No edit summary Tag: 2017 wikitext editor |
Ritchie333 (talk | contribs) |
||
Line 37: | Line 37: | ||
[[File:Ambox notice.svg|link=|25px|alt=Information icon]] |
[[File:Ambox notice.svg|link=|25px|alt=Information icon]] |
||
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at [[Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring]] regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on [[Wikipedia:Edit warring|edit warring]]. <!--Template:An3-notice--> Thank you. |
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at [[Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring]] regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on [[Wikipedia:Edit warring|edit warring]]. <!--Template:An3-notice--> Thank you. |
||
:Okay, to be honest I would have either blocked {{u|MjolnirPants}} / {{u|MPants at work}} ''and'' you, or (more likely) stuck a note on the talk page along the lines of "okay, that's enough, next person to revert on here on anything that is '''not''' clearly and obviously worthy of a [[WP:RD2|redaction]] gets blocked. However, blocks are [[WP:NOTPUNITIVE|not punishment]], so I can't block Pants now as he's not currently being disruptive. I've had a word with Pants, and I think the best course of action is you just avoid each other from here on. [[User:Ritchie333|<b style="color:#7F007F">Ritchie333</b>]] [[User talk:Ritchie333|<sup style="color:#7F007F">(talk)</sup>]] [[Special:Contributions/Ritchie333|<sup style="color:#7F007F">(cont)</sup>]] 11:18, 26 September 2018 (UTC) |
Revision as of 11:18, 26 September 2018
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.
Points to note:
- Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
- Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.
If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. GMGtalk 16:21, 25 September 2018 (UTC)
Before you get blocked for this childishness, I just thought I'd explain, since you seem to have some real confusion
WP:NPA is a link that you need to actually read. It's not a personal attack to remove your comments. But it is a personal attack for you to whine about "PC editors" and "SJW's" deleting your comments. ᛗᛁᛟᛚᚾᛁᚱPants Tell me all about it. 16:36, 25 September 2018 (UTC)
- I removed your edit because you were calling another editor a "white supremacist" when that followed from nothing he'd written. You hypocrite and sophomoric spanner in the works. This isn't a playground or a safe space. 82.132.233.249 (talk) 16:42, 25 September 2018 (UTC)
- That editor is a self-avowed white supremacist. Go to his user page and read his blog. It's not a personal attack to say "You're an X" if that person has "I'm an X" all over their blog. ᛗᛁᛟᛚᚾᛁᚱPants Tell me all about it. 16:46, 25 September 2018 (UTC)
- You're a filthy well poisoning liar. I'm familiar with Emil's work. It's not "white supremacist" it's just normal HBD stuff. You're a disgusting disgusting communist activist, a liar, an ad hominem wielding debate ruiner, and it's no wonder wikipedia is a garbage source with childish morons like you running amok all over the place. 82.132.233.249 (talk) 16:50, 25 September 2018 (UTC)
- Just for the record, "normal HBD stuff" is white supremacy. Don't believe me? Ask any anthropologist who doesn't do "HBD stuff" what it is. Or read this link. And if you immediately think "the SPLC is lying" then you're hopeless and it's not worth my time explaining anything else to you. ᛗᛁᛟᛚᚾᛁᚱPants Tell me all about it. 16:56, 25 September 2018 (UTC)
- You're a filthy well poisoning liar. I'm familiar with Emil's work. It's not "white supremacist" it's just normal HBD stuff. You're a disgusting disgusting communist activist, a liar, an ad hominem wielding debate ruiner, and it's no wonder wikipedia is a garbage source with childish morons like you running amok all over the place. 82.132.233.249 (talk) 16:50, 25 September 2018 (UTC)
- That editor is a self-avowed white supremacist. Go to his user page and read his blog. It's not a personal attack to say "You're an X" if that person has "I'm an X" all over their blog. ᛗᛁᛟᛚᚾᛁᚱPants Tell me all about it. 16:46, 25 September 2018 (UTC)
"HBD is white supremacist". You're a literal lunatic. Yes the SPLC is a Jewish run anti-white smear operation. Shame on you, shame on this shitty website. 82.132.233.249 (talk) 17:21, 25 September 2018 (UTC)
September 2018
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
. caknuck ° needs to be running more often 16:51, 25 September 2018 (UTC)- If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.
82.132.233.249 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
Leftist editors here are contacting people off wiki to dogpile opponents. Rules are being applied selectively. Leftists editors are allowed to engage in personal attacks while removing comments of their opponents. Meanwhile scientists have their comments removed. Leftist editors are allowed to box off discussions in progress. The leftist editors tend to be sophomoric PC ignoramuses. This is extremely shameful. 82.132.233.249 (talk) 19:02, 25 September 2018 (UTC)
Decline reason:
I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that
- the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
- the block is no longer necessary because you
- understand what you have been blocked for,
- will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
- will make useful contributions instead.
Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. Yamla (talk) 19:03, 25 September 2018 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
- More of the same ridiculous claims in unblock requests is unfortunately unlikely to help... —PaleoNeonate – 01:22, 26 September 2018 (UTC)
- Hmm so I checked the history and can maybe explain in relation to your concerns. Recommended reading: WP:NPA, WP:NOTFORUM. Article talk pages are not to rant but to discuss specific changes to the article using reliable sources. Wikipedia is also not for WP:FREESPEECH or WP:SOAPBOXING. Lastly: WP:DISRUPT, WP:TENDENTIOUS and WP:3RR (in relation to editing itself). The block is short but should also be an opportunity to revise WP policies and processes. —PaleoNeonate – 01:32, 26 September 2018 (UTC)
Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Thank you.
- Okay, to be honest I would have either blocked MjolnirPants / MPants at work and you, or (more likely) stuck a note on the talk page along the lines of "okay, that's enough, next person to revert on here on anything that is not clearly and obviously worthy of a redaction gets blocked. However, blocks are not punishment, so I can't block Pants now as he's not currently being disruptive. I've had a word with Pants, and I think the best course of action is you just avoid each other from here on. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 11:18, 26 September 2018 (UTC)