correct spelling |
Alexyflemming (talk | contribs) An Unblock Request. |
||
Line 45: | Line 45: | ||
Your long-term disruptive approach to editing on the topic of Cyprus is the reason for your block. Wikipedia is not the place to push a particular point of view on a subject. We need to present a balanced neutral view, especially in volatile topic areas. Your incredibly long talk page posts do not help generate collegial discussion, but rather are disruptive and counterproductive. Edit warring your preferred version of articles is also disruptive. Recent examples of edit warring: [[History of Northern Cyprus]], [[Modern history of Cyprus]], [[Northern Cyprus]]. -- [[User:Diannaa|Diannaa]] ([[User talk:Diannaa|talk]]) 19:51, 4 November 2014 (UTC) |
Your long-term disruptive approach to editing on the topic of Cyprus is the reason for your block. Wikipedia is not the place to push a particular point of view on a subject. We need to present a balanced neutral view, especially in volatile topic areas. Your incredibly long talk page posts do not help generate collegial discussion, but rather are disruptive and counterproductive. Edit warring your preferred version of articles is also disruptive. Recent examples of edit warring: [[History of Northern Cyprus]], [[Modern history of Cyprus]], [[Northern Cyprus]]. -- [[User:Diannaa|Diannaa]] ([[User talk:Diannaa|talk]]) 19:51, 4 November 2014 (UTC) |
||
{{unblock|reason='''A.''' Diannaa, yes, [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Alexyflemming&diff=632464608&oldid=632459369 it is "Cyprus", not "Cypress"...]<br/> |
|||
'''B.''' {{tq|We need to present a balanced neutral view, especially in volatile topic areas:}}<br/> |
|||
I defended that neutral point in various places and offered the usage of "neutral phrasing used by United Nations to describe the things in Cyprus dispute": |
|||
: United Nations's standard way of currently handling the issue is from neutral point of view always:<br/> |
|||
: <ins>'''[http://www.un.org/en/peacekeeping/missions/unficyp/mandate.shtml United Nations' Official Website]UNFICYP Mandate: "...Following the hostilities of 1974, ..."'''<ins> |
|||
: <ins>'''[http://www.un.org/en/peacekeeping/missions/unficyp/background.shtml United Nations' Official Website]UNFICYP Background: "Since the events of 1974, ..." |
|||
: <ins>'''The descriptions they qualify as "euphemisms"/"POV" are used by United Nations.'''</ins> |
|||
'''C.''' {{tq|Your incredibly long talk page posts do not help generate collegial discussion, but rather are disruptive and counterproductive:}}<br/> |
|||
So, let you block every Wiki user that tries to explain things as much as clear? Lengthness of posts cannot be a blocking reason alone. |
|||
'''D.''' {{tq|Edit warring your preferred version of articles is also disruptive:}} |
|||
I am not the 3RR violator. See the timeline of edits last time carefully to solve who violated 3RR for example:<br/> |
|||
*[[User:Bbb23|Bbb23]]: "{{ping|Dr.K.}} (or anyone else who knows) is the earliest edit in the revert list way above a brand new addition or the restoration of material previously removed?"<br/> |
|||
'''15.10.2014:07.43:''' [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Northern_Cyprus&diff=prev&oldid=629682860 I added Arbitration Committee's decision "The Arbitration Committee, in their infinite wisdom, determined that Cyprus does not fall under WP:ARBMAC discretionary sanction" to Talk page of Northern Cyprus (to let Wiki users edit via keeping this in mind)]<br/> |
|||
'''15.10.2014:07.48:''' [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Northern_Cyprus&diff=next&oldid=629682860 Dr.K. immediately removed resulting decision of Arbitration Committee from Talk page of Northern Cyprus.]<br/> |
|||
........<br/> |
|||
'''15.10.2014:07.47:''' [[User:Dr.K.|Dr.Κ.]] also reverted my edit on Northern Cyprus in the pretext that "[https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Northern_Cyprus&diff=629683251&oldid=629683076 edit-war <ins>'''against consensus'''</ins>. (The reality is just the opposite. See below:) ]".<br/> |
|||
But, [[User:Dr.K.|Dr.Κ.]] distorted again: He presented as if there is a consensus on removing the relevant material!<br/> |
|||
'''14.10.2014; 20.16:''' (my first edit) after [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Northern_Cyprus&diff=629620638&oldid=629617637 my first edit] <br/> |
|||
'''14.10.2014:20.30:''' an [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Northern_Cyprus&diff=629622269&oldid=629620638 unkown IP31 reverted my edit vandalistically] on the pretext that "This is about a case a US court did not, actually hear.".<br/> |
|||
'''14.10.2014, 21.08:''' [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Northern_Cyprus&diff=prev&oldid=629626577 I then presented the USA Federal Court really heared the case and decided the verdict on Talk page. I have supplied USA Federal Court decision from the official website of the Court].<br/> |
|||
'''14.10.2014:21.42:''' [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Northern_Cyprus&diff=next&oldid=629622269 Wikipedian [[User Talk:Alexikoua|Alexikoua]] reacted the unknown IP31's vandalism.] (edit summary of [[User Talk:Alexikoua|Alexikoua]]: "rv essential part removal"). [[User Talk:Alexikoua|Alexikoua]] is a Hellen, but neutral like me.<br/> |
|||
'''15.10.2014:00.37:''' [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Northern_Cyprus&diff=next&oldid=629630417 This time another unknown IP85 appeared and removed the edit without any edit summary. Hence, essentially removed the sourced context that [[User Talk:Alexikoua|Alexikoua]] opposes to be removed besides me.]<br/> |
|||
'''15.10.2014:00.38:''' Wikipedian [[User Talk:MelbourneStar|MelbourneStar]] [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Northern_Cyprus&diff=next&oldid=629648564 reacted to the unknown IP85's vandalism and protected the edit.]<br/> |
|||
'''15.10.2014:00.58:''' [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Northern_Cyprus&diff=629651029&oldid=629648735 This time, [[User:Dr.K.|Dr.K.]] appeared and reverted the edit with edit summary (Reverted 1 edit by MelbourneStar: Sorry Star. IP 31.xx was correct. Reverting undue POV-push by SPA. Please see Arbitration Enforcement report.) without waiting my defense in Arbitration Enforcement and the resulting decision of Arbitration Committee]]]. |
|||
'''15.10.2014:05.23:''' Arbitration Committee rejected [[User:Dr.K.|Dr.K.]]:<br/> |
|||
{{cot| <ins>'''Not actionable because this topic area is not covered by discretionary sanctions.'''</ins> }} |
|||
<small>''This section is to be edited only by uninvolved administrators. Comments by others will be moved to the section above.''</small> |
|||
*The Arbitration Committee, in their infinite wisdom, determined that Cyprus [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia%3AArbitration%2FRequests%2FClarification_and_Amendment&diff=504461552&oldid=504460176 does not fall under these discretionary sanctions]. So unless I've missed something, this case is not currently actionable. [[User:Heimstern|Heimstern Läufer]] [[User talk:Heimstern|(talk)]] 04:23, 15 October 2014 (UTC) |
|||
*Agreed. Cyprus is not part of the Balkans and therefore not covered by the [[WP:ARBMAC]] discretionary sanctions. Closing as not actionable. <small><span style="border:1px solid black;padding:1px;">[[User:Sandstein|<font style="color:white;background:blue;font-family:sans-serif;">''' Sandstein '''</font>]]</span></small> 05:23, 15 October 2014 (UTC) |
|||
{{cob}}<br/> |
|||
'''15.10.2014:07.45:''' [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Northern_Cyprus&diff=629683076&oldid=629651029 I replace the edit whose protection is the consensus of the known Wiki users ([[User Talk:Alexikoua|Alexikoua]],[[User Talk:MelbourneStar|MelbourneStar]])].<br/> |
|||
'''15.10.2014:07.47:''' [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Northern_Cyprus&diff=next&oldid=629683076 [[User Talk:Dr.K.|Dr.K.]] reverted with edit summary "edit-war against consensus"]<br/> |
|||
'''E.''' There is a very clear '''Distortion of History''' of one of the related parties:<br/> |
|||
'''a.''' [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Turkish_invasion_of_Cyprus&diff=594624211&oldid=594598505 (09.02.2014) "'''hiding the name of the principal initiator''' of that war"]; <br/> |
|||
[[User:Dr.K.|Dr.Κ.]]: "The term "1974 Cyprus War" is misleading because it hides the name of the principal initiator of that war, which is Turkey"<br/> |
|||
{{cot| [[User:Alexyflemming|Alexyflemming]]: The disproofs:}} |
|||
Look at what you wrote a couple of lines below: [http://www.britannica.com/EBchecked/topic/359142/Makarios-III Britannica]: {{xt|In July 1974 the Greek Cypriot National Guard, whose officers were mainland Greeks, atempted a coup, planned by the ruling military junta in Athens, to achieve enosis.}}. Hence, you disprove yourself your "hiding principal initiator" arguement. Notice that, almost whatever is handled in Cyprus dispute, there is some degree of bias just as your new "principal initiator" arguement. It should be Wikipedia's neutrality aim to be free from this conflict of interests. Also, 15.07.1974, Coup and declaration of "Hellenic Republic of Cyprus", 19.07.1974, Makarios' speech at UN SG: "Cyprus invaded by Greece", 20.07.1974, Turkey's meddling. Are 15.07.1974 and 19.07.1974 not preceding 20.07.1974? {{xt|'''Are <br/> |
|||
- "coup", <br/> |
|||
- "Declaration of Hellenic Republic of Cyprus", "Enosis (union with Greece)", <br/> |
