EdwardsBot (talk | contribs) →The Wikipedia Signpost: 19 July 2010: new section |
|||
Line 38: | Line 38: | ||
<div style="margin-top:10px; font-size:90%; padding-left:5px; font-family:Georgia, Palatino, Palatino Linotype, Times, Times New Roman, serif;">'''[[Wikipedia:Wikipedia Signpost|Read this Signpost in full]]''' · [[Wikipedia:Wikipedia_Signpost/Single|Single-page]] · [[Wikipedia:Wikipedia Signpost/Subscribe|Unsubscribe]] · [[User:EdwardsBot|EdwardsBot]] ([[User talk:EdwardsBot|talk]]) 15:12, 19 July 2010 (UTC)</div> |
<div style="margin-top:10px; font-size:90%; padding-left:5px; font-family:Georgia, Palatino, Palatino Linotype, Times, Times New Roman, serif;">'''[[Wikipedia:Wikipedia Signpost|Read this Signpost in full]]''' · [[Wikipedia:Wikipedia_Signpost/Single|Single-page]] · [[Wikipedia:Wikipedia Signpost/Subscribe|Unsubscribe]] · [[User:EdwardsBot|EdwardsBot]] ([[User talk:EdwardsBot|talk]]) 15:12, 19 July 2010 (UTC)</div> |
||
<!-- EdwardsBot 0058 --> |
<!-- EdwardsBot 0058 --> |
||
== race and intelligence arbitration: procedural question == |
|||
Your opinion as clerk, please. I intend to appeal any editing restrictions (per the Topic Restrictions section of the proposed decision) since I had no part in any of the troubles on the page, and would appreciate the opportunity to work on the page without all the hysterics. However, I'm not sure whether it's more appropriate to make that request now during this phase or to wait for the final decision and make an appeal. how would you suggest I approach it? --[[User_talk:Ludwigs2|<span style="color:darkblue;font-weight:bold">Ludwigs</span><span style="color:green;font-weight:bold">2</span>]] 00:22, 20 July 2010 (UTC) |
Revision as of 00:22, 20 July 2010
User:AGK/NoticeUser:AGK/NoticeTemplate loop detected: User:AGK
Old messages are at User talk:AGK/Archive.
Wikipedia:Requests for undeletion is quickest for having pages undeleted.
E-mail me at Special:EmailUser/AGK.
to talk. Talkbacks are fine with me.
Pifeedback
Pifeedback
Could you give your opinion on Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard#Pifeedback.com?ChaosMaster16 (talk) 12:53, 13 July 2010 (UTC)ChaosMaster16
The Wikipedia Signpost: 12 July 2010
- UK COI edits: British politicians accused of WP cover-ups
- News and notes: Board changes, Wikimania, Public Policy Initiative
- Discussion report: Article ownership, WikiProjects vs. Manual of Style, Unverifiable village
- WikiProject report: WikiProject Apple Inc.
- Features and admins: The best of the week
- Arbitration report: The Report on Lengthy Litigation
- Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
The Wikipedia Signpost: 19 July 2010
- News and notes: Politician defends editing own article, Google translation, Row about a small Wikipedia
- WikiProject report: Up close with WikiProject Animals
- Features and admins: The best of the week
- Arbitration report: ArbCom to appoint CU/OS positions after dumping election results
- Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
race and intelligence arbitration: procedural question
Old messages are at User talk:AGK/Archive.
Wikipedia:Requests for undeletion is quickest for having pages undeleted.
E-mail me at Special:EmailUser/AGK.
to talk. Talkbacks are fine with me.
Pifeedback
Pifeedback
Could you give your opinion on Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard#Pifeedback.com?ChaosMaster16 (talk) 12:53, 13 July 2010 (UTC)ChaosMaster16
The Wikipedia Signpost: 12 July 2010
- UK COI edits: British politicians accused of WP cover-ups
- News and notes: Board changes, Wikimania, Public Policy Initiative
- Discussion report: Article ownership, WikiProjects vs. Manual of Style, Unverifiable village
- WikiProject report: WikiProject Apple Inc.
- Features and admins: The best of the week
- Arbitration report: The Report on Lengthy Litigation
- Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
The Wikipedia Signpost: 19 July 2010
- News and notes: Politician defends editing own article, Google translation, Row about a small Wikipedia
- WikiProject report: Up close with WikiProject Animals
- Features and admins: The best of the week
- Arbitration report: ArbCom to appoint CU/OS positions after dumping election results
- Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
race and intelligence arbitration: procedural question
Your opinion as clerk, please. I intend to appeal any editing restrictions (per the Topic Restrictions section of the proposed decision) since I had no part in any of the troubles on the page, and would appreciate the opportunity to work on the page without all the hysterics. However, I'm not sure whether it's more appropriate to make that request now during this phase or to wait for the final decision and make an appeal. how would you suggest I approach it? --Ludwigs2 00:22, 20 July 2010 (UTC)