→September 2010: you've been blocked |
|||
Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
[[File:Nuvola apps important.svg|25px]] You currently appear to be engaged in an '''[[Wikipedia:Edit warring|edit war]]'''. Note that the [[Wikipedia:Edit warring#The three-revert rule|three-revert rule]] prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24-hour period. Additionally, users who perform several reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring even if they do not technically violate the [[Wikipedia:Edit warring#The three-revert rule|three-revert rule]]. When in dispute with another editor you should first try to [[Wikipedia:Talk page guidelines|discuss controversial changes]] to work towards wording and content that gains a [[Wikipedia:Consensus|consensus]] among editors. Should that prove unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek [[Wikipedia:Dispute resolution|dispute resolution]], and in some cases it may be appropriate to request [[Wikipedia:Protection policy|page protection]]. If the edit warring continues, '''you may be [[Wikipedia:Blocking policy|blocked]] from editing''' without further notice. <!-- Template:uw-3rr --> [[User:O Fenian|O Fenian]] ([[User talk:O Fenian|talk]]) 13:55, 25 September 2010 (UTC) |
[[File:Nuvola apps important.svg|25px]] You currently appear to be engaged in an '''[[Wikipedia:Edit warring|edit war]]'''. Note that the [[Wikipedia:Edit warring#The three-revert rule|three-revert rule]] prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24-hour period. Additionally, users who perform several reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring even if they do not technically violate the [[Wikipedia:Edit warring#The three-revert rule|three-revert rule]]. When in dispute with another editor you should first try to [[Wikipedia:Talk page guidelines|discuss controversial changes]] to work towards wording and content that gains a [[Wikipedia:Consensus|consensus]] among editors. Should that prove unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek [[Wikipedia:Dispute resolution|dispute resolution]], and in some cases it may be appropriate to request [[Wikipedia:Protection policy|page protection]]. If the edit warring continues, '''you may be [[Wikipedia:Blocking policy|blocked]] from editing''' without further notice. <!-- Template:uw-3rr --> [[User:O Fenian|O Fenian]] ([[User talk:O Fenian|talk]]) 13:55, 25 September 2010 (UTC) |
||
:I regret to inform you that you've been blocked from editing for 24 hours because of your edit warring. In the future, you must seek [[WP:CON|consensus]] for your edits, pursuing [[WP:DR|dispute resolution]] where necessary. If you wish to appeal your block, you may add <nowiki>{{unblock|your reason here}}</nowiki> to your talk page, but please read our [[WP:GAB|guide to appealing blocks]] first. [[User:Heimstern|Heimstern Läufer]] [[User talk:Heimstern|(talk)]] 14:29, 25 September 2010 (UTC) |
:I regret to inform you that you've been blocked from editing for 24 hours because of your edit warring. In the future, you must seek [[WP:CON|consensus]] for your edits, pursuing [[WP:DR|dispute resolution]] where necessary. If you wish to appeal your block, you may add <nowiki>{{unblock|your reason here}}</nowiki> to your talk page, but please read our [[WP:GAB|guide to appealing blocks]] first. [[User:Heimstern|Heimstern Läufer]] [[User talk:Heimstern|(talk)]] 14:29, 25 September 2010 (UTC) |
||
== Community restrictions == |
|||
{{Consensus|The article [[Louis Mountbatten, 1st Earl Mountbatten of Burma]], along with other articles relating to [[The Troubles]], is currently subject to '''[[Wikipedia:Requests_for_arbitration/The_Troubles#Final_remedies_for_AE_case|active arbitration remedies]]''', as laid out during a previous [[WP:AE|Arbitration Enforcement]] case that closed in October 2007, and was amended by community consensus in October 2008. The current restrictions are: |
|||
* All editors on Troubles-related articles are directed to get the advice of neutral parties via means such as [[WP:RFC|outside opinions]]. |
|||
* All articles related to The Troubles, defined as: any article that could be reasonably construed as being related to The Troubles, Irish nationalism, and British nationalism in relation to Ireland falls under [[WP:1RR]] (one [[WP:revert|revert]] per editor per article ''per day''). When in doubt, assume it is related. |
|||
** Clear vandalism, or edits by anonymous IP editors, may be reverted without penalty |
|||
* Editors who violate this 1RR restriction may be blocked <u>without warning</u> by any uninvolved administrator, even on a first offense. |
|||
If you are a new editor, or an editor unfamiliar with the situation, please follow the guidelines laid out in the above link. If you are unsure if your edit is appropriate, discuss it on this talk page first. Thank you. }} [[User:O Fenian|O Fenian]] ([[User talk:O Fenian|talk]]) 01:09, 27 December 2010 (UTC) |
Revision as of 01:09, 27 December 2010
September 2010
Welcome to Wikipedia, and thank you for your contributions. One of the core policies of Wikipedia is that articles should always be written from a neutral point of view. A contribution you made to Louis Mountbatten, 1st Earl Mountbatten of Burma appears to carry a non-neutral point of view, and your edit may have been changed or reverted to correct the problem. Please remember to observe this important core policy. Thank you. RepublicanJacobiteThe'FortyFive' 13:34, 25 September 2010 (UTC)
- If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.
Please do not add commentary or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did to Louis Mountbatten, 1st Earl Mountbatten of Burma. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Thank you. RepublicanJacobiteThe'FortyFive' 13:45, 25 September 2010 (UTC)
- If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24-hour period. Additionally, users who perform several reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. When in dispute with another editor you should first try to discuss controversial changes to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. Should that prove unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. If the edit warring continues, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. O Fenian (talk) 13:55, 25 September 2010 (UTC)
- I regret to inform you that you've been blocked from editing for 24 hours because of your edit warring. In the future, you must seek consensus for your edits, pursuing dispute resolution where necessary. If you wish to appeal your block, you may add {{unblock|your reason here}} to your talk page, but please read our guide to appealing blocks first. Heimstern Läufer (talk) 14:29, 25 September 2010 (UTC)