169.244.116.11 (talk) |
→Orlady RfA: new section |
||
Line 1,068: | Line 1,068: | ||
:If you were paying attention, you'd realize that this is a school IP, and that was merely a classmate's vandalism, not mine. I don't appreciate you reverting my constructive post concerning Frankie Campbell's early life in Bath, Maine. Please do not revert it again. [[Special:Contributions/169.244.116.11|169.244.116.11]] ([[User talk:169.244.116.11|talk]]) 17:10, 14 April 2009 (UTC) |
:If you were paying attention, you'd realize that this is a school IP, and that was merely a classmate's vandalism, not mine. I don't appreciate you reverting my constructive post concerning Frankie Campbell's early life in Bath, Maine. Please do not revert it again. [[Special:Contributions/169.244.116.11|169.244.116.11]] ([[User talk:169.244.116.11|talk]]) 17:10, 14 April 2009 (UTC) |
||
== Orlady RfA == |
|||
Thought you might want to know about [[User:Orlady|Orlady]]'s [[Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Orlady|Request for adminship]]. [[User:Kaldari|Kaldari]] ([[User talk:Kaldari|talk]]) 17:50, 14 April 2009 (UTC) |
Revision as of 17:53, 14 April 2009
Welcome!
Reverting everything i add?
What is up with you? your like a wikinazi, i cant add anything or fix any typo without you reverting itMuffinman991 (talk) 20:01, 12 April 2009 (UTC) Muffinman991 (talk) 20:01, 12 April 2009 (UTC)
Paul Kondratuk
I'm the user that keeps deleting the play house 22 section of the East Brunswick, NJ article. It was a relevant and necessary edit because I live in East Brunswick and the it's been announced that the project for rebuilding playhouse 22 has been stopped and the playhouse will no longer be an attraction to our town. So please do not block me for making important edits. If you have any questions or comments please email me @ paulkondratuk@hotmail.com. Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.46.70.48 (talk • contribs)
Jeff Behar
I didnt know how to email you, for the information about Jeff behar and hillsborogh
Professional bodybuilders | Mister-olympia, see: http://mister-olympia.bganzeige.de/professional-bodybuilders
also see:
http://botw.org/top/Sports/Strength_Sports/Bodybuilding/Personal_Page/
You can also just google him, jeff behar writer, jeff behar bodybuilder, jeff Behar NASA, jeff Behar ceo of Musclemagfitness.com
He graduated from hillsboro, 1983.
U can also see him on TV, on comedy central by googling his name and comedy central or going here:
http://www.comedycentral.com/videos/index.jhtml?videoId=70301&title=golds-gym
U can also confirm by checking the hillsboro area at classmates.com
Sorry for having to wroite in here. I did not know how else to email you back with the information you requested.
December 2008
Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to World government has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you.
Fuck you! read the bloody message. this is not to cite your own info. source it! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jor Monn (talk • contribs)
Thank you for reverting the profane vandalism made to my userpage!
DYK for Joseph Kahn (shipping executive)
Number 298 (185 create/expand - 113 nominations)
Vandalism?
WHAT VANDALISM ARE YOU TALKING ABOUT SIR? I ONLY EDITED THE DICTION OF THE ARTICLE -- WHICH WAS LACKING! I SUGGEST YOU TAKE THAT OFF OF MY PAGE AND DISCONTINUE THE SLANDER. THANK YOU AND GOOD DAY. Ilovenc123 (talk) 19:56, 5 April 2009 (UTC)
DYK for Howard Pack
Number 299 (186 create/expand - 113 nominations)
Fruity
why did you change fruity >=( fruity is a word. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Beast778899 (talk • contribs)
- I don't see any change about the word "fruity". It's the rest of your vandalism that's been a problem. Alansohn (talk) 11:47, 8 April 2009 (UTC)
Gurumayi Chidvilasananda
Also, you seem to know the ropes within the wikipedia. I submit you another case, theringess is again and again suppressing any independent material about Gurumayi Chidvilasananda including the transcriptiion of an article of the new yorker. Please study the history of the article. 82.67.232.89 (talk)
You can join me at cognominal@gmail.com
I need to be banned
I can't stop vandalizing pages. If you don't ban me I will do it again. It's a serious problem, I can't stop. Please do me a favor and ban me from editing pages. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 65.160.148.51 (talk • contribs)
Lol..this is too hilarious! You people are crazy. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 154.20.78.146 (talk) 04:47, 18 March 2009 (UTC)
Barn Star
The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar | ||
For tirelessly reverting vandalism...and beating me to it. :) |
Jordan Wu
Nobody loves this poor poor soul. This is his cry for help, or in the words of Gary Larson, Helf.
question
what did i do wrong i added on more about the soup all of it was true why should i be blocked
Cookie
Martyn_Godfrey
Hi! I made a page about an author named Martyn_Godfrey. Here's the link: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Martyn_Godfrey. Could you please edit the page? Thanks!Neptunekh
information on admins and edits
thank you for the information but i have another question for you. are the admins contacted after an edit or is there a page for admins which shows the most recent edits and users that changed articles? sorry for the questions but i am just trying to understand the process better so i do not look like an idiot when i make my presentation and i want to be able to present the facts. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.248.35.171 (talk • contribs)
But
My other edits were a mistake that I did not mean to make. North Carolina is a very urban state and I thought the article was wrong -- what about cities like Charlotte, Greensboro, and Raleigh? ARE THOSE RURAL??????? I WANT THIS WARNING CORRECTED. Ilovenc123 (talk) 21:44, 5 April 2009 (UTC)
Bubble tea!
Enjoy the bubble tea!