|||
- "Makarios(1st President of Cyprus, in UN SC meeting): "Cyprus was invaded by Greece"" not initiator for a war?'''}} <br/> |
|||
: The facts:<br/> |
|||
: 20.07.1974 (I-day): Turkey's military operation to Cyprus. <br/> |
|||
: 19.07.1974 (just 1 day before I-day): Makarios, 1st president of Cyprus, a Greek Cypriot, on United Nations Security Council Meeting: "Cyprus was invaded by Greece"<br/> |
|||
: 17.07.1974 (3 days before I-day): Nicos Sampson: "I declare "Hellenic Republic of Cyprus"" |
|||
: 15.07.1974 (5 days before I-day): Nicos Sampson finished Makarios with a coup." |
|||
{{cob}} |
|||
'''b.''' [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Cyprus&diff=597993932&oldid=597987311 (03.03.2014) '''island nation''' of Cyprus];<br/> |
|||
[[User:Dr.K.|Dr.Κ.]]: "Historically, the island and the island nation of Cyprus have been considered to be the same."<br/> |
|||
{{cot| [[User:Alexyflemming|Alexyflemming]]: The disproofs:}} |
|||
When one mentions a certain people as a nation, there appears at least one dominant character (religion, ethnicity, language, culture, etc.) in that people. What is the religion, ethnicity, language, culture of this "the" island "nation" pre-1571 and post 1571? Forget experts <ins>even beginners</ins> know that there is no "the" "nation" in Cyprus island. Pre-1571 it was "CatholicChristian/OrthodoxChristian", "Frankish&Italian/GreekCypriot", "Latin/Greek", "Latin/Helen"; post-1571 it was "Islam/OrthodoxChristian", "Turk/Greek", "Turkish/Greek", "Turk/Helen". There occurred lots of conflicts, struggles and wars for the last millennium within the people of Cyprus island since the people of Cyprus island is not a "nation". This "the" island "nation" injection of bias/pre-conditioning is rather a merit of a politician, not a fair Wikipedian.<br/> |
|||
As an expert, I want to redirect you to Makarios (1st President of Rep. of Cyprus, you know): <br/> |
|||
:This way, Makarios (1st President of Rep. of Cyprus) emphasized the absence of "the" "nation" of Cyprus island!:<br/> |
|||
:[http://www.thefreelibrary.com/Wild+Karpas+donkeys+at+risk+of+extinction.-a0217265508 Makarios:"Donkeys: the only true Cypriots on Cyprus"]<br/> |
|||
:[http://cyprusgreenparty.blogspot.com.tr/2008/04/greek-and-turkish-cypriots-join-up-to.html Makarios: "Donkeys: the only true Cypriots on Cyprus"]<br/> |
|||
:[http://core.kmi.open.ac.uk/download/pdf/44363.pdf Makarios:"There's only one living Cypriot in Cyprus and that is the Cypriot donkey"] |
|||
{{cob}} |
|||
'''c.''' [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Template_talk:History_of_Northern_Cyprus&diff=632211469&oldid=632197547 (03.11.2014) "'''forcible eviction'''"].<br/> |
|||
[[User:Dr.K.|Dr.Κ.]]: ""Northern Cyprus" ....is the result of forcible population evictions".<br/> |
|||
{{cot| [[User:Alexyflemming|Alexyflemming]]: The disproofs:}} |
|||
[[File:Remained Greek and Maronite Cypriots.png|thumb|thumb|Locations of orthodox Greek Cypriots and catholic Maronite Cypriots who chose to stay in north of Cyprus in 1975 and are still living in north of Cyprus in 2014]] |
|||
: Greek Cypriots in Rizokarpaso chose to stay in northern Cyprus in 1975, and now living in Northern Cyprus in 2014. |
|||
: Greek Cypriots in Agios Andronikos chose to stay in northern Cyprus in 1975, and now living in Northern Cyprus in 2014. |
|||
: Greek Cypriots in Agia Triada chose to stay in northern Cyprus in 1975, and now living in Northern Cyprus in 2014. |
|||
: Maronites in Asomatos chose to stay in northern Cyprus in 1975, and now living in Northern Cyprus in 2014. |
|||
: Maronites in Karpasia chose to stay in northern Cyprus in 1975, and now living in Northern Cyprus in 2014. |
|||
: Maronites in Kormakitis chose to stay in northern Cyprus in 1975, and now living in Northern Cyprus in 2014. |
|||
: Turkish Cypriots in Lemmossol chose to stay in southern Cyprus in 1975, and now living in Cyprus in 2014. |
|||
: All the rest chose voluntarily to switch the sides in 1975 according to [http://www.un.org/Docs/journal/asp/ws.asp?m=s/11789 "Voluntary Population Exchange Agreement on 02.08.1975" between Turkish and Greek Cypriots (Third Vienna Agreement)] under the auspices of United Nations. |
|||
: i.e. if all of the Greek Cypriots in Kyrenia had chosen to stay in northern Cyprus in 1975, and all of them now would be living in Northern Cyprus in 2014. |
|||
: Since this is so, the Greek Cypriots (who want to return Northern Cyprus) were/are/will be always rejected '''wherever they go''': |
|||
: '''USA Federal Court (09.10.2014)''': "..Greek Cypriots CANNOT CLAIM here that the government in control of Northern Cyprus gave their homes to Turkish Cypriots...." |
|||
: The news of the decision of the Court: (13.10.2014): http://www.courthousenews.com/2014/10/13/72392.htm |
|||
: The website of the case of the Court: http://dockets.justia.com/docket/district-of-columbia/dcdce/1:2009cv01967/139002 |
|||
: The decision of the Court.....: http://docs.justia.com/cases/federal/district-courts/district-of-columbia/dcdce/1:2009cv01967/139002/53 |
|||
: NOTE: Previously, '''The European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR)''' rejected Greek Cypriots' request to return Northern Cyprus. |
|||
: European Court of Human Rights (ECHR) ('''27.05.2010'''): (Tasos Asproftas: [Application no. 16079/90] and Marianna Petrakidou [Application no. 16081/90]): “The houses which the Greek Cypriots left in North Cyprus are not their homes any more because they have lived almost for all their lives in another place and they have no concrete and persisting links with the houses they claimed. Therefore Greek Cypriots have no right to return to the North.” Sources: |
|||
:<nowiki>http://hudoc.echr.coe.int/sites/eng/Pages/search.aspx#{"fulltext":["Asproftas"],"documentcollectionid2":["CASELAW"],"itemid":["001-98684"]} </nowiki> |
|||
:<nowiki>http://hudoc.echr.coe.int/sites/eng/Pages/search.aspx#{"fulltext":["Petrakidou"],"documentcollectionid2":["CASELAW"],"itemid":["001-98688"]}</nowiki> |
|||
{{cob}} |
|||
'''F.''' Since this "Distortion of History" is revealed very clearly, that related party used every insulting word towards me:<br/> |
|||
[[User Talk:Dr.K.|Dr.K.]] said [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Dr.K.&oldid=596955636&diff=prev"Silly" to me.]<br/> |
|||
[[User Talk:Neo ^|Neo ^]] said [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Alexyflemming&diff=629745857&oldid=629736718 "Paid Supporter" to me.]<br/> |
|||
Despite all these insulting words, I protected my common sense, and did not respond them in the way they are accustomed towards me.<br/> |
|||
[[User:Alexyflemming|Alexyflemming]] ([[User talk:Alexyflemming#top|talk]]) 20:44, 4 November 2014 (UTC)}}. |
Revision as of 20:44, 4 November 2014
Archieves | |
---|---|
As an expert on Northern Cyprus and Eastern Mediterranean, I have edits in all of the following Wikipedia pages since 2010:
Northern Cyprus, Talk:Northern Cyprus, Turkey
Politics: Foreign relations of Northern Cyprus, Cyprus dispute, Cypriot intercommunal violence, United Nations Security Council Resolution 541, 2014 Cyprus Joint Declaration, Human rights in Northern Cyprus, Exclusive economic zone, Mediterranean Oil Dispute, Military of Northern Cyprus, List of Republics
Demography: Population transfer, Population exchange between Greek and Turkish Cypriots, Cypriot refugees, Template:PopulationChartUnder1m, List of countries by population, List of sovereign states and dependent territories by population density,
Locations: Mediterranean Sea, Template:Municipalities of Northern Cyprus, Kyrenia, Güzelyurt District, Morphou, Famagusta, Trikomo, Cyprus, Ayios Andronikos, Cyprus, Ayios Seryios, Cyprus, Lefka, Karpass Peninsula, Bellapais
Transportation: Ercan International Airport, Nicosia International Airport
Education: Education in Northern Cyprus, Middle East Technical University Northern Cyprus Campus, Cyprus International University, University of Kyrenia
Sports: Sport in Northern Cyprus, World Pool-Billiard Association, European Pocket Billiard Federation, European Cyclists' Federation, Paragliding, Professional Football Leagues
Geography: List of countries by easternmost point, Pentadaktylos, List of countries by highest point, List of islands of Northern Cyprus, List of islands#Europe
Culture: List of top international rankings by country, Bayrak (TV Channel of Northern Cyprus)
Religion: Religions by country, Religion in Europe, Religion in Northern Cyprus
Tourism: Tourism in Northern Cyprus
Others: North Cyprus Red Crescent Society, Wikipedia talk:Categories for discussion/Log/2013 November 26 (Is Northern Cyprus a Eurasian country?), Cittaslow
Files: Long Beach Trikomo.jpg
United States Federal Court also Kicked Greek Cypriots
United States Federal Court: "..Greek Cypriots cannot claim that the government in control of Northern Cyprus gave their homes to Turkish Cypriots....Although the United States does not recognize it as a state, the TRNC purportedly operates as a democratic republic with a president, prime minister, legislature and judiciary...TRNC is not vulnerable to a lawsuit in Washington". Source.Alexyflemming (talk) 14:18, 14 October 2014 (UTC)
Not actionable because this topic area is not covered by discretionary sanctions.
|
---|
This section is to be edited only by uninvolved administrators. Comments by others will be moved to the section above.
|
- Wikipedia Arbitration Committee: "In our infinite wisdom, we determine that Cyprus does not fall under WP:ARBMAC discretionary sanction.
