→Public toilets: Reply |
85.12.88.17 (talk) →Nintendo Wii (24 December 2010 edits): new section |
||
Line 137: | Line 137: | ||
:::I can't speak for the user who removed it, but the statement in the article went way beyond what the source said. "A student asked a few hundred children in a few schools in one city in Sweden and said that 16% of them made a particular response" is by no stretch the same thing as a global, unqualified, statement that that applies to 16% of all school children. There are also other issues, such as giving undue weight to the information. In addition, continually using this talk page to repeatedly indicate your lack of understanding of matters which have been repeatedly explained to you wastes people's time (whether in unblock requests, "helpme" requests, or otherwise). Your talk page access will be revoked if you do it again. [[User:JamesBWatson|JamesBWatson]] ([[User talk:JamesBWatson|talk]]) 12:50, 17 January 2011 (UTC) |
:::I can't speak for the user who removed it, but the statement in the article went way beyond what the source said. "A student asked a few hundred children in a few schools in one city in Sweden and said that 16% of them made a particular response" is by no stretch the same thing as a global, unqualified, statement that that applies to 16% of all school children. There are also other issues, such as giving undue weight to the information. In addition, continually using this talk page to repeatedly indicate your lack of understanding of matters which have been repeatedly explained to you wastes people's time (whether in unblock requests, "helpme" requests, or otherwise). Your talk page access will be revoked if you do it again. [[User:JamesBWatson|JamesBWatson]] ([[User talk:JamesBWatson|talk]]) 12:50, 17 January 2011 (UTC) |
||
== Nintendo Wii (24 December 2010 edits) == |
|||
{{helpme|Why did no-one accept my edit to [[Wii]]. My edit was at 12:41pm 24 Dec 2010. Can you please revert article back to my edit and accept my edit. Thanks }}--[[Special:Contributions/85.12.88.17|85.12.88.17]] ([[User talk:85.12.88.17#top|talk]]) 12:37, 20 January 2011 (UTC) |
Revision as of 12:37, 20 January 2011
Editing by unregistered users from your shared IP address or address range may be currently disabled due to abuse. However, you are still able to edit if you sign in with an account. If you are currently blocked from creating an account, and cannot create one elsewhere in the foreseeable future, you may follow the instructions at Wikipedia:Request an account to request that volunteers create your username for you. Please use an email address issued to you by your ISP, school or organization so that we may verify that you are a legitimate user on this network. Please reference this block in the comment section of the form.
Please check on this list that the username you choose has not already been taken. We apologize for any inconvenience.
Welcome!
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions.
Currently, you are editing without a username. You can continue to do so, as you are not required to log in to Wikipedia to read and edit articles; however, logging in will result in a username being shown instead of your IP address (yours is 85.12.88.17). Logging in does not require any personal details. There are many other benefits for logging in to Wikipedia. For now, if you are stuck, you can type {{helpme}} on this page and an experienced Wikipedian will be around to answer any questions you may have.
Please note these points:
- Please respect others' copyrights; do not copy and paste the contents from webpages directly.
- Please use a neutral point of view when editing articles; this is possibly the most important Wikipedia policy.
- If you are testing, please use the Sandbox to .
- Do not add unreasonable contents into any articles, such as: copyrighted text, advertisement messages, and text that is not related to an article's subject. Both adding such unreasonable information and editing articles maliciously are considered vandalism.
The Wikipedia Tutorial is a good place to start learning about Wikipedia. If you have any questions, ask me on my Talk page. I will answer your questions as far as I can! Thank you again for contributing to Wikipedia. Kukini 12:59, 3 May 2006 (UTC)
March 2007
Welcome, and thank you for experimenting with the page Energy on Wikipedia. Your test worked, and it has been reverted or removed. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Will (aka Wimt) 16:13, 7 March 2007 (UTC)
- If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, please ignore this notice
Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent contribution removed content from Bone Thugs-n-Harmony. Please be more careful when editing articles and do not remove content from Wikipedia without a good reason, which should be specified in the edit summary. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox. Thank you. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. Húsönd 14:32, 18 May 2007 (UTC)
July 2007
Please do not delete content from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to List of MMORPGs. Your edits do not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use Wikipedia:Sandbox for test edits. Thank you. MarašmusïneTalk 17:28, 19 July 2007 (UTC)
February 2009
Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to the page Pompeii has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. Thingg⊕⊗ 16:26, 9 February 2009 (UTC)
March 2009
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Watershed College, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Hotcrocodile (talk) 15:50, 2 March 2009 (UTC)
- If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make any unconstructive edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant warnings.