Thanks! Re: Judy Blume
Thanks for the apology about the Judy Blume correction, I really appreciate that you took the time to do so. On that note, I realize that I probably sounded a little overly annoyed and short in my message. Writing a paper at the end of midterm week will do that to you. But for that, I'd like to apologize myself. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.123.140.102 (talk) 21:51, 15 March 2009 (UTC)
DYK for Thaddeus Dod
Number 413 (287 create/expand - 126 nominations)
--Dravecky (talk) 02:37, 16 March 2009 (UTC)
DYK for Ernest Trova
Number 414 (288 create/expand - 126 nominations)
--Dravecky (talk) 02:38, 16 March 2009 (UTC)
DYK for George Keverian
Number 415 (289 create/expand - 126 nominations)
Congratulations! PeterSymonds (talk) 09:15, 16 March 2009 (UTC)
Alansohn protection for the SDA cult
COngradulations "Alansohn," I'm sure the Seventh Day Arrogance church appreciates your protection from anyone knowing what their cult actually preaches....that they are the only ones who are right, that anyone outside of their church (or at least that does anything on Saturday's) has lost their salvation, that by working on Saturdays you are more likely to get sick etc. All the while having members that build 7,000 sq/ft houses for single people and lie to the courts and then turn around and claim “The Bible, and the Bible alone.” But wait, even the Bible can't get it's own stories straight, so why should we expect anything different from a cult that has it's own self-proclaimed profit!?! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 129.93.10.78 (talk) 13:57, 16 March 2009 (UTC)
DYK for Mark H. Beers
Number 416 (290 create/expand - 126 nominations)
Congratulations! PeterSymonds (talk) 22:07, 16 March 2009 (UTC)
Mark Beers
Hi Alansohn
As you can see from the history of the Mark Beers page and the history of the Mark H. Beers page, you elected to create a new article rather than expand a stub (a stub which, in fact, had a talk page with additional resources and a number of key biographical details to be added to the articles) that was clearly in existence. Even if you believe (in this case, I don't see any support for the idea) that per Wikipedia naming convention, "Mark H. Beers" is the appropriate name, a page move and/or redirect is a better way to address such a view than to duplicate an entry.
Regards, Bongomatic 00:57, 17 March 2009 (UTC)
- I so rarely create articles with middle initials, but the medical references I had found used it so I createdMark H. Beers never realizing that you had created Mark Beers an hour earlier. Given that you had done all the research on Beers, why didn't you create the full-fledged DYK-eligible article instead of a bare stub?Alansohn (talk) 01:34, 17 March 2009 (UTC)
- Actually, the article was created seven hours earlier, not one. As is frequently the case, I didn't have the time or inclination to create a full article, but was sufficiently interested by the subject to leave (at the same time) a detailed list of key items and several references. Bongomatic 16:27, 17 March 2009 (UTC) p.s. No need—this time or any other time—to reply on my talk page or leave a {{talkback}}. I watch talk pages when I leave a comment.
DYK for Tom Cole (writer)
Number 417 (291 create/expand - 126 nominations)
--Dravecky (talk) 04:08, 17 March 2009 (UTC)
DYK for About Time (play)
Number 418 (292 create/expand - 126 nominations)
--Dravecky (talk) 04:08, 17 March 2009 (UTC)
Warnings
Sorry I didn't realize that connecting a common intrest was considered vandalism. Also I didn't see your warnings before I made more edits. Thats the ONLY reason I kept doing it
Kingrattus (talk) 16:04, 17 March 2009 (UTC)
I should have also listed Crib & Bib (I did on some but forgot on others).. So it should be infant, crib, bib, baby monitor & SIDS. 2 are very important when it comes to SIDS, and well SIDS is important all on its own as so many people aren't even aware of it.. baby sling is an accessory (also a safty thing) & so are bibs. Everything goes with Baby Showers, as the people who are buying something for a gift should be informed on the best/safest product. As a bad buy can cause harm or possibly SIDS (baby crib mattress for example)...
I'm not trying to cause harm. Just trying to make it easier to find things (more so the important one that are related)... When I was finished with Babies (saftey for the most part), I was going to start on Security Cameras as they need updating & then onto pets.
I have a list of all the pages I did change so I could go back & tweek them as needed. If you want me to undo what I did, I will, or tweek them so its a better fit (maybe I should just use infant, baby shower, & SIDS), I can do that too.
I honestly mean no harm
Kingrattus (talk) 19:36, 17 March 2009 (UTC)
ok, Do you want me to go back & change what I edited? So its only infant? I am sorry for being a pain :(
Kingrattus (talk) 20:18, 17 March 2009 (UTC)
Episodes Table
This is what I'm talking about, no one can get "confused" because it's listed with the episodes. Btw, I heard back from Discovery, they don't have a date for Season 4 finale. 70.24.233.37 (talk) 17:52, 17 March 2009 (UTC)
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Jon_%26_Kate_Plus_8_episodes
Series Overview
Season | Episodes | Season Premiere | Season Finale | |
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 8 | April 10, 2007 | May 14, 2007 | |
2 | 12 | October 15, 2007 | December 17, 2007 | |
3 | 31 | January 7, 2008 | June 16, 2008 | |
4 | June 23, 2008 |
Ray Hunt
Hi. You mentioned somewhere that you monitor the NYTimes obituaries. Would you keep a look out for Ray Hunt? I'm trying to expand a stub in time for the memorial services later this month. Thanks! --Una Smith (talk) 04:40, 18 March 2009 (UTC)
Naturopathy/ThujaSol
Can you clarify why my edit is considered vandalism and why a level 4 warning? - --ThujaSol∆๏̯͡๏ 22:45, 18 March 2009 (UTC)
???
Do you work for wikipedia? Because it is so sad that you care so much about it. Do you live in your parents basememnt and sit behind a screen all day making sure no one is "vandalizing". Get a job. While your at it get a life as well. Its the sad truth. Stop hiding from it. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 78.151.149.247 (talk • contribs)
Episodes Table
I've been editing/adding episodes for Jon & Kate Plus 8 for over a year now and I am not doing any vandalism. The episode table is already listed, why list it twice, epsecially now? The old expression "if it ain't broke, why fix it"?
Take a look here: Follow this link and you'll see the table of episodes http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Jon_%26_Kate_Plus_8_episodes 70.24.233.37 (talk) 00:04, 19 March 2009 (UTC)
DYK for Michael Shannon (pediatrician)
Number 419 (293 create/expand - 126 nominations)
Shubinator (talk) 01:24, 19 March 2009 (UTC)
Someone interesting. Regards. Bongomatic 02:01, 19 March 2009 (UTC)
- That was quick. How about George Hedges? Another interesting person. Bongomatic 03:18, 19 March 2009 (UTC)
Whilst you might disagree with his edits, there are absolutely no way his edits are vandalism, although I concur that they weren't correct. Please don't bite the newbies - he has been actively editing for less than a month, and there is no way that his edits are in bad faith. — neuro(talk)(review) 17:42, 19 March 2009 (UTC)
Vandalism?
