→Discretionary sanctions: new section |
TonyBallioni (talk | contribs) →Warning: new section |
||
Line 197: | Line 197: | ||
You were notifed of the discretionary sanctions concerning pseudoscience back in May in [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Tornado_chaser&oldid=781873583 this diff]. Please do keep them in mind when you edit about vaccines. Thx [[User:Jytdog|Jytdog]] ([[User talk:Jytdog|talk]]) 04:11, 28 January 2018 (UTC) |
You were notifed of the discretionary sanctions concerning pseudoscience back in May in [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Tornado_chaser&oldid=781873583 this diff]. Please do keep them in mind when you edit about vaccines. Thx [[User:Jytdog|Jytdog]] ([[User talk:Jytdog|talk]]) 04:11, 28 January 2018 (UTC) |
||
== Warning == |
|||
Hi Tornado chaser, after looking at some of your recent edits to vaccine pages, I was considering placing you under 0RR because you appear to be reverting and not discussing controversial changes on the talk page, and your edits do not in my view adhere to NPOV as defined under the Pseudoscience case. Since you don't appear to have been sanctioned before, however, I've decided just to make Jytdog's warning above a bit more official, and remind you to discuss controversial changes on the talk page and to adhere to a neutral point of view. I've [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia%3AArbitration_enforcement_log%2F2018&type=revision&diff=822730968&oldid=822717833 recorded] this warning at the AE log. You generally do good work on Wikipedia, but this is a contentious area, and caution is advised when making any potentially controversial changes. [[User:TonyBallioni|TonyBallioni]] ([[User talk:TonyBallioni|talk]]) 04:46, 28 January 2018 (UTC) |
Revision as of 04:46, 28 January 2018
2017 May, June, July, August, September, October, November, December. 2018 |
Lots of Mistakes and Irrelevant Data
Hello,
The section had lots of mistakes in briefing it, i just fixed it with correct measures.
Thanks. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Actus.zeus (talk • contribs) 13:23, 29 December 2017 (UTC)
- @Actus.zeus: You removed references and properly referenced material, everything in wikipedia must be properly referenced, so plese don't remove references without at least using a edit summary to explain the reson fore your changes. Also, anything that you add must be properly referenced, so far you have not explained the reason for your changes or provided a reliable source (or any source) for your changes, this is why I have undid your edits. Tornado chaser (talk) 13:30, 29 December 2017 (UTC)
- @Actus.zeus:. Tornado chaser (talk) 13:30, 29 December 2017 (UTC)
South Deering
I just added two sources. Please stop deleting my edits. Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2601:243:C302:71A6:4C1E:7453:D311:EB09 (talk) 20:05, 30 December 2017 (UTC)
- Oops, thanks for pointing out my mistake, I have now restored the content. Tornado chaser (talk) 20:10, 30 December 2017 (UTC)
Suzuki Swift changes
do not simply delete the modified articles. please refer the facts and figures in the cited sources. wikipedia is to provide the readers true information rather than the filtered info. Thanks — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2405:204:3488:CDE9:5CD8:3AB7:8D80:21A1 (talk) 13:01, 1 January 2018 (UTC)
- There are 2 problems with your edit, first you are not just stating facts, but directly saying this car should not be bought, which violates wikipedia's policy on neutral point of view, also I suspect that in may be WP:UNDUE to include a section about theft in this artical, feel free to ask me if you have any questions. Tornado chaser (talk) 13:07, 1 January 2018 (UTC)
- now i am putting the indian media news in the article. all the provided links are national dailies. please let me know the reason it should not be posted — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2405:204:3488:CDE9:5CD8:3AB7:8D80:21A1 (talk) 13:21, 1 January 2018 (UTC)
- (edit conflict)Your sources don't say what you wrote, the first source (hindustan times) only talks about 1 theft case which happened to be a swift, it does not say that the swift is commonly stolen. Then you talk about the theft ring that was busted, citing 2 sources, but 1 (the hindu) doesn't say anything about the swift, and the other source (daily pioneer) says 1 of the stolen cars was a swift, not that most were. You cite no sources at all for the fact that "India is known for the whole gangs involved in the theft of Maruti Swift", and while you do cite the safety features, you have no sources for the fact that thefts of the swift are increasing. You cite a hindustan times article on the car theft ring, but it only mentions that 2 of 4 stolen cars were swifts. It was an improvement when you removed the non neutral language form your edit, but you still need to have properly referenced info, see WP:V. Tornado chaser (talk) 13:34, 1 January 2018 (UTC)
- now i am putting the indian media news in the article. all the provided links are national dailies. please let me know the reason it should not be posted — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2405:204:3488:CDE9:5CD8:3AB7:8D80:21A1 (talk) 13:21, 1 January 2018 (UTC)
now read these sources -
the comment in article is - The gang specialised in stealing Swift cars but stole other vehicles after receiving the demand from their counterparts in northeast India and Nepal. The cars were transported from Haryana to Nagaland in containers. According to joint commissioner (crime), Alok Kumar, the gang used to dispose of the stolen vehicles by implanting the documents of total loss accidental vehicles. They also supplied these cars to dealers in Haryana and Delhi as used cars. Cops have recovered 15 Swift and Swift Dzire cars, two i20s, two Scorpios, two Innovas, two Crets and two Ciaz apart from a Tata Safari,
Source 2 https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/city/gurgaon/6-burglars-arrested-scorpio-swift-and-gold-biscuit-seized/articleshow/59328459.cms search for Swift Stolen
