187.255.222.128 (talk) →June 2022: Reply Tag: Reply |
→June 2023: 3rr |
||
Line 20: | Line 20: | ||
:No way! I want ''[[Skull Island (TV series)|Skull Island]]'' co-produced by [[Warner Bros. Animation]]!!!! [[Special:Contributions/187.255.222.128|187.255.222.128]] ([[User talk:187.255.222.128#top|talk]]) 16:15, 30 June 2023 (UTC) |
:No way! I want ''[[Skull Island (TV series)|Skull Island]]'' co-produced by [[Warner Bros. Animation]]!!!! [[Special:Contributions/187.255.222.128|187.255.222.128]] ([[User talk:187.255.222.128#top|talk]]) 16:15, 30 June 2023 (UTC) |
||
[[File:Stop hand nuvola.svg|30px|left|alt=Stop icon]] Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an [[Wikipedia:Edit warring|edit war]]; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the [[Wikipedia:Talk page guidelines|talk page]] to work toward making a version that represents [[Wikipedia:Consensus|consensus]] among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war; read about [[WP:EPTALK|how this is done]]. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant [[Wikipedia:Noticeboards|noticeboard]] or seek [[Wikipedia:Dispute resolution|dispute resolution]]. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary [[Wikipedia:Protection policy|page protection]]. |
|||
'''Being involved in an edit war can result in you being [[Wikipedia:Blocking policy|blocked from editing]]'''—especially if you violate the [[Wikipedia:Edit warring#The three-revert rule|three-revert rule]], which states that an editor must not perform more than three [[Help:Reverting|reverts]] on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—'''even if you do not violate the three-revert rule'''—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.<!-- Template:uw-3rr --> [[User:Barry Wom|Barry Wom]] ([[User talk:Barry Wom|talk]]) 16:18, 30 June 2023 (UTC) |
Revision as of 16:18, 30 June 2023
June 2022
This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at Talk: Pokémon Ultimate Journeys: The Series, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Ajeeb Prani (talk) 16:09, 10 June 2023 (UTC)
- No way! I want Ash Ketchum back, reuniting all of his old friends to fight against Team Rocket, challenging Giovanni for a final battle, reuniting with Serena, Ash and Serena getting married and having their own kids in 26 years in the future!!! 187.255.222.128 (talk) 16:18, 30 June 2023 (UTC)
Skull Island should to be produced by Warner Bros. Animation
The executives of Netflix don't want to collaborate with Warner Bros. Animation for that. In a way, people are disgusted by the anime-style series without using the Warner Bros. Animation logo in the opening and closing credits. One of them is complaining about the episodes without the Warner Bros. Animation logo. The producers, writers, animators, storyboarders and directors of Warner Bros. Animation are not involved with the anime-style series. Netflix executives did not authorize Warner Bros. Animation collaborate with the anime-style series. Executives at Netflix and Legendary Television wanted to collaborate with Warner Bros. Animation for the anime-style series "Skull Island", but they wouldn't because Netflix and Legendary can't produce a series without Warner Bros. Animation's authorization.
Warner Bros. Animation was unable to collaborate with "Skull Island" because Netflix did not agree with the studio. Netflix executives declined to credit Warner Bros. Animation and Sam Register for collaborating on the anime-style series. The anime-style series was to be co-produced in association with Warner Bros. Animation, but Netflix doesn't want to collaborate with Warner Bros. Animation because Netflix did not authorize. Netflix executives don't want to put Warner Bros. Animation in place by collaboration by Legendary and Powerhouse Animation. One person commented on social media about the anime-style series saying "why not the series be co-produced by Warner Bros. Animation?", and they said "no", so the producers, writers, directors and executives of Netflix doesn't want to collaborate the anime-style series with Warner Bros. Animation.
The anime-style series was to be co-produced in association with Warner Bros. Animation, but for an unknown reason, Netflix is not collaborating with Warner Bros. Animation at this point. Sam Register, the executive producer of Warner Bros. Animation is not involved with the anime-style series for unknown reasons, in which case people who watch this anime-style series would be disgusted by the series without Warner Bros. Animation's collaboration. Netflix and Legendary Television could not have produced the MonsterVerse anime-style series without Warner Bros. Animation's authorization. 187.255.222.128 (talk) 12:50, 24 June 2023 (UTC)
June 2023
Please do not add or change content without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Barry Wom (talk) 13:42, 30 June 2023 (UTC)
Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at List of unproduced Warner Bros. Animation projects, you may be blocked from editing. Barry Wom (talk) 16:11, 30 June 2023 (UTC)
- No way! I want Skull Island co-produced by Warner Bros. Animation!!!! 187.255.222.128 (talk) 16:15, 30 June 2023 (UTC)
Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war; read about how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.
Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Barry Wom (talk) 16:18, 30 June 2023 (UTC)