ANI
- Regarding this, you might want to consider WP:TLDR. I, for one, am not likely to read a wall of text such as that. - Sitush (talk) 10:00, 4 November 2014 (UTC)
![Stop icon](https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/thumb/4/42/Stop_x_nuvola.svg/40px-Stop_x_nuvola.svg.png)
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Diannaa (talk) 19:51, 4 November 2014 (UTC)Your long-term disruptive approach to editing on the topic of Cyprus is the reason for your block. Wikipedia is not the place to push a particular point of view on a subject. We need to present a balanced neutral view, especially in volatile topic areas. Your incredibly long talk page posts do not help generate collegial discussion, but rather are disruptive and counterproductive. Edit warring your preferred version of articles is also disruptive. Recent examples of edit warring: History of Northern Cyprus, Modern history of Cyprus, Northern Cyprus. -- Diannaa (talk) 19:51, 4 November 2014 (UTC)
![](https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/f/f6/Appointment_blue.svg/48px-Appointment_blue.svg.png)
Alexyflemming (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
B. We need to present a balanced neutral view, especially in volatile topic areas:
I defended that neutral point in various places and offered the usage of "neutral phrasing used by United Nations to describe the things in Cyprus dispute":
- United Nations's standard way of currently handling the issue is from neutral point of view always:
- United Nations' Official WebsiteUNFICYP Mandate: "...Following the hostilities of 1974, ..."
- United Nations' Official WebsiteUNFICYP Background: "Since the events of 1974, ..."
- The descriptions they qualify as "euphemisms"/"POV" are used by United Nations.
C. Your incredibly long talk page posts do not help generate collegial discussion, but rather are disruptive and counterproductive:
So, let you block every Wiki user that tries to explain things as much as clear? Lengthness of posts cannot be a blocking reason alone.
D. Edit warring your preferred version of articles is also disruptive:
I am not the 3RR violator. See the timeline of edits last time carefully to solve who violated 3RR for example:
- Bbb23: "@Dr.K.: (or anyone else who knows) is the earliest edit in the revert list way above a brand new addition or the restoration of material previously removed?"
15.10.2014:07.43: I added Arbitration Committee's decision "The Arbitration Committee, in their infinite wisdom, determined that Cyprus does not fall under WP:ARBMAC discretionary sanction" to Talk page of Northern Cyprus (to let Wiki users edit via keeping this in mind)
15.10.2014:07.48: Dr.K. immediately removed resulting decision of Arbitration Committee from Talk page of Northern Cyprus.
........
15.10.2014:07.47: Dr.Κ. also reverted my edit on Northern Cyprus in the pretext that "edit-war against consensus. (The reality is just the opposite. See below:) ".
But, Dr.Κ. distorted again: He presented as if there is a consensus on removing the relevant material!
14.10.2014; 20.16: (my first edit) after my first edit
14.10.2014:20.30: an unkown IP31 reverted my edit vandalistically on the pretext that "This is about a case a US court did not, actually hear.".
14.10.2014:21.42: Wikipedian Alexikoua reacted the unknown IP31's vandalism. (edit summary of Alexikoua: "rv essential part removal"). Alexikoua is a Hellen, but neutral like me.
15.10.2014:00.37: This time another unknown IP85 appeared and removed the edit without any edit summary. Hence, essentially removed the sourced context that Alexikoua opposes to be removed besides me.
15.10.2014:00.38: Wikipedian MelbourneStar reacted to the unknown IP85's vandalism and protected the edit.
15.10.2014:00.58: This time, Dr.K. appeared and reverted the edit with edit summary (Reverted 1 edit by MelbourneStar: Sorry Star. IP 31.xx was correct. Reverting undue POV-push by SPA. Please see Arbitration Enforcement report.) without waiting my defense in Arbitration Enforcement and the resulting decision of Arbitration Committee]].
15.10.2014:05.23: Arbitration Committee rejected Dr.K.:
Not actionable because this topic area is not covered by discretionary sanctions.
|
---|
This section is to be edited only by uninvolved administrators. Comments by others will be moved to the section above.
|
15.10.2014:07.45: I replace the edit whose protection is the consensus of the known Wiki users (Alexikoua,MelbourneStar).
15.10.2014:07.47: Dr.K. reverted with edit summary "edit-war against consensus"
E. There is a very clear Distortion of History of one of the related parties:
a. (09.02.2014) "hiding the name of the principal initiator of that war";
Dr.Κ.: "The term "1974 Cyprus War" is misleading because it hides the name of the principal initiator of that war, which is Turkey"
Alexyflemming: The disproofs:
|
---|
Look at what you wrote a couple of lines below: Britannica: In July 1974 the Greek Cypriot National Guard, whose officers were mainland Greeks, atempted a coup, planned by the ruling military junta in Athens, to achieve enosis.. Hence, you disprove yourself your "hiding principal initiator" arguement. Notice that, almost whatever is handled in Cyprus dispute, there is some degree of bias just as your new "principal initiator" arguement. It should be Wikipedia's neutrality aim to be free from this conflict of interests. Also, 15.07.1974, Coup and declaration of "Hellenic Republic of Cyprus", 19.07.1974, Makarios' speech at UN SG: "Cyprus invaded by Greece", 20.07.1974, Turkey's meddling. Are 15.07.1974 and 19.07.1974 not preceding 20.07.1974? Are
|
b. (03.03.2014) island nation of Cyprus;
Dr.Κ.: "Historically, the island and the island nation of Cyprus have been considered to be the same."
Alexyflemming: The disproofs:
|
---|
When one mentions a certain people as a nation, there appears at least one dominant character (religion, ethnicity, language, culture, etc.) in that people. What is the religion, ethnicity, language, culture of this "the" island "nation" pre-1571 and post 1571? Forget experts even beginners know that there is no "the" "nation" in Cyprus island. Pre-1571 it was "CatholicChristian/OrthodoxChristian", "Frankish&Italian/GreekCypriot", "Latin/Greek", "Latin/Helen"; post-1571 it was "Islam/OrthodoxChristian", "Turk/Greek", "Turkish/Greek", "Turk/Helen". There occurred lots of conflicts, struggles and wars for the last millennium within the people of Cyprus island since the people of Cyprus island is not a "nation". This "the" island "nation" injection of bias/pre-conditioning is rather a merit of a politician, not a fair Wikipedian. As an expert, I want to redirect you to Makarios (1st President of Rep. of Cyprus, you know):
|
c. (03.11.2014) "forcible eviction".
Dr.Κ.: ""Northern Cyprus" ....is the result of forcible population evictions".
Alexyflemming: The disproofs:
|
---|
![]()
|
F. Since this "Distortion of History" is revealed very clearly, that related party used every insulting word towards me:
Dr.K. said "Silly" to me.
Neo ^ said "Paid Supporter" to me.
Despite all these insulting words, I protected my common sense, and did not respond them in the way they are accustomed towards me.
Notes:
- In some cases, you may not in fact be blocked, or your block has already expired. Please check the list of active blocks. If no block is listed, then you have been autoblocked by the automated anti-vandalism systems. Please remove this request and follow these instructions instead for quick attention by an administrator.
- Please read our guide to appealing blocks to make sure that your unblock request will help your case. You may change your request at any time.