http://www.tribuneindia.com/news/chandigarh/snatchers-gang-busted-3-held/518173.html
search for swift
Source 3 http://www.dailypioneer.com/city/inter-state-gang--of-vehicle-lifters-busted-six-held.html search for swift
videos you can see
now do not revert. discuss and then do — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2405:204:3488:CDE9:5CD8:3AB7:8D80:21A1 (talk) 13:46, 1 January 2018 (UTC)
- The only source you cite that mentions a pattern of stealing swifts (not just 1 or 2 thefts) is a source that talks about a crime ring that stole 15 swifts, the edit you made to the swift article had the same problems I pointed out in my last comment, for example you still have not provided even 1 source that says india is known for swift thefts. Even a gang that specialized in stealing swifts and stole 15 is not significant enough to be in an encyclopedia article on swifts, see WP:UNDUE. I am fine with discussing this but your repeated reinstatement of disputed content while discussion is ongoing is verging on disruptive editing. Tornado chaser (talk) 14:58, 1 January 2018 (UTC)
Swift edit
I do not agree wiTh you. INDIA is not known for swift thefts. But the car is repeatedly stolen in India. Do you want if specifically the swift is the most stollen car then is it a valid information. I do not agree with you. I think swift stolen information is correct Lavikushi (talk) 17:15, 1 January 2018 (UTC)
- @Lavikushi: Could you clarify what you mean? and who you are talking to (me or 2405:204:3488:cde9:5cd8:3ab7:8d80:21a1). Tornado chaser (talk) 17:17, 1 January 2018 (UTC)
Vazhappally Maha Siva Temple
Hello Tornado,Iam new to wiki ,now I have added a source kindly check — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jyothiz (talk • contribs) 10:51, 2 January 2018 (UTC)
- @Jyothiz: You added a citation, but you put it under the content, rather than directly after the3 sentence/paragraph being sourced from it. You should move the reverence to be directly after the content you are sourcing to that reference, feel free to ask me if you have any questions. Tornado chaser (talk) 19:20, 2 January 2018 (UTC)
Welcome (and Kegedonce Press)
Good afternoon Tornado chaser!
Thank you for your warm welcome to Wikipedia. Also, your username is a very cool one. I used to want to be a storm chaser when I was younger.
Now, in terms of Kegedonce Press. I'll admit that it was my first edit (I'm still really new to Wikimedia as a whole) but I am in no way affiliated or are employed by or for Kegedonce Press. I just really appreciate Indigenous literature. I noticed when I was doing Wikipedia searches on Indigenous content in North America that it was asking for further information (such as secondary sources), so I did some digging and inputted some new content.
The red (unlinked) names are ones that I will approach the authors to request permission to write a Wikipedia article on them (as some of them have written works that have greatly contributed to Indigenous literature in Canada, some have even won awards). I do not work for the authors that I wish to input into the article (and create content for), but recognize the increasing need for Indigenous content on Wikipedia.
If you have any pro-tips on how to do this without appearing to have a conflict of interest, I would sincerely appreciate your input.
Cheers,
Morinjam Morinjam (talk) 21:08, 11 January 2018 (UTC)
- You seem to be ok, I Looked at some of your edits and there doesn't seem to be a COI problem (not that it hurts to know the rules), feel free to ask my if you have any questions. Tornado chaser (talk) 02:04, 12 January 2018 (UTC)
@Morinjam:. Tornado chaser (talk) 02:05, 12 January 2018 (UTC)
Rotaviral gastroenterits
Please don't try to fix these issues of "desired title occupied by redirect" by cut-and-paste moves. That just detroys all article history. I'll put in a request for a technical page move, and an admin will sort it. --Elmidae (talk · contribs) 18:12, 14 January 2018 (UTC) Requested [1]. --Elmidae (talk · contribs) 18:17, 14 January 2018 (UTC)
Please comment on Talk:Jesse Hamilton
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Jesse Hamilton. Legobot (talk) 04:29, 16 January 2018 (UTC)
Merger discussion for Fake News Awards
An article that you have been involved in editing—Fake News Awards—has been proposed for merging with another article. If you are interested, please participate in the merger discussion. Thank you. DARTHBOTTO talk•cont 23:04, 18 January 2018 (UTC)
Please comment on Talk:David Wolfe (entrepreneur)
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:David Wolfe (entrepreneur). Legobot (talk) 04:31, 19 January 2018 (UTC)
Editing a page about myself
Hello, You kindly left me a message after I edited a page about myself. I looked on the guidelines and believe I was within right to edit the page due to the fact the article is continually being edited to include my own private information: I have a stage name and my private and legal name keeps being published. I am desperately checking the page frequently and remove it whenever I see it. But it’s upsetting me that the work I put into making the page more neutral, as stipulated by Wikipedia, by including information about my whole career and not just lengthy information about one credit, and removing private information and old photos with incorrect captions, keeps being undone. I try to rectify and it is a waste of time. What can I do? Thanks — Preceding unsigned comment added by Amyjk (talk • contribs) 23:31, 20 January 2018 (UTC)
- @Amyjk: I looked at the article more and removed the supposed real name (it was not in any of the sources cited, violating WP:V), I agree that newer photos are better, but why is an old photo worse than no photo?(and what is wrong with the caption?) I think the reason you are being reverted is because self-promotional editing is so common that any editing by the subject of an article is suspicious, when editing an article about yourself, make sure to add references to reliable sourcesand to always edit in a neutral manner Feel free to ask me if you have any questions. Tornado chaser (talk) 01:54, 21 January 2018 (UTC)
What happened?
