→Unblock with apologies: wow. |
→Unblock with apologies: "reports"?! |
||
Line 231: | Line 231: | ||
:Is it standard operating procedure to block completely innocent editors indefinitely and with no warning? -- [[User:!!|!!]] [[User talk:!!|??]] 22:55, 18 November 2007 (UTC) |
:Is it standard operating procedure to block completely innocent editors indefinitely and with no warning? -- [[User:!!|!!]] [[User talk:!!|??]] 22:55, 18 November 2007 (UTC) |
||
::Right - and so there have been [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/Incidents&diff=prev&oldid=172315359|"reports"] circulating about me, to an undisclosed list of people. What was said, and to whom? -- [[User:!!|!!]] [[User talk:!!|??]] 23:13, 18 November 2007 (UTC) |
Revision as of 23:13, 18 November 2007
This is a Wikipedia user talk page.
This is not an encyclopedia article or the talk page for an encyclopedia article. If you find this page on any site other than Wikipedia, you are viewing a mirror site. Be aware that the page may be outdated and that the user to whom this talk page belongs to may have no personal affiliation with any site other than Wikipedia itself. The original talk page is located at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/!!. |
Contents |
---|
Virgin
I like walking on virgin snow. --Dweller 12:22, 1 November 2007 (UTC)
- Touched for the very first time, eh? You can be arrested for that. -- !! ?? 12:57, 1 November 2007 (UTC)
- "Sense of humour still intact" check - Done --Dweller 13:00, 1 November 2007 (UTC)
Sense of humour failure shortly afterwards? check - Done -- !! ?? 21:32, 4 November 2007 (UTC)
Finchly
I can easily obtain a (legal) scan of that, I just need someone to upload it for me. 68.39.174.238 14:25, 3 November 2007 (UTC)
An article which you started, or significantly expanded, George Styles, was selected for DYK!
Thanks for your contributions! Nishkid64 (talk) 18:25, 3 November 2007 (UTC)
Charles de Jaeger
--GeeJo (t)⁄(c) • 01:05, 4 November 2007 (UTC)
Re: DYK/next
Sorry, I wasn't aware that you were working on the page at the same time. :) --Camptown 10:59, 4 November 2007 (UTC)
Leonard Miall
--GeeJo (t)⁄(c) • 17:10, 4 November 2007 (UTC)
- Well done, I think you are underslling yourself. Blnguyen (bananabucket) 00:15, 8 November 2007 (UTC)
Thx for the plump up. Team efforts are a good way of doing this. Looks good and more worthy of a UK philanthropist Victuallers 14:34, 5 November 2007 (UTC)
No argment its a 3 way split of some proportion. Not sure of the niceties ... do you appeal to admins, nominator or first editor... if its me then nick a copy off my talk page. This has happened to me before and I put it down to "working with amateurs" (ie sOK, as I ve also had undeserved credit, too, which balances it up).. but as I said you have my support for your claim and I think we want to make collaborations attractive. Victuallers 16:16, 7 November 2007 (UTC)
- Oh, I expect someone will be along in due course. I think this one was a three-way tie, actually. I can always do the necessary myself, if need be - I am not that averse to giving myself due credit :) -- !! ?? 17:31, 7 November 2007 (UTC)
Well done folks, Blnguyen (bananabucket) 05:48, 7 November 2007 (UTC)
Blnguyen (bananabucket) 01:46, 8 November 2007 (UTC)
- It seems I am not very good at deciding whether a person is notable any more. -- !! ?? 15:50, 8 November 2007 (UTC)
- Yes you are. Blnguyen (bananabucket) 00:22, 9 November 2007 (UTC)
!!
- Oh, I see ! works! Well done, User:Doubleyoupea! -- !! ?? 00:17, 9 November 2007 (UTC)
- I don't approve of counting mind, but spying on your contributions generally lets me catch up (and I see you've made it to the 3rd century). WP 12:06, 9 November 2007 (UTC)
- Well, As I am sure you are aware, it depicts the guards marching out to a muster on Finchley Common, in the distance. -- !! ?? 13:30, 9 November 2007 (UTC)
- We are at cross-purposes today. I meant where is it in your canon of work? Somebody's uploaded that rather nice scan, pity to waste it. WP 13:43, 9 November 2007 (UTC)
- Well, As I am sure you are aware, it depicts the guards marching out to a muster on Finchley Common, in the distance. -- !! ?? 13:30, 9 November 2007 (UTC)
I could ask the same question, Mr Characters and Caricaturas. All in good time. I have some non-notable baronets to write up. -- !! ?? 13:46, 9 November 2007 (UTC)
- I can't muster the strength for more than one every couple of weeks. At least the Bot recognized this one as "good". WP 13:54, 9 November 2007 (UTC)
dyk you are 100?
The 100 DYK Medal | ||
Brilliant! 25 is tricky, 50 is a lot of work, but one hundred!!! and more!!! Well done!!!! I know I'm overusing!!! exclamation marks!!! But you can forgive that I hope! We do!!!!!!!!! Victuallers 15:33, 9 November 2007 (UTC) |
Thanks for the extra obits. That's much appreciated. JH (talk page) 21:10, 9 November 2007 (UTC)
- You are welcome - he was on my list, so I was pleasantly surprised to find an article where there was previously a redlink. Unfortuantely, I have not had time to read those obituaries and incorporate anything new, but I have nominated your article at WP:DYK. -- !! ?? 21:13, 9 November 2007 (UTC)
DYK
Cheers, Daniel 23:04, 9 November 2007 (UTC)
--PFHLai 07:46, 10 November 2007 (UTC)
--Carabinieri 23:28, 11 November 2007 (UTC)
--Carabinieri 15:19, 12 November 2007 (UTC)
Blnguyen (bananabucket) 03:18, 13 November 2007 (UTC)
Well done again Sir, Blnguyen (bananabucket) 00:36, 15 November 2007 (UTC)
--PFHLai 13:30, 15 November 2007 (UTC)
DYK
--Zzyzx11 (Talk) 03:55, 17 November 2007 (UTC)
DYK
--Zzyzx11 (Talk) 00:51, 18 November 2007 (UTC)
Indefinite block
This account has been blocked indefinitely for violations of WP:SOCK. Due to the nature of this investigation I will not be discussing the reasons through normal channels. Please take to arbitration if you wish to dispute this action. DurovaCharge! 16:46, 18 November 2007 (UTC)
- I have posted to ANI requesting further explanation of this block. Newyorkbrad (talk) 17:00, 18 November 2007 (UTC)
- That would be a normal channel. Surely you can understand how the explanation may involve sensitive information? 1 != 2 17:18, 18 November 2007 (UTC)
Unblock with apologies
When I make a mistake I like to be the first to step forward and correct myself. I was wrong here. Sorry for the inconvenience. DurovaCharge! 18:01, 18 November 2007 (UTC)
- "Sorry for the inconvenience." Wow.
- I trust you can provide a good explanation? Like, I mean, a *really* good explanation? One that might be even slightly convincing?