If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, replace this template with the following, replacing "blocking administrator" with the name of the blocking admin:
{{Unblock on hold |1=blocking administrator |2='''A.''' Diannaa, yes, [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Alexyflemming&diff=632464608&oldid=632459369 it is "Cyprus", not "Cypress"...]<br/> '''B.''' <q class="inline-quote-talk ">We need to present a balanced neutral view, especially in volatile topic areas:</q><br/> I defended that neutral point in various places and offered the usage of "neutral phrasing used by United Nations to describe the things in Cyprus dispute": : United Nations's standard way of currently handling the issue is from neutral point of view always:<br/> : <ins>'''[http://www.un.org/en/peacekeeping/missions/unficyp/mandate.shtml United Nations' Official Website]UNFICYP Mandate: "...Following the hostilities of 1974, ..."'''<ins> : <ins>'''[http://www.un.org/en/peacekeeping/missions/unficyp/background.shtml United Nations' Official Website]UNFICYP Background: "Since the events of 1974, ..." : <ins>'''The descriptions they qualify as "euphemisms"/"POV" are used by United Nations.'''</ins> '''C.''' <q class="inline-quote-talk ">Your incredibly long talk page posts do not help generate collegial discussion, but rather are disruptive and counterproductive:</q><br/> So, let you block every Wiki user that tries to explain things as much as clear? Lengthness of posts cannot be a blocking reason alone. '''D.''' <q class="inline-quote-talk ">Edit warring your preferred version of articles is also disruptive:</q> I am not the 3RR violator. See the timeline of edits last time carefully to solve who violated 3RR for example:<br/> *[[User:Bbb23|Bbb23]]: "<span class="template-ping">@[[User:Dr.K.|Dr.K.]]:</span> (or anyone else who knows) is the earliest edit in the revert list way above a brand new addition or the restoration of material previously removed?"<br/> '''15.10.2014:07.43:''' [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Northern_Cyprus&diff=prev&oldid=629682860 I added Arbitration Committee's decision "The Arbitration Committee, in their infinite wisdom, determined that Cyprus does not fall under WP:ARBMAC discretionary sanction" to Talk page of Northern Cyprus (to let Wiki users edit via keeping this in mind)]<br/> '''15.10.2014:07.48:''' [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Northern_Cyprus&diff=next&oldid=629682860 Dr.K. immediately removed resulting decision of Arbitration Committee from Talk page of Northern Cyprus.]<br/> ........<br/> '''15.10.2014:07.47:''' [[User:Dr.K.|Dr.Κ.]] also reverted my edit on Northern Cyprus in the pretext that "[https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Northern_Cyprus&diff=629683251&oldid=629683076 edit-war <ins>'''against consensus'''</ins>. (The reality is just the opposite. See below:) ]".<br/> But, [[User:Dr.K.|Dr.Κ.]] distorted again: He presented as if there is a consensus on removing the relevant material!<br/> '''14.10.2014; 20.16:''' (my first edit) after [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Northern_Cyprus&diff=629620638&oldid=629617637 my first edit] <br/> '''14.10.2014:20.30:''' an [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Northern_Cyprus&diff=629622269&oldid=629620638 unkown IP31 reverted my edit vandalistically] on the pretext that "This is about a case a US court did not, actually hear.".<br/> '''14.10.2014, 21.08:''' [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Northern_Cyprus&diff=prev&oldid=629626577 I then presented the USA Federal Court really heared the case and decided the verdict on Talk page. I have supplied USA Federal Court decision from the official website of the Court].<br/> '''14.10.2014:21.42:''' [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Northern_Cyprus&diff=next&oldid=629622269 Wikipedian [[User Talk:Alexikoua|Alexikoua]] reacted the unknown IP31's vandalism.] (edit summary of [[User Talk:Alexikoua|Alexikoua]]: "rv essential part removal"). [[User Talk:Alexikoua|Alexikoua]] is a Hellen, but neutral like me.<br/> '''15.10.2014:00.37:''' [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Northern_Cyprus&diff=next&oldid=629630417 This time another unknown IP85 appeared and removed the edit without any edit summary. Hence, essentially removed the sourced context that [[User Talk:Alexikoua|Alexikoua]] opposes to be removed besides me.]<br/> '''15.10.2014:00.38:''' Wikipedian [[User Talk:MelbourneStar|MelbourneStar]] [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Northern_Cyprus&diff=next&oldid=629648564 reacted to the unknown IP85's vandalism and protected the edit.]<br/> '''15.10.2014:00.58:''' [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Northern_Cyprus&diff=629651029&oldid=629648735 This time, [[User:Dr.K.|Dr.K.]] appeared and reverted the edit with edit summary (Reverted 1 edit by MelbourneStar: Sorry Star. IP 31.xx was correct. Reverting undue POV-push by SPA. Please see Arbitration Enforcement report.) without waiting my defense in Arbitration Enforcement and the resulting decision of Arbitration Committee]]]. '''15.10.2014:05.23:''' Arbitration Committee rejected [[User:Dr.K.|Dr.K.]]:<br/> <div style="margin-left:0"> {| class="mw-collapsible mw-archivedtalk mw-collapsed " style="background: transparent; text-align: left; border: 1px solid Silver; margin: 0.2em auto auto; width:100%; clear: both; padding: 1px;" |- ! style="background: #CCFFCC; font-size:87%; padding:0.2em 0.3em; text-align:center; " | <div style="font-size:115%;margin:0 4em"> <ins>'''Not actionable because this topic area is not covered by discretionary sanctions.'''</ins> </div> |- | style="border: solid 1px Silver; padding: 0.6em; background: White;" | <small>''This section is to be edited only by uninvolved administrators. Comments by others will be moved to the section above.''</small> *The Arbitration Committee, in their infinite wisdom, determined that Cyprus [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia%3AArbitration%2FRequests%2FClarification_and_Amendment&diff=504461552&oldid=504460176 does not fall under these discretionary sanctions]. So unless I've missed something, this case is not currently actionable. [[User:Heimstern|Heimstern Läufer]] [[User talk:Heimstern|(talk)]] 04:23, 15 October 2014 (UTC) *Agreed. Cyprus is not part of the Balkans and therefore not covered by the [[WP:ARBMAC]] discretionary sanctions. Closing as not actionable. <small><span style="border:1px solid black;padding:1px;">[[User:Sandstein|<font style="color:white;background:blue;font-family:sans-serif;">''' Sandstein '''</font>]]</span></small> 05:23, 15 October 2014 (UTC) |}</div><br/> '''15.10.2014:07.45:''' [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Northern_Cyprus&diff=629683076&oldid=629651029 I replace the edit whose protection is the consensus of the known Wiki users ([[User Talk:Alexikoua|Alexikoua]],[[User Talk:MelbourneStar|MelbourneStar]])].<br/> '''15.10.2014:07.47:''' [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Northern_Cyprus&diff=next&oldid=629683076 [[User Talk:Dr.K.|Dr.K.]] reverted with edit summary "edit-war against consensus"]<br/> '''E.''' There is a very clear '''Distortion of History''' of one of the related parties:<br/> '''a.''' [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Turkish_invasion_of_Cyprus&diff=594624211&oldid=594598505 (09.02.2014) "'''hiding the name of the principal initiator''' of that war"]; <br/> [[User:Dr.K.|Dr.Κ.]]: "The term "1974 Cyprus War" is misleading because it hides the name of the principal initiator of that war, which is Turkey"<br/> <div style="margin-left:0"> {| class="mw-collapsible mw-archivedtalk mw-collapsed " style="background: transparent; text-align: left; border: 1px solid Silver; margin: 0.2em auto auto; width:100%; clear: both; padding: 1px;" |- ! style="background: #CCFFCC; font-size:87%; padding:0.2em 0.3em; text-align:center; " | <div style="font-size:115%;margin:0 4em"> [[User:Alexyflemming|Alexyflemming]]: The disproofs:</div> |- | style="border: solid 1px Silver; padding: 0.6em; background: White;" | Look at what you wrote a couple of lines below: [http://www.britannica.com/EBchecked/topic/359142/Makarios-III Britannica]: <span class="example" style="font-family: Georgia, 'DejaVu Serif', serif; color: #006400;" >In July 1974 the Greek Cypriot National Guard, whose officers were mainland Greeks, atempted a coup, planned by the ruling military junta in Athens, to achieve enosis.</span>. Hence, you disprove yourself your "hiding principal initiator" arguement. Notice that, almost whatever is handled in Cyprus dispute, there is some degree of bias just as your new "principal initiator" arguement. It should be Wikipedia's neutrality aim to be free from this conflict of interests. Also, 15.07.1974, Coup and declaration of "Hellenic Republic of Cyprus", 19.07.1974, Makarios' speech at UN SG: "Cyprus invaded by Greece", 20.07.1974, Turkey's meddling. Are 15.07.1974 and 19.07.1974 not preceding 20.07.1974? <span class="example" style="font-family: Georgia, 'DejaVu Serif', serif; color: #006400;" >'''Are <br/> - "coup", <br/> - "Declaration of Hellenic Republic of Cyprus", "Enosis (union with Greece)", <br/> - "Makarios(1st President of Cyprus, in UN SC meeting): "Cyprus was invaded by Greece"" not initiator for a war?'''</span> <br/> : The facts:<br/> : 20.07.1974 (I-day): Turkey's military operation to Cyprus. <br/> : 19.07.1974 (just 1 day before I-day): Makarios, 1st president of Cyprus, a Greek Cypriot, on United Nations Security Council Meeting: "Cyprus was invaded by Greece"<br/> : 17.07.1974 (3 days before I-day): Nicos Sampson: "I declare "Hellenic Republic of Cyprus"" : 15.07.1974 (5 days before I-day): Nicos Sampson finished Makarios with a coup." |}</div> '''b.''' [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Cyprus&diff=597993932&oldid=597987311 (03.03.2014) '''island nation''' of Cyprus];<br/> [[User:Dr.K.