No edit summary Tag: Manual revert |
Binksternet (talk | contribs) AN3 notice Tag: Reverted |
||
Line 127: | Line 127: | ||
Oh you’re good lol [[User:TheXuitts|TheXuitts]] ([[User talk:TheXuitts#top|talk]]) 07:34, 23 January 2022 (UTC) |
Oh you’re good lol [[User:TheXuitts|TheXuitts]] ([[User talk:TheXuitts#top|talk]]) 07:34, 23 January 2022 (UTC) |
||
== Notice of edit warring noticeboard discussion == |
|||
[[File:Information icon4.svg|link=|25px|alt=Information icon]] |
|||
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at [[Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring]] regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on [[Wikipedia:Edit warring|edit warring]]. <!--Template:An3-notice--> Thank you. [[User:Binksternet|Binksternet]] ([[User talk:Binksternet|talk]]) 03:33, 14 February 2022 (UTC) |
Revision as of 03:33, 14 February 2022
Notorious B.I.G. page
hey man thanks for your edits :) me and you have really done a good job on there --Aaron106 (talk) 23:24, 2 November 2021 (UTC)
Haha np TheXuitts (talk) 07:25, 12 November 2021 (UTC)
Falsely
Please make sure you have sources before adding "falsely" to BLP material. While this addition may be true [1] (it is likely Rittenhouse isn't a licensed EMT), this addition was absolutely not supported by any source [2]. Your edit implies that Rittenhouse was lying about his stated intent (vs lying about credentials). Springee (talk) 02:12, 5 November 2021 (UTC)
My b I thought it showed the clip where he confirmed on the stand that he lied TheXuitts (talk) 07:20, 12 November 2021 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for November 12
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Kelly Gissendaner, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Capital punishment in Georgia. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:02, 12 November 2021 (UTC)
Suge knight
hey do you think we should show suge knight on the murder page, i know he may of orchestrated the killing but should we not just show the shooters instead --Aaron106 (talk) 14:20, 18 November 2021 (UTC)
Yeah, it’s widely accepted he was an accomplice and it’s only under accused anyways. Keefe is mentioned under accused on Pac’s page so it makes sense TheXuitts (talk) 10:49, 21 November 2021 (UTC)
Charli baltimore
also i got some new information. from this video https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tm-Kiz_Nrbk 8:23 Charli Baltimore says she and Biggie relationship's went to the next level where big flyed her over to LA during the filming of the TV Show "Martin" I checked the episode and it aired on September 23 1995. So 1995 has got to been the year --Aaron106 (talk) 14:29, 18 November 2021 (UTC)
Fair enough TheXuitts (talk) 10:53, 21 November 2021 (UTC)
@TheXuitts: Hey i was thinking 1995 maybe isn't correct and a bit of a stretch. They definitely were together in 1996-1997 or (1997) either one of thoses I wouldn't mind if you changed back too --Aaron106 (talk) 03:47, 25 December 2021 (UTC)
I got banned for a week apparently but I think 1996-1997 is more accurate TheXuitts (talk) 18:58, 25 December 2021 (UTC)
@TheXuitts: You could change it now I think since you are unbanned :) --Aaron106 (talk) 16:01, 26 December 2021 (UTC)
.
YesSimon is going on a changing spree again for Amir Muhammed. this is like 10 times now.. --Aaron106 (talk) 13:46, 22 November 2021 (UTC)
I filed a protection request, until then keep changing it back TheXuitts (talk) 03:15, 23 November 2021 (UTC)
It’s seriously frustrating because Billups’s life was almost ruined by false accusations and these dunces are trying to start it again. TheXuitts (talk) 03:18, 23 November 2021 (UTC)
ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message
The Last B.I.G. night
hey as a B.I.G fan i suggest you watch this https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=quN-33HNFAw. Puffys bodyguard Gene Deal explains everything that went down that night :) --Aaron106 (talk) 16:56, 23 November 2021 (UTC)
Constitutional Democratic Party of Japan
Hi TheXuitts. Per your request to be notified about mistakes I thought I'd let you know your changes on this page have been reverted. You changed the political position section from "centre to centre-left" to "centre-left to left-wing". When changing or adding claims you should always provide at least one supporting citation that supports your claim. The party is not currently stated to be left-wing anywhere on the page and no citations are provided that support this claim. If you want to change this you should provide at least one citation from a reliable source that explicitly calls the party left-wing. You also gave no justification for why you removed centre/centrism. Centre along with the claim for centre-left are both cited with sources in the "Ideology and platform" section of the page. Providing a brief description of your edit in the edit summary is also helpful and much appreciated by other edits and can be used to give your reasoning (however claims should still always be cited by at least one reliable source). Hope this helps and all the best. Helper201 (talk) 00:55, 1 December 2021 (UTC)
My bad TheXuitts (talk) 07:04, 12 December 2021 (UTC)
Mary Kay Letourneau
I'm not defending the woman, but accuracy is important. She wasn't Jimmy Savile, and even his wikipedia article doesn't have the first sentence say what you added. One minor was involved and the words you added were discussed on talk. Based on Talk:Mary Kay Letourneau/Archive 5#BRD discussion, you shouldn't add "pedophilia" as a motive to that page. Pedophilia as a motive isn't in sources on this topic. 195.226.154.85 (talk) 23:54, 8 December 2021 (UTC)
For the most up-to-date discussion about using the term statutory rape at that article, see Talk:Mary Kay Letourneau/Archive 3#statutory child rape. The consensus is to continue to state "second-degree rape of a child" while pipelinking to the statutory rape article. There's also a discussion several years older than that one. 195.226.154.53 (talk) 01:01, 9 December 2021 (UTC)
