57.140.16.57 (talk) UPE |
57.140.16.57 (talk) In case this needs to go to the edit warring noticeboard |
||
Line 12: | Line 12: | ||
[[File:Information icon4.svg|link=|25px|alt=Information icon]] There is currently a discussion at [[Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard]] regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.<!--Template:Discussion notice--><!--Template:AN-notice--> [[User:User110022|User110022]] ([[User talk:User110022#top|talk]]) 14:21, 14 March 2024 (UTC) |
[[File:Information icon4.svg|link=|25px|alt=Information icon]] There is currently a discussion at [[Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard]] regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.<!--Template:Discussion notice--><!--Template:AN-notice--> [[User:User110022|User110022]] ([[User talk:User110022#top|talk]]) 14:21, 14 March 2024 (UTC) |
||
== March 2024 == |
|||
[[File:Information.svg|left|25px|alt=Information icon]] Hello User110022. The nature of your edits gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's [[Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure|mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements]]. Paid advocacy is a category of [[Wikipedia:Conflict of interest|conflict of interest]] (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on [[Wikipedia:Neutral point of view|neutral point of view]] and what [[Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not|Wikipedia is not]], and is an especially serious type of COI; the [[Wikimedia Foundation]] regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to [[Spamdexing|black-hat search-engine optimization]]. |
[[File:Information.svg|left|25px|alt=Information icon]] Hello User110022. The nature of your edits gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's [[Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure|mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements]]. Paid advocacy is a category of [[Wikipedia:Conflict of interest|conflict of interest]] (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on [[Wikipedia:Neutral point of view|neutral point of view]] and what [[Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not|Wikipedia is not]], and is an especially serious type of COI; the [[Wikimedia Foundation]] regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to [[Spamdexing|black-hat search-engine optimization]]. |
||
Line 17: | Line 18: | ||
Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are '''<u>required</u> by the [[wmf:TOU#paid-contrib-disclosure|Wikimedia Terms of Use]] to disclose your employer, client and affiliation.''' You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at [[User:User110022]]. The template {{tl|Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{tlc|paid|2=user=User110022|3=employer=<var>InsertName</var>|4=client=<var>InsertName</var>}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, '''do not edit further''' until you answer this message. <!-- Template:Uw-paid1 --> [[Special:Contributions/57.140.16.57|57.140.16.57]] ([[User talk:57.140.16.57|talk]]) 16:03, 14 March 2024 (UTC) |
Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are '''<u>required</u> by the [[wmf:TOU#paid-contrib-disclosure|Wikimedia Terms of Use]] to disclose your employer, client and affiliation.''' You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at [[User:User110022]]. The template {{tl|Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{tlc|paid|2=user=User110022|3=employer=<var>InsertName</var>|4=client=<var>InsertName</var>}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, '''do not edit further''' until you answer this message. <!-- Template:Uw-paid1 --> [[Special:Contributions/57.140.16.57|57.140.16.57]] ([[User talk:57.140.16.57|talk]]) 16:03, 14 March 2024 (UTC) |
||
[[File:Information.svg|25px|alt=Information icon]] Hi User110022! I noticed that you have reverted to restore your preferred version of an article several times. The impulse to undo an edit you disagree with is understandable, but I wanted to make sure you're aware that the [[WP:Edit warring|edit warring policy]] disallows repeated reversions even if they are justifiable. |
|||
All editors are expected to discuss content disputes on article [[Help:Talk pages|talk pages]] to try to reach [[Wikipedia:Consensus#Through discussion|consensus]]. If you are unable to agree, please use one of the [[Wikipedia:Dispute resolution requests|dispute resolution options]] to seek input from others. Using this approach instead of reverting can help you avoid getting drawn into an edit war. Thank you.<!-- Template:uw-ewsoft --> [[Special:Contributions/57.140.16.57|57.140.16.57]] ([[User talk:57.140.16.57|talk]]) 16:12, 14 March 2024 (UTC) |
Revision as of 16:12, 14 March 2024
Please do not add promotional material to Wikipedia. While objective prose about beliefs, organisations, people, products or services is acceptable, Wikipedia is not a vehicle for soapboxing, advertising or promotion. Thank you. Mean as custard (talk) 09:32, 13 March 2024 (UTC)
- Hi Mean as custard,
- We did NOT put any promotional material on Wikipedia, our brand page needed a regular update. The Bakkafrost Wikipedia page is for informative purposes. If you could point out which parts you found "promotional" we would be happy to reconsider rewording.
- We would like to officially ask you to stop interfering with our company information and stop us from being transparent about our operations, products and services.
- Hope you have a lovely day Mean as custard! User110022 (talk) 08:45, 14 March 2024 (UTC)
Please stop. If you continue to add promotional or advertising material to Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. Mean as custard (talk) 12:04, 14 March 2024 (UTC)
- A random example: "With its commitment to renewable energy and sustainable practices, Förka exemplifies Bakkafrost's dedication to environmental stewardship and demonstrates the potential for innovative solutions within the biogas industry." - Does that sound promotional? . . Mean as custard (talk) 12:05, 14 March 2024 (UTC)
- Mean as custard, I will revert to the updated version of our brand page as I do not classify your given example as promotional. I kindly ask you to send all your concerns to HRcentral at bakkafrost.com and we can take it from there. User110022 (talk) 14:16, 14 March 2024 (UTC)
- ==Notice of noticeboard discussion==
- Mean as custard, I will revert to the updated version of our brand page as I do not classify your given example as promotional. I kindly ask you to send all your concerns to HRcentral at bakkafrost.com and we can take it from there. User110022 (talk) 14:16, 14 March 2024 (UTC)
There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. User110022 (talk) 14:21, 14 March 2024 (UTC)
March 2024
Hello User110022. The nature of your edits gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.
Paid advocates are strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.
Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:User110022. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=User110022|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}
. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. 57.140.16.57 (talk) 16:03, 14 March 2024 (UTC)
Hi User110022! I noticed that you have reverted to restore your preferred version of an article several times. The impulse to undo an edit you disagree with is understandable, but I wanted to make sure you're aware that the edit warring policy disallows repeated reversions even if they are justifiable.
All editors are expected to discuss content disputes on article talk pages to try to reach consensus. If you are unable to agree, please use one of the dispute resolution options to seek input from others. Using this approach instead of reverting can help you avoid getting drawn into an edit war. Thank you. 57.140.16.57 (talk) 16:12, 14 March 2024 (UTC)