19:15, 14 February 2014 (UTC)
Mullins
Hi Alf, a few days ago I picked up a newish book (2010) of Pound criticism essays. At least one has more info about Mullins than I've noticed in some of the other sources I have. I'm sort of dug in at the moment with Pound, but when I get to it, will extract what I can about Mullins. Would it be best to plop directly into the article or onto the talk page? Victoria (tk) 01:05, 15 February 2014 (UTC)
- Oh, interesting! I'd go straight for the article if you're up for it; things seem to have settled down over there for now. I have a new source (new to me, anyway) with a lot of stuff on Mullins too. That article is really shaping up! Thanks,— alf laylah wa laylah (talk) 01:37, 15 February 2014 (UTC)
Regarding Glendale, California#Notable people
I noticed you reverted the Game Grumps edit because Arin and Dan don't have their own pages ("then on the page they go!"). Is this just because Dan doesn't have his own article, because Arin and the webshow both have pages.
>> Arin Hanson
--Matthew (talk) 02:12, 16 February 2014 (UTC)
- Yes, sorry. I saw the pipe and didn't realize it was his pseudonym. As for Dan, it's better to wait till he has his own article. I'll fix it, obviously I should have checked both of them.— alf laylah wa laylah (talk) 02:15, 16 February 2014 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for February 17
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Haaretz, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page David Landau (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:53, 17 February 2014 (UTC)
False accusation
I suggest you get off your high horse and do a bit of fact-checking yourself before you make a false accusation of "conspiracy" against a fellow wikipedian. I'm giving you the benefit of the doubt in guessing that you're unfamiliar with the rules on Rfcs and don't know that it's necessary to have two editors involved before you can raise one. Perhaps you would have been happy to use someone else's name without first notifyinng them, but I consider it a basic courtesy. Deb (talk) 12:48, 17 February 2014 (UTC)
- I didn't accuse you of conspiracy, I noted, with a diff, that you and Fortuna Imperatrix Mundi are co-conspirators. I know all about RfCs, and exactly what the two of you were up to. As for the rest of your nonsense, including "giving me the benefit of the doubt," I don't know what you're talking about and I don't suppose I want to.— alf laylah wa laylah (talk) 12:59, 17 February 2014 (UTC)
- Thanks, that clears that up then. It was a false accusation made with full knowledge of the circumstances. Just be aware that an abusive, confrontational attitude will get you nowhere on this project. You will find it more than outweighs any positive contribution you may make. Deb (talk) 13:07, 17 February 2014 (UTC)
- You accusing me of having a confrontational attitude? That's hilarious. Bye.— alf laylah wa laylah (talk) 13:10, 17 February 2014 (UTC)
- Interesting, that co-conspirators may conspire but not in a conspiracy. I think that given the rudeness you demonstrated on her page, she has been remarkably lenient towards you. As you say... Goodbye. Fortuna Imperatrix Mundi
- You accusing me of having a confrontational attitude? That's hilarious. Bye.— alf laylah wa laylah (talk) 13:10, 17 February 2014 (UTC)
- Thanks, that clears that up then. It was a false accusation made with full knowledge of the circumstances. Just be aware that an abusive, confrontational attitude will get you nowhere on this project. You will find it more than outweighs any positive contribution you may make. Deb (talk) 13:07, 17 February 2014 (UTC)