→November 2023: Reply Tag: Reply |
→English grammar; links: Reply Tag: Reply |
||
(14 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
Line 14: | Line 14: | ||
:Ok noted. Thank you [[User:Uzones|Uzones]] ([[User talk:Uzones#top|talk]]) 20:06, 17 November 2023 (UTC) |
:Ok noted. Thank you [[User:Uzones|Uzones]] ([[User talk:Uzones#top|talk]]) 20:06, 17 November 2023 (UTC) |
||
== English grammar; links == |
|||
I'm sorry to have to say this, but I've just reverted every one of your changes that hadn't already been reverted. There are two reasons: |
|||
* You appear to have difficulty with English grammar and usage. I've restored a number of these articles to a condition in which they were written correctly. |
|||
* You went on a small spree of removing perfectly ordinary and useful wikilinks (links to other articles) with the false edit summaries like "Remove advertising content". I've restored those links. |
|||
In particular, [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Alternatives&diff=prev&oldid=1185609937 this edit] to [[Alternatives]], your edit summary says you "edited wrong spelling" but the words had been correct in US spelling. See [[MOS:ENGVAR]] about the choice of spelling to use in articles. |
|||
You should stop unlinking wikilinks for invalid reasons and fixing things that don't need to be fixed. Let me know if you have any questions about this. [[User:Largoplazo|Largoplazo]] ([[User talk:Largoplazo|talk]]) 12:00, 18 November 2023 (UTC) |
|||
:Some linking was showing promotion that's why I removed it. Spelling and some tense were mistakes. Thank you for feedback. [[User:Uzones|Uzones]] ([[User talk:Uzones#top|talk]]) 12:54, 18 November 2023 (UTC) |
|||
::None of the links you removed were to external sites, they were all to other Wikipedia articles. [[User:Largoplazo|Largoplazo]] ([[User talk:Largoplazo|talk]]) 13:30, 18 November 2023 (UTC) |
|||
:::There were some external link that's why i removed. Next time, I will keep screenshot. Thank you for your response.😊 [[User:Uzones|Uzones]] ([[User talk:Uzones#top|talk]]) 13:45, 18 November 2023 (UTC) |
|||
::::No, there weren't. No need to wait till "next time" and no need for screenshots. Your [[Special:Contributions/Uzones|contribution history]] gives access to the [[Help:Diff|diffs]] for all of your edits. Your two edits with edit summaries mentioning advertising were [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Text_to_speech_in_digital_television&diff=prev&oldid=1185608496 this] and [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Alternatives&diff=prev&oldid=1185609937 this]. All of the links you removed in those edits were internal links, "wikilinks", to other articles, not external links to outside sources. [[User:Largoplazo|Largoplazo]] ([[User talk:Largoplazo|talk]]) 19:40, 18 November 2023 (UTC) |
|||
:::::You have more knowledge, happy😄 [[User:Uzones|Uzones]] ([[User talk:Uzones#top|talk]]) 19:43, 18 November 2023 (UTC) |
|||
In addition, [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Halal_Development_Corporation&diff=prev&oldid=1185741015 this more recent edit] of yours was simply wrong, replacing good English with bad English. In the case of [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Clearbanc&diff=prev&oldid=1185741426 this edit], the text really was missing a word before{{emdash}}but your edit was also not correct, so I've changed it. Finally, [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=R%C4%93zekne_Academy_of_Technology&diff=prev&oldid=1185743370 this edit] was wrong. The language was correct before: something happens ''in'' a year, not ''on'' it. I'm sorry to be annoying about this, but if your knowledge of English grammar and usage is incomplete then, no matter how good your intentions are, your attempts to correct existing language, especially when it's already correct, aren't helpful, and they waste the time of others. [[User:Largoplazo|Largoplazo]] ([[User talk:Largoplazo|talk]]) 19:50, 18 November 2023 (UTC) |
|||
:You are more knowledge. Please you do your work, I will do my work. [[User:Uzones|Uzones]] ([[User talk:Uzones#top|talk]]) 19:53, 18 November 2023 (UTC) |
|||
::Even here, your English is incorrect: "You are more knowledge" doesn't mean anything. And if "your work" breaks what isn't broken, then you shouldn't be doing it. [[User:Largoplazo|Largoplazo]] ([[User talk:Largoplazo|talk]]) 19:58, 18 November 2023 (UTC) |
|||
:::Do your work. [[User:Uzones|Uzones]] ([[User talk:Uzones#top|talk]]) 19:59, 18 November 2023 (UTC) |
|||
::::It is not your property, it is free site, so you do your work and i will do my work. You keep your good English with yourself. [[User:Uzones|Uzones]] ([[User talk:Uzones#top|talk]]) 20:02, 18 November 2023 (UTC) |
|||
:::::If you think "free site" means you can do what you want even when it's wrong, you're mistaken. At this point, if you continue, it will be considered [[WP:disruptive editing|disruptive editing]] and can lead to you being blocked from editing. [[User:Largoplazo|Largoplazo]] ([[User talk:Largoplazo|talk]]) 20:05, 18 November 2023 (UTC) |
|||