Really, just because you don't like an edit, you're going to call it vandalism? Because I very much doubt you can prove, from an objective point of view, that the change I made had made that page any worse. Sure, maybe to your point of view, but I don't think it had that much more merit before my edit, than after.
In that case, wouldn't you just call it another pointless edit, to an already pointless page?
Unless you can find some specific guideline that spells out exactly why my change was vandalism, I think you really should stop that kind of thing. It's annoying as hell to have small changes labeled like that. 24.23.32.249 (talk) 22:51, 19 March 2009 (UTC)
- I am amazed by the ability to rationalize away vandalism, but your edit wasn't even a close call. Alansohn (talk) 23:01, 19 March 2009 (UTC)
- Once again, maybe to your point of view, but are you really so sure that all other points of view would agree? I do not think so. I think my edit had merit, even if you don't see it. 98.238.188.211 (talk) 00:47, 20 March 2009 (UTC)
Thanks
I'm sure you hear it a lot, but thank you for reverting the vandalism on my user page. I appreciate it. TravisAF (talk) 05:19, 20 March 2009 (UTC)
Shelby, NC
I'm somewhat baffled that my reference to Kenny Powers, a fictional character from HBO's "Eastbound and Down", was removed from the Shelby, NC homepage. In the program, Powers is, indeed, supposed to be a product and resident of Shelby. What would make such a reference appropriate? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.206.40.48 (talk) 20:22, 20 March 2009 (UTC)
DYK for Robert E. A. Lee
Number 420 (294 create/expand - 126 nominations)
Royalbroil 05:55, 21 March 2009 (UTC)
- I hate to say it, but there you go again. Bongomatic 09:40, 21 March 2009 (UTC)
People of note
- Kalman Bloch
- John Leech (restauranteur)
- Robert Soost
- Glenn Sundby
- Gianni Giansanti (not created by me, but added the only two citations)
Bongomatic 10:21, 21 March 2009 (UTC)
DYK for Steve Bernard
Number 421 (295 create/expand - 126 nominations)
Gatoclass (talk) 11:53, 21 March 2009 (UTC)
- And again. Bongomatic 15:06, 21 March 2009 (UTC)
Please check w:index.php?title=Arundhati_Roy&action=history and revert to include latest info about Roy's list. Each objection is carefully addressed, then the edit gets reverted anyway by two editors working in tandem. Thanks, 74.162.153.220 (talk) 16:35, 21 March 2009 (UTC)
Hi, I'd like to restore this edit. Please see this about "Roy's List" then this about the edit. Thanks, 65.246.126.130 (talk) 21:10, 25 March 2009 (UTC)
You're invited!
New York City Meetup |
In the afternoon, we will hold a session dedicated to meta:Wikimedia New York City activities, sign official incorporation papers for the chapter, review recent projects like Wikipedia Loves Art and upcoming projects like Wikipedia at the Library, and hold salon-style group discussions on Wikipedia and the other Wikimedia projects (see the January meeting's minutes).
In the evening, we'll share dinner and chat at a local restaurant, and generally enjoy ourselves and kick back.
You can add or remove your name from the New York City Meetups invite list at Wikipedia:Meetup/NYC/Invite list.
To keep up-to-date on local events, you can also join our mailing list.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 18:57, 21 March 2009 (UTC)
DYK for Charles S. Lieber
Number 422 (296 create/expand - 126 nominations)
Shubinator (talk) 00:25, 22 March 2009 (UTC)
- Three in a day. Bongomatic 00:29, 22 March 2009 (UTC)
Administrator intervention against vandalism
Hello. Please be careful when making edits to WP:AIV, as it appears that you accidentally removed one of my administrator's comment [1]. Thanks — Kralizec! (talk) 03:35, 22 March 2009 (UTC)
DYK for John Dyneley Prince
Number 423 (296 create/expand - 127 nominations)
Shubinator (talk) 06:27, 22 March 2009 (UTC)
DYK for Doris Abrahams
Number 424 (297 create/expand - 127 nominations)
Shubinator (talk) 06:27, 22 March 2009 (UTC)
DYK for Kermit Bloomgarden
Number 425 (298 create/expand - 127 nominations)
Shubinator (talk) 06:27, 22 March 2009 (UTC)
DYK for Nixon's Last Press Conference
Number 426 (299 create/expand - 127 nominations)
Royalbroil 12:36, 22 March 2009 (UTC)
DYK for Ralph Mercado
Number 427 (300 create/expand - 127 nominations)
Two different hooks in the same group - no wonder you're the most prolific DYK contributor! Royalbroil 12:44, 22 March 2009 (UTC)
DYK for Lawrence Herkimer
Number 428 (301 create/expand - 127 nominations)
Shubinator (talk) 20:10, 22 March 2009 (UTC)
Bubble tea!
Thanks for reverting the recent vandalism on {{bubble tea}}! For that, I give you...
Vandalism?
Quite frankly sir, it is not my fault that you have such a low grasp on Norse mythology. I myself am from Oslo, Norway, and I'm sure I know more about my homeland than you do. The fact that you reverted my edit shows your incompetence. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.186.168.203 (talk) 02:36, 23 March 2009 (UTC)
- As a mere resident of New Jersey, having reviewed the edit in question, my lack of in-depth knowledge of Norse mythology was no impediment to identifying your edit as vandalism, in all its epicness. Alansohn (talk) 02:47, 23 March 2009 (UTC)
- Epicness—NICE! Think we need a (non dict def) entry for it. Some references
- http://sports.espn.go.com/espn/print?id=1491704&type=page2Story
- http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/07/27/AR2007072700731_pf.html
- http://www.guardian.co.uk/music/2007/feb/11/popandrock.features
- http://www.guardian.co.uk/travel/2006/dec/02/green.saturday.environment
- http://www.independent.ie/entertainment/film-cinema/lavish-costumes-and-panstick-conceal-a-rather-ordinary-film-125886.html
- http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/magazine/4123406.stm
- http://www.laweekly.com/1999-07-15/music/dark-angels/
- Bongomatic 03:06, 23 March 2009 (UTC)
- Epicness—NICE! Think we need a (non dict def) entry for it. Some references
"Notable alumni" of minor league teams
Hi. Another editor, NatureBoyMD, has come up with what I think is a good and thoughtful template and conditions for a "notable alumni" list for a minor league team that interests him. See [2]. I thought that before he finalizes it, it/he might benefit from you taking a glance at it, and giving him any comments that you may have, since I could see it being used for other minor league teams (its better than anything I've seen), and you are a baseball editor whose views I respect. Feel free to leave your comments on it for him on my home talk page at the above url, as that is where he and I have been discussing it. Thanks.--Epeefleche (talk) 05:34, 23 March 2009 (UTC)
INSULTING
STOP INSULTING THE WIKIPEDIA! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 147.252.234.42 (talk) 15:49, 23 March 2009 (UTC)
Interesting fellows
Bongomatic 05:39, 23 March 2009 (UTC)
DYK help?