|Dr.Κ.]]: "Historically, the island and the island nation of Cyprus have been considered to be the same."<br/> <div style="margin-left:0"> {| class="mw-collapsible mw-archivedtalk mw-collapsed " style="background: transparent; text-align: left; border: 1px solid Silver; margin: 0.2em auto auto; width:100%; clear: both; padding: 1px;" |- ! style="background: #CCFFCC; font-size:87%; padding:0.2em 0.3em; text-align:center; " | <div style="font-size:115%;margin:0 4em"> [[User:Alexyflemming|Alexyflemming]]: The disproofs:</div> |- | style="border: solid 1px Silver; padding: 0.6em; background: White;" | When one mentions a certain people as a nation, there appears at least one dominant character (religion, ethnicity, language, culture, etc.) in that people. What is the religion, ethnicity, language, culture of this "the" island "nation" pre-1571 and post 1571? Forget experts <ins>even beginners</ins> know that there is no "the" "nation" in Cyprus island. Pre-1571 it was "CatholicChristian/OrthodoxChristian", "Frankish&Italian/GreekCypriot", "Latin/Greek", "Latin/Helen"; post-1571 it was "Islam/OrthodoxChristian", "Turk/Greek", "Turkish/Greek", "Turk/Helen". There occurred lots of conflicts, struggles and wars for the last millennium within the people of Cyprus island since the people of Cyprus island is not a "nation". This "the" island "nation" injection of bias/pre-conditioning is rather a merit of a politician, not a fair Wikipedian.<br/> As an expert, I want to redirect you to Makarios (1st President of Rep. of Cyprus, you know): <br/> :This way, Makarios (1st President of Rep. of Cyprus) emphasized the absence of "the" "nation" of Cyprus island!:<br/> :[http://www.thefreelibrary.com/Wild+Karpas+donkeys+at+risk+of+extinction.-a0217265508 Makarios:"Donkeys: the only true Cypriots on Cyprus"]<br/> :[http://cyprusgreenparty.blogspot.com.tr/2008/04/greek-and-turkish-cypriots-join-up-to.html Makarios: "Donkeys: the only true Cypriots on Cyprus"]<br/> :[http://core.kmi.open.ac.uk/download/pdf/44363.pdf Makarios:"There's only one living Cypriot in Cyprus and that is the Cypriot donkey"] |}</div> '''c.''' [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Template_talk:History_of_Northern_Cyprus&diff=632211469&oldid=632197547 (03.11.2014) "'''forcible eviction'''"].<br/> [[User:Dr.K.|Dr.Κ.]]: ""Northern Cyprus" ....is the result of forcible population evictions".<br/> <div style="margin-left:0"> {| class="mw-collapsible mw-archivedtalk mw-collapsed " style="background: transparent; text-align: left; border: 1px solid Silver; margin: 0.2em auto auto; width:100%; clear: both; padding: 1px;" |- ! style="background: #CCFFCC; font-size:87%; padding:0.2em 0.3em; text-align:center; " | <div style="font-size:115%;margin:0 4em"> [[User:Alexyflemming|Alexyflemming]]: The disproofs:</div> |- | style="border: solid 1px Silver; padding: 0.6em; background: White;" | [[File:Remained Greek and Maronite Cypriots.png|thumb|thumb|Locations of orthodox Greek Cypriots and catholic Maronite Cypriots who chose to stay in north of Cyprus in 1975 and are still living in north of Cyprus in 2014]] : Greek Cypriots in Rizokarpaso chose to stay in northern Cyprus in 1975, and now living in Northern Cyprus in 2014. : Greek Cypriots in Agios Andronikos chose to stay in northern Cyprus in 1975, and now living in Northern Cyprus in 2014. : Greek Cypriots in Agia Triada chose to stay in northern Cyprus in 1975, and now living in Northern Cyprus in 2014. : Maronites in Asomatos chose to stay in northern Cyprus in 1975, and now living in Northern Cyprus in 2014. : Maronites in Karpasia chose to stay in northern Cyprus in 1975, and now living in Northern Cyprus in 2014. : Maronites in Kormakitis chose to stay in northern Cyprus in 1975, and now living in Northern Cyprus in 2014. : Turkish Cypriots in Lemmossol chose to stay in southern Cyprus in 1975, and now living in Cyprus in 2014. : All the rest chose voluntarily to switch the sides in 1975 according to [http://www.un.org/Docs/journal/asp/ws.asp?m=s/11789 "Voluntary Population Exchange Agreement on 02.08.1975" between Turkish and Greek Cypriots (Third Vienna Agreement)] under the auspices of United Nations. : i.e. if all of the Greek Cypriots in Kyrenia had chosen to stay in northern Cyprus in 1975, and all of them now would be living in Northern Cyprus in 2014. : Since this is so, the Greek Cypriots (who want to return Northern Cyprus) were/are/will be always rejected '''wherever they go''': : '''USA Federal Court (09.10.2014)''': "..Greek Cypriots CANNOT CLAIM here that the government in control of Northern Cyprus gave their homes to Turkish Cypriots...." : The news of the decision of the Court: (13.10.2014): http://www.courthousenews.com/2014/10/13/72392.htm : The website of the case of the Court: http://dockets.justia.com/docket/district-of-columbia/dcdce/1:2009cv01967/139002 : The decision of the Court.....: http://docs.justia.com/cases/federal/district-courts/district-of-columbia/dcdce/1:2009cv01967/139002/53 : NOTE: Previously, '''The European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR)''' rejected Greek Cypriots' request to return Northern Cyprus. : European Court of Human Rights (ECHR) ('''27.05.2010'''): (Tasos Asproftas: [Application no. 16079/90] and Marianna Petrakidou [Application no. 16081/90]): “The houses which the Greek Cypriots left in North Cyprus are not their homes any more because they have lived almost for all their lives in another place and they have no concrete and persisting links with the houses they claimed. Therefore Greek Cypriots have no right to return to the North.” Sources: :http://hudoc.echr.coe.int/sites/eng/Pages/search.aspx#{"fulltext":["Asproftas"],"documentcollectionid2":["CASELAW"],"itemid":["001-98684"]} :http://hudoc.echr.coe.int/sites/eng/Pages/search.aspx#{"fulltext":["Petrakidou"],"documentcollectionid2":["CASELAW"],"itemid":["001-98688"]} |}</div> '''F.''' Since this "Distortion of History" is revealed very clearly, that related party used every insulting word towards me:<br/> [[User Talk:Dr.K.|Dr.K.]] said [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Dr.K.&oldid=596955636&diff=prev"Silly" to me.]<br/> [[User Talk:Neo ^|Neo ^]] said [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Alexyflemming&diff=629745857&oldid=629736718 "Paid Supporter" to me.]<br/> Despite all these insulting words, I protected my common sense, and did not respond them in the way they are accustomed towards me.<br/> [[User:Alexyflemming|Alexyflemming]] ([[User talk:Alexyflemming#top|talk]]) 20:44, 4 November 2014 (UTC) |3 = ~~~~}}
If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following code, substituting {{subst:Decline reason here}}
with a specific rationale. Leaving the decline reason unchanged will result in display of a default reason, explaining why the request was declined.
{{unblock reviewed |1='''A.''' Diannaa, yes, [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Alexyflemming&diff=632464608&oldid=632459369 it is "Cyprus", not "Cypress"...]<br/> '''B.''' <q class="inline-quote-talk ">We need to present a balanced neutral view, especially in volatile topic areas:</q><br/> I defended that neutral point in various places and offered the usage of "neutral phrasing used by United Nations to describe the things in Cyprus dispute": : United Nations's standard way of currently handling the issue is from neutral point of view always:<br/> : <ins>'''[http://www.un.org/en/peacekeeping/missions/unficyp/mandate.shtml United Nations' Official Website]UNFICYP Mandate: "...Following the hostilities of 1974, ..."'''<ins> : <ins>'''[http://www.un.org/en/peacekeeping/missions/unficyp/background.shtml United Nations' Official Website]UNFICYP Background: "Since the events of 1974, ..." : <ins>'''The descriptions they qualify as "euphemisms"/"POV" are used by United Nations.'''</ins> '''C.''' <q class="inline-quote-talk ">Your incredibly long talk page posts do not help generate collegial discussion, but rather are disruptive and counterproductive:</q><br/> So, let you block every Wiki user that tries to explain things as much as clear? Lengthness of posts cannot be a blocking reason alone. '''D.''' <q class="inline-quote-talk ">Edit warring your preferred version of articles is also disruptive:</q> I am not the 3RR violator. See the timeline of edits last time carefully to solve who violated 3RR for example:<br/> *[[User:Bbb23|Bbb23]]: "<span class="template-ping">@[[User:Dr.K.|Dr.K.]]:</span> (or anyone else who knows) is the earliest edit in the revert list way above a brand new addition or the restoration of material previously removed?"<br/> '''15.10.2014:07.43:''' [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Northern_Cyprus&diff=prev&oldid=629682860 I added Arbitration Committee's decision "The Arbitration Committee, in their infinite wisdom, determined that Cyprus does not fall under WP:ARBMAC discretionary sanction" to Talk page of Northern Cyprus (to let Wiki users edit via keeping this in mind)]<br/> '''15.10.2014:07.48:''' [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Northern_Cyprus&diff=next&oldid=629682860 Dr.K. immediately removed resulting decision of Arbitration Committee from Talk page of Northern Cyprus.]<br/> ........<br/> '''15.10.2014:07.47:''' [[User:Dr.K.|Dr.Κ.]] also reverted my edit on Northern Cyprus in the pretext that "[https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Northern_Cyprus&diff=629683251&oldid=629683076 edit-war <ins>'''against consensus'''</ins>. (The reality is just the opposite. See below:) ]".<br/> But, [[User:Dr.K.|Dr.Κ.]] distorted again: He presented as if there is a consensus on removing the relevant material!<br/> '''14.10.2014; 20.16:''' (my first edit) after [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Northern_Cyprus&diff=629620638&oldid=629617637 my first edit] <br/> '''14.10.2014:20.30:''' an [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Northern_Cyprus&diff=629622269&oldid=629620638 unkown IP31 reverted my edit vandalistically] on the pretext that "This is about a case a US court did not, actually hear.".