August 2009
Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to the page Lisronagh has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. Fieldday-sunday (talk) 12:43, 4 August 2009 (UTC)
October 2009
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Bandarban District, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted by ClueBot. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you believe there has been a mistake and would like to report a false positive, please report it here and then remove this warning from your talk page. If your edit was not vandalism, please feel free to make your edit again after reporting it. The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Bandarban District was changed by 85.12.88.17 (u) (t) making a minor change with obscenities on 2009-10-30T15:51:00+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot (talk) 15:51, 30 October 2009 (UTC)
December 2010
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Urinal (restroom). Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Pinethicket (talk) 16:21, 14 December 2010 (UTC)
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Urinal (restroom), you may be blocked from editing. Pinethicket (talk) 16:29, 14 December 2010 (UTC)
December 2010
Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to Urinal (restroom) has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. Vrenator (talk) 11:54, 17 December 2010 (UTC)
This is your last warning; the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Technopat (talk) 12:01, 17 December 2010 (UTC)
- If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.
Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to Bus has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. DVdm (talk) 15:27, 23 December 2010 (UTC)
The recent edit you made to Bus constitutes vandalism, and has been reverted. Please do not continue to vandalize pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thank you. DVdm (talk) 15:32, 23 December 2010 (UTC)
- Comments like "You are welcome to edit this list, as it's far from complete" have no place in the article. If an article is incomplete, there are various {{stub}} and {{expand}} tags that can be used to bring this to the editors' attention. Likewise, comments like "DO NOT UNDO!!!" are inappropriate; it's the main principle of Wikipedia that other users may edit the previous users' contributions. - Mike Rosoft (talk) 15:33, 23 December 2010 (UTC)
DO NOT UNDO!!!
Nobody respects DO NOT UNDOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO!!.It litters the page and if there is something to be undone it will be undone. --Piellas Athena (talk) 15:47, 23 December 2010 (UTC)
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Urination, you may be blocked from editing. Stephenb (Talk) 12:45, 24 December 2010 (UTC)
- If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make any unconstructive edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant warnings.
Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to Urinary bladder has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. Anna Frodesiak (talk) 13:10, 29 December 2010 (UTC)
The recent edit you made to Urinary bladder constitutes vandalism, and has been reverted. Please do not continue to vandalize pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thank you. Anna Frodesiak (talk) 13:15, 29 December 2010 (UTC)
I don't want to revert you again. I kindly ask that you fix: baldder --> bladder. Also, "You are welcome to edit or dicuss this matter." should not be in the body of the article. Maybe add it to the talk page. Thanks. Anna Frodesiak (talk) 13:27, 29 December 2010 (UTC)
Please do not remove content from pages without explanation, as you did with this edit to Bus. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing. Cst17 (talk) 13:48, 29 December 2010 (UTC)
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
below this notice, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Nlu (talk) 14:25, 29 December 2010 (UTC)- If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.
Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to Bus has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. Hoo man (talk) 11:44, 31 December 2010 (UTC)
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
below this notice, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Nlu (talk) 15:43, 31 December 2010 (UTC)- If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.
Urinary bladder and Bus
You keep adding the same information and it gets reverted. Please get consensus on the talk pages before putting it back. You keep getting blocked for this and you will again if you continue. Anna Frodesiak (talk) 11:52, 4 January 2011 (UTC)
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
This is your last warning; the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Anna Frodesiak (talk) 12:10, 4 January 2011 (UTC)
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
below this notice, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. -- Ed (Edgar181) 14:01, 4 January 2011 (UTC)85.12.88.17 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
What did I do wrong?