Hello! By any chance can you help with making this a DYK? I am not sure how to add these things, but I think this referenced fact would be a good one to include. Best, --A NobodyMy talk 17:55, 23 March 2009 (UTC)
- This would have been a great candidate for a hook, but the article doesn't meet the qualifications for DYK. Per WP:DYK, an article must be new or have been expanded fivefold within the past five days. As this article is a rather old one, and has not met the expansion requirement, it would not be eligible. I'll be happy to take a look at any new / newly-expanded articles. Alansohn (talk) 18:09, 23 March 2009 (UTC)
- Okay, what about with this? As you can see I expanded the article considerably? Could we ask, "Did you know that Will Kane's was Gary Cooper's second Academy Award winning role?" or "Did you know that Will Kane is ranked fourteenth on Entertainment Weeklys list of Top 20 Heroes of all time?" Best, --A NobodyMy talk 19:31, 27 March 2009 (UTC)
You needn't worry
You needn't worry that I'm seriously plotting to assassinate troublesome categories. For one, I'm not a bureaucrat, nor would I want to be one, so I can't satisfy my own stated pre-requisites for perpetration. Secondly, it would of course be an affront to the principle of "consensus", which (at least until further notice) is foundational. Thirdly, it would surely result in the perpetrators getting banned; nobody wants to be banned. Fourthly, I couldn't handle the media attention. Fifthly, what would my auntie Kay think? Lastly, there are not enough knives in all the world to properly finish the job on the category tree. Good Ol’factory (talk) 21:21, 23 March 2009 (UTC)
- I'm worried. I'm very worried. I've already seen the damage that can and will be done to those who dare to disagree, even without all the knives sharpened. Trivializing the Holocaust and child molestation, and now turning the Night of the Long Knives into a sick joke, is a rather disturbing precedent for any administrator, even one whose not a bureaucrat. Alansohn (talk) 21:27, 23 March 2009 (UTC)
- Relax, Alansohn. It was a passing joke—whether or not it's "sick" or not, I'm unsure—I'll have to get a fecal sample from it to know for sure. :) Just to clarify, I don't have a problem with users disagreeing with me on issues as opinion-dependent as the existence of a particular category. You can choose be "very worried" about all of this if you want—don't misunderstand me as being bossy or ordering you not to—but my suggestion would be that life is too short and for most people there are probably more important and relevant things to spend your "worry time" on. Good Ol’factory (talk) 21:47, 23 March 2009 (UTC)
Possibly of concern to you
I was looking at a user's contributions and quite by accident I saw that the user had edited User talk:Alansohn2. Is User:Alansohn2 anything to do with you? If not, we might want to take further steps, as there's a possible risk of impersonation due to the similarity of your names. (The new account edited a page on NJ and also posted a warning on a user talk page, which is why I thought it might be you experimenting with another account, but if not this increases the potential confusion problems of a user using this name.) Good Ol’factory (talk) 00:23, 24 March 2009 (UTC)
- Fort Lee is about 5 miles away, but it's not me. There is a genuine possibility that its could be someone else with the same name, which would be quite a coincidence but far from impossible. I'd keep an eye on the account. It doesn't appear to be someone trying to spoof my edits, but the person could be close enough that some of our edits might overlap. Alansohn (talk) 02:20, 24 March 2009 (UTC)
- Let me know if you run into any trouble from it and I'll help if I can. Good Ol’factory (talk) 02:48, 24 March 2009 (UTC)
- You are so sneaky, Alansohn, selecting such an unguessable name for your sock. Good sleuthing, Good Olfactory! Keep up the vigilance! Bongomatic 02:56, 24 March 2009 (UTC)
- I guess I never thought anyone would make the connection to my "other" ID. I am so glad that I've been saving my Dunkin' Donuts receipts since my last sockpuppet problem cropped up. Alansohn (talk) 02:59, 24 March 2009 (UTC)
- Huh, wha? I never thought of this as a "sock" problem at all. Had this been the "real" Alansohn's other account I would have assumed, based on the accounts edits, that he was simply experimenting with using another account. My concern was actually that another user was trying to impersonate our fine editor here. If you're just mocking me for the sake of doing so, Bongo, I'm now going to laugh along .... (ha ha ha cough cough gurgle...) Good Ol’factory (talk) 04:53, 24 March 2009 (UTC)
- I think that Bongo was joking here, as was I. No gurgling necessary. Alansohn (talk) 20:39, 24 March 2009 (UTC)
- I thought probably that was the case—I tried to laugh along and then it got stuck in my throat ... I can dish it out but I can't take it ... Good Ol’factory (talk) 20:51, 24 March 2009 (UTC)
- I think that Bongo was joking here, as was I. No gurgling necessary. Alansohn (talk) 20:39, 24 March 2009 (UTC)
- Huh, wha? I never thought of this as a "sock" problem at all. Had this been the "real" Alansohn's other account I would have assumed, based on the accounts edits, that he was simply experimenting with using another account. My concern was actually that another user was trying to impersonate our fine editor here. If you're just mocking me for the sake of doing so, Bongo, I'm now going to laugh along .... (ha ha ha cough cough gurgle...) Good Ol’factory (talk) 04:53, 24 March 2009 (UTC)
- I guess I never thought anyone would make the connection to my "other" ID. I am so glad that I've been saving my Dunkin' Donuts receipts since my last sockpuppet problem cropped up. Alansohn (talk) 02:59, 24 March 2009 (UTC)
- You are so sneaky, Alansohn, selecting such an unguessable name for your sock. Good sleuthing, Good Olfactory! Keep up the vigilance! Bongomatic 02:56, 24 March 2009 (UTC)
