decline |
83.191.91.138 (talk) Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit |
||
Line 93: | Line 93: | ||
** Does the accuser also mean this person is unreliable that is featured in NKnews and other sources such as CNN? https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jonathan_McDowell http://money.cnn.com/2018/02/09/technology/future/tesla-orbit-elon-musk-spacex/index.html Nknews too? https://www.cnn.com/travel/amp/north-korea-nk-news-defectors/index.html https://www.nknews.org/in-the-media/ |
** Does the accuser also mean this person is unreliable that is featured in NKnews and other sources such as CNN? https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jonathan_McDowell http://money.cnn.com/2018/02/09/technology/future/tesla-orbit-elon-musk-spacex/index.html Nknews too? https://www.cnn.com/travel/amp/north-korea-nk-news-defectors/index.html https://www.nknews.org/in-the-media/ |
||
{{unblock reviewed | 1=Block relies on assumptions and conjectures, I ak from Croatia and my english isnt perfect, how many more Croats are going to be blocked for being just that and because one user is convenient excuse to make assertion of block evasion due to ones nationality? You admins/moderators are validating opinion of the accuser of what are reliable and unreliable sources without consesus in first place. Because I have similarities I must be that guy, close enough for you people. Treating assumptions as fact the reason to justify block. Circumstancial evidence at best is treated as solid on basis of nationality and location, 4 million people, 1 million at my location. Why dont you check if someone else has been accused too? [[Special:Contributions/83.191.91.138|83.191.91.138]] ([[User talk:83.191.91.138#top|talk]]) 17:30, 4 July 2018 (UTC) | decline = Your first edits were adding the same material as the previous block-evading IP, from the same location, to the same obscure article, with the same broken English. You are welcome to make an unblock request from your original account, but you are not welcome to edit here until that is resolved. [[User:Kuru|<span style="font-family:Segoe print; color:#cd853f; text-shadow:gray 0.2em 0.2em 0.4em;">Kuru</span>]] [ |
{{unblock reviewed | 1=Block relies on assumptions and conjectures, I ak from Croatia and my english isnt perfect, how many more Croats are going to be blocked for being just that and because one user is convenient excuse to make assertion of block evasion due to ones nationality? You admins/moderators are validating opinion of the accuser of what are reliable and unreliable sources without consesus in first place. Because I have similarities I must be that guy, close enough for you people. Treating assumptions as fact the reason to justify block. Circumstancial evidence at best is treated as solid on basis of nationality and location, 4 million people, 1 million at my location. Why dont you check if someone else has been accused too? [[Special:Contributions/83.191.91.138|83.191.91.138]] ([[User talk:83.191.91.138#top|talk]]) 17:30, 4 July 2018 (UTC) | decline = Your first edits were adding the same material as the previous block-evading IP, from the same location, to the same obscure article, with the same broken English. You are welcome to make an unblock request from your original account, but you are not welcome to edit here until that is resolved. [[User:Kuru|<span style="font-family:Segoe print; color:#cd853f; text-shadow:gray 0.2em 0.2em 0.4em;">Kuru</span>]] [similar broken english as asserted.User talk:Kuru|<span style="color:#f5deb3">''(talk)''</span>]] 18:14, 4 July 2018 (UTC)}} |
||
*Your reason to decline unblock like others relies on asserting I am the person for which I am being accused as and assumption that I have created an account previously, circumstancial "evidence" relying on association/similarities thus guilty because I am Croatian as clear by accuser focusing on my nationality and my imperfect grasp of english language... Similar "broken" english, so what... Nothing unique for any individual from any part of the world. No, my first edit was involving IRIS-T and KAI FA-50. 83.180.80.152 [[User:Kuru|<span style="font-family:Segoe print; color:#cd853f; text-shadow:gray 0.2em 0.2em 0.4em;">Kuru</span>]] |
Revision as of 18:40, 4 July 2018
Welcome!
|
July 2018
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page Kwangmyŏngsŏng-4 has been reverted.
Your edit here to Kwangmyŏngsŏng-4 was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links in references which are discouraged per our reliable sources guideline. The reference(s) you added or changed (http://sattrackcam.blogspot.de/2016/02/imaging-north-koreas-new-kwangmyongsong.html) is/are on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. If the external link you inserted or changed was to a blog, forum, free web hosting service, fansite, or similar site (see 'Links to avoid', #11), then please check the information on the external site thoroughly. Note that such sites should probably not be linked to if they contain information that is in violation of the creator's copyright (see Linking to copyrighted works), or they are not written by a recognised, reliable source. Linking to sites that you are involved with is also strongly discouraged (see conflict of interest).
If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 10:03, 1 July 2018 (UTC)
If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, please ignore this notice.
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
. NeilN talk to me 13:52, 4 July 2018 (UTC)- If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.
page:
83.191.91.138 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
Banned for being from Croatia as evident by SamaranEmeralds logic 83.191.91.138 (talk) 16:04, 4 July 2018 (UTC)
Decline reason:
Not sure what your unblock request means, but block evasion is a "no-no" and I'm declining your unblock request due to this. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 16:21, 4 July 2018 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
83.191.91.138 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
So I am being blocked for being from Croatia. Your denial relies on assumption by the way. 83.191.91.138 (talk) 17:07, 4 July 2018 (UTC)
Decline reason:
I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that
- the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
- the block is no longer necessary because you
- understand what you have been blocked for,
- will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
- will make useful contributions instead.
Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. Yamla (talk) 17:08, 4 July 2018 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
You are blocked based on all the evidence presented - not just one aspect of it. --NeilN talk to me 17:09, 4 July 2018 (UTC)
- I am aware and it is clear he's focusing on aspect of me being from Croatia and not having perfect english, as if its requirement for any foreigner/non-native speaker of english to have perfect handling of it! I am being blocked based on his opinion of what sources are and arent reliable.
- Does the accuser also mean this person is unreliable that is featured in NKnews and other sources such as CNN? https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jonathan_McDowell http://money.cnn.com/2018/02/09/technology/future/tesla-orbit-elon-musk-spacex/index.html Nknews too? https://www.cnn.com/travel/amp/north-korea-nk-news-defectors/index.html https://www.nknews.org/in-the-media/
83.191.91.138 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
Block relies on assumptions and conjectures, I ak from Croatia and my english isnt perfect, how many more Croats are going to be blocked for being just that and because one user is convenient excuse to make assertion of block evasion due to ones nationality? You admins/moderators are validating opinion of the accuser of what are reliable and unreliable sources without consesus in first place. Because I have similarities I must be that guy, close enough for you people. Treating assumptions as fact the reason to justify block. Circumstancial evidence at best is treated as solid on basis of nationality and location, 4 million people, 1 million at my location. Why dont you check if someone else has been accused too? 83.191.91.138 (talk) 17:30, 4 July 2018 (UTC)
Decline reason:
Your first edits were adding the same material as the previous block-evading IP, from the same location, to the same obscure article, with the same broken English. You are welcome to make an unblock request from your original account, but you are not welcome to edit here until that is resolved. Kuru [similar broken english as asserted.User talk:Kuru
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
- Your reason to decline unblock like others relies on asserting I am the person for which I am being accused as and assumption that I have created an account previously, circumstancial "evidence" relying on association/similarities thus guilty because I am Croatian as clear by accuser focusing on my nationality and my imperfect grasp of english language... Similar "broken" english, so what... Nothing unique for any individual from any part of the world. No, my first edit was involving IRIS-T and KAI FA-50. 83.180.80.152 Kuru