Darkknight2149 (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
|||
Line 53: | Line 53: | ||
::It was fine for the last 5 years, why it's an issue now is beyond me when thousands of articles on here use the same method! I will be making one change to the table you reverted as it should be listed in order of when the character first received star billing. [[User:B.Davis2003|B.Davis2003]] ([[User talk:B.Davis2003|talk]]) 12:21, 7 January 2017 (UTC) |
::It was fine for the last 5 years, why it's an issue now is beyond me when thousands of articles on here use the same method! I will be making one change to the table you reverted as it should be listed in order of when the character first received star billing. [[User:B.Davis2003|B.Davis2003]] ([[User talk:B.Davis2003|talk]]) 12:21, 7 January 2017 (UTC) |
||
:::Again: If you think that the table should exist in the face of reverting editors, begin a discussion on the article's talk pages with your reasons as to how the table would ''contribute'' and be ''beneficial'' to the article, and not simply "because others do it". On that latter sentence, you are correct. [[User:AlexTheWhovian|<span style="color:#16329F;text-shadow:3px 3px 8px #102372;">'''Alex'''|''The''|'''Whovian'''</span>]]<sup>[[User talk:AlexTheWhovian#top|<span style="color:#8F0104">'''?'''</span>]]</sup> 12:25, 7 January 2017 (UTC) |
:::Again: If you think that the table should exist in the face of reverting editors, begin a discussion on the article's talk pages with your reasons as to how the table would ''contribute'' and be ''beneficial'' to the article, and not simply "because others do it". On that latter sentence, you are correct. [[User:AlexTheWhovian|<span style="color:#16329F;text-shadow:3px 3px 8px #102372;">'''Alex'''|''The''|'''Whovian'''</span>]]<sup>[[User talk:AlexTheWhovian#top|<span style="color:#8F0104">'''?'''</span>]]</sup> 12:25, 7 January 2017 (UTC) |
||
==[[Joker (character)]] nominated for deletion== |
|||
You are invited to take part at the deletion discussion at [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Joker (character)]]. '''[[User:Darkknight2149|<span style="color:grey;">Dark</span>]][[User talk:Darkknight2149|<span style="color:black;">Knight</span>]][[Special:Contributions/Darkknight2149|<span style="color:grey;">2149</span>]]''' 23:01, 8 January 2017 (UTC) |
Revision as of 23:01, 8 January 2017
Hey AtW
Happy New Year to you! I just saw that Sherlock's "The Six Thatchers" (which I enjoyed immensely) was seen by 8.1 million and that is just the UK viewing figures. As the 11th Dr would say - YOWZA!! :-) So even if the post you responded to here Talk:Sherlock (TV series)#series 5 had been correct you can bet that ways would be found to adapt everyone's schedule to film another story or three. Best regards. MarnetteD|Talk 18:55, 2 January 2017 (UTC)
- And to you, Marnette! Sherlock was an amazing way to ring in the new year - that many viewers is insane, but I guess that's what happens when you don't air a complete season for three years. Moffat, Cumberbatch and Freeman have all said they'd love to keep it going for as long as they can, so it might just keep going, even if seasons are now three years apart. Guess we'll find out by 2020! Alex|The|Whovian? 01:24, 3 January 2017 (UTC)
Yet another revert
I would be grateful if you would point me to where in WP:MOSTV it says that the cast list section of a television article is strictly restricted to characters defined as 'main', and also from where the 'main cast' of Vikings (tv) is being sourced since the information appears to be unverifiable, please? Thanks in anticipation IanB2 (talk) 23:58, 3 January 2017 (UTC)
- I have replied to the duplicate discussion you created at Talk:List of Vikings characters. Alex|The|Whovian? 00:06, 4 January 2017 (UTC)
Problems with another user
I'm having an issue with one of the users on Reign (season 4). I removed the episodes table because the only source was IMDb which is not reliable. B.Davis2003 keeps on re-adding the episodes table saying that the sources are reliable. Would you be willing to help resolve the issue? 74thClarkBarHG (talk) 08:24, 6 January 2017 (UTC)
- @74thClarkBarHG: No problems. I've reverted the editor, and posted both an automatic and specific message on their talk page. If they continue to revert regardless of this, and not open a discussion, then a report may be in order. Alex|The|Whovian? 08:29, 6 January 2017 (UTC)
- There were other RELIABLE sources on that table besides IMDB. B.Davis2003 (talk) 08:32, 6 January 2017 (UTC)