- Let me know if you run into any trouble from it and I'll help if I can. Good Ol’factory (talk) 02:48, 24 March 2009 (UTC)
DRV
I have opened a DRV on the wrangler categories, on which you opined. Occuli (talk) 02:43, 24 March 2009 (UTC)
For expansion
DYK for James Beach
Number 429 (302 create/expand - 127 nominations)
Gatoclass (talk) 06:34, 24 March 2009 (UTC)
Thank You
...For removing the vandalism on my talk page Dougofborg (talk) 14:36, 24 March 2009 (UTC)
DYK for Martin Knowlton
Number 430 (303 create/expand - 127 nominations)
Gatoclass (talk) 09:26, 25 March 2009 (UTC)
DRV of the Wrangler categories
I'm unhappy with your comment about my "concocting an excuse" to close the Second Wrangler category as "delete" because I put my personal views above process. You may have missed my comment that I closed the 2008 discussion as "keep", so I don't know why you think my views accord with the outcome. Please retract your remarks. Regards, BencherliteTalk 11:54, 25 March 2009 (UTC)
- Are you planning to reply? Or do I have to raise the matter elsewhere, given your prima facie assumption of bad faith on my part? BencherliteTalk 18:24, 25 March 2009 (UTC)
- Just so we're entirely clear, this is the diff I'm talking about. BencherliteTalk 18:26, 25 March 2009 (UTC)
- I hadn't seen your earlier note. I will review and make a determination as to what modification would be appropriate to more accurately reflect your actions in closing this CfD under discussion. Alansohn (talk) 18:31, 25 March 2009 (UTC)
- Thanks. Regards, BencherliteTalk 18:35, 25 March 2009 (UTC)
- When? You've been doing plenty of editing since I left the second message, let alone the first message, and I'm disappointed that you haven't given this a higher priority. BencherliteTalk 09:36, 26 March 2009 (UTC)
- I had been trying to word my response and hadn't had a chance to stop by DRV. I have replied and made it clear that I do not believe that you "concocted" anything, rather that there was a misapplication and misinterpretation of Wikipedia policy in closing the CfD in question. I hope this addresses your concerns. Please feel free to respond further either on my talk page or at DRV. Alansohn (talk) 12:33, 26 March 2009 (UTC)
- Thank you for removing any suggestion of bad faith. The reasonableness of my closure is clearly something upon which people can, and do, differ, and so I don't have any remaining issues with your comments. Regards, BencherliteTalk 14:21, 26 March 2009 (UTC)
- I had been trying to word my response and hadn't had a chance to stop by DRV. I have replied and made it clear that I do not believe that you "concocted" anything, rather that there was a misapplication and misinterpretation of Wikipedia policy in closing the CfD in question. I hope this addresses your concerns. Please feel free to respond further either on my talk page or at DRV. Alansohn (talk) 12:33, 26 March 2009 (UTC)
- When? You've been doing plenty of editing since I left the second message, let alone the first message, and I'm disappointed that you haven't given this a higher priority. BencherliteTalk 09:36, 26 March 2009 (UTC)
- Thanks. Regards, BencherliteTalk 18:35, 25 March 2009 (UTC)
- I hadn't seen your earlier note. I will review and make a determination as to what modification would be appropriate to more accurately reflect your actions in closing this CfD under discussion. Alansohn (talk) 18:31, 25 March 2009 (UTC)
SimplySim
|Bibikha is not a vandal, he is a sockpuppet for user talk:HugovivScientus (talk) 18:35, 25 March 2009 (UTC)
Continued vandalism
There has been repeat vandalism from a shared user account that you have previously notified User talk:194.221.133.211. I guess that Aviva employees have nothing better to do than vandalise Wikipedia... Could you arrange a block? DiverScout (talk) 20:17, 25 March 2009 (UTC)
Thanks for the revert on my userpage
Thank you, also great work in the recent changes, keep it up! All the best SpitfireTally-ho! 20:58, 25 March 2009 (UTC)
I am not vandalizing this page. Do your reasearch and pay attention to the links, the proof was there all along. You can make Wikipedia more enjoyable by reading what is presented to you first before making assumptions on what is correct and not correct - got it? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 12.108.255.76 (talk) 21:33, 25 March 2009 (UTC)
- The discrepancy between the title of Mansfield, Florida and the name in the article is what made this appear to be vandalism. I am investigating and will try to help resolve this issue. Alansohn (talk) 22:28, 25 March 2009 (UTC)
- Hi, yes I'm looking at it too. Ghost towns can be tricky, it seems. :) See the ref list I've added to the talk page. Proofreader77 (talk) 23:23, 25 March 2009 (UTC)
- Follow-up - After carefully investigating (and checking "Mansfield, Florida" as well), I'm satisfied that Mannfield is the correct name in this case. I have moved it. Like Obama, I take responsibility for this. :) Cheers. Proofreader77 (talk) 00:06, 26 March 2009 (UTC)
- Follow-up
NOTE: I did not remove the warning on 12.108.255.76 talk (did not want to act on your behalf without your approval). Proofreader77 (talk) 00:14, 26 March 2009 (UTC)Since you are apparently offline, I have removed the warning in question (since the information I've added to the talk page has substantially changed the equation of available information for decision). If further evaluation suggests the warning should be restored, please excuse this ephemeral action. :) Proofreader77 (talk) 02:57, 26 March 2009 (UTC) (Edited: Proofreader77 (talk) 02:57, 26 March 2009 (UTC))
- Follow-up
- SOME ONE NEEDS TO REMOVE IT AND STOP JUMPING TO CONCLUSIONS, ESPECIALLY WHEN THE FACTS ARE ALREADY IN FRONT OF YOU.--12.108.255.76 (talk) 01:56, 26 March 2009 (UTC)
- It appears Alansohn is off duty at this time. (I will respond further on your talk page) Proofreader77 (talk) 02:37, 26 March 2009 (UTC)
re: "good and evil"
"Hear hear!" for your words (on your user page) re "common sense."