::::::Go!I don't want to argue in meaningless talk. Thank you for your suggestion. [[User:Uzones|Uzones]] ([[User talk:Uzones#top|talk]]) 20:07, 18 November 2023 (UTC) |
Revision as of 20:07, 18 November 2023
November 2023
Hello, I'm Materialscientist. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions—specifically this edit to Atumpan (singer)—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. Materialscientist (talk) 08:58, 17 November 2023 (UTC)
Please do not add promotional material to Wikipedia, as you did to Zomato. While objective prose about beliefs, organisations, people, products or services is acceptable, Wikipedia is not a vehicle for soapboxing, advertising or promotion. Thank you. Shadow311 (talk) 19:58, 17 November 2023 (UTC)
Please stop. If you continue to add promotional or advertising material to Wikipedia, as you did at Swiggy, you may be blocked from editing. Shadow311 (talk) 20:03, 17 November 2023 (UTC)
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you use Wikipedia for promotion or advertising, as you did at Zomato. Shadow311 (talk) 20:05, 17 November 2023 (UTC)
English grammar; links
I'm sorry to have to say this, but I've just reverted every one of your changes that hadn't already been reverted. There are two reasons:
- You appear to have difficulty with English grammar and usage. I've restored a number of these articles to a condition in which they were written correctly.
- You went on a small spree of removing perfectly ordinary and useful wikilinks (links to other articles) with the false edit summaries like "Remove advertising content". I've restored those links.
In particular, this edit to Alternatives, your edit summary says you "edited wrong spelling" but the words had been correct in US spelling. See MOS:ENGVAR about the choice of spelling to use in articles.
You should stop unlinking wikilinks for invalid reasons and fixing things that don't need to be fixed. Let me know if you have any questions about this. Largoplazo (talk) 12:00, 18 November 2023 (UTC)
- Some linking was showing promotion that's why I removed it. Spelling and some tense were mistakes. Thank you for feedback. Uzones (talk) 12:54, 18 November 2023 (UTC)
- None of the links you removed were to external sites, they were all to other Wikipedia articles. Largoplazo (talk) 13:30, 18 November 2023 (UTC)
- There were some external link that's why i removed. Next time, I will keep screenshot. Thank you for your response.😊 Uzones (talk) 13:45, 18 November 2023 (UTC)
- No, there weren't. No need to wait till "next time" and no need for screenshots. Your contribution history gives access to the diffs for all of your edits. Your two edits with edit summaries mentioning advertising were this and this. All of the links you removed in those edits were internal links, "wikilinks", to other articles, not external links to outside sources. Largoplazo (talk) 19:40, 18 November 2023 (UTC)
- There were some external link that's why i removed. Next time, I will keep screenshot. Thank you for your response.😊 Uzones (talk) 13:45, 18 November 2023 (UTC)
- None of the links you removed were to external sites, they were all to other Wikipedia articles. Largoplazo (talk) 13:30, 18 November 2023 (UTC)
In addition, this more recent edit of yours was simply wrong, replacing good English with bad English. In the case of this edit, the text really was missing a word before—but your edit was also not correct, so I've changed it. Finally, this edit was wrong. The language was correct before: something happens in a year, not on it. I'm sorry to be annoying about this, but if your knowledge of English grammar and usage is incomplete then, no matter how good your intentions are, your attempts to correct existing language, especially when it's already correct, aren't helpful, and they waste the time of others. Largoplazo (talk) 19:50, 18 November 2023 (UTC)
- You are more knowledge. Please you do your work, I will do my work. Uzones (talk) 19:53, 18 November 2023 (UTC)
- Even here, your English is incorrect: "You are more knowledge" doesn't mean anything. And if "your work" breaks what isn't broken, then you shouldn't be doing it. Largoplazo (talk) 19:58, 18 November 2023 (UTC)
- Do your work. Uzones (talk) 19:59, 18 November 2023 (UTC)
- It is not your property, it is free site, so you do your work and i will do my work. You keep your good English with yourself. Uzones (talk) 20:02, 18 November 2023 (UTC)
- If you think "free site" means you can do what you want even when it's wrong, you're mistaken. At this point, if you continue, it will be considered disruptive editing and can lead to you being blocked from editing. Largoplazo (talk) 20:05, 18 November 2023 (UTC)
- It is not your property, it is free site, so you do your work and i will do my work. You keep your good English with yourself. Uzones (talk) 20:02, 18 November 2023 (UTC)
- Do your work. Uzones (talk) 19:59, 18 November 2023 (UTC)
- Even here, your English is incorrect: "You are more knowledge" doesn't mean anything. And if "your work" breaks what isn't broken, then you shouldn't be doing it. Largoplazo (talk) 19:58, 18 November 2023 (UTC)