<br/> '''14.10.2014, 21.08:''' [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Northern_Cyprus&diff=prev&oldid=629626577 I then presented the USA Federal Court really heared the case and decided the verdict on Talk page. I have supplied USA Federal Court decision from the official website of the Court].<br/> '''14.10.2014:21.42:''' [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Northern_Cyprus&diff=next&oldid=629622269 Wikipedian [[User Talk:Alexikoua|Alexikoua]] reacted the unknown IP31's vandalism.] (edit summary of [[User Talk:Alexikoua|Alexikoua]]: "rv essential part removal"). [[User Talk:Alexikoua|Alexikoua]] is a Hellen, but neutral like me.<br/> '''15.10.2014:00.37:''' [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Northern_Cyprus&diff=next&oldid=629630417 This time another unknown IP85 appeared and removed the edit without any edit summary. Hence, essentially removed the sourced context that [[User Talk:Alexikoua|Alexikoua]] opposes to be removed besides me.]<br/> '''15.10.2014:00.38:''' Wikipedian [[User Talk:MelbourneStar|MelbourneStar]] [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Northern_Cyprus&diff=next&oldid=629648564 reacted to the unknown IP85's vandalism and protected the edit.]<br/> '''15.10.2014:00.58:''' [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Northern_Cyprus&diff=629651029&oldid=629648735 This time, [[User:Dr.K.|Dr.K.]] appeared and reverted the edit with edit summary (Reverted 1 edit by MelbourneStar: Sorry Star. IP 31.xx was correct. Reverting undue POV-push by SPA. Please see Arbitration Enforcement report.) without waiting my defense in Arbitration Enforcement and the resulting decision of Arbitration Committee]]]. '''15.10.2014:05.23:''' Arbitration Committee rejected [[User:Dr.K.|Dr.K.]]:<br/> <div style="margin-left:0"> {| class="mw-collapsible mw-archivedtalk mw-collapsed " style="background: transparent; text-align: left; border: 1px solid Silver; margin: 0.2em auto auto; width:100%; clear: both; padding: 1px;" |- ! style="background: #CCFFCC; font-size:87%; padding:0.2em 0.3em; text-align:center; " | <div style="font-size:115%;margin:0 4em"> <ins>'''Not actionable because this topic area is not covered by discretionary sanctions.'''</ins> </div> |- | style="border: solid 1px Silver; padding: 0.6em; background: White;" | <small>''This section is to be edited only by uninvolved administrators. Comments by others will be moved to the section above.''</small> *The Arbitration Committee, in their infinite wisdom, determined that Cyprus [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia%3AArbitration%2FRequests%2FClarification_and_Amendment&diff=504461552&oldid=504460176 does not fall under these discretionary sanctions]. So unless I've missed something, this case is not currently actionable. [[User:Heimstern|Heimstern Läufer]] [[User talk:Heimstern|(talk)]] 04:23, 15 October 2014 (UTC) *Agreed. Cyprus is not part of the Balkans and therefore not covered by the [[WP:ARBMAC]] discretionary sanctions. Closing as not actionable. <small><span style="border:1px solid black;padding:1px;">[[User:Sandstein|<font style="color:white;background:blue;font-family:sans-serif;">''' Sandstein '''</font>]]</span></small> 05:23, 15 October 2014 (UTC) |}</div><br/> '''15.10.2014:07.45:''' [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Northern_Cyprus&diff=629683076&oldid=629651029 I replace the edit whose protection is the consensus of the known Wiki users ([[User Talk:Alexikoua|Alexikoua]],[[User Talk:MelbourneStar|MelbourneStar]])].<br/> '''15.10.2014:07.47:''' [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Northern_Cyprus&diff=next&oldid=629683076 [[User Talk:Dr.K.|Dr.K.]] reverted with edit summary "edit-war against consensus"]<br/> '''E.''' There is a very clear '''Distortion of History''' of one of the related parties:<br/> '''a.''' [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Turkish_invasion_of_Cyprus&diff=594624211&oldid=594598505 (09.02.2014) "'''hiding the name of the principal initiator''' of that war"]; <br/> [[User:Dr.K.|Dr.Κ.]]: "The term "1974 Cyprus War" is misleading because it hides the name of the principal initiator of that war, which is Turkey"<br/> <div style="margin-left:0"> {| class="mw-collapsible mw-archivedtalk mw-collapsed " style="background: transparent; text-align: left; border: 1px solid Silver; margin: 0.2em auto auto; width:100%; clear: both; padding: 1px;" |- ! style="background: #CCFFCC; font-size:87%; padding:0.2em 0.3em; text-align:center; " | <div style="font-size:115%;margin:0 4em"> [[User:Alexyflemming|Alexyflemming]]: The disproofs:</div> |- | style="border: solid 1px Silver; padding: 0.6em; background: White;" | Look at what you wrote a couple of lines below: [http://www.britannica.com/EBchecked/topic/359142/Makarios-III Britannica]: <span class="example" style="font-family: Georgia, 'DejaVu Serif', serif; color: #006400;" >In July 1974 the Greek Cypriot National Guard, whose officers were mainland Greeks, atempted a coup, planned by the ruling military junta in Athens, to achieve enosis.</span>. Hence, you disprove yourself your "hiding principal initiator" arguement. Notice that, almost whatever is handled in Cyprus dispute, there is some degree of bias just as your new "principal initiator" arguement. It should be Wikipedia's neutrality aim to be free from this conflict of interests. Also, 15.07.1974, Coup and declaration of "Hellenic Republic of Cyprus", 19.07.1974, Makarios' speech at UN SG: "Cyprus invaded by Greece", 20.07.1974, Turkey's meddling. Are 15.07.1974 and 19.07.1974 not preceding 20.07.1974? <span class="example" style="font-family: Georgia, 'DejaVu Serif', serif; color: #006400;" >'''Are <br/> - "coup", <br/> - "Declaration of Hellenic Republic of Cyprus", "Enosis (union with Greece)", <br/> - "Makarios(1st President of Cyprus, in UN SC meeting): "Cyprus was invaded by Greece"" not initiator for a war?'''</span> <br/> : The facts:<br/> : 20.07.1974 (I-day): Turkey's military operation to Cyprus. <br/> : 19.07.1974 (just 1 day before I-day): Makarios, 1st president of Cyprus, a Greek Cypriot, on United Nations Security Council Meeting: "Cyprus was invaded by Greece"<br/> : 17.07.1974 (3 days before I-day): Nicos Sampson: "I declare "Hellenic Republic of Cyprus"" : 15.07.1974 (5 days before I-day): Nicos Sampson finished Makarios with a coup." |}</div> '''b.''' [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Cyprus&diff=597993932&oldid=597987311 (03.03.2014) '''island nation''' of Cyprus];<br/> [[User:Dr.K.|Dr.Κ.]]: "Historically, the island and the island nation of Cyprus have been considered to be the same."<br/> <div style="margin-left:0"> {| class="mw-collapsible mw-archivedtalk mw-collapsed " style="background: transparent; text-align: left; border: 1px solid Silver; margin: 0.2em auto auto; width:100%; clear: both; padding: 1px;" |- ! style="background: #CCFFCC; font-size:87%; padding:0.2em 0.3em; text-align:center; " | <div style="font-size:115%;margin:0 4em"> [[User:Alexyflemming|Alexyflemming]]: The disproofs:</div> |- | style="border: solid 1px Silver; padding: 0.6em; background: White;" | When one mentions a certain people as a nation, there appears at least one dominant character (religion, ethnicity, language, culture, etc.) in that people. What is the religion, ethnicity, language, culture of this "the" island "nation" pre-1571 and post 1571? Forget experts <ins>even beginners</ins> know that there is no "the" "nation" in Cyprus island. Pre-1571 it was "CatholicChristian/OrthodoxChristian", "Frankish&Italian/GreekCypriot", "Latin/Greek", "Latin/Helen"; post-1571 it was "Islam/OrthodoxChristian", "Turk/Greek", "Turkish/Greek", "Turk/Helen". There occurred lots of conflicts, struggles and wars for the last millennium within the people of Cyprus island since the people of Cyprus island is not a "nation". This "the" island "nation" injection of bias/pre-conditioning is rather a merit of a politician, not a fair Wikipedian.<br/> As an expert, I want to redirect you to Makarios (1st President of Rep. of Cyprus, you know): <br/> :This way, Makarios (1st President of Rep. of Cyprus) emphasized the absence of "the" "nation" of Cyprus island!:<br/> :[http://www.thefreelibrary.com/Wild+Karpas+donkeys+at+risk+of+extinction.-a0217265508 Makarios:"Donkeys: the only true Cypriots on Cyprus"]<br/> :[http://cyprusgreenparty.blogspot.com.tr/2008/04/greek-and-turkish-cypriots-join-up-to.html Makarios: "Donkeys: the only true Cypriots on Cyprus"]<br/> :[http://core.kmi.open.ac.uk/download/pdf/44363.pdf Makarios:"There's only one living Cypriot in Cyprus and that is the Cypriot donkey"] |}</div> '''c.''' [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Template_talk:History_of_Northern_Cyprus&diff=632211469&oldid=632197547 (03.11.2014) "'''forcible eviction'''"].<br/> [[User:Dr.K.|Dr.Κ.]]: ""Northern Cyprus" ....is the result of forcible population evictions".