- @B.Davis2003: Please read the post on your talk page. The only source that wasn't IMDb was The Futon Critic, which listed only the dates (specifically, dates for TBA episodes, not dates for specific episodes) - this is not enough information to create an episode table upon. Alex|The|Whovian? 08:33, 6 January 2017 (UTC)
- There were other RELIABLE sources on that table besides IMDB. B.Davis2003 (talk) 08:32, 6 January 2017 (UTC)
script-formatdates issue
Hi,
I just fixed an episode header that was modified by the script-formatdates. I think it wrapped too many things:
https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=A_Very_Peculiar_Practice&type=revision&diff=758579955&oldid=756165380 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ggaughan (talk • contribs) 09:32, 6 January 2017 (UTC)
- @Ggaughan: Apologies about that. I've fixed things slightly further, per this edit, given that
| OriginalAirDate = {{Start date}}
shouldn't exist in {{Episode table}} (as|OriginalAirDate=
in that template is only for the width of the column), and|OriginalAirDate=
in {{Episode list}} should use {{Start date}} (as that parameter is for the episode air dates). Alex|The|Whovian? 09:41, 6 January 2017 (UTC)
Teen Wolf - Last Two Episodes Edit
Those are the oficial names of the episodes but I don't know how to add the source, please do it for me. Here it is: http://www.teenwolf.com.br/2017/01/05/divulgados-titulos-dos-tres-ultimos-episodios-da-6a-temporada-parte-a/
Yes, it's brazilian but it is the main Teen Wolf website of Brazil.
Here is the translation of the plots:
6x07: Scott and Liam make an attempt to capture a Ghost Rider; Malia and Peter try to find a way into the Wild Hunt. 6X08: Scott, Lydia and Malia decide to attack the crevasse and rescue Stiles; Liam, Hayden and Mason make a pact with Theo to discover Douglas's plan.
Thank you! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 131.161.144.78 (talk) 03:03, 7 January 2017 (UTC)
- Apologies, but that is a fan site, and hence is unreliable and cannot be used here on Wikipedia. Also, we do not copy-and-paste summaries, as that is a violation of the copyright policies of Wikipedia; we wait until the episode has aired and then summarize the events of the episodes in our own words. Thank you. Alex|The|Whovian?
One Tree Hill characters
If you went back over the history of the discussions, it was agreed upon that character notes would be used below the table in stead of an episode count. As for recurring characters, many other TV show articles have a table for their recurring characters, I updated the table to what you all wanted so why isn't One Tree Hill eligible for one? B.Davis2003 (talk) 12:11, 7 January 2017 (UTC)
- @B.Davis2003: Character notes should not be used, nor episode counts, as it is, as I stated, a violation of WP:TVCAST: "
The cast listing should not contain an episode count, e.g. (# episodes), to indicate the number of episodes in which the actor/character appeared. If an actor misses an episode due to a real world occurrence, such as an injury that prevents them from appearing, this info can be noted in the character's description or "Production" section with a reliable source.
" Stating which episodes an actor and their character do not appear in has no encyclopedic content. You also do not have consensus to add a recurring table, as you have been reverted multiple times and a discussion was also created on the topic, stating how and why it was not necessary. Do not base your articles on how other articles do it. If you continue to reinstate it, you will be reported for edit-warring. Alex|The|Whovian? 12:16, 7 January 2017 (UTC)- It was fine for the last 5 years, why it's an issue now is beyond me when thousands of articles on here use the same method! I will be making one change to the table you reverted as it should be listed in order of when the character first received star billing. B.Davis2003 (talk) 12:21, 7 January 2017 (UTC)
- Again: If you think that the table should exist in the face of reverting editors, begin a discussion on the article's talk pages with your reasons as to how the table would contribute and be beneficial to the article, and not simply "because others do it". On that latter sentence, you are correct. Alex|The|Whovian? 12:25, 7 January 2017 (UTC)
- It was fine for the last 5 years, why it's an issue now is beyond me when thousands of articles on here use the same method! I will be making one change to the table you reverted as it should be listed in order of when the character first received star billing. B.Davis2003 (talk) 12:21, 7 January 2017 (UTC)
Joker (character) nominated for deletion
You are invited to take part at the deletion discussion at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Joker (character). DarkKnight2149 23:01, 8 January 2017 (UTC)