P.S. re "poop" -- Here's to ever-smarter bots, so we don't have to scoop. :) Proofreader77 (talk) 01:00, 26 March 2009 (UTC)
- Better bots would be one option, but leash laws might be even better. Alansohn (talk) 02:04, 27 March 2009 (UTC)
User talk:Majidmushtaq
Hi Alansohn, I wonder if you'd be willing to look again at the warning you gave this newbie. It looks to me like Majid was blanking stuff he'd written after it had been challenged. ϢereSpielChequers 18:50, 26 March 2009 (UTC)
- As requested, and after further review of the circumstances, I removed the warning. Alansohn (talk) 18:58, 26 March 2009 (UTC)
Again, my sorriness is weighty
I want to apologize dearly to you, my friend, for my work on Sallust. I have ADD and cannot pay attention. So I sit with a book and read until I can't and then make Sallust different. I understand this is wrong and that I have no business doing it. Much love for the new Year. 128.197.244.131 (talk) 20:06, 26 March 2009 (UTC)
Interesting person
- Lawrence Salander
- Thanks for the notice. Looking at the article, Salander-O'Reilly Galleries might be a better subject for this article, as there seems to be little about the person, and lots about his business. Alansohn (talk) 01:51, 27 March 2009 (UTC)
- Not sure I agree—the bankruptcy and crimes are personal, the gallery was 100% owned and run by him. As the articles point out, the art business is a trust one, person-to-person, not person-to-company. Bongomatic 02:13, 27 March 2009 (UTC)
Thanks
Hey there, thanks for getting rid of the vandalism on my userpage. I really appreciate it. MelicansMatkin (talk) 03:04, 27 March 2009 (UTC)
DYK for Dorothea Holt Redmond
Number 431 (304 create/expand - 127 nominations)
Gatoclass (talk) 07:07, 27 March 2009 (UTC)
DYK for George Hedges
Number 432 (305 create/expand - 127 nominations)
Gatoclass (talk) 07:08, 27 March 2009 (UTC)
A couple more
Enjoy, Bongomatic 08:56, 27 March 2009 (UTC)
Re: Little tikes
I have restored the above article to the following location: User:Alansohn/Little tikes. ... discospinster talk 13:43, 27 March 2009 (UTC)
- Just as I have explained on Discospinster's page, the page was deleted multiple times as blatant copy-and-paste copyright infringement of [3]; I tagged for G11 the first time because I couldn't find the copyvio. MuZemike 16:38, 27 March 2009 (UTC)
- I've restored it to User:Alansohn/Little Tikes for you. ... discospinster talk 19:27, 27 March 2009 (UTC)
Your message on my talk page
... was probably intended for User talk:Peteryesness, author of a deleted-by-me article about a non-notable backup singer. --Orange Mike | Talk 19:03, 27 March 2009 (UTC)
- You are absolutely correct. This is not the first time that Huggle has had me send a message to the wrong page, and I will be even more careful the next time (and will still screw it up). Thanks for relocating the message to its correct destination. Alansohn (talk) 19:13, 27 March 2009 (UTC)
Thank you for reverts
On Hellions of Troy. Amy "Bitches Bruze" Moore (talk) 19:24, 27 March 2009 (UTC)
142.23.96.174
He/she is a vandal. Please have a look at its talk... --Calgaco (talk) 20:39, 27 March 2009 (UTC)
DYK for Glenn Sundby
Number 433 (306 create/expand - 127 nominations)
Shubinator (talk) 15:46, 28 March 2009 (UTC)
DYK triple
Number 434-436 (309 create/expand - 127 nominations)
--Gatoclass (talk) 15:48, 29 March 2009 (UTC)
People of interest
Bongomatic 07:22, 30 March 2009 (UTC)
- Monte Hale—already exists, so expansion may need to be significant for DYK, but could be fun.
My recent post on Alan Barton is factually accurate. Please revert your allegation of vandalism. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 124.39.210.185 (talk) 13:07, 30 March 2009 (UTC)
- If it's accurate, I have been unable to find the details regarding the zippo lighter, nor does the wording provide a warm and fuzzy feeling. I will be happy to retract the warning if reliable and verifiable sources can be produced to support the claim, as I was unable to find anything. Alansohn (talk) 14:23, 30 March 2009 (UTC)
Needing a bit of help
Spotted a comment on the Bernards High site saying that a reference is needed for the citation of J Geils as a grad. A while ago I saw the 1964 yearbook with his picture in it -also know people who knew him - & recently saw the following on the internet:
_
June 6th, 2005
BERNARDS HIGH SCHOOL in Bernardsville is celebrating its centennial this month. One famous graduate from the Class of 64 is John W. Geils Jr. Retired librarian and teacher Mary Elizabeth Young who worked at the school for 41 years, recalls J.Geils:
QUOTE: "always wore nice slacks and tie and a white shirt and jacket,"
Source: Bridgewater Courier News - Bridgewater,NJ,USA http://www.funkyjudge.net/geils_newsround_2005.html
- so where does this bring things? no, it is not quite an ironclad reference- but it would seem that it does lend substantial support - what is the protocol in a case like this? and how should this reference be noted? as a total novice, I plead ignorance in regard to these details & and admit to a concern about making a hash of things- If an action is warranted & if it is rather straightforward & you would do it - that would be great & I'll watch & learn. JinNJ (talk) 03:59, 31 March 2009 (UTC)
- The item is a single sentence quoted on a blog from a newspaper article. While I am familiar with the paper, and I would accept it as a source if I could find it, I have been unable to find the original article. Another search of Google / News / Archive also finds nothing. I don't doubt that he attended, I just can't find a satisfactory source to support the claim. Alansohn (talk) 18:40, 31 March 2009 (UTC)
Edit to Department of the Taoiseach that you reverted
Edited that page, because the undoing of previous edit by Anthony Lynch seemed unfair. The link provided was valid after all.
