Andy Dingley (talk | contribs) →FYI: new section |
|||
Line 28: | Line 28: | ||
'''Being involved in an edit war can result in your being [[Wikipedia:Blocking policy|blocked from editing]]'''—especially if you violate the [[Wikipedia:Edit warring#The three-revert rule|three-revert rule]], which states that an editor must not perform more than three [[Help:Reverting|reverts]] on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—'''even if you don't violate the three-revert rule'''—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.<!-- Template:uw-3rr --> [[User:Jytdog|Jytdog]] ([[User talk:Jytdog|talk]]) 03:14, 18 March 2017 (UTC) |
'''Being involved in an edit war can result in your being [[Wikipedia:Blocking policy|blocked from editing]]'''—especially if you violate the [[Wikipedia:Edit warring#The three-revert rule|three-revert rule]], which states that an editor must not perform more than three [[Help:Reverting|reverts]] on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—'''even if you don't violate the three-revert rule'''—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.<!-- Template:uw-3rr --> [[User:Jytdog|Jytdog]] ([[User talk:Jytdog|talk]]) 03:14, 18 March 2017 (UTC) |
||
:This is not edit warring. You made an edit without policy-based justification. I reverted it (With modification just to ensure it fit policy). That was it. I have seen you do this to other editors you disagree with. [[User:Utsill|Utsill]] ([[User talk:Utsill#top|talk]]) 12:17, 18 March 2017 (UTC) |
:This is not edit warring. You made an edit without policy-based justification. I reverted it (With modification just to ensure it fit policy). That was it. I have seen you do this to other editors you disagree with. [[User:Utsill|Utsill]] ([[User talk:Utsill#top|talk]]) 12:17, 18 March 2017 (UTC) |
||
== FYI == |
|||
The [[Memphis Meats]] issue has made it to [[WP:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents#Seeking a one way IBAN re Andy Dingley]]. [[User:Andy Dingley|Andy Dingley]] ([[User talk:Andy Dingley|talk]]) 20:59, 18 March 2017 (UTC) |
Revision as of 20:59, 18 March 2017
Utsill, you are invited to the Teahouse!
Hi Utsill! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. We hope to see you there!
Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts 16:05, 19 July 2016 (UTC) |
Notice of Conflict of interest noticeboard discussion
This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Conflict of interest/Noticeboard regarding a possible conflict of interest incident in which you may be involved. Thank you. David Gerard (talk) 15:04, 4 October 2016 (UTC)
Edit war warning
Your recent editing history at Memphis Meats shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.
Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Jytdog (talk) 03:14, 18 March 2017 (UTC)
- This is not edit warring. You made an edit without policy-based justification. I reverted it (With modification just to ensure it fit policy). That was it. I have seen you do this to other editors you disagree with. Utsill (talk) 12:17, 18 March 2017 (UTC)
FYI
The Memphis Meats issue has made it to WP:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents#Seeking a one way IBAN re Andy Dingley. Andy Dingley (talk) 20:59, 18 March 2017 (UTC)