Johnny Spasm (talk | contribs) →Infoboxes & player positions: new section |
Neutralhomer (talk | contribs) |
||
(6 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown) | |||
Line 164: | Line 164: | ||
There is conversation going on at [[Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Baseball]] and on [[Rickey Henderson]]'s and [[Babe Ruth]]'s talk pages about infoboxes and the position listed for the players. I'd appreciate your input regardless of whether or not you agree with me.--[[User:Johnny Spasm|Johnny Spasm]] ([[User talk:Johnny Spasm|talk]]) 23:38, 6 August 2009 (UTC) |
There is conversation going on at [[Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Baseball]] and on [[Rickey Henderson]]'s and [[Babe Ruth]]'s talk pages about infoboxes and the position listed for the players. I'd appreciate your input regardless of whether or not you agree with me.--[[User:Johnny Spasm|Johnny Spasm]] ([[User talk:Johnny Spasm|talk]]) 23:38, 6 August 2009 (UTC) |
||
==ArbCom Clarification== |
|||
I need a clarification on an ArbCom dicision. ChildofMidnight (CoM) is commenting on a Obama related discussion on [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/Incidents#Subsection_for_evidence ANI]. I feel that falls under his ban on Obama [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Requests_for_arbitration/Obama_articles#ChildofMidnight_topic_banned related articles/discussions]. Can I get a clarification on this please? - <small style="border:1px solid #990000;padding:1px;">[[User:Neutralhomer|<font style="color:#990000;background:#FFFFFF;">NeutralHomer</font>]] • [[User_talk:Neutralhomer|<font style="color:#000000;background:#FFFFFF;">Talk</font>]] • 01:22, 7 August 2009 (UTC)</small> |
|||
:OK, just checking. I thought I had missed you so I also emailed this just a moment ago. You can disregard that. Thanks...<small style="border:1px solid #990000;padding:1px;">[[User:Neutralhomer|<font style="color:#990000;background:#FFFFFF;">NeutralHomer</font>]] • [[User_talk:Neutralhomer|<font style="color:#000000;background:#FFFFFF;">Talk</font>]] • 01:32, 7 August 2009 (UTC)</small> |
|||
::The interpretation that the topic ban applies only to articles and article talk space, but not Wikipedia space, contradicts the interpretation given by at least one administrator.[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia%3AArticles_for_deletion%2FGerald_Walpin&diff=298683271&oldid=298679399][http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:ChildofMidnight&diff=prev&oldid=299867459] The edits are also problematic per [[Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Obama articles#ChildofMidnight and Wikidemon restricted]], as they have chased me away from a section I started at AN/I by accusing me there of bad faith. Is there a safe harbor to state my concerns, short of a [[Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Enforcement]] / [[Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Clarification]]? [[User:Wikidemon|Wikidemon]] ([[User talk:Wikidemon|talk]]) 01:47, 7 August 2009 (UTC) |
|||
:::Like CIreland (who Wikidemon refers to above with the diffs) I had assumed the topic ban applied project wide. If it doesn't it doesn't, but that seems rather odd. Much of the disruption surrounding the Obama pages (not just from ChildofMidnight by the way) came from ANI or other noticeboard threads, and to say that ChildofMidnight and Scjessey (the other editor topic banned - though he as far as I know has indeed avoided these subjects) can comment on ANI and AfDs and the like somewhat defeats the purpose in my view. I don't know if it's standard in ArbCom cases to limit topic bans to article space, but it seems rather intuitive to me that such bans should be all encompassing, given that controversial article issues inevitably spill over into project space. There might well be something I'm missing in terms of past precedent but that's how I see it. |
|||
:::Thanks for clarifying regardless—there's actually been a good deal of confusion over the Obama remedies unfortunately. --[[User:Bigtimepeace|Bigtimepeace]] <small>| [[User_talk:Bigtimepeace|talk]] | [[Special:Contributions/Bigtimepeace|contribs]]</small> 02:43, 7 August 2009 (UTC) |
|||
::::I will likely be filing a formal request for clarification, as none have answered my question yet. [[User:Wikidemon|Wikidemon]] ([[User talk:Wikidemon|talk]]) 03:07, 7 August 2009 (UTC) |
|||
:::::Please provide a link to that formal request, as I would like to be a part of it. - <small style="border:1px solid #990000;padding:1px;">[[User:Neutralhomer|<font style="color:#990000;background:#FFFFFF;">NeutralHomer</font>]] • [[User_talk:Neutralhomer|<font style="color:#000000;background:#FFFFFF;">Talk</font>]] • 03:34, 7 August 2009 (UTC)</small> |
Revision as of 03:34, 7 August 2009
- To those leaving messages: Try to keep them brief and to the point. Posts that are too lengthy may not get a timely response. Thank you. To those leaving RfA thankspam: Consider yourself welcomed. I appreciate the thought, but they tend to take up a lot of my page and archives, and I really don't need them for anything. Wizardman
Hi. You seem to have deleted this template redirect that I have frequently used as a "Recently-created, implausible redirect". I wonder if you might reconsider. Is there something that makes tagging an article talk page {{Bio}}, as I have long done (as here, in April), problematic? --Moonriddengirl (talk) 00:46, 14 July 2009 (UTC)