<br/> <div style="margin-left:0"> {| class="mw-collapsible mw-archivedtalk mw-collapsed " style="background: transparent; text-align: left; border: 1px solid Silver; margin: 0.2em auto auto; width:100%; clear: both; padding: 1px;" |- ! style="background: #CCFFCC; font-size:87%; padding:0.2em 0.3em; text-align:center; " | <div style="font-size:115%;margin:0 4em"> [[User:Alexyflemming|Alexyflemming]]: The disproofs:</div> |- | style="border: solid 1px Silver; padding: 0.6em; background: White;" | [[File:Remained Greek and Maronite Cypriots.png|thumb|thumb|Locations of orthodox Greek Cypriots and catholic Maronite Cypriots who chose to stay in north of Cyprus in 1975 and are still living in north of Cyprus in 2014]] : Greek Cypriots in Rizokarpaso chose to stay in northern Cyprus in 1975, and now living in Northern Cyprus in 2014. : Greek Cypriots in Agios Andronikos chose to stay in northern Cyprus in 1975, and now living in Northern Cyprus in 2014. : Greek Cypriots in Agia Triada chose to stay in northern Cyprus in 1975, and now living in Northern Cyprus in 2014. : Maronites in Asomatos chose to stay in northern Cyprus in 1975, and now living in Northern Cyprus in 2014. : Maronites in Karpasia chose to stay in northern Cyprus in 1975, and now living in Northern Cyprus in 2014. : Maronites in Kormakitis chose to stay in northern Cyprus in 1975, and now living in Northern Cyprus in 2014. : Turkish Cypriots in Lemmossol chose to stay in southern Cyprus in 1975, and now living in Cyprus in 2014. : All the rest chose voluntarily to switch the sides in 1975 according to [http://www.un.org/Docs/journal/asp/ws.asp?m=s/11789 "Voluntary Population Exchange Agreement on 02.08.1975" between Turkish and Greek Cypriots (Third Vienna Agreement)] under the auspices of United Nations. : i.e. if all of the Greek Cypriots in Kyrenia had chosen to stay in northern Cyprus in 1975, and all of them now would be living in Northern Cyprus in 2014. : Since this is so, the Greek Cypriots (who want to return Northern Cyprus) were/are/will be always rejected '''wherever they go''': : '''USA Federal Court (09.10.2014)''': "..Greek Cypriots CANNOT CLAIM here that the government in control of Northern Cyprus gave their homes to Turkish Cypriots...." : The news of the decision of the Court: (13.10.2014): http://www.courthousenews.com/2014/10/13/72392.htm : The website of the case of the Court: http://dockets.justia.com/docket/district-of-columbia/dcdce/1:2009cv01967/139002 : The decision of the Court.....: http://docs.justia.com/cases/federal/district-courts/district-of-columbia/dcdce/1:2009cv01967/139002/53 : NOTE: Previously, '''The European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR)''' rejected Greek Cypriots' request to return Northern Cyprus. : European Court of Human Rights (ECHR) ('''27.05.2010'''): (Tasos Asproftas: [Application no. 16079/90] and Marianna Petrakidou [Application no. 16081/90]): “The houses which the Greek Cypriots left in North Cyprus are not their homes any more because they have lived almost for all their lives in another place and they have no concrete and persisting links with the houses they claimed. Therefore Greek Cypriots have no right to return to the North.” Sources: :http://hudoc.echr.coe.int/sites/eng/Pages/search.aspx#{"fulltext":["Asproftas"],"documentcollectionid2":["CASELAW"],"itemid":["001-98684"]} :http://hudoc.echr.coe.int/sites/eng/Pages/search.aspx#{"fulltext":["Petrakidou"],"documentcollectionid2":["CASELAW"],"itemid":["001-98688"]} |}</div> '''F.''' Since this "Distortion of History" is revealed very clearly, that related party used every insulting word towards me:<br/> [[User Talk:Dr.K.|Dr.K.]] said [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Dr.K.&oldid=596955636&diff=prev"Silly" to me.]<br/> [[User Talk:Neo ^|Neo ^]] said [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Alexyflemming&diff=629745857&oldid=629736718 "Paid Supporter" to me.]<br/> Despite all these insulting words, I protected my common sense, and did not respond them in the way they are accustomed towards me.<br/> [[User:Alexyflemming|Alexyflemming]] ([[User talk:Alexyflemming#top|talk]]) 20:44, 4 November 2014 (UTC) |decline = {{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}
If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting Accept reason here
with your rationale:
{{unblock reviewed |1='''A.''' Diannaa, yes, [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Alexyflemming&diff=632464608&oldid=632459369 it is "Cyprus", not "Cypress"...]<br/> '''B.''' <q class="inline-quote-talk ">We need to present a balanced neutral view, especially in volatile topic areas:</q><br/> I defended that neutral point in various places and offered the usage of "neutral phrasing used by United Nations to describe the things in Cyprus dispute": : United Nations's standard way of currently handling the issue is from neutral point of view always:<br/> : <ins>'''[http://www.un.org/en/peacekeeping/missions/unficyp/mandate.shtml United Nations' Official Website]UNFICYP Mandate: "...Following the hostilities of 1974, ..."'''<ins> : <ins>'''[http://www.un.org/en/peacekeeping/missions/unficyp/background.shtml United Nations' Official Website]UNFICYP Background: "Since the events of 1974, ..." : <ins>'''The descriptions they qualify as "euphemisms"/"POV" are used by United Nations.'''</ins> '''C.''' <q class="inline-quote-talk ">Your incredibly long talk page posts do not help generate collegial discussion, but rather are disruptive and counterproductive:</q><br/> So, let you block every Wiki user that tries to explain things as much as clear? Lengthness of posts cannot be a blocking reason alone. '''D.''' <q class="inline-quote-talk ">Edit warring your preferred version of articles is also disruptive:</q> I am not the 3RR violator. See the timeline of edits last time carefully to solve who violated 3RR for example:<br/> *[[User:Bbb23|Bbb23]]: "<span class="template-ping">@[[User:Dr.K.|Dr.K.]]:</span> (or anyone else who knows) is the earliest edit in the revert list way above a brand new addition or the restoration of material previously removed?"<br/> '''15.10.2014:07.43:''' [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Northern_Cyprus&diff=prev&oldid=629682860 I added Arbitration Committee's decision "The Arbitration Committee, in their infinite wisdom, determined that Cyprus does not fall under WP:ARBMAC discretionary sanction" to Talk page of Northern Cyprus (to let Wiki users edit via keeping this in mind)]<br/> '''15.10.2014:07.48:''' [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Northern_Cyprus&diff=next&oldid=629682860 Dr.K. immediately removed resulting decision of Arbitration Committee from Talk page of Northern Cyprus.]<br/> ........<br/> '''15.10.2014:07.47:''' [[User:Dr.K.|Dr.Κ.]] also reverted my edit on Northern Cyprus in the pretext that "[https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Northern_Cyprus&diff=629683251&oldid=629683076 edit-war <ins>'''against consensus'''</ins>. (The reality is just the opposite. See below:) ]".<br/> But, [[User:Dr.K.|Dr.Κ.]] distorted again: He presented as if there is a consensus on removing the relevant material!<br/> '''14.10.2014; 20.16:''' (my first edit) after [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Northern_Cyprus&diff=629620638&oldid=629617637 my first edit] <br/> '''14.10.2014:20.30:''' an [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Northern_Cyprus&diff=629622269&oldid=629620638 unkown IP31 reverted my edit vandalistically] on the pretext that "This is about a case a US court did not, actually hear.".<br/> '''14.10.2014, 21.08:''' [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Northern_Cyprus&diff=prev&oldid=629626577 I then presented the USA Federal Court really heared the case and decided the verdict on Talk page. I have supplied USA Federal Court decision from the official website of the Court].<br/> '''14.10.2014:21.42:''' [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Northern_Cyprus&diff=next&oldid=629622269 Wikipedian [[User Talk:Alexikoua|Alexikoua]] reacted the unknown IP31's vandalism.] (edit summary of [[User Talk:Alexikoua|Alexikoua]]: "rv essential part removal"). [[User Talk:Alexikoua|Alexikoua]] is a Hellen, but neutral like me.<br/> '''15.10.2014:00.37:''' [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Northern_Cyprus&diff=next&oldid=629630417 This time another unknown IP85 appeared and removed the edit without any edit summary. Hence, essentially removed the sourced context that [[User Talk:Alexikoua|Alexikoua]] opposes to be removed besides me.]<br/> '''15.10.2014:00.38:''' Wikipedian [[User Talk:MelbourneStar|MelbourneStar]] [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Northern_Cyprus&diff=next&oldid=629648564 reacted to the unknown IP85's vandalism and protected the edit.]<br/> '''15.10.2014:00.58:''' [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Northern_Cyprus&diff=629651029&oldid=629648735 This time, [[User:Dr.K.|Dr.K.]] appeared and reverted the edit with edit summary (Reverted 1 edit by MelbourneStar: Sorry Star. IP 31.xx was correct. Reverting undue POV-push by SPA. Please see Arbitration Enforcement report.) without waiting my defense in Arbitration Enforcement and the resulting decision of Arbitration Committee]]]. '''15.10.2014:05.23:''' Arbitration Committee rejected [[User:Dr.K.|Dr.K.]]:<br/> <div style="margin-left:0"> {| class="mw-collapsible mw-archivedtalk mw-collapsed " style="background: transparent; text-align: left; border: 1px solid Silver; margin: 0.2em auto auto; width:100%; clear: both; padding: 1px;" |- ! style="background: #CCFFCC; font-size:87%; padding:0.2em 0.3em; text-align:center; " | <div style="font-size:115%;margin:0 4em"> <ins>'''Not actionable because this topic area is not covered by discretionary sanctions.'''</ins> </div> |- | style="border: solid 1px Silver; padding: 0.6em; background: White;" | <small>''This section is to be edited only by uninvolved administrators. Comments by others will be moved to the section above.''</small> *The Arbitration Committee, in their infinite wisdom, determined that Cyprus [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia%3AArbitration%2FRequests%2FClarification_and_Amendment&diff=504461552&oldid=504460176 does not fall under these discretionary sanctions]. So unless I've missed something, this case is not currently actionable. [[User:Heimstern|Heimstern Läufer]] [[User talk:Heimstern|(talk)]] 04:23, 15 October 2014 (UTC) *Agreed. Cyprus is not part of the Balkans and therefore not covered by the [[WP:ARBMAC]] discretionary sanctions. Closing as not actionable. <small><span style="border:1px solid black;padding:1px;">[[User:Sandstein|<font style="color:white;background:blue;font-family:sans-serif;">''' Sandstein '''</font>]]</span></small> 05:23, 15 October 2014 (UTC) |}</div><br/> '''15.10.2014:07.45:''' [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Northern_Cyprus&diff=629683076&oldid=629651029 I replace the edit whose protection is the consensus of the known Wiki users ([[User Talk:Alexikoua|Alexikoua]],[[User Talk:MelbourneStar|MelbourneStar]])].