Nick Cooper (talk | contribs) Undid revision 493679635 by 89.100.207.51 (talk) |
89.100.207.51 (talk) Read WP:NOTVAND. |
||
Line 39: | Line 39: | ||
Hi. Please be careful not to get caught up in an edit war about Chaplin. (It's always difficult to know if we are talking to the same person on an IP address, but if you have not already done so, please read [[WP:3RR]]). As far as Chaplin is concerned you are wishing to remove content which has been accepted for some time (possibly grudgingly) and has a reference (even if possibly not good enough). It would be fine to remove it, with a good explanation such as you have provided in your most recent edit summary, if nobody objects (see [[WP:BOLD]]) but since that is not the case it is probably better to open a talk page section about it. --[[User:Mirokado|Mirokado]] ([[User talk:Mirokado|talk]]) 15:38, 16 May 2012 (UTC) |
Hi. Please be careful not to get caught up in an edit war about Chaplin. (It's always difficult to know if we are talking to the same person on an IP address, but if you have not already done so, please read [[WP:3RR]]). As far as Chaplin is concerned you are wishing to remove content which has been accepted for some time (possibly grudgingly) and has a reference (even if possibly not good enough). It would be fine to remove it, with a good explanation such as you have provided in your most recent edit summary, if nobody objects (see [[WP:BOLD]]) but since that is not the case it is probably better to open a talk page section about it. --[[User:Mirokado|Mirokado]] ([[User talk:Mirokado|talk]]) 15:38, 16 May 2012 (UTC) |
||
== May 2012 == |
|||
[[File:Information.svg|25px|alt=|link=]] Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is invited to contribute, at least one of [[Special:Contributions/89.100.207.51|your recent edits]], such as the one you made to [[:List of 50 metre swimming pools in the Republic of Ireland]], did not appear to be constructive and has been [[Help:Reverting|reverted]] or removed. Please use [[Wikipedia:Sandbox|the sandbox]] for any test edits you would like to make, and read the [[Wikipedia:Welcoming committee/Welcome to Wikipedia|welcome page]] to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you.<!-- Template:uw-vandalism1 --><!-- Template:uw-cluebotwarning1 --> [[User:Nick Cooper|Nick Cooper]] ([[User talk:Nick Cooper|talk]]) 07:47, 17 May 2012 (UTC) |
|||
[[Image:Ambox warning pn.svg|30px|left|alt=|link=]] You currently appear to be engaged in an [[Wikipedia:Edit warring|edit war]]  according to the reverts you have made on [[:Secular humanism]]. Users are expected to [[Wikipedia:TALKDONTREVERT|collaborate]] with others, to avoid editing [[Wikipedia:Disruptive editing|disruptively]], and to [[WP:CONSENSUS|try to reach a consensus]] rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.<br> |
|||
Please be particularly aware, [[Wikipedia:Edit warring|Wikipedia's policy on edit warring]] states: |
|||
# '''Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made'''; that is to say, editors are not automatically "entitled" to three reverts. |
|||
# '''Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.''' |
|||
If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's [[Wikipedia:Talk page guidelines|talk page]] to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents [[Wikipedia:Consensus|consensus]] among editors. You can post a request for help at an [[Wikipedia:Noticeboards|appropriate noticeboard]] or seek [[Wikipedia:Dispute resolution|dispute resolution]]. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary [[Wikipedia:Protection policy|page protection]]. If you engage in an edit war, you '''may be [[Wikipedia:Blocking policy|blocked]] from editing.'''<!-- Template:uw-ew --> — [[User:Mann_jess|<b>Jess</b>]]<span style="margin:0 7px;font-variant:small-caps;font-size:0.9em">· [[Special:Contributions/Mann_jess|Δ]][[User_talk:Mann_jess|♥]]</span> 20:58, 18 May 2012 (UTC) |
|||
[[File:Ambox warning pn.svg|25px|alt=|link=]] Please stop your [[Wikipedia:Disruptive editing|disruptive editing]]. If you continue to [[Wikipedia:Vandalism|vandalize]] Wikipedia, as you did at [[:List of 50 metre swimming pools in the Republic of Ireland]], you may be [[Wikipedia:Blocking policy|blocked from editing]]. <!-- Template:uw-vandalism3 --><!-- Template:uw-cluebotwarning3 --> [[User:Nick Cooper|Nick Cooper]] ([[User talk:Nick Cooper|talk]]) 11:58, 19 May 2012 (UTC) |
|||
[[Image:Stop hand nuvola.svg|30px|alt=|link=]] This is your '''only warning'''; if you [[Wikipedia:Vandalism|vandalize]] Wikipedia again, as you did at [[:List of 50 metre swimming pools in the Republic of Ireland]], you may be '''[[Wikipedia:Blocking policy|blocked from editing]] without further notice'''. <!-- Template:uw-vandalism4im --><!-- Template:uw-cluebotwarning4 --> [[User:Nick Cooper|Nick Cooper]] ([[User talk:Nick Cooper|talk]]) 15:00, 21 May 2012 (UTC) |
|||
:''If this is a [[closed proxy|shared IP address]], and you didn't make the edit, consider [[Wikipedia:Why create an account?|creating an account]] for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.''<!-- Template:Shared IP advice --> |
Revision as of 16:21, 21 May 2012
April 2012
Your recent editing history at Katana shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.
To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. You need to discuss this or invite some outside opinions (maybe start an RfC). You can't just keep on reverting eathother and calling eachother names like "vandal" or "troll". DanielRigal (talk) 12:41, 15 April 2012 (UTC)
- If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.
Nyttend (talk) 13:35, 15 April 2012 (UTC)
Lily Allen
She lived and went to school in Leixlip. http://www.stevecummins.com/interviews/lily-allen-whats-up-tiger-lily:
"He lives in Dunboyne, but I lived in Leixlip for about a year and a half,” she explains. “My mom was doing a film in Ireland called Hear My Song. I was really young, like six or seven at the time. Weirdly enough, he was in the same school as me in Leixlip, but we didn’t meet again until something like eight or nine years later, which was a mad coincidence.”
Hope this clears it up for you. Murry1975 (talk) 16:51, 25 April 2012 (UTC)
Fair enough, I assumed it was vandalism. 89.100.207.51 (talk) 17:21, 25 April 2012 (UTC)
Your recent editing history at Leixlip shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.
To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. Murry1975 (talk) 13:43, 26 April 2012 (UTC)
ANI report
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Wesley☀Mouse 21:46, 25 April 2012 (UTC)
A cup of tea for you!
Following the minor misunderstandings at ANI and here, I feel that a lot of things may have been learnt from the outcome. Therefore, I would like to send this WikiLove Cup of Tea, as a sign of peace between us all. Wesley☀Mouse 23:46, 25 April 2012 (UTC) |
- If I weren't such an impudent shit, I'd throw in a cookie--but I ate them all. Best, Drmies (talk) 00:02, 26 April 2012 (UTC)
- It's okay, I forgive you, Drmies. 89.100.207.51 (talk) 02:21, 26 April 2012 (UTC)
Jessica Chastain
Hi. Please be careful not to get caught up in an edit war about Chaplin. (It's always difficult to know if we are talking to the same person on an IP address, but if you have not already done so, please read WP:3RR). As far as Chaplin is concerned you are wishing to remove content which has been accepted for some time (possibly grudgingly) and has a reference (even if possibly not good enough). It would be fine to remove it, with a good explanation such as you have provided in your most recent edit summary, if nobody objects (see WP:BOLD) but since that is not the case it is probably better to open a talk page section about it. --Mirokado (talk) 15:38, 16 May 2012 (UTC)