→Block: no you cannot edit your user page |
No edit summary |
||
(8 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
Line 36: | Line 36: | ||
Yes, you can edit your own talk page - you just did! No, you cannot edit your user page because doing so is not contributing to the development of Wikipedia. Change the few things when the block expires. — [[User:RHaworth|RHaworth]] ([[User talk:RHaworth|talk]] '''·''' [[Special:Contributions/RHaworth|contribs]]) 21:09, 1 February 2012 (UTC) |
Yes, you can edit your own talk page - you just did! No, you cannot edit your user page because doing so is not contributing to the development of Wikipedia. Change the few things when the block expires. — [[User:RHaworth|RHaworth]] ([[User talk:RHaworth|talk]] '''·''' [[Special:Contributions/RHaworth|contribs]]) 21:09, 1 February 2012 (UTC) |
||
* No, I can't, when I creae a new topic! P.S. Can you tell me when I'll be unblocked in military time typed otu? [[User:WBJB003|<font color="gold">WBJB003</font>]] | [[User talk:WBJB003|<font color="orange">talk</font>]] 15:21, 2 February 2012 (UTC) |
|||
Any ads I place here can you move to the top of my user page? |
|||
Numbers: 1, 4, 8, 24-25, 45, 56, 67, 69, 85, 93, 119-120, 122, 125, 162, 166, 169, 174-176, 214, and 217. |
|||
{{wikipedia ads}} |
Revision as of 17:17, 2 February 2012
FYI: I may delete some things, but this is just to save space.WBJB003 | talk 17:09, 19 January 2012 (UTC)
Welcome!
|
Barnstars
Hi, while it is nice to see all of the good things you've been doing to improve Wikipedia, you shouldn't give yourself barnstars for it. Those are given by OTHER Wikipedia editors. TropicalAnalystwx13 (talk) 21:30, 19 January 2012 (UTC)
K thanks. Also, I have a new barnstar being made. I'll tell you what it is when it's ready.WBJB003 | talk 15:22, 20 January 2012 (UTC)
February 2012
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at NCIS (season 4). Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been reverted or removed.
Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive, until the dispute is resolved through consensus. Continuing to edit disruptively could result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you.
Editing disruptively just so you can reach 2,000 edits, as you stated was your goal on my talk page,[1] is bound to end badly. --AussieLegend (talk) 16:18, 1 February 2012 (UTC)
I'll run out of pages to edit if it doesn't get reverted.WBJB003 | talk 17:01, 1 February 2012 (UTC)
Block
I have blocked you briefly to show that we mean business. This is because you have been editing disruptively just so you can reach 2,000 edits (see above). And have admitted that "this user prefers using userboxes to fill up his/her user page instead of actually writing something useful". I have also taken the liberty of deleting your self-awarded barnstars "just to save space". — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 19:06, 1 February 2012 (UTC)
- I like that about removing the branstars to save space. But, can you at least allow me to edit my user page? That the least. I just need to change a few things. I'll give you the template to make your username and talk different colors. WBJB003 | talk 19:18, 1 February 2012 (UTC)
- I can't even edit my own talk page? That's going over the line!!!!WBJB003 | talk 19:56, 1 February 2012 (UTC)
Yes, you can edit your own talk page - you just did! No, you cannot edit your user page because doing so is not contributing to the development of Wikipedia. Change the few things when the block expires. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 21:09, 1 February 2012 (UTC)
- No, I can't, when I creae a new topic! P.S. Can you tell me when I'll be unblocked in military time typed otu? WBJB003 | talk 15:21, 2 February 2012 (UTC)
Any ads I place here can you move to the top of my user page? Numbers: 1, 4, 8, 24-25, 45, 56, 67, 69, 85, 93, 119-120, 122, 125, 162, 166, 169, 174-176, 214, and 217.