I’m not going to die on this hill but the Jimmy Savile argument you have is pretty weak as he was never convicted of child rape and Letourneau was. She was by definition a child rapist, but once again, I’m not dying on this hill and I have refrained from engaging in an edit war. TheXuitts (talk) 07:03, 12 December 2021 (UTC)
December 2021
Welcome to Wikipedia, and thank you for your contributions. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, please note that there is a Manual of Style that should be followed to maintain a consistent, encyclopedic appearance. Deviating from this style, as you did in Murder of John Lennon, disturbs uniformity among articles and may cause readability or accessibility problems. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Sundayclose (talk) 01:18, 11 December 2021 (UTC)
Please do not use styles that are nonstandard, unusual, inappropriate or difficult to understand in articles, as you did in Murder of John Lennon. There is a Manual of Style, and edits should not deliberately go against it without special reason. Thank you. Sundayclose (talk) 03:51, 11 December 2021 (UTC)
- READ WP:MOS, especially WP:ENGVAR. John Lennon was British. Articles related to him use British English. Sundayclose (talk) 03:56, 11 December 2021 (UTC)
Please stop attacking other editors. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Comment on content, not on other contributors or people. Acroterion (talk) 02:30, 15 December 2021 (UTC)
- Editors are welcome to re-open the discussion on the talkpage that achieved the present consensus. Otherwise, lay off the "bigots" potshots. Acroterion (talk) 02:31, 15 December 2021 (UTC)
Ok TheXuitts (talk) 23:30, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
It appears that you have been canvassing—leaving messages on a biased choice of users' talk pages (such as User talk:ThatGuyCade) to notify them of an ongoing community decision, debate, or vote—in order to influence Talk:George Stinney. While friendly notices are allowed, they should be limited and nonpartisan in distribution and should reflect a neutral point of view. Please do not post notices which are indiscriminately cross-posted, which espouse a certain point of view or side of a debate, or which are selectively sent only to those who are believed to hold the same opinion as you. Remember to respect Wikipedia's principle of consensus-building by allowing decisions to reflect the prevailing opinion among the community at large. Thank you. TJRC (talk) 01:21, 17 December 2021 (UTC)
Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit you made to Gautama Buddha, did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. Joshua Jonathan -Let's talk! 06:38, 18 December 2021 (UTC)
Notification
This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.
You have shown interest in articles about living or recently deceased people, and edits relating to the subject (living or recently deceased) of such biographical articles. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.
For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.
Acroterion (talk) 21:46, 18 December 2021 (UTC)
December 2021 2
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
. —valereee (talk) 18:36, 25 December 2021 (UTC)- Block is for disruptive editing, pblocking from article space because the addition of unsourced content about a living person at Murder of Ahmaud Arbery without even an edit summary was the last straw for me. No objection to any other admin lifting this block if this editor will commit to responding to and addressing complaints at their user talk. —valereee (talk) 18:39, 25 December 2021 (UTC)
My apologies for not adding an edit summary, and additional apologies if I did not respond to a previous warning. I’ll commit to responding to and address complaints on my user talk page, and I’d greatly appreciate if you were kind enough to lift the block. If not, I understand, and in that case I’d wait out my block. TheXuitts (talk) 19:04, 25 December 2021 (UTC)
TheXuitts (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
Will commit to responding to and addressing complaints at my user talk page from here on out, and will commit to always adding edit summaries from here on out. TheXuitts (talk) 19:07, 25 December 2021 (UTC)
Accept reason:
Thank you very much! I promise to work on it from here on out. TheXuitts (talk) 00:35, 26 December 2021 (UTC)
January 2022
Hello, I'm HurricaneEdgar. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Scott Cawthon, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. HurricaneEdgar 12:08, 3 January 2022 (UTC)
I didn’t add a reference because it was mentioned in the body of the article. I’m not a beginner editor, don’t patronize me. TheXuitts (talk) 04:56, 4 January 2022 (UTC)
Peep
Hey there, I know you've done a lot of work on the Lil Peep article and I get the feeling you probably know more about music than me so thought you'd be the right person to come to for this. I imagine you probably have the article on your watchlist but if not a person just added a bunch of new genres to the article, and while it doesn't look like nonsense I'm not sure they all fit, but also not knowledgable enough to revert. Would appreciate if you could have a look at it whenever you got time if you're familiar with all the genres added. --TylerBurden (talk) 03:47, 12 January 2022 (UTC)
- Actually nevermind, someone removed the genres I was more unsure about as I was writing this on your talk. Sorry for the ping lol. --TylerBurden (talk) 03:54, 12 January 2022 (UTC)
Apology
Your edit to stephanie adams listing her as a murderer popped up on my watchlist and not knowing the background I rolled it back thinking it must be some kind of blp vio. When I read the article I saw I was mistaken and rolled my rollback back. Please accept my apologies for the incorrect use of rollback. Spartaz Humbug! 20:34, 16 January 2022 (UTC)
Oh you’re good lol TheXuitts (talk) 07:34, 23 January 2022 (UTC)
Notice of edit warring noticeboard discussion
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Thank you. Binksternet (talk) 03:33, 14 February 2022 (UTC)