Unblocked |
→Blocked: Reply Tag: Reply |
||
Line 81: | Line 81: | ||
:::::Yes thats fine [[User:Aaron106|Aaron106]] ([[User talk:Aaron106#top|talk]]) 11:33, 4 May 2023 (UTC) |
:::::Yes thats fine [[User:Aaron106|Aaron106]] ([[User talk:Aaron106#top|talk]]) 11:33, 4 May 2023 (UTC) |
||
::::::I have lifted your block. Note that the restriction is only around "refactoring". [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk%3AAaron106&diff=1153127109&oldid=1153125828 These changes], for example, consists of introducing new content (perfectly fine!) followed by ''six refactors'' (not fine, too many). If you have any questions, please ask. Welcome back and thanks for clearing this up with me. Happy editing! --[[User:Yamla|Yamla]] ([[User talk:Yamla|talk]]) 11:36, 4 May 2023 (UTC) |
::::::I have lifted your block. Note that the restriction is only around "refactoring". [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk%3AAaron106&diff=1153127109&oldid=1153125828 These changes], for example, consists of introducing new content (perfectly fine!) followed by ''six refactors'' (not fine, too many). If you have any questions, please ask. Welcome back and thanks for clearing this up with me. Happy editing! --[[User:Yamla|Yamla]] ([[User talk:Yamla|talk]]) 11:36, 4 May 2023 (UTC) |
||
:::::::@[[User:Yamla|Yamla]] Hi I read up Wikipedia and found three-revert-rule. If I see vandalism It might take two edits before I noticed like here. [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Death_Row_Records&diff=prev&oldid=1152767991][https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Death_Row_Records&diff=prev&oldid=1152768381] Waiting 24 hours after an edit is a bit of pain. If I were to opt out of this program would I have to wait a week block? This was my first time being blocked and I don’t want this to happen again and would only edit under 3 times on a page going forwards. [[User:Aaron106|Aaron106]] ([[User talk:Aaron106#top|talk]]) 12:50, 4 May 2023 (UTC) |
Revision as of 12:50, 4 May 2023
Welcome!
Hello, Aaron106, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Staney Hill, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may soon be deleted.
There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:
- Starting an article
- Your first article
- Biographies of living persons
- How to write a great article
- The five pillars of Wikipedia
- Help pages
- Tutorial
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! MJ94 (talk) 02:13, 2 February 2012 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Staney Hill
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on Staney Hill requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. MJ94 (talk) 02:13, 2 February 2012 (UTC)
August 2021
Hi Aaaron, I noticed you tried to sign your message incorrectly. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either:
- Add four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment, or
- With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button located above the edit window.
This will automatically insert a signature with your username and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.
Thank you. Jr8825 • Talk 23:52, 17 August 2021 (UTC)
East Coast–West Coast hip hop rivalry
I'll be sure to add info about Nas vs. Tupac. I think I'm gonna be putting in a lot of work on this article when I'm able to. I think I'm pretty far from finished at the moment. --Dennis C. Abrams (talk) 15:49, 29 November 2021 (UTC)
Hello. Help cleanup. Thanks you. Guoimd (talk) 07:46, 15 December 2021 (UTC)
@Guoimd: Sure --Aaron106 (talk) 07:52, 15 December 2021 (UTC)
I've sent a cleanup request, hopefully they approve it @Guoimd: --Aaron106 (talk) 08:17, 15 December 2021 (UTC)
See Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Haiyenslna. Platonk (talk) 08:38, 15 December 2021 (UTC)
- You may be unaware but they are a sock: Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Haiyenslna. I suggest you ignore them. Kind regards, Robby.is.on (talk) 09:41, 15 December 2021 (UTC)
@Robby.is.on: Got it --Aaron106 (talk) 09:42, 15 December 2021 (UTC)
ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}}
to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:08, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
ITN recognition for Diamond and Silk
