→Yadava: Done. |
Khan Of Naral (talk | contribs) →Swati Tribe: new section Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit New topic |
||
Line 188: | Line 188: | ||
* {{Done}}. --[[User:Technopat|Technopat]] ([[User talk:Technopat#top|talk]]) 15:04, 30 July 2023 (UTC) |
* {{Done}}. --[[User:Technopat|Technopat]] ([[User talk:Technopat#top|talk]]) 15:04, 30 July 2023 (UTC) |
||
== Swati Tribe == |
|||
Why you removed that infobox ? Explain me otherwise I will brought this matter to Noticeboard [[User:Khan Of Naral|Khan Of Naral]] ([[User talk:Khan Of Naral|talk]]) 08:12, 1 August 2023 (UTC) |
Revision as of 08:12, 1 August 2023
Thank you for visiting "my" talk page. Please leave your message at the bottom of this page, either by clicking "New section" (above) or "Click here..." (below). I'll reply wherever you prefer (my usual habit is to reply on your talk page, which means I'm watching it, and there's no need to add the {{talkback}} template or quote any previous message).
Oh yeah, before I forget, if you came here because I undid or reverted your unsourced content, there's really no point bringing it up here. Just cite your references in the article you edited.
|
---|
Grille
Can you explain why you're reverting my edit? Simply reverting without a meaningful edit summary is very rude. Parsecboy (talk) 11:15, 4 July 2023 (UTC)
Your message on my talk page
The sources for my edits were the US Census QuickFacts and a few other surveys in the demographics section of the articles. Should I copy that source again or is it better to use a source that discusses the demographics of the cities rather than just listing census data?
Also, is there some way that I can respond on my talk page to make you see my message? I don't know how to do this. 135.180.146.84 (talk) 16:41, 6 July 2023 (UTC)
Sources
You mentioned on my talk page that I don't cite sources when I do cite multiple sources so where did I not cite sources??? You cant make a statement and not tell me where. Fortnitegamer3432 (talk) 20:43, 7 July 2023 (UTC)
- Replied. --Technopat (talk) 21:01, 7 July 2023 (UTC)
- The YouTube video was a interview with the former Pakistani Minister of Interior, its not the only source citing Hamid Gul's participation in the battle of Jalalabad there are plenty of other sources considering the reason he got sacked was because of that specific Operations failure Fortnitegamer3432 (talk) 21:31, 7 July 2023 (UTC)
- e Article already mentioned Hamid Gul's Participation in the Battle of Jalalabad so I dont see how getting mad over a source was nessacary considering there already is a sourceh
- Fortnitegamer3432 (talk) 21:40, 7 July 2023 (UTC)
- The Article already had the Source* Fortnitegamer3432 (talk) 21:40, 7 July 2023 (UTC)
July 2023
Thank you for making a report about SaulGoodman6969 (talk · contribs · block log) at Wikipedia:Administrator intervention against vandalism. Reporting and removing vandalism is vital to the functioning of Wikipedia and all users are encouraged to revert, warn, and report vandalism. However, it appears that the editor you reported may not have engaged in vandalism, or the user was not sufficiently or appropriately warned. Please note there is a difference between vandalism and unhelpful or misguided edits made in good faith. If the user continues to vandalise after a recent final warning, please re-report it. Thank you. IanDBeacon (talk) 16:55, 8 July 2023 (UTC)
- Just for the record (for future reference): The user, after having received a sufficient number of warnings from other users, including a "may be blocked from editing without further warning" from an admin, continued to removed perfectly valid references, on at least two occasions that I was aware of: (an edit which had been reverted before I could do so and (and one that I reverted). This second edit was made after the page had been protected. That is not, in my humble opinion, mere "unhelpful or misguided edits made in good faith". --Technopat (talk) 17:29, 8 July 2023 (UTC)
Revert at Genetic recombination
Hello. Could you explain why you reverted my edit to Genetic recombination, please? Thank you. 47.155.41.201 (talk) 09:03, 9 July 2023 (UTC)
- Replied and apologised. --Technopat (talk) 09:28, 9 July 2023 (UTC)
Closure edit
Don't revert if you don't know what is happening. 24.161.76.18 (talk) 15:40, 9 July 2023 (UTC)
Anthony Stevens date of the death
Please explain why you reverted my edit about the date of death of Dr. Anthony Stevens?
Don't revert if you don't know what is happening! Иван Куряков (talk) 07:50, 14 July 2023 (UTC)
Sorry!
Sorry for the sandbox. TYCF (talk) 10:45, 16 July 2023 (UTC)
Elvetham Heath.