<br/> '''15.10.2014:07.47:''' [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Northern_Cyprus&diff=next&oldid=629683076 [[User Talk:Dr.K.|Dr.K.]] reverted with edit summary "edit-war against consensus"]<br/> '''E.''' There is a very clear '''Distortion of History''' of one of the related parties:<br/> '''a.''' [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Turkish_invasion_of_Cyprus&diff=594624211&oldid=594598505 (09.02.2014) "'''hiding the name of the principal initiator''' of that war"]; <br/> [[User:Dr.K.|Dr.Κ.]]: "The term "1974 Cyprus War" is misleading because it hides the name of the principal initiator of that war, which is Turkey"<br/> <div style="margin-left:0"> {| class="mw-collapsible mw-archivedtalk mw-collapsed " style="background: transparent; text-align: left; border: 1px solid Silver; margin: 0.2em auto auto; width:100%; clear: both; padding: 1px;" |- ! style="background: #CCFFCC; font-size:87%; padding:0.2em 0.3em; text-align:center; " | <div style="font-size:115%;margin:0 4em"> [[User:Alexyflemming|Alexyflemming]]: The disproofs:</div> |- | style="border: solid 1px Silver; padding: 0.6em; background: White;" | Look at what you wrote a couple of lines below: [http://www.britannica.com/EBchecked/topic/359142/Makarios-III Britannica]: <span class="example" style="font-family: Georgia, 'DejaVu Serif', serif; color: #006400;" >In July 1974 the Greek Cypriot National Guard, whose officers were mainland Greeks, atempted a coup, planned by the ruling military junta in Athens, to achieve enosis.</span>. Hence, you disprove yourself your "hiding principal initiator" arguement. Notice that, almost whatever is handled in Cyprus dispute, there is some degree of bias just as your new "principal initiator" arguement. It should be Wikipedia's neutrality aim to be free from this conflict of interests. Also, 15.07.1974, Coup and declaration of "Hellenic Republic of Cyprus", 19.07.1974, Makarios' speech at UN SG: "Cyprus invaded by Greece", 20.07.1974, Turkey's meddling. Are 15.07.1974 and 19.07.1974 not preceding 20.07.1974? <span class="example" style="font-family: Georgia, 'DejaVu Serif', serif; color: #006400;" >'''Are <br/> - "coup", <br/> - "Declaration of Hellenic Republic of Cyprus", "Enosis (union with Greece)", <br/> - "Makarios(1st President of Cyprus, in UN SC meeting): "Cyprus was invaded by Greece"" not initiator for a war?'''</span> <br/> : The facts:<br/> : 20.07.1974 (I-day): Turkey's military operation to Cyprus. <br/> : 19.07.1974 (just 1 day before I-day): Makarios, 1st president of Cyprus, a Greek Cypriot, on United Nations Security Council Meeting: "Cyprus was invaded by Greece"<br/> : 17.07.1974 (3 days before I-day): Nicos Sampson: "I declare "Hellenic Republic of Cyprus"" : 15.07.1974 (5 days before I-day): Nicos Sampson finished Makarios with a coup." |}</div> '''b.''' [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Cyprus&diff=597993932&oldid=597987311 (03.03.2014) '''island nation''' of Cyprus];<br/> [[User:Dr.K.|Dr.Κ.]]: "Historically, the island and the island nation of Cyprus have been considered to be the same."<br/> <div style="margin-left:0"> {| class="mw-collapsible mw-archivedtalk mw-collapsed " style="background: transparent; text-align: left; border: 1px solid Silver; margin: 0.2em auto auto; width:100%; clear: both; padding: 1px;" |- ! style="background: #CCFFCC; font-size:87%; padding:0.2em 0.3em; text-align:center; " | <div style="font-size:115%;margin:0 4em"> [[User:Alexyflemming|Alexyflemming]]: The disproofs:</div> |- | style="border: solid 1px Silver; padding: 0.6em; background: White;" | When one mentions a certain people as a nation, there appears at least one dominant character (religion, ethnicity, language, culture, etc.) in that people. What is the religion, ethnicity, language, culture of this "the" island "nation" pre-1571 and post 1571? Forget experts <ins>even beginners</ins> know that there is no "the" "nation" in Cyprus island. Pre-1571 it was "CatholicChristian/OrthodoxChristian", "Frankish&Italian/GreekCypriot", "Latin/Greek", "Latin/Helen"; post-1571 it was "Islam/OrthodoxChristian", "Turk/Greek", "Turkish/Greek", "Turk/Helen". There occurred lots of conflicts, struggles and wars for the last millennium within the people of Cyprus island since the people of Cyprus island is not a "nation". This "the" island "nation" injection of bias/pre-conditioning is rather a merit of a politician, not a fair Wikipedian.<br/> As an expert, I want to redirect you to Makarios (1st President of Rep. of Cyprus, you know): <br/> :This way, Makarios (1st President of Rep. of Cyprus) emphasized the absence of "the" "nation" of Cyprus island!:<br/> :[http://www.thefreelibrary.com/Wild+Karpas+donkeys+at+risk+of+extinction.-a0217265508 Makarios:"Donkeys: the only true Cypriots on Cyprus"]<br/> :[http://cyprusgreenparty.blogspot.com.tr/2008/04/greek-and-turkish-cypriots-join-up-to.html Makarios: "Donkeys: the only true Cypriots on Cyprus"]<br/> :[http://core.kmi.open.ac.uk/download/pdf/44363.pdf Makarios:"There's only one living Cypriot in Cyprus and that is the Cypriot donkey"] |}</div> '''c.''' [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Template_talk:History_of_Northern_Cyprus&diff=632211469&oldid=632197547 (03.11.2014) "'''forcible eviction'''"].<br/> [[User:Dr.K.|Dr.Κ.]]: ""Northern Cyprus" ....is the result of forcible population evictions".<br/> <div style="margin-left:0"> {| class="mw-collapsible mw-archivedtalk mw-collapsed " style="background: transparent; text-align: left; border: 1px solid Silver; margin: 0.2em auto auto; width:100%; clear: both; padding: 1px;" |- ! style="background: #CCFFCC; font-size:87%; padding:0.2em 0.3em; text-align:center; " | <div style="font-size:115%;margin:0 4em"> [[User:Alexyflemming|Alexyflemming]]: The disproofs:</div> |- | style="border: solid 1px Silver; padding: 0.6em; background: White;" | [[File:Remained Greek and Maronite Cypriots.png|thumb|thumb|Locations of orthodox Greek Cypriots and catholic Maronite Cypriots who chose to stay in north of Cyprus in 1975 and are still living in north of Cyprus in 2014]] : Greek Cypriots in Rizokarpaso chose to stay in northern Cyprus in 1975, and now living in Northern Cyprus in 2014. : Greek Cypriots in Agios Andronikos chose to stay in northern Cyprus in 1975, and now living in Northern Cyprus in 2014. : Greek Cypriots in Agia Triada chose to stay in northern Cyprus in 1975, and now living in Northern Cyprus in 2014. : Maronites in Asomatos chose to stay in northern Cyprus in 1975, and now living in Northern Cyprus in 2014. : Maronites in Karpasia chose to stay in northern Cyprus in 1975, and now living in Northern Cyprus in 2014. : Maronites in Kormakitis chose to stay in northern Cyprus in 1975, and now living in Northern Cyprus in 2014. : Turkish Cypriots in Lemmossol chose to stay in southern Cyprus in 1975, and now living in Cyprus in 2014. : All the rest chose voluntarily to switch the sides in 1975 according to [http://www.un.org/Docs/journal/asp/ws.asp?m=s/11789 "Voluntary Population Exchange Agreement on 02.08.1975" between Turkish and Greek Cypriots (Third Vienna Agreement)] under the auspices of United Nations. : i.e. if all of the Greek Cypriots in Kyrenia had chosen to stay in northern Cyprus in 1975, and all of them now would be living in Northern Cyprus in 2014. : Since this is so, the Greek Cypriots (who want to return Northern Cyprus) were/are/will be always rejected '''wherever they go''': : '''USA Federal Court (09.10.2014)''': "..Greek Cypriots CANNOT CLAIM here that the government in control of Northern Cyprus gave their homes to Turkish Cypriots...." : The news of the decision of the Court: (13.10.2014): http://www.courthousenews.com/2014/10/13/72392.htm : The website of the case of the Court: http://dockets.justia.com/docket/district-of-columbia/dcdce/1:2009cv01967/139002 : The decision of the Court.....: http://docs.justia.com/cases/federal/district-courts/district-of-columbia/dcdce/1:2009cv01967/139002/53 : NOTE: Previously, '''The European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR)''' rejected Greek Cypriots' request to return Northern Cyprus. : European Court of Human Rights (ECHR) ('''27.05.2010'''): (Tasos Asproftas: [Application no. 16079/90] and Marianna Petrakidou [Application no. 16081/90]): “The houses which the Greek Cypriots left in North Cyprus are not their homes any more because they have lived almost for all their lives in another place and they have no concrete and persisting links with the houses they claimed. Therefore Greek Cypriots have no right to return to the North.” Sources: :http://hudoc.echr.coe.int/sites/eng/Pages/search.aspx#{"fulltext":["Asproftas"],"documentcollectionid2":["CASELAW"],"itemid":["001-98684"]} :http://hudoc.echr.coe.int/sites/eng/Pages/search.aspx#{"fulltext":["Petrakidou"],"documentcollectionid2":["CASELAW"],"itemid":["001-98688"]} |}</div> '''F.''' Since this "Distortion of History" is revealed very clearly, that related party used every insulting word towards me:<br/> [[User Talk:Dr.K.|Dr.K.]] said [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Dr.K.&oldid=596955636&diff=prev"Silly" to me.]<br/> [[User Talk:Neo ^|Neo ^]] said [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Alexyflemming&diff=629745857&oldid=629736718 "Paid Supporter" to me.]<br/> Despite all these insulting words, I protected my common sense, and did not respond them in the way they are accustomed towards me.<br/> [[User:Alexyflemming|Alexyflemming]] ([[User talk:Alexyflemming#top|talk]]) 20:44, 4 November 2014 (UTC) |accept = accept reason here ~~~~}}
.