On 11 January 2023, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article Diamond and Silk, which you updated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. Thryduulf (talk) 18:27, 11 January 2023 (UTC)
Blocked
I've blocked this account as the editing pattern on User talk:Drmies is exceptionally unusual. I therefore suspect this account is compromised. If you can, in no more than three edits, explain what was going on there, explain why you needed to make more than 70 edits to another user's talk page, I'll be happy to consider unblocking you. --Yamla (talk) 10:38, 4 May 2023 (UTC)
- Yamla Hi sorry about that, that's not how I usally edit [1]. I was talking to a administrator about a suspected sockpuppet, and was adjusting my words to try make my grammar a bit better. I apologize. Aaron106 (talk) 10:42, 4 May 2023 (UTC)
- I told you no more than three edits and you made seven. I'm concerned something's going on here. If there's something causing you to act this way, you absolutely don't need to tell us but do need to step back until it's over (and I very, very sincerely wish you well). I, or any other admin, will be happy to unblock you once we are sure you are no longer going to edit in this manner but at the moment, you clearly aren't capable of restraining yourself. I want to be clear, I fully believe you are a constructive editor apart from this. If you are willing to be restricted to no more than one revision per page per 24 hour period or if you can convince us whatever is currently going on with you has stopped, your block will be lifted. --Yamla (talk) 11:21, 4 May 2023 (UTC)
- @Yamla My apologies. I will only try to edit in replies once from now on Aaron106 (talk) 11:25, 4 May 2023 (UTC)
- I will immediately unblock you if you commit to "no more than one edit, per page, per 24 hour period". Is that acceptable to you? Also, Wikipedia has a preview feature which you may find helpful. You probably already know about it, but not everyone does. --Yamla (talk) 11:27, 4 May 2023 (UTC)
- Yes thats fine Aaron106 (talk) 11:33, 4 May 2023 (UTC)
- I have lifted your block. Note that the restriction is only around "refactoring". These changes, for example, consists of introducing new content (perfectly fine!) followed by six refactors (not fine, too many). If you have any questions, please ask. Welcome back and thanks for clearing this up with me. Happy editing! --Yamla (talk) 11:36, 4 May 2023 (UTC)
- @Yamla Hi I read up Wikipedia and found three-revert-rule. If I see vandalism It might take two edits before I noticed like here. [2][3] Waiting 24 hours after an edit is a bit of pain. If I were to opt out of this program would I have to wait a week block? This was my first time being blocked and I don’t want this to happen again and would only edit under 3 times on a page going forwards. Aaron106 (talk) 12:50, 4 May 2023 (UTC)
- I have lifted your block. Note that the restriction is only around "refactoring". These changes, for example, consists of introducing new content (perfectly fine!) followed by six refactors (not fine, too many). If you have any questions, please ask. Welcome back and thanks for clearing this up with me. Happy editing! --Yamla (talk) 11:36, 4 May 2023 (UTC)
- Yes thats fine Aaron106 (talk) 11:33, 4 May 2023 (UTC)
- I will immediately unblock you if you commit to "no more than one edit, per page, per 24 hour period". Is that acceptable to you? Also, Wikipedia has a preview feature which you may find helpful. You probably already know about it, but not everyone does. --Yamla (talk) 11:27, 4 May 2023 (UTC)
- @Yamla My apologies. I will only try to edit in replies once from now on Aaron106 (talk) 11:25, 4 May 2023 (UTC)
- I told you no more than three edits and you made seven. I'm concerned something's going on here. If there's something causing you to act this way, you absolutely don't need to tell us but do need to step back until it's over (and I very, very sincerely wish you well). I, or any other admin, will be happy to unblock you once we are sure you are no longer going to edit in this manner but at the moment, you clearly aren't capable of restraining yourself. I want to be clear, I fully believe you are a constructive editor apart from this. If you are willing to be restricted to no more than one revision per page per 24 hour period or if you can convince us whatever is currently going on with you has stopped, your block will be lifted. --Yamla (talk) 11:21, 4 May 2023 (UTC)