November 2007
Please do not delete content from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Saks Fifth Avenue. Your edits do not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox for test edits. Thank you. EJF 17:32, 4 November 2007 (UTC)
- If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make any unconstructive edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant warnings.
Please stop. If you continue to blank out or delete portions of page content, templates or other materials from Wikipedia, you will be blocked from editing. GlassCobra 13:54, 10 November 2007 (UTC)
- If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make any unconstructive edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant warnings.
Please stop. If you continue to blank out or delete portions of page content, templates or other materials from Wikipedia, you will be blocked from editing. --Fogeltje 21:33, 10 November 2007 (UTC)
Rasputin's Penis
(copied from CliffC's talk page)
I was just making the text of the article agree with the reference. I would hardly think this requires a description in the change log, but I appreciate you making me both waste my time writing this and realize once again what a pointless endeavor Wikipedia is. 70.173.50.153 18:44, 13 November 2007 (UTC)
- After you are around Wikipedia a little longer you'll realize that it's infested with people who like to make joke edits, and the first indication of a joke edit is the lack of an edit summary. It's a courtesy that keeps other editors from having to spend time deciding whether an edit is constructive or not. I personally have not committed to memory the length of Rasputin's penis, so I checked the length as given in the article a few versions back and so assumed your edit was vandalism. Some editors won't spend even the small amount of time I spent, they will just revert such unexplained edits automatically. I see you have now corrected the article again, but without an edit summary your changes will always look questionable and waste other people's time. Looking at your other contributions so far, which seem to be limited to removing article tags, you are headed for a vandalism block.
- I see from your note to me that you know how to write a sentence, so why not stick around and contribute? I'm adding a {{welcome}} template below, not to break your chops but because I see no one has done so yet; these links are good reading to understand how Wikipedia works. Best, --CliffC 19:28, 13 November 2007 (UTC)
Re: Block Request
Confusion tends be caused when users edit from IPs as no one is sure whether the edit history all pertains to the same user. Keeping the warnings on the talkpage is a way of getting a quick indication of the sort of edits coming from an IP so generally practice is to keep them. If you want a talkpage you can really do with as you please without these issues - I would encourage you to create an account. Its free and literally only takes a couple of seconds - you just have to choose a username and password (no need to give any other details). Whatever you decide, thanks for edits to those articles. WjBscribe 10:59, 20 November 2007 (UTC)
November 2007
Please do not delete content from pages on Wikipedia. Your edits do not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox for test edits. Thank you. Don't remove user warning templates. Thinboy00 talk/contribs @143, i.e. 02:25, 21 November 2007 (UTC)
- If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.
Please do not erase warnings on this page. Doing so is also considered vandalism.[1] — Jeff G. (talk|contribs) 17:30, 29 November 2007 (UTC)
Please do not delete content from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to User talk:70.173.50.153. Your edits do not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox for test edits. Thank you. User Doe ☻T ☼C 18:00, 29 November 2007 (UTC)
- If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make any unconstructive edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant warnings.
This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
The next time you delete or blank page contents or templates from Wikipedia, you will be blocked from editing. User Doe ☻T ☼C 18:02, 29 November 2007 (UTC)
- If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions in a content dispute within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. --Fogeltje (talk) 18:03, 29 November 2007 (UTC)