adding AFD templates |
|||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
<onlyinclude> |
<onlyinclude> |
||
===Requesting permission to restore [[User:Valoem/Involuntary celibacy]] to mainspace - another round of AfD=== |
===Requesting permission to restore [[User:Valoem/Involuntary celibacy]] to mainspace - another round of AfD=== |
||
{{REMOVE THIS TEMPLATE WHEN CLOSING THIS AfD|W}} |
|||
{{rfc|soc|media|rfcid=0EE79DA}} |
{{rfc|soc|media|rfcid=0EE79DA}} |
||
:{{pagelinks|User:Valoem/Involuntary celibacy}} – (<includeonly>[[User talk:Valoem/Involuntary celibacy|View RFC/AfD]]</includeonly><noinclude>[[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2015 March 15#{{anchorencode:User talk:Valoem/Involuntary celibacy}}|View log]]</noinclude>{{int:dot-separator}} <span class="plainlinks">[https://tools.wmflabs.org/jackbot/snottywong/cgi-bin/votecounter.cgi?page=User_talk:Valoem/Involuntary_celibacy Stats]</span>) |
|||
:({{Find sources AFD|Involuntary celibacy}})) |
|||
'''History''' |
'''History''' |
||
:{{pagelinks|User:Valoem/Involuntary celibacy}} – (<includeonly>[[User talk:Valoem/Involuntary celibacy|View RFC/AfD]]</includeonly>) |
|||
*[[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Involuntary celibacy]] - keep |
*[[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Involuntary celibacy]] - keep |
||
*[[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Involuntary celibacy (2nd nomination)]] - merge |
*[[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Involuntary celibacy (2nd nomination)]] - merge |
Revision as of 22:39, 15 March 2015
Requesting permission to restore User:Valoem/Involuntary celibacy to mainspace - another round of AfD
- User:Valoem/Involuntary celibacy (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL))
History
- Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Involuntary celibacy - keep
- Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Involuntary celibacy (2nd nomination) - merge
- Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Denise Donnelly - del
- Wikipedia:Deletion review/Log/2014 December 7 - NC to restore
I've noticed a growing trend on Wikipedia which diverges from our initial goals with a dangerous precedence being set. Our goal is to document the world based on verfiability and notability. It is here that we have the right to document the unusual apart from the usual with a neutral point of view. Mainstream acceptance has never been a requirement, while this social phenomenon is unusual to rare there are enough secondary reliable sources to deem it notable. I feel in many ways the previous close was against consensus. We have the term no consensus for a reason such as this case when there is no consensus. The ensuing dispute only emphasizes the lack of consensus.
Upon reviewing the sources, this topic has been covered both academically and by mainstream media including a documented shooting which the perpetrator directly specified incelism as a motivate. I've added an additional six citations to tokyogirl's version the argument that this lacks notability or is not a social condition simply does not hold. I am requesting that the current version be moved to the mainspace. Valoem talk contrib 19:57, 15 March 2015 (UTC)
- Administrative note: I've transcluded this nonstandard AFD (in an RFC format) to today's AFD log, in order to receive the maximum amount of community exposure for this nonstandard request. — Coffee // have a cup // beans // 22:33, 15 March 2015 (UTC)