--Fiachra Ó Raghallaigh (talk) 16:43, 31 March 2009 (UTC)
- The fact that the link exists as described by User:Anthony Lynch exists at Department of the Taoiseach is no reason for inclusion. While I would have little (or lesser) objection to inclusion of the link if it was covered by reliable and verifiable sources, it is not and no sources of any kind are provided. Alansohn (talk) 16:49, 31 March 2009 (UTC)
DYK for Billy C. Clark
--Dravecky (talk) 18:37, 31 March 2009 (UTC)
300 DYK & 400 DYK
Despite today's date, I am serious in communicating enthusiastic congratulations on you having having nominated 400+ DYKs total, of which 300+ DYKs you created or expanded. I don't know if anyone has made a medal to commemorate your singular level of great achievement, but nevertheless I hasten to laud your efforts and to deliver deserved kudos. Best wishes and continued happy editing! --Boston (talk) 08:48, 1 April 2009 (UTC) |
I've nominated this article at FAC. Since you had an interest in it, I was wondering if you might want to take a peek at it and leave comments and views at the FAC page. Thanks!--Wehwalt (talk) 09:52, 1 April 2009 (UTC)
Thank you
April Fool's DYK for Bob Backus
Gatoclass (talk) 16:14, 1 April 2009 (UTC)
Promiscuity
This section originally contained several sources about promiscuity and MSM, but were removed by Allstarecho. Of those statistics he only left those which positively portray MSM. What is your rationale for including only a portion of the statistics? Would you be opposed to allowing the other statistics be reinstated? EJNOGARB 16:15, 1 April 2009 (UTC)
- I appreciate your frustration. However, the solution is not a tit-for-tat removal of sourced information. I would suggest that you start discussing the issue on the article's talk page before considering any further actions. Alansohn (talk) 16:20, 1 April 2009 (UTC)
- You haven't answered either of my questions. What is your rationale for including only a portion of the statistics? Would you be opposed to allowing the other statistics be reinstated? EJNOGARB 16:24, 1 April 2009 (UTC)
Paul Wight
Recently on Raw, the commentator, Michael Cole, said that The Big Show (Paul Wight) weighed in at 485lbs that very morning. Sorry for changing it without anything to back it up, I didn't realise. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.38.40.74 (talk) 17:31, 1 April 2009 (UTC)
Reversion at Garry's Mod
Why did you revert my edit to Garry's Mod? My change simply fixed a spelling error, and inlined a poorly-done (forcing the section into code layout), unnecessary numbered list into the sentence it was properly part of. John Darrow (talk) 18:44, 1 April 2009 (UTC)
why vandalism it is
It was conversational —Preceding unsigned comment added by 93.97.83.75 (talk) 19:18, 1 April 2009 (UTC)
Thanks!
For reverting the vandalism on my userpage?--Giants27 : Chat 22:30, 1 April 2009 (UTC)
Thanx!
For reverting the nonsense on my talk page, and above all for your decent work and watchful eye! Best regards, --Catgut (talk) 22:46, 1 April 2009 (UTC)
Dodge SRT-4 vandalism
Hi, In regards to your edit for the Dodge SRT4 hood scoop, I feel you are mistaken. You believe it is functional, but do you have a source? We can argue the rear wing is functional as well... — Preceding unsigned comment added by Exploringonions (talk • contribs)
- The issue is not the hood scoop. It's the edit that changed Curt Simmons to Richard Simmons that is vandalism. Alansohn (talk) 00:14, 2 April 2009 (UTC)
Origin of romanians
hello and tank you for the message you left me on the talk page. i would like to inform that originally i did give a proper explanation for why i removed the content however my original edit was reverted by a more misinformed user who did not know the content was misleading and as such the edit that you deleted was just my reversion of the respective user's edit (pretty confusing, huh?), and there is a topic in talk page regarding the respective content since last month. while i appreciate the you doing your part to help improve wikipedia i would like to give you a friendly piece of advice: please check the discussion page and the edit history before randomly reverting edits. thank you very much for your time and have a nice weekend.Adijarca (talk) 07:15, 2 April 2009 (UTC)
Chad Smith and Wilma Mankiller
Hi - I saw that you have dealt with POV problems with the articles for Chad "Corntassel" Smith and Wilma Mankiller in the past, so I was wondering if you could provide any guidance for the new wave of John Cornsilk-style defamation provided by User:Skeele. Thanks for any help. -Uyvsdi (talk) 22:02, 2 April 2009 (UTC)Uyvsdi
- These articles are out of my core competency, but I will take a look. Alansohn (talk) 22:58, 2 April 2009 (UTC)
Hello Alansohn. Your reasonable start for this article has been overtaken by new contributors who may not yet be familiar with our standards. Someone has begun a discussion at WP:COIN#Polypill and Polycap about the editing of Drmaseeh (talk · contribs). If you have any time yourself, I wonder if you feel like pruning out any of the excessive material? (bold text, etc.) There might be a copyvio in there, judging from the language used. EdJohnston (talk) 15:43, 3 April 2009 (UTC)
Non Sibi Sed Patriae
please explain the reason for changing "Non Sibi Sed Patriae", is not what Wikipedia represents, a tool to build upon with a strong focus on historical reality. --PietroSavo (talk) 04:31, 4 April 2009 (UTC) Pietro
Some new people from the last few days
- Emory Elliott
- George Stoddard
- Dorothy Kelly (educator)
- Frances Blaisdell
- William Schwartz (physician)
I think I also ran across an interesting one that you'd created and added a reference or something. Bongomatic 06:15, 4 April 2009 (UTC)
DYK for Arthur Richman
Gatoclass (talk) 16:29, 4 April 2009 (UTC)
RE: WP:NJ thanks
Not a problem; I am quite happy to be using my interest in New Jersey politics for the benefit of Wikipedia. I also sincerely appreciate the DYK nomination and your addition of other facts to James Beach. I look forward to further collaboration with you on WP:NJ articles. A Stop at Willoughby (talk) 17:56, 4 April 2009 (UTC)
Recent edit to the page Polygamy
This is regarding your message at User talk:75.72.217.46 regarding this edit to the page Polygamy. I am obviously new to editing and while reading the article came across a typo so thought of fixing that. I did not give a detailed description as the fix was self evident but after getting a message from Tiderolls I re-edited and this time I gave a detailed edit description. But now I notice that the page has been reverted and I am given a warning. I would appreciate if you could could look into the page and see for yourself that I was just trying to fix an error. Cheers :) Umnmathtutor (talk) 03:03, 5 April 2009 (UTC)
