108.65.82.200 (talk) |
To reviewing admin |
||
Line 17: | Line 17: | ||
{{Unblock|I now understand about the [[WP:0RR]], which means that reverting is forbidden, and one revert usually becomes three. I will now try to discuss the issues.}} |
{{Unblock|I now understand about the [[WP:0RR]], which means that reverting is forbidden, and one revert usually becomes three. I will now try to discuss the issues.}} |
||
To the reviewing admin, make sure you read [[Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/IncidentArchive943#Long_term_disruption_from_anon_using_108.65....2C_108.66....2C_99.101...]]. [[WP:SO]] is probably the only plausible avenue of redemption for this user and would would require at least six months of zero edits (that is, zero edits from any IP address or from any account). Though even then, I'd probably personally be unwilling to unblock given the apparently multi-year long trolling or [[WP:CIR]] issues. Practically speaking, this user is under a de facto ban. --[[User:Yamla|Yamla]] ([[User talk:Yamla|talk]]) 22:50, 19 March 2017 (UTC) |
Revision as of 22:50, 19 March 2017
Trolling/block evasion/etc.
See User_talk:108.71.122.211#Reverting. - SummerPhDv2.0 14:40, 17 January 2017 (UTC)
January 2017
Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did to 42 (dominoes). This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. SummerPhDv2.0 14:38, 17 January 2017 (UTC)
- If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at 42 (dominoes). You are citing an unreliable source for some material and removing other material whose removal has been contested. You will likely need to discuss this after your forthcoming block. SummerPhDv2.0 18:25, 17 January 2017 (UTC)
- If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.
March 2017
WP:EVADE applies. - SummerPhDv2.0 18:22, 19 March 2017 (UTC)
108.65.82.200 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
I now know that we use the official 42 rules, bidding Nello applies.
Decline reason:
That's not what you're blocked for, though it doesn't help your cause. Huon (talk) 20:13, 19 March 2017 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
108.65.82.200 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
I now understand that WP:LETITBE now applies to the WP:MODERNTEST, and I will no longer edit it in a way that most admins think is vandalism and block evasion.
Decline reason:
As per User_talk:108.71.122.211#Reverting, no. So much no. Yamla (talk) 21:43, 19 March 2017 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
108.65.82.200 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
Notes:
- In some cases, you may not in fact be blocked, or your block has already expired. Please check the list of active blocks. If no block is listed, then you have been autoblocked by the automated anti-vandalism systems. Please remove this request and follow these instructions instead for quick attention by an administrator.
- Please read our guide to appealing blocks to make sure that your unblock request will help your case. You may change your request at any time.
If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, replace this template with the following, replacing "blocking administrator" with the name of the blocking admin:
{{Unblock on hold |1=blocking administrator |2=I now understand about the [[WP:0RR]], which means that reverting is forbidden, and one revert usually becomes three. I will now try to discuss the issues. |3 = ~~~~}}
If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following code, substituting {{subst:Decline reason here}}
with a specific rationale. Leaving the decline reason unchanged will result in display of a default reason, explaining why the request was declined.
{{unblock reviewed |1=I now understand about the [[WP:0RR]], which means that reverting is forbidden, and one revert usually becomes three. I will now try to discuss the issues. |decline = {{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}
If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting Accept reason here
with your rationale:
{{unblock reviewed |1=I now understand about the [[WP:0RR]], which means that reverting is forbidden, and one revert usually becomes three. I will now try to discuss the issues. |accept = accept reason here ~~~~}}
To the reviewing admin, make sure you read Wikipedia:Administrators'_noticeboard/IncidentArchive943#Long_term_disruption_from_anon_using_108.65....2C_108.66....2C_99.101.... WP:SO is probably the only plausible avenue of redemption for this user and would would require at least six months of zero edits (that is, zero edits from any IP address or from any account). Though even then, I'd probably personally be unwilling to unblock given the apparently multi-year long trolling or WP:CIR issues. Practically speaking, this user is under a de facto ban. --Yamla (talk) 22:50, 19 March 2017 (UTC)