72.198.26.61 (talk) typo |
2602:306:c5b4:e3d0:4811:21a:b873:1a02 (talk) No edit summary |
||
Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
# '''Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.''' |
# '''Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.''' |
||
If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's [[Wikipedia:Talk page guidelines|talk page]] to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents [[Wikipedia:Consensus|consensus]] among editors. You can post a request for help at an [[Wikipedia:Noticeboards|appropriate noticeboard]] or seek [[Wikipedia:Dispute resolution|dispute resolution]]. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary [[Wikipedia:Protection policy|page protection]]. If you engage in an edit war, you '''may be [[Wikipedia:Blocking policy|blocked]] from editing.'''{{Break}}You have been reverting with edit summaries containing phrases like "per talk" and "discussed on talk page". Such phrases are generally taken to mean that the edits have talk page consensus, but in fact you have merely made arguments for them on the talk page, arguments that lack consensus. Please don't misuse edit summaries in this manner, and please don't make disputed edits without consensus.<!-- Template:uw-ew --> [[Special:Contributions/72.198.26.61|72.198.26.61]] ([[User talk:72.198.26.61|talk]]) 22:19, 12 November 2015 (UTC) |
If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's [[Wikipedia:Talk page guidelines|talk page]] to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents [[Wikipedia:Consensus|consensus]] among editors. You can post a request for help at an [[Wikipedia:Noticeboards|appropriate noticeboard]] or seek [[Wikipedia:Dispute resolution|dispute resolution]]. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary [[Wikipedia:Protection policy|page protection]]. If you engage in an edit war, you '''may be [[Wikipedia:Blocking policy|blocked]] from editing.'''{{Break}}You have been reverting with edit summaries containing phrases like "per talk" and "discussed on talk page". Such phrases are generally taken to mean that the edits have talk page consensus, but in fact you have merely made arguments for them on the talk page, arguments that lack consensus. Please don't misuse edit summaries in this manner, and please don't make disputed edits without consensus.<!-- Template:uw-ew --> [[Special:Contributions/72.198.26.61|72.198.26.61]] ([[User talk:72.198.26.61|talk]]) 22:19, 12 November 2015 (UTC) |
||
:Discuss it on the talk page. |
Revision as of 23:20, 12 November 2015
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Shooting of Samuel DuBose. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.
Please be particularly aware that Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states:
- Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made.
- Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.
If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing.
You have been reverting with edit summaries containing phrases like "per talk" and "discussed on talk page". Such phrases are generally taken to mean that the edits have talk page consensus, but in fact you have merely made arguments for them on the talk page, arguments that lack consensus. Please don't misuse edit summaries in this manner, and please don't make disputed edits without consensus. 72.198.26.61 (talk) 22:19, 12 November 2015 (UTC)
- Discuss it on the talk page.