Doris Day
Thanks for that revert. I don't know what it is that was imbedded in the IP change ("AlProxy-Connection: keep-alive" and "Cache-Control: max-age=0") or its purpose, but it looked troublesome to me. Do you have any idea? Wildhartlivie (talk) 18:56, 5 April 2009 (UTC)
- I have seen it before in vandalistic edits, but I have no idea where it comes from. I will try to research. Alansohn (talk) 04:20, 6 April 2009 (UTC)
- Please let me know, it seems very weird! Wildhartlivie (talk) 23:50, 6 April 2009 (UTC)
Jacob B Agus
I did not create the article Jacob B Agus, but an admin deleted it this morning and I rescued it, rewrote it, and recreated it. Can you spend a few minutes and help wikify and clean it up?--Jayrav (talk) 19:38, 5 April 2009 (UTC)
Thanks. I was also surprised. --Jayrav (talk) 14:50, 6 April 2009 (UTC)
Image reversion VIA FP9ARM
There is no reason to revert this image. The image that was added is no different to the one that was originally there, the person who added the second image is obviously just wanting their own images on the page. 67.193.221.128 (talk) 02:57, 6 April 2009 (UTC)
- Thankyou. I'm guessing that it got your attention because there was no edit summary. If so the mistake is mine. I thought I had entered that info but obviously didn't, I seem to have an issue with using Wiki rightnow as I just entered an Edit summary without editing the page. I should pay greater attention to what I am doing.67.193.219.104 (talk) 04:17, 6 April 2009 (UTC)
- Now I can't log on to my account and have a different IP address? Have you heard of this elsewhere in your experience? 67.193.219.104 (talk) 04:19, 6 April 2009 (UTC)
Some more
- Eva Evdokimova
- Jorge Preloran
- John Blankenchip
- http://www.latimes.com/news/obituaries/la-me-richard-oneill5-2009apr05,0,2602055.story
Bongomatic 06:30, 6 April 2009 (UTC)
But wait, there's more!
Bongomatic
New message!
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
Control-alt-delete ★ user◾talk◾favs 15:03, 6 April 2009 (UTC)
New message!
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
Control-alt-delete ★ user◾talk◾favs 19:35, 6 April 2009 (UTC)
New message!
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
Control-alt-delete ★ user◾talk◾favs 20:34, 6 April 2009 (UTC)
Autism
Did you not read the reference? And I quote: "a DSM-IV diagnosis of Asperger's disorder is unlikely or impossible.". Hoax. Plain and simple. Please read the details before calling controversial papers "vandalism" if there is a lack of scientific consensus then perhaps it shouldn't be on Wikipedia at all. In case you didn't see it the first time [4], also [5] provides a layman's introduction. 129.97.134.80 (talk) 22:52, 6 April 2009 (UTC)
- While you are quoting a reference to support your claim, the article I read does not use the word "hoax" or claim it as such. The article questions the diagnostic criteria established by DSM-IV for Asperger's. If you are going to expunge any mentions of Asperger's or refer to it as a hoax, you will need to rebut the thousands of other articles that treat it as a rather real condition. Do not remove any content without discussing it first on the talk page. Alansohn (talk) 23:58, 6 April 2009 (UTC)
Otisjimmy1
Thanks, for reverting that vandalism from my page. Best, otisjimmy1 (talk) 04:02, 7 April 2009 (UTC)
Ferris Beuller's Day Off in popular culture merge discussion
Informing everyone who participated in the AFD for Ferris Beuller's Day Off in popular culture that a merge discussion is now underway concerning the same material. Please share your comments here Dream Focus 04:11, 7 April 2009 (UTC)
DYK twofer
Heh, could have used this one for April Fool's :) --Gatoclass (talk) 10:15, 7 April 2009 (UTC)
Nasal irrigation
Just to make sure you don't get into an edit war under false assumptions. The IP you just warned for removing sourced content is a static one who regularly removes questionable content that is always being added by the same COI SPA. See my "Note for vandal fighters" on the IP's talk page. --Hans Adler (talk) 15:31, 7 April 2009 (UTC)
- Thanks for the heads up. The content removed seemed more than plausible and the lack of an edit summary coming from an IP editor made it appear as vandalism. With subsequent edits to the article, I now understand why the content was removed. Alansohn (talk) 15:33, 7 April 2009 (UTC)
- It's a strange situation. The content looks more than plausible, but Grockl has in the past been making claims that are totally over the top, so I tend to err on the side of caution and decline to accept anything without bulletproof sourcing. --Hans Adler (talk) 18:52, 7 April 2009 (UTC)
Hi!
Thanks for reverting the vandalism to my talk page! Long time no talk. I hope all is well. Wishing you a חג כשר ושמח! shirulashem (talk) 00:35, 8 April 2009 (UTC)
Free Speech
free speech dingdong, its the talk page —Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.171.186.242 (talk) 03:36, 8 April 2009 (UTC)
DYK for Polycap
Dravecky (talk) 16:31, 8 April 2009 (UTC)
DYK for Gus Cifelli
Dravecky (talk) 10:55, 9 April 2009 (UTC)
DYK for H. Clay Earles
Hassocks5489 (tickets please!) 13:05, 10 April 2009 (UTC)
86.171.224.204
This IP recieved an level 3 warning before he replaced it with gibberish, please review page history(I ususally do when encountering a blank/nonsense IP talk page). Happy vandal hunting. Gsmgm (talk) 14:27, 14 April 2009 (UTC)
Frankie Campbell
I'm sorry but I am confused as to why my edit wasn't viewed as constructive...? 169.244.116.11 (talk) 16:57, 14 April 2009 (UTC)
- Sources show that he had a record of 33-4-2 as shown in the article, but your edit changed it a record of 730-4-2 in 736 fights. This is blatant vandalism, and is far from the first time you have vandalized articles. Alansohn (talk) 17:04, 14 April 2009 (UTC)
- If you were paying attention, you'd realize that this is a school IP, and that was merely a classmate's vandalism, not mine. I don't appreciate you reverting my constructive post concerning Frankie Campbell's early life in Bath, Maine. Please do not revert it again. 169.244.116.11 (talk) 17:10, 14 April 2009 (UTC)
Orlady RfA
Thought you might want to know about Orlady's Request for adminship. Kaldari (talk) 17:50, 14 April 2009 (UTC)