comments about others
I suppose that you might discount this because of your presumed general opinion of me, but I have found it not a good idea to specifically say you are following a articular editor. in looking at multiple works from an editor, not to say specifically what you are doing. It can look too much like wikihounding. As you have seen, I will support you when you do identify an actual problem. DGG ( talk ) 05:30, 6 December 2016 (UTC)
- User:DGG: I follow you, because you are the problem. You should resign your admin bit and arb, and find something else to do. Good day sir. -- 1Wiki8........................... (talk) 05:49, 6 December 2016 (UTC)
- I wasn't thinking about myself. You may follow me as much as you please--quite a few people do. I don't think I have ever complained about how people think of me , or deal with me. I But we might even find some way of working together, since we do have some common ground, as some recent discussions show. DGG ( talk ) 06:14, 6 December 2016 (UTC)
- Really, I am serious, dear User:DGG. You should immediately resign from arb and your admin bit. We don't have to drag your "breaches" into the public discussion, it won't be pretty. Just find some other hobby. Really, you need to go. -- 1Wiki8........................... (talk) 09:50, 10 December 2016 (UTC)
- you are one of the only two people in WP who has said so. I've known the other guy a long time, and since he is able to explain himself,we have had polite discussion, and remain friends of a sort. Just what are you complaining about? What have I done as an arb that you do not like? What have I done as an admin that seriously breaks the rules for admins? or persistently done wrong as an editor? Of mown volition I shall remain an arb until I either lose an election or or bored with it, and the second will probably be sooner. I shall remain as an admin and an ed. until there's a successful arb case against me, or I get too old to participate and lose interest, or get frustrated enough in having to deal receptively with the same problems. As there;s never been a negative sanction agains me herein an forum, I dont think I'll end up leaving unwillingly. You are welcome to try; its only fair to warn you to beware of the boomerang. But I cam here to try to reach sone kind of informal modus vivendi, as I have with modt of the people taking my side in notability issues. DGG ( talk ) 10:59, 10 December 2016 (UTC)
- I wasn't thinking about myself. You may follow me as much as you please--quite a few people do. I don't think I have ever complained about how people think of me , or deal with me. I But we might even find some way of working together, since we do have some common ground, as some recent discussions show. DGG ( talk ) 06:14, 6 December 2016 (UTC)
BBC 12-hour Editathon - large influx of new pages & drafts expected
New Page Reviewers are asked to be especially on the look out 08:00-20:00 UTC (that's local London time - check your USA and AUS times) on Thursday 8 December for new pages. The BBC together with Wikimedia UK is holding a large 12-hour editathon. Many new articles and drafts are expected. See BBC 100 Women 2016: How to join our edit-a-thon. Follow also on #100womenwiki, and please, don't bite the newbies :) (user:Kudpung for NPR. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 23:55, 7 December 2016 (UTC))
BBC 12-hour Editathon - large influx of new pages & drafts expected
AfC Reviewers are asked to be especially on the look out 08:00-20:00 UTC (that's local London time - check your USA and AUS times) on Thursday 8 December for new pages. The BBC together with Wikimedia UK is holding a large 12-hour editathon. Many new articles and drafts are expected. See BBC 100 Women 2016: How to join our edit-a-thon. Follow also on #100womenwiki, and please, don't bite the newbies :) (user:Kudpung for NPR. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:02, 8 December 2016 (UTC)
MfD nomination of Draft:Alakanani Itireleng
Draft:Alakanani Itireleng, a page which you created or substantially contributed to (or which is in your userspace), has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; you may participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:Alakanani Itireleng and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Draft:Alakanani Itireleng during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. --Another Believer (Talk) 00:36, 9 December 2016 (UTC)
MfD nomination of Draft:Blockverify
Draft:Blockverify, a page which you created or substantially contributed to (or which is in your userspace), has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; you may participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:Blockverify and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Draft:Blockverify during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. --Another Believer (Talk) 23:11, 9 December 2016 (UTC)