No edit summary Tags: Reverted 2017 wikitext editor |
ToosieJoosie (talk | contribs) Tags: Reverted Reply |
||
Line 12: | Line 12: | ||
::4. You probably don't have the experience to figure out who and what added to an article version through its history, and to see the difference in bytes. And also your approach of accusing other wikipedians who correct your own mistakes of being malicious is not healthy behaviour either. Since you're getting personal, I think it would be better to get the administration involved in this situation. [[User:Solidest|Solidest]] ([[User talk:Solidest|talk]]) 20:53, 12 November 2023 (UTC) |
::4. You probably don't have the experience to figure out who and what added to an article version through its history, and to see the difference in bytes. And also your approach of accusing other wikipedians who correct your own mistakes of being malicious is not healthy behaviour either. Since you're getting personal, I think it would be better to get the administration involved in this situation. [[User:Solidest|Solidest]] ([[User talk:Solidest|talk]]) 20:53, 12 November 2023 (UTC) |
||
::: [[File:Information icon4.svg|link=|25px|alt=Information icon]] There is currently a discussion at [[Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents]] regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.<!--Template:Discussion notice--><!--Template:ANI-notice--> [[User:Solidest|Solidest]] ([[User talk:Solidest|talk]]) 21:09, 12 November 2023 (UTC) |
::: [[File:Information icon4.svg|link=|25px|alt=Information icon]] There is currently a discussion at [[Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents]] regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.<!--Template:Discussion notice--><!--Template:ANI-notice--> [[User:Solidest|Solidest]] ([[User talk:Solidest|talk]]) 21:09, 12 November 2023 (UTC) |
||
::::You display highly toxic behaviours , which includes literal bullying and gaslighting. |
|||
::::You also have a habit of twisting words into your own version/ interpretation for your own gain or benefit. Again, I really don't understand your fixation(obsession). |
|||
::::'''1.''' I understand what you may mean regarding the capitilizaton , however you could've written to me on my talk page to perform , the move myself, if it was genuinely out of improvement and betterment of the page as well as my edits. It really seems maliscious and patronizing, especially after your other edit(s). https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hard_NRG is stylized in that manner however also appears online in lower case , meaning there could be some exceptions. |
|||
::::'''2''' There are numerous sources and even current trending songs in the subgenres' category whereas various artists blatantly stipulate the songs description as fusion(s). |
|||
::::'''3'''I found , literally at least 3 duplicate created citations, carried out by yourself/ other(s) which make no sense , instead of re-using or not even citing at all. |
|||
::::'''4''' Your last paragraph is evidential of your patronizing, editing as well as fixation. Especially coming from an experienced editor, you're supposed to be encouraging and assisting me , not all this toxicity. It's highly, demotivating and shocking, which is probably what you like/want. [[User:ToosieJoosie|ToosieJoosie]] ([[User talk:ToosieJoosie#top|talk]]) 21:42, 12 November 2023 (UTC) |
Revision as of 21:42, 12 November 2023
Following WP:MOS, reading infobox documentation, posting false sources
Please, read WP:MOS and documentation for Template:Infobox music genre. You're the one who's doing disruptive edits. 1. Music genres are never capitalized in English unless it's a proper name (such as Afro). There's also a consensus on enwiki to follow such formatting. And this is especially true when there is no consistency in the sources - then we follow the standard rules of grammar. 2. "Fusion genres" parameter is used to list fusion genres of the described genre, not the ones which are usually fused by producers with this genre. The is written in the documentation of the infobox. And see how it's used in the other articles. 3. And also please, don't put sources where they source nothing. I fixed this in the second sentence in the article, but you've reverted it - this could also be considered a vandalism or disruptive edit = putting pointless sources in sentences. So please restore all my edits that you cancelled. Solidest (talk) 19:44, 12 November 2023 (UTC)
- 1. They are clearly two seperate words, and how the subgenres name is predominantly displayed as well as typed across a plethora of sources and platforms, not a stylization. (Your move also only suspiciously, took place after the pages views were increasing. After your move ,it's back to near 0. Again seems malicious and unecessary, not even by accident or genuinely wanting to improve.Thus, if the bots or more established admins haven't found a problem, I think you should disregard it.
- 2. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:Fusion_music_genres ; "This category contains music genres that could be considered fusions of various historical genres; that is, they combine elements of different genres together." As per numerous sources and evidence , this is or will definitely be the case , in future, if not so, already.
- 3 None of the sources , source nothing , if you have time to read they all mention or highlight the topic/ article. Thank you. ToosieJoosie (talk) 19:52, 12 November 2023 (UTC)
- I have actually just found that you are the last and only editor on the https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Afro_Tech page's contributions that created a duplicate , citation, instead of re-using, which I have to rescue and fix, now. I don't know what your problem is but please stop with the fixation and malisciousness. ToosieJoosie (talk) 20:03, 12 November 2023 (UTC)
- 1. "Tech" is not a proper name and should not be capitalised. Your "it's ok to violate the rules as long as the admins don't find it" approach is malicious. Other users have absolutely the same rights to point out that WP:MOS is being violated. I pointed it out and corrected the mistakes, and you unreasonably reverted that. This is what is truly malicious.
- 2. The fusion genres parameter is used to list actual names of the existing genres, not a potential genre lists what could be fused with it based on editors assumptions. Your approach in this case, besides being nonsensical, actually violates WP:NOR.
- 3. Please pay attention to the sentence I pointed out (since it was the only edit where I edited sources). I removed the source from where Afro tech is not mentioned at all, you put it back in, which makes no sense.
- 4. You probably don't have the experience to figure out who and what added to an article version through its history, and to see the difference in bytes. And also your approach of accusing other wikipedians who correct your own mistakes of being malicious is not healthy behaviour either. Since you're getting personal, I think it would be better to get the administration involved in this situation. Solidest (talk) 20:53, 12 November 2023 (UTC)
- There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Solidest (talk) 21:09, 12 November 2023 (UTC)
- You display highly toxic behaviours , which includes literal bullying and gaslighting.
- You also have a habit of twisting words into your own version/ interpretation for your own gain or benefit. Again, I really don't understand your fixation(obsession).
- 1. I understand what you may mean regarding the capitilizaton , however you could've written to me on my talk page to perform , the move myself, if it was genuinely out of improvement and betterment of the page as well as my edits. It really seems maliscious and patronizing, especially after your other edit(s). https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hard_NRG is stylized in that manner however also appears online in lower case , meaning there could be some exceptions.
- 2 There are numerous sources and even current trending songs in the subgenres' category whereas various artists blatantly stipulate the songs description as fusion(s).
- 3I found , literally at least 3 duplicate created citations, carried out by yourself/ other(s) which make no sense , instead of re-using or not even citing at all.
- 4 Your last paragraph is evidential of your patronizing, editing as well as fixation. Especially coming from an experienced editor, you're supposed to be encouraging and assisting me , not all this toxicity. It's highly, demotivating and shocking, which is probably what you like/want. ToosieJoosie (talk) 21:42, 12 November 2023 (UTC)
- There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Solidest (talk) 21:09, 12 November 2023 (UTC)