Decline reason:
Procedural; not a request for unblock. Also, see below. UltraExactZZ Said ~ Did 14:56, 6 January 2011 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Near as I can tell, you kept adding this and this to the Urinary bladder article, and were repeatedly told (when the information was removed) to discuss the matter on the talk page. You did, but only by copying the information (or bits of it) to the talk page - which explains precisely nothing about why you want to include the information. This is disruptive. UltraExactZZ Said ~ Did 14:56, 6 January 2011 (UTC)
Reversion of edits to Bus article.
I have reverted your recent edits to the Bus article for the reasons given on the talk page. Please discuss first and only edit when agreement has been reached. PeterEastern (talk) 13:52, 13 January 2011 (UTC)
January 2011
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
below this notice, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Favonian (talk) 12:43, 15 January 2011 (UTC)- If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.
85.12.88.17 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
What bad edits did i do, please tell me 85.12.88.17 (talk) 7:46 am, Today (UTC−5)
Decline reason:
I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that
- the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
- the block is no longer necessary because you
- understand what you have been blocked for,
- will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
- will make useful contributions instead.
Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. TNXMan 15:02, 15 January 2011 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
- Comment
You were adding the same text to Urinary bladder and Bus that have previously been contested by several editors. You have been doing this persistently and have in fact been blocked recently (twice) for the same transgression. Since you refuse to change your behavior, I saw no alternative to escalating the block. Favonian (talk) 12:55, 15 January 2011 (UTC)
85.12.88.17 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
Why do I get blocked just for adding a list of buses in Bus? This was to tell people about the kinds of buses. As for the Urinary bladder edits, that was just to tell people about the frequency of urination, and that about 16% of schoolkids never urinate at school. I will always do constructive edits to inform people, but I want to know whats wrong with my edits
Decline reason:
Please have only one unblock request open at a time: see below. JamesBWatson (talk) 12:39, 17 January 2011 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
{{tl:helpme|Why do I get blocked just for adding a list of buses in Bus? This was to tell people about the kinds of buses. As for the Urinary bladder edits, that was just to tell people about the frequency of urination, and that about 16% of schoolkids never urinate at school. I will always do constructive edits to inform people, but I want to know whats wrong with my edits}}
- See below. JamesBWatson (talk) 12:39, 17 January 2011 (UTC)
85.12.88.17 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
I will NEVER do anything bad to Wikipedia. I only added a list of buses to inform, and just told people about urination frequency. I WONT DO ANTHING WRONG!!!!!!
Decline reason:
You have repeatedly had it explained to you. You have had use of talk pages explained, but have persisted with your unilateral actions, so your claims (above) not to know why you have been blocked don't carry much weight. You have had plenty of warnings, and repeatedly been blocked, over a period of weeks. A month's break will give you time to think over what you have done, study Wikipedia's guidelines, and look at how other editors constructively deal with disagreements over editing. Then you will be ready to come back and edit constructively. JamesBWatson (talk) 12:39, 17 January 2011 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Public toilets
Why did someone removed the School Toilets section in Public toilets?}}
- You can see from the page history who it was - user Butlertd (talk) - so ask on his/her talk page. JohnCD (talk) 12:27, 17 January 2011 (UTC)
- I can't speak for the user who removed it, but the statement in the article went way beyond what the source said. "A student asked a few hundred children in a few schools in one city in Sweden and said that 16% of them made a particular response" is by no stretch the same thing as a global, unqualified, statement that that applies to 16% of all school children. There are also other issues, such as giving undue weight to the information. In addition, continually using this talk page to repeatedly indicate your lack of understanding of matters which have been repeatedly explained to you wastes people's time (whether in unblock requests, "helpme" requests, or otherwise). Your talk page access will be revoked if you do it again. JamesBWatson (talk) 12:50, 17 January 2011 (UTC)
Nintendo Wii (24 December 2010 edits)
Why did no-one accept my edit to Wii. My edit was at 12:41pm 24 Dec 2010. Can you please revert article back to my edit and accept my edit. Thanks
--85.12.88.17 (talk) 12:37, 20 January 2011 (UTC)