welcome to Wikipedia |
3RR warning |
||
Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
*Hi there! I just saw your recent edits at Sexual Objectification, and liked both the edits, and your message about them on the talk page. Have you considered registering here? It's free, and you can do a lot more as an established user. I hope you consider it, and thanks again for the constructive edits! [[User:Jeffpw|Jeffpw]] 21:17, 28 January 2007 (UTC) |
*Hi there! I just saw your recent edits at Sexual Objectification, and liked both the edits, and your message about them on the talk page. Have you considered registering here? It's free, and you can do a lot more as an established user. I hope you consider it, and thanks again for the constructive edits! [[User:Jeffpw|Jeffpw]] 21:17, 28 January 2007 (UTC) |
||
[[Image:Information.png|25px]] Please refrain from repeatedly undoing other people's edits {{{{{subst|}}}#if:sexual objectification|, as you are doing in [[:sexual objectification]]}}. If you continue, you may be [[Wikipedia:Blocking policy|blocked]] from editing Wikipedia. The [[Wikipedia:Three-revert rule|three-revert rule]] prohibits making more than three reversions in a content dispute within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for [[Wikipedia:Edit war|edit warring]], even if they do not technically violate the [[Wikipedia:Three-revert rule|three-revert rule]]. Rather than reverting, please discuss disputed changes on the talk page. The revision you want is not going to be implemented by edit warring. {{{2|Thank you.}}}<!-- {{uw-3rr1}} --> [[User:Atomaton|Atom]] 00:10, 29 January 2007 (UTC) |
Revision as of 00:10, 29 January 2007
Hello, I'm Atomaton. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Internet sexual addiction, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you.
Hello, I'm [[User:{{subst:REVISIONUSER}}|{{subst:REVISIONUSER}}]]. Wikipedia is written by people who have a wide diversity of opinions, but we try hard to make sure articles have a neutral point of view. Your recent edit to Sexual objectification seemed less than neutral and has been removed. If you think this was a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on [[User_talk:{{subst:REVISIONUSER}}|my talk page]]. Thank you.
- Hi there! I just saw your recent edits at Sexual Objectification, and liked both the edits, and your message about them on the talk page. Have you considered registering here? It's free, and you can do a lot more as an established user. I hope you consider it, and thanks again for the constructive edits! Jeffpw 21:17, 28 January 2007 (UTC)
Please refrain from repeatedly undoing other people's edits , as you are doing in sexual objectification. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. The three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions in a content dispute within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. Rather than reverting, please discuss disputed changes on the talk page. The revision you want is not going to be implemented by edit warring. Thank you. Atom 00:10, 29 January 2007 (UTC)