m →DYK for Vinita Gupta: bit more |
→Macdonald: new section |
||
Line 219: | Line 219: | ||
While I can only answer for myself (I'm not sure the other editor even watches the nomination) I hope I have answered your concerns regarding [[Template talk:Did you know#Vinita Gupta]]. It would have helped if you were clearer about your concern. Is it notability? COI? Am I missing something? --[[User:Muhandes|Muhandes]] ([[User talk:Muhandes|talk]]) 11:36, 29 June 2011 (UTC) |
While I can only answer for myself (I'm not sure the other editor even watches the nomination) I hope I have answered your concerns regarding [[Template talk:Did you know#Vinita Gupta]]. It would have helped if you were clearer about your concern. Is it notability? COI? Am I missing something? --[[User:Muhandes|Muhandes]] ([[User talk:Muhandes|talk]]) 11:36, 29 June 2011 (UTC) |
||
== Macdonald == |
|||
I think I am going to start a discussion on Raul's talk page.--[[User:Wehwalt|Wehwalt]] ([[User talk:Wehwalt|talk]]) 12:43, 29 June 2011 (UTC) |
Revision as of 12:43, 29 June 2011
Archive 1 – Archive 2 – Archive 3 – Archive 4 – Archive 5 – Archive 6 – Archive 7 – Archive 8 – Archive 9
This user is proud to be a financial member of Wikimedia Australia. |
Last updated by cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online at 07:53, 1 June 2024 (UTC) |
16 May 2024 |
FACs needing feedback view • | |
---|---|
Mission: Impossible – Fallout | Review it now |
I'm God | Review it now |
You Belong with Me | Review it now |
Blackrocks Brewery | Review it now |
- Archive 1 (4 August – 14 October 2005):
- Archive 2 (15 October 2005 – 5 March 2006):
- Archive 3 (6 March – 15 June 2006):
- Archive 4 (16 June – 6 September 2006):
- Archive 5 (6 September – 29 December 2006):
- Archive 6 (30 December 2006 – 6 April 2007):
- Archive 7 (7 April – 29 July 2007):
- Archive 8 (30 July – 7 September 2007):
- Archive 9 (7 September – 16 December 2007):
- Archive 10 (17 December – 18 January 2008):
- Archive 11 (19 January – 30 March 2008):
- Archive 12 (31 March – 28 April 2008):
- Archive 13 (29 April – 7 June 2008):
- Archive 14 (7 June – 25 June 2008):
Real-life workload: 3.5
- 1 = no work pressure
- 5 = middling
- > 5 = please don't expect much
- 10 = frenzied
Please note that I do not normally (1) copy-edit articles or (2) review articles that are not already candidates for promotion to featured status.
Current listening obsession: BWV11, last movement: Wann soll es doch geschehen (JS Bach). Here's the Harnoncourt version, which is great in many ways, but the flutes needed separate miking—they're drowned out in the tutti passages.
Help request
Thank You!
Re: FDPHello, Tony1. You have new messages at Wikipedia:Featured sound candidates/Take Me Out to the Ball Game.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template. A WikiLove-pint for you!
TalkbackHello, Tony1. You have new messages at Sadads's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template. TalkbackHello, Tony1. You have new messages at NeilN's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template. TalkbackHello, Tony1. You have new messages at Wehwalt's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template. The Case of the Dean of St AsaphI have reverted your edits to The Case of the Dean of St Asaph, which replaced emdashes with endashes. WP:MOSDASH clearly indicates that emdashes are to be used when indicating a break in the sentence — as I have done in this comment, as an example — and that is precisely what they are doing in the article. Ironholds (talk) 08:20, 24 June 2011 (UTC)
FS CriteriaIs there anyway that you could present a draft of what you think the criteria should look like? cheers --Guerillero | My Talk 06:45, 25 June 2011 (UTC)
TFA blurb for Jesus College buildingsHi Tony, FYI - is it better now? I didn't relink Liz I, although I'm not sure why you delinked her. I don't see it as overlinking - and if your thought is that people can find the link through the lead section of the article, that would apply to all the other links in the blurb! BencherliteTalk 13:09, 25 June 2011 (UTC) airplane FACI'm trying to help the A330 get a star. The writer is a first-timer and a kid. Saw you had reviewed the 747 four years ago. Wondered if you could give it a little help. I am busily Brassoing it as best I can. Thing has a lot of very sound detail, but has the intrinsic dullness of an aircraft article. I'm also going to try to develop a graphic that shows the development progression as I think this will help reduce the pain of the number-letter soup. I'll still look at DYK, like I said. I just want to help this guy out first. TCO (talk) 06:58, 26 June 2011 (UTC) TalkbackHello, Tony1. You have new messages at Bruce1ee's talk page.
