EdJohnston (talk | contribs) |
EdJohnston (talk | contribs) →3RR warning: new section |
||
Line 13: | Line 13: | ||
The [[Naveen Jain]] article has been the subject of [[Wikipedia:Conflict_of_interest/Noticeboard/Archive_21#Naveen_Jain|a case]] at the [[Wikipedia:Conflict of interest/Noticeboard]]. A single anonymous editor who tries to undo a verdict reached at that noticeboard is unlikely to be successful. To ensure that other editors respect consensus, administrators are allowed to use blocks or article protection. If you believe the article contains errors, explain what they are, and provide sources. [[User:EdJohnston|EdJohnston]] ([[User talk:EdJohnston|talk]]) 04:16, 10 February 2008 (UTC) |
The [[Naveen Jain]] article has been the subject of [[Wikipedia:Conflict_of_interest/Noticeboard/Archive_21#Naveen_Jain|a case]] at the [[Wikipedia:Conflict of interest/Noticeboard]]. A single anonymous editor who tries to undo a verdict reached at that noticeboard is unlikely to be successful. To ensure that other editors respect consensus, administrators are allowed to use blocks or article protection. If you believe the article contains errors, explain what they are, and provide sources. [[User:EdJohnston|EdJohnston]] ([[User talk:EdJohnston|talk]]) 04:16, 10 February 2008 (UTC) |
||
== 3RR warning == |
|||
[[Image:Nuvola apps important.svg|30px|]] You currently appear to be engaged in an [[Wikipedia:Edit war|edit war]]{{#if:Naveen Jain|  according to the reverts you have made on [[:Naveen Jain]]}}. Note that the [[Wikipedia:Three-revert rule|three-revert rule]] prohibits making more than three reversions in a content dispute within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the [[Wikipedia:Three-revert rule|three-revert rule]]. If you continue, '''you may be [[Wikipedia:Blocking policy|blocked]] from editing'''. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a [[Wikipedia:Consensus|consensus]] among editors. If necessary, pursue [[Wikipedia:Dispute resolution|dispute resolution]]. {{#if:|{{{2}}}|}}<!-- Template:uw-3rr --> [[User:EdJohnston|EdJohnston]] ([[User talk:EdJohnston|talk]]) 23:55, 10 February 2008 (UTC) |
Revision as of 23:55, 10 February 2008
November 2007
Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Nelson DeMille, you will be blocked from editing. Nobody of consequence 14:45, 1 November 2007 (UTC)
Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed content from Naveen Jain. When removing text, please specify a reason in the edit summary and discuss edits that are likely to be controversial on the article's talk page. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the text has been restored, as you can see from the page history. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Someguy1221 (talk) 22:35, 9 February 2008 (UTC)
Using false edit summaries does not let you sidestep the definition of vandalism or POV pushing. If you have an issue with the content in the article, comment on the talk page. Further removal of content may result in your being blocked from editing. Someguy1221 (talk) 01:07, 10 February 2008 (UTC)
This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive comments.
If you continue to make personal attacks on other people, you will be blocked for disruption. Comment on content, not on other contributors or people. Someguy1221 (talk) 03:55, 10 February 2008 (UTC)
The Naveen Jain article has been the subject of a case at the Wikipedia:Conflict of interest/Noticeboard. A single anonymous editor who tries to undo a verdict reached at that noticeboard is unlikely to be successful. To ensure that other editors respect consensus, administrators are allowed to use blocks or article protection. If you believe the article contains errors, explain what they are, and provide sources. EdJohnston (talk) 04:16, 10 February 2008 (UTC)
3RR warning
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Naveen Jain. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions in a content dispute within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. If necessary, pursue dispute resolution. EdJohnston (talk) 23:55, 10 February 2008 (UTC)