Renamed user e8LqRIqjJf2zlGDYPSu1aXoc (talk | contribs) Warning: Copyright violation on Rock of Love: Charm School. (TW) |
Plastikspork (talk | contribs) →I Love Money (Season 1): new section |
||
Line 38: | Line 38: | ||
== November 2008 == |
== November 2008 == |
||
[[Image:Stop hand nuvola.svg|30px]] Please do not add copyrighted material to Wikipedia without permission from the copyright holder{{#if:Rock of Love: Charm School|, as you did to [[:Rock of Love: Charm School]]}}. For [[Wikipedia:Copyrights|legal reasons]], we cannot accept [[Wikipedia:Copyrights|copyrighted]] text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of ''information'', but not as a source of ''sentences''. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators '''will''' be [[Wikipedia:Blocking policy|blocked]] from editing. {{#if:|{{{2}}}|}}<!-- Template:uw-copyright --> ''Specifically violating copyright are the "official episode synopses" you've listed. You cannot use the exact wording from VH1.'' —/[[User:Mendaliv|<b>M</b><small>endaliv</small>]]/<sup><small>[[User talk:Mendaliv|2¢]]</small></sup>/<sub><small>[[Special:Contributions/Mendaliv|Δ's]]</small></sub>/ 20:12, 16 November 2008 (UTC) |
[[Image:Stop hand nuvola.svg|30px]] Please do not add copyrighted material to Wikipedia without permission from the copyright holder{{#if:Rock of Love: Charm School|, as you did to [[:Rock of Love: Charm School]]}}. For [[Wikipedia:Copyrights|legal reasons]], we cannot accept [[Wikipedia:Copyrights|copyrighted]] text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of ''information'', but not as a source of ''sentences''. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators '''will''' be [[Wikipedia:Blocking policy|blocked]] from editing. {{#if:|{{{2}}}|}}<!-- Template:uw-copyright --> ''Specifically violating copyright are the "official episode synopses" you've listed. You cannot use the exact wording from VH1.'' —/[[User:Mendaliv|<b>M</b><small>endaliv</small>]]/<sup><small>[[User talk:Mendaliv|2¢]]</small></sup>/<sub><small>[[Special:Contributions/Mendaliv|Δ's]]</small></sub>/ 20:12, 16 November 2008 (UTC) |
||
== I Love Money (Season 1) == |
|||
{{uw-3rr}} |
Revision as of 01:56, 2 February 2009
July 2008
Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to I Love Money has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thanks. Sean9500 • Talk • Contributions 16:29, 16 July 2008 (UTC)
- Also, stop changing the table. The format I put it in was just fine. The format you put in, however, is not needed. Thanks. Sean9500 • Talk • Contributions 20:54, 16 July 2008 (UTC)
- Furthermore, if you wish to add a new table, please discuss it over with the majority of the editors on the talk page. While you and maybe some other prefer another version, there only needs to be one. Please review the manual of style before making such changes. Thanks, IRK!Leave me a note or two 02:26, 21 July 2008 (UTC)
- And why do I care? The same reason you "don't" care, apparently. This isn't about what I want, it's about WP:STYLE.IRK!Leave me a note or two 02:36, 21 July 2008 (UTC)
- Furthermore, if you wish to add a new table, please discuss it over with the majority of the editors on the talk page. While you and maybe some other prefer another version, there only needs to be one. Please review the manual of style before making such changes. Thanks, IRK!Leave me a note or two 02:26, 21 July 2008 (UTC)
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on I Love Money. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. If necessary, pursue dispute resolution. Dina (talk) 02:39, 21 July 2008 (UTC)
I'm attempting to get a consensus on the talk page for I Love Money. If you would like to add your thoughts, it would be greatly appreciated. IRK!Leave me a note or two 06:38, 24 July 2008 (UTC)
Speedy deletion of I Want To Work For Diddy
A tag has been placed on I Want To Work For Diddy, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to have no meaningful content or history, and the text is unsalvageably incoherent. If the page you created was a test, please use the sandbox for any other experiments you would like to do. Feel free to leave a message on my talk page if you have any questions about this.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}}
to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. Vianello (talk) 01:46, 5 August 2008 (UTC)
Speedy deletion of I want to work for diddy
Please refrain from introducing inappropriate pages such as I want to work for diddy, to Wikipedia. Doing so is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}}
to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. Vianello (talk) 01:46, 5 August 2008 (UTC)
Proposed deletion of I Want To Work For Diddy
A proposed deletion template has been added to the article I Want To Work For Diddy, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}}
notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Dlohcierekim's sock (talk) 01:57, 5 August 2008 (UTC)
I Love Money
Please stop adding spoilers to the page. Your edits have been reverted. Ophois (talk) 03:57, 4 September 2008 (UTC)
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to I Love Money. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Please stop adding spoilers. Your edits have been reverted. Ophois (talk) 05:49, 15 September 2008 (UTC)
November 2008
Please do not add copyrighted material to Wikipedia without permission from the copyright holder, as you did to Rock of Love: Charm School. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Specifically violating copyright are the "official episode synopses" you've listed. You cannot use the exact wording from VH1. —/Mendaliv/2¢/Δ's/ 20:12, 16 November 2008 (UTC)
I Love Money (Season 1)
Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war; read about how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.
Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.