Baking Soda (talk | contribs) →Harper Lee, Umberto Eco: new section |
Baking Soda (talk | contribs) →Chris Christie: new section |
||
Line 65: | Line 65: | ||
{{In the news}} |
{{In the news}} |
||
Note Recent deaths, also see [[Portal:Current_events/Sidebar]] [[User:Spirit Ethanol|Spirit Ethanol]] ([[User talk:Spirit Ethanol|talk]]) 17:14, 20 February 2016 (UTC) |
Note Recent deaths, also see [[Portal:Current_events/Sidebar]] [[User:Spirit Ethanol|Spirit Ethanol]] ([[User talk:Spirit Ethanol|talk]]) 17:14, 20 February 2016 (UTC) |
||
== Chris Christie == |
|||
What's wrong with including endorsement line below? |
|||
*Former presidential candidate, [[Governor of New Jersey|Governor]] [[Chris Christie]] ([[New Jersey]]), who suspended his campaign two weeks ago, endorses [[Donald Trump]]. [http://www.cnn.com/2016/02/26/politics/chris-christie-endorses-donald-trump/ (CNN)] |
|||
[[User:Spirit Ethanol|Spirit Ethanol]] ([[User talk:Spirit Ethanol|talk]]) 13:53, 27 February 2016 (UTC) |
Revision as of 13:53, 27 February 2016
Going forward
As you may have seen, I did the work of opening an SPI and providing evidence. Several socks are now blocked. If you suspect socks of the same editor have appeared again, please post to Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Spliff Joint Blunt (with evidence). If you are unsure how to format your report, post to my talk page (again, with specific evidence) and I will handle it. --NeilN talk to me 15:12, 12 November 2015 (UTC)
- for the love of god thank you--68.231.26.111 (talk) 15:12, 12 November 2015 (UTC)
Your talk page additions
Adding this to talk pages, implying that I have blocked the IP or have determined it's a sock, is not good. Please do not do that again. If you think an IP is block evading, you can add {{subst:uw-socksuspect|Spliff Joint Blunt}} and provide evidence on the SPI case page. Also, please read over User_talk:NeilN#does_an_indefititely_blocked_editor_have_the_right_to_post_on_user_pages and respond if you wish. --NeilN talk to me 00:20, 3 December 2015 (UTC)
December 2015
Please do not attack other editors, as you did at Supergirl (U.S. TV series). Comment on content, not on contributors. Personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Please stay cool and keep this in mind while editing. Alex|The|Whovian 10:52, 4 December 2015 (UTC)
- dude you just attacked me and called me a plaguirist!!!--68.231.26.111 (talk) 10:55, 4 December 2015 (UTC)
- That's not an attack. Continue the conversation on my talk page (which is where you took it). Alex|The|Whovian 10:56, 4 December 2015 (UTC)
- Here you go. Under "Recap – Prev Episode". Perfectly matches what's on Wikipedia - proof it has been copied to here. Alex|The|Whovian 11:40, 4 December 2015 (UTC)
- dude is that all you have for evidence!!! the webpage you quote is just a sniffer it finds thing already written and just becomes a file cabinet for them - you need to show a citation - a thing SIGNED by some author!!!--68.231.26.111 (talk) 11:45, 4 December 2015 (UTC)
- You need proof that you created it. If it's found on another website, it's reverted. It's really as easy as that. Alex|The|Whovian 11:46, 4 December 2015 (UTC)
- again dude are you brain dead the webpage you show is just a sniffer - it runs around the internet and just copies stuff - i am sure it has billions for wiki lines it has stolen!!!
- None of this you can prove. Alex|The|Whovian 11:49, 4 December 2015 (UTC)
- Neutral party here, i'm with the IP on this one, see their synopsis for ep6 before they changed it..its not always necessary that things were copied from other sites, its also possible others sites copy stuff from wikipedia; infact, its more likely and quite prevalent..--Stemoc 12:00, 4 December 2015 (UTC)
- None of this you can prove. Alex|The|Whovian 11:49, 4 December 2015 (UTC)
- again dude are you brain dead the webpage you show is just a sniffer - it runs around the internet and just copies stuff - i am sure it has billions for wiki lines it has stolen!!!