Message added 09:59, 27 June 2011 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template. —Bruce1eetalk 09:59, 27 June 2011 (UTC)
CentiloquiumConcerned that your re-written hook for DYK may now appear to get the appearance and the reality back-to-front. I've raised the question at Wikipedia talk:Did you know Jheald (talk) 17:22, 27 June 2011 (UTC) Image layout concernAm concerned that there continues to be a view that both alternating sides and default width are "rules" that have to be followed. Also, concerned that it makes the articles often look worse than better. For instance, left justifying a photo in a small section, puts it right under the section break and plays hell with the sections below. See here for discussion of the issue coming up on A330 FAC. (Also, just came up in the Manhattan Project FAC, a minute ago.) I thought we had moved on from this... TCO (talk) 21:01, 27 June 2011 (UTC) The Signpost: 27 June 2011
Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe · EdwardsBot (talk) 01:55, 28 June 2011 (UTC)
10 AH urgentI dont get what you mean when you left that message on my page? --Misconceptions2 (talk) 14:08, 28 June 2011 (UTC) Discussion pointerHello! Please see Talk:Main Page#Did you know ... that the f-word did not begin as an acronym. Thanks! —David Levy 14:51, 28 June 2011 (UTC) Nice to see...I am not suggesting you did it as a personal favour but my thanks to you and Dabomb87 for the prominence of the famous St K photo - and indeed your continued fine work on the Signpost. All the best, Ben MacDui 18:11, 28 June 2011 (UTC)
Your recent post on Talk:Main PageI noted your comments in the thread about the DYK yesterday. The WMF Board of Trustees has actually made a resolution with respect to controversial content, which directly applies to this situation: "We support the principle of least astonishment: content on Wikimedia projects should be presented to readers in such a way as to respect their expectations of what any page or feature might contain." This stemmed from the 2010 study on controversial content that you mentioned in your comment. I've posted a comment later in the same thread reminding people of this principle. Frankly, I thought it was a sufficiently well written and researched article that any number of good hooks could have come from it; deliberately selecting the most salacious seems to fly in the face of the WMF principle. I'd be curious to know what your take is. Risker (talk) 06:16, 29 June 2011 (UTC)
Image widthBecause of the past problems, our DYK bot is set up to accept only 100x100px at the moment. It is easy to change the bot (and I'll try to widen that image on the main page directly, if I'm online), but the right way is to gain general consensus at talk:Main Page. Cheers. Materialscientist (talk) 09:13, 29 June 2011 (UTC)
RFC for PmandersonPersonally, I would prefer to see him topic banned sooner rather than later. It's trivial to look at his block log to see that he's not working well with others; he just makes whatever changes he wants, and he runs completely roughshod over even majorities against him; people shy away because they don't want to get blocked at the same time he is. I think if we started an RFC we could probably get him topic blocked from making changes to the MOS-related policies and guidelines, without any further edits by him. He's just continually bullying the other users. He's been at the centre of two policy locked down in just a few weeks. This has to stop, it's no good for the project. Would you be willing to second an RFC against him? -Rememberway (talk) 10:57, 29 June 2011 (UTC)
DYK for Vinita GuptaWhile I can only answer for myself (I'm not sure the other editor even watches the nomination) I hope I have answered your concerns regarding Template talk:Did you know#Vinita Gupta. It would have helped if you were clearer about your concern. Is it notability? COI? Am I missing something? --Muhandes (talk) 11:36, 29 June 2011 (UTC) MacdonaldI think I am going to start a discussion on Raul's talk page.--Wehwalt (talk) 12:43, 29 June 2011 (UTC) |