Where did the tornado chaser go? Oh wow. I'm blown away....Anyone that wants to challenge the "conspiracy theory" please do your own investigation like any logical person would before they open there mouths and start yapping about something they haven't a clue about. DBLUF (talk) 22:09, 21 January 2018 (UTC) I didn't think you'd have much to say to that. DBLUF (talk) 22:17, 21 January 2018 (UTC)
@DBLUF:I responded on your talk page. Tornado chaser (talk) 22:31, 21 January 2018 (UTC)
Dainese Settantadue page
Hi there!
I just wanted to let you know I have published a new page on this - with much shorter new wording than the one you objected to and which hopefully now meets encylopedic criteria.
I hope I've learnt from your comments. I'm new to this. I started by editing a page but this is the first I have created to update Wikipedia.
I'm a motorcycle and rugby football enthusiast.
Jack — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jackfenwick (talk • contribs) 12:19, 22 January 2018 (UTC)
- @Jackfenwick: I made a few changes to the draft page to make it sound less like an ad, feel free to ask if you have any questions. Tornado chaser (talk) 22:40, 22 January 2018 (UTC)
- @Tornado chaser: Many thanks for the guidance. I thought a generic dry description would be helpful and OK. Jackfenwick (talk) 13:40, 23 January 2018 (UTC)
Female edits....
Why did you remove the word typically from the edit? Are females that do not produce eggs not females? Post menopausal, cancer survivors, etc. are All still female, no??
Feel free to message me: knowmenomicooper@gmail.com
- Looks like an accident/error on my part, thanks for fixing it. Tornado chaser (talk) 01:39, 25 January 2018 (UTC)
Please comment on Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style/Dates and numbers
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style/Dates and numbers. Legobot (talk) 04:29, 25 January 2018 (UTC)
January 2018 - Roxy Jacenko
Hi TornadoChaser,
Thanks for your feedback on my talk page in regards to recent edits made to the Roxy Jacenko biographical wiki page.
If you had taken the time to properly examine the edit history of the page, you would see that at multiple instances, citations and references to her narcissm and her family history have been continually removed by single ip address non-registered users, believed to be owned by Roxy Jacenko or people within her business. You would know as a recent changes patroller that this actually represents wiki vandalism. These IP addresses have had messages added to their talk pages by multiple users asking them not to remove references on the page.
In future, I would ask you to refrain from reverting entire edits and marking as "vandalism" without doing proper research and to instead, if you believe an article lacks citation, mark it as such.
Thanks for your time - Tommosimmo
- @Tommosimmo: Calling someone a narcissist or any other opinionated word in wikipedia's voice is a violation of WP:NPOV, fixing NPOV violations is not vandalism. Tornado chaser (talk) 19:39, 26 January 2018 (UTC)
Please comment on Talk:Military Sealift Command
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Military Sealift Command. Legobot (talk) 04:27, 27 January 2018 (UTC)
New section
There was a reference for it.
Please do not delete something with a credible source again.
Discretionary sanctions
You were notifed of the discretionary sanctions concerning pseudoscience back in May in this diff. Please do keep them in mind when you edit about vaccines. Thx Jytdog (talk) 04:11, 28 January 2018 (UTC)
Warning
Hi Tornado chaser, after looking at some of your recent edits to vaccine pages, I was considering placing you under 0RR because you appear to be reverting and not discussing controversial changes on the talk page, and your edits do not in my view adhere to NPOV as defined under the Pseudoscience case. Since you don't appear to have been sanctioned before, however, I've decided just to make Jytdog's warning above a bit more official, and remind you to discuss controversial changes on the talk page and to adhere to a neutral point of view. I've recorded this warning at the AE log. You generally do good work on Wikipedia, but this is a contentious area, and caution is advised when making any potentially controversial changes. TonyBallioni (talk) 04:46, 28 January 2018 (UTC)