- You need proof that you created it. If it's found on another website, it's reverted. It's really as easy as that. Alex|The|Whovian 11:46, 4 December 2015 (UTC)
- dude is that all you have for evidence!!! the webpage you quote is just a sniffer it finds thing already written and just becomes a file cabinet for them - you need to show a citation - a thing SIGNED by some author!!!--68.231.26.111 (talk) 11:45, 4 December 2015 (UTC)
- Here you go. Under "Recap – Prev Episode". Perfectly matches what's on Wikipedia - proof it has been copied to here. Alex|The|Whovian 11:40, 4 December 2015 (UTC)
- That's not an attack. Continue the conversation on my talk page (which is where you took it). Alex|The|Whovian 10:56, 4 December 2015 (UTC)
One simply needs to Google the summary to see that it is on multiple sites. Do you have a cache for each of them? Alex|The|Whovian 12:05, 4 December 2015 (UTC)
- It's definitely on multiple sites with no clear indication of where it originally came from but, since it wasn't originally from this site, we have to treat it as a copyright violation. --AussieLegend (✉) 12:08, 4 December 2015 (UTC)
- have you see how the edits were made by the IP? It was not a single edit, but multiple ones within minutes such as this, 20 mins later, 5 mins later which collaborates with the link provided above and then over 5 hours later, the IP makes changes which the site mentioned above uses as a prequel option in their next episode..as i said, its the other way around, they are copying US.--Stemoc 12:57, 4 December 2015 (UTC)
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
.During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.
— Berean Hunter (talk) 03:17, 7 December 2015 (UTC)
You can't post. Over and above your block, the page is now protected. (cur | prev) 17:29, 6 December 2015 Ymblanter (talk | contribs) m . . (126,652 bytes) (0) . . (Changed protection level of Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring: Persistent sock puppetry ([Edit=Allow only autoconfirmed users] (expires 05:29, 7 December 2015 (UTC)) [Move=Allow only administrators] (indefinite))) (undo | thank) 7&6=thirteen (☎) 03:19, 7 December 2015 (UTC)
- i couldnt even defend myself - how fair is that!--68.231.26.111 (talk) 03:21, 7 December 2015 (UTC)
- wiki proves again - whole thing is absolutely pointless - please explain to me in terms even a 3-year-old can understand how it happens that the other guy is also not looking at the same block - he posted 7 reverts himself!!! all i ever see here is warrior assistance, sock puppet assistance, bias assistance, people that dont have the slightess clue what they are sayijng getting assistance --68.231.26.111 (talk) 03:38, 7 December 2015 (UTC)
- i couldnt even defend myself - how fair is that!--68.231.26.111 (talk) 03:21, 7 December 2015 (UTC)
- 3RR
- Blanking your talk page when others tried to communicate with you
- this personal attack
— Berean Hunter (talk) 04:03, 7 December 2015 (UTC)
Some words
Look, I think you're a net positive to Wikipedia but not if you set the attackmeter to 11 every time someone reverts you or questions your edits. If that happens, you'll probably be treated like most IPs who disrupt or vandalize. So, question for you - assuming that you get reverted in the future (and it's going to happen), how can we stop the situation from quickly deteriorating into a battlefield? --NeilN talk to me 04:23, 7 December 2015 (UTC)
Your edits
The New York Times is a notable source for coverage, the current events section is also not an article so policy regarding articles wouldn't apply. Like it, don't like it the Brussels comments received coverage from reliable sources. - Knowledgekid87 (talk) 15:31, 28 January 2016 (UTC)
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
.During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. Jezebel's Ponyobons mots 23:27, 29 January 2016 (UTC)
jan 30, 2016
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Portal:Current_events/2016_January_30
South Korean golfer Jang Ha-na makes first albatross on par-four in LPGA history at Bahamas tournament. http://www.abc.net.au/news/2016-01-31/jang-ha-na-makes-historic-albatross-in-bahamas-lpga-event/7127812
--68.231.26.111 (talk) 01:04, 1 February 2016 (UTC)
Done Sukhoi 24 (talk) 08:54, 1 February 2016 (UTC)
Recent deaths "Sidebar"
Jan 27, 2016
Artur Fischer = "over 1100 patents"!
--68.231.26.111 (talk) 06:28, 3 February 2016 (UTC)
Not done per article quality/lack of inline citations. Feel free to improve first. Spirit Ethanol (talk) 11:05, 3 February 2016 (UTC)
- The Iberian lynx (pictured) is reclassified from endangered to vulnerable on the IUCN Red List.
- American baseball player Willie Mays dies at the age of 93.
- In basketball, the Boston Celtics defeat the Dallas Mavericks to win the NBA Finals.
- A fire in a residential building in Mangaf, south of Kuwait City, kills fifty people.
Note Recent deaths, also see Portal:Current_events/Sidebar Spirit Ethanol (talk) 17:14, 20 February 2016 (UTC)
Chris Christie
What's wrong with including endorsement line below?
- Former presidential candidate, Governor Chris Christie (New Jersey), who suspended his campaign two weeks ago, endorses Donald Trump. (CNN)
Spirit Ethanol (talk) 13:53, 27 February 2016 (UTC)