How can I bring the Betsy Aardsma article up in the rankings? You tagged it as a C. Thx. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 198.181.161.250 (talk) 19:16, 27 July 2009 (UTC) GA review of Beth PhoenixHey, thanks for the review. I've adressed your points at Talk:Beth Phoenix/GA1. ♥Nici♥Vampire♥Heart♥ 19:22, 22 July 2009 (UTC) Responded to your comments at Talk:Jillian Hall/GA1. Thanks for the review. ♥Nici♥Vampire♥Heart♥ 17:28, 23 July 2009 (UTC) Wikipedia on ColbertI was in complete shock when I saw this. Have you seen it? [1] Voyaging(talk) 21:51, 23 July 2009 (UTC) Kimberley JosephThanks for reviewing! Bradley0110 (talk) 17:11, 24 July 2009 (UTC) DYK for Herschel BennettHi Wizardman, Thanks for nominating Marty Hogan for GA status! Best, twelsht (talk) 04:24, 25 July 2009 (UTC) Spotlight needs suggestionsQuestionFor an article such as Rome, Mississippi, is it necessary to include the postcode? Just wondering.--The LegendarySky Attacker 01:57, 26 July 2009 (UTC) It was just that I don't usually see that. Thanks for your time.--The LegendarySky Attacker 02:01, 26 July 2009 (UTC) Louie Caporusso GACI have responded to your concerns at Talk:Louie Caporusso/GA1.--TonyTheTiger (t/c/bio/WP:CHICAGO/WP:LOTM) 22:41, 26 July 2009 (UTC)
I will begin a GA review of this article tomorrow. Letting you know as nominator. Nosleep break my slumber 15:59, 27 July 2009 (UTC)
Delivered by -- Tinu Cherian BOT - 14:55, 28 July 2009 (UTC) ArticleHi, I noticed that you worked on 2007 NBA betting scandal. I found this while working on Tim Donaghy, which is at GAN; it's a bit old, but might be useful. Cheers, Dabomb87 (talk) 21:53, 28 July 2009 (UTC) I don't think the motion is passingPlease see my comment here. Paul August ☎ 19:41, 29 July 2009 (UTC) Jeffrey D. Sadow at DYKHi there - you might want to take a look at what I've said at this DYK, and on the article's talk page, in case you don't agree. Cheers. hamiltonstone (talk) 03:35, 30 July 2009 (UTC) File:250px-Israel-peleg.jpgHi, you have deleted File:250px-Israel-peleg.jpg, with the reason "F3: Media file with improper license". However, iddo lavie, who took this picture, has sent a permission (Ticket#2009071610018913) that says: "You have my pernission to use this picture in the wikipedia". I believe that this means acceptance of Wikipedia GFDL license. Please restore the file. Thanks, Ohad1584 (talk) 14:51, 30 July 2009 (UTC) TradeCheers! You guys got a good deal out of it too. Carrasco figures to take Lee's place next season or 2011, and Marson will be an instant replacement if they trade Martinez. You guys definitely got some good picks. I hope you can turn some of my Phillies DYK articles into featured content for Cleveland! KV5 (Talk • Phils) 22:30, 30 July 2009 (UTC) I have left you a comment here. regards--Vintagekits (talk) 09:30, 31 July 2009 (UTC) Wizardman, your comment might be appreciated at Wikipedia:Deletion_review/Log/2009_July_30#Scott_Doe. --SmokeyJoe (talk) 10:40, 31 July 2009 (UTC)
GA Sweeps August updateThanks to everyone's dedicated efforts to the GA Sweeps process, a total of 215 articles were swept in July! We are currently nearly 80% done with Sweeps, with under 600 articles left to review. With 50 members, that averages out to about 12 articles per person. Once the remaining articles drop to 100, I'll help in reviewing the last articles (I'm currently taking a break). If each member reviews an article every other day this month (or several!), we'll be completely finished. Again, I want to thank you for using your time to ensure the quality of the older GAs. Feel free to recruit other editors who have reviewed GANs in the past and might be interested in the process. The more editors, the less the workload, and hopefully the faster this will be completed. If you have any questions about reviews or the process let me know and I'll be happy to get back to you. Again, thank you for taking the time to help with the process, I appreciate your efforts! --Happy editing! Nehrams2020 (talk • contrib) 19:36, 1 August 2009 (UTC) Thanks very much for your help :) Aaroncrick (talk) 22:24, 1 August 2009 (UTC) Hi, I picked the above out of the GAN list and then found that you had started the review. Then I found that you had withdrawn [2] so I will pick up. Hope that this is OK. Jezhotwells (talk) 16:26, 2 August 2009 (UTC)
Delivered by SoxBot (talk) at 06:56, 4 August 2009 (UTC) UserpageHow come you don't have your userpage semi-protected, or even full protected for that matter? Until It Sleeps Wake me`` Recovery of a deleted articleHello: On 17 December 2008 you deleted the article Unusual articles per this log: [3] Would it be possible for you to recover a copy of it for me to download. Perhaps you could place it on a sub-page of your or my Talk page? I understand the reason for the deletion. It was an article that I had been involved with several years ago and I was quite fond of it. Thank you. --AStanhope (talk) 15:26, 4 August 2009 (UTC) Gawrsh!Two keep and two delete !votes and you deleted, whats with that? --Richard Arthur Norton (1958- ) (talk) 05:23, 6 August 2009 (UTC) Infoboxes & player positionsThere is conversation going on at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Baseball and on Rickey Henderson's and Babe Ruth's talk pages about infoboxes and the position listed for the players. I'd appreciate your input regardless of whether or not you agree with me.--Johnny Spasm (talk) 23:38, 6 August 2009 (UTC) ArbCom ClarificationI need a clarification on an ArbCom dicision. ChildofMidnight (CoM) is commenting on a Obama related discussion on ANI. I feel that falls under his ban on Obama related articles/discussions. Can I get a clarification on this please? - NeutralHomer • Talk • 01:22, 7 August 2009 (UTC)
|