Why did you revert the edit when there is no active content dispute or edit war ? Elvetham Heath TYCF (talk) 12:30, 16 July 2023 (UTC)
- From Wikipedia:Stable version . TYCF (talk) 12:33, 16 July 2023 (UTC)
- It is not a edit war. TYCF (talk) 12:54, 16 July 2023 (UTC)
- Technopat, I know there are some unsourced content, but they are there before I started editing. And I don't understand why it is excessive and also, is it too long because of the images ? TYCF (talk) 13:19, 16 July 2023 (UTC)
- Also, can I revert your edit but remove the unsourced content and some photos . TYCF (talk) 13:23, 16 July 2023 (UTC)
Reversions in User talk:HORACE HORACE HORACE
Don't bother. I think reverting their edits is just baiting and feeding them. Edward-Woodrow :) [talk] 17:15, 20 July 2023 (UTC)
- Thank you for your note. You may have other opinions and experiences. Technopat (talk) 17:22, 20 July 2023 (UTC)
- Makes sense. Thanks. Edward-Woodrow :) [talk] 17:23, 20 July 2023 (UTC)
Invitation
Hello Technopat!
- The New Pages Patrol is currently struggling to keep up with the influx of new articles needing review. We could use a few extra hands to help.
- We think that someone with your activity and experience is very likely to meet the guidelines for granting.
- Reviewing/patrolling a page doesn't take much time, but it requires a strong understanding of Wikipedia’s CSD policy and notability guidelines.
- Kindly read the tutorial before making your decision, and feel free to post on the project talk page with questions.
- If patrolling new pages is something you'd be willing to help out with, please consider applying here.
Thank you for your consideration. We hope to see you around!
Sent by Zippybonzo using MediaWiki message delivery (talk) at 07:51, 21 July 2023 (UTC)
Edits
can we please talk? I'm trying to be civil but it feels like your messing with me Wwew345t (talk) 23:58, 21 July 2023 (UTC)
July 22
sir you need to visit "pakistan army equipment" page there are some informations which are based on unreliable source's, these sources itself using Wikipedia as a source and just copy pasting unreliable information of Wikipedia (uncited).And patriotic people's using these sources to save unreliable information. I researched a lot and try to edit it with reliable sources (india/pakistan army equipment) Page's,but one person still reediting it many times.I am not saying I am completely right that's why I need your help, visit page and make conclusions/edit. Dl ff (talk) 11:33, 22 July 2023 (UTC)
- Reply (to be continued...). --Technopat (talk) 11:38, 22 July 2023 (UTC)
- Thanks for replying,the person who is reediting informations gave source of "armedforces.eu"
- For your help.
- Just go on 'see more section'(below in article and before about us section) and click on 'source'and than see what source it's coding in smerch/A-100 MLRS and M109 spg,in this page. (the same source of armedforces.eu he gave)
https://armedforces.eu/land_forces/self_propelled_artillery/M109 https://armedforces.eu/land_forces/rocket_artillery/BM-30_Smerch Dl ff (talk) 13:12, 22 July 2023 (UTC)
- Replied more fully (to be continued...). --Technopat (talk) 22:24, 22 July 2023 (UTC)
- Thanks,I was saying the number of M109(self propelled artillery) and A-100(Rocket launchers) are wrong in this page.someone randomly gave random numbers,and other sources who uses Wikipedia as a source also updated their data(based on wiki random numbers) and the same unreliable source people's are citing.I have reliable sources and Numbers of weapons but i don't want to be in the edit war,You test these sources, if you find them reliable, then edit on the basis of them. I think it is at least more reliable than uncited, and random numbers.
- For A-100(Rocket artillery)
- Current Random number of launchers - 800+
- Based on source - 36
- Sources -
- 1.https://militaryleak.com/2019/01/09/pakistan-army-inducts-a-100-multiple-rocket-launcher-system-in-artillery-corps/?amp=1
- 2.https://www.militarytoday.com/artillery/a100.htm
- 3.https://www.globalsecurity.org/military/world/china/a100.htm
- 4.https://encyclopedia.pub/entry/34517
- For M-109(Self propelled artillery)
- Current Random number - 785
- Based on sources - 438
- Sources
- 1.https://economictimes.indiatimes.com/news/defence/in-a-first-pakistan-showcases-nuke-capable-howitzer/articleshow/90416975.cms?from=mdr
- 2.https://en.dailypakistan.com.pk/23-Mar-2022/in-a-first-pakistan-showcases-nuclear-capable-sh-15-howitzer-in-national-day-parade
- 3.https://www.armyrecognition.com/defense_news_march_2022_global_security_army_industry/pakistan_unveils_its_new_chinese-made_sh-15_155mm_6x6_howitzers_during_national_day_parade.html
- 4.http://www.defenseindustrydaily.com/pakistan-requests-115-m109a5-selfpropelled-howitzers-01645/
- According to this source number of m109 in pakistani army is 275
- https://tanks-encyclopedia.com/coldwar/US/M109_Paladin.php#google_vignette Dl ff (talk) 02:35, 23 July 2023 (UTC)
- For M110(Self propelled artillery)
- Number 1 and 2 source of M109(previous comment).
- sh-15(Self propelled artillery)
- pakistan ordered 236 artillery's but delivery of all systems are not completed,but in page it's mentioned '236-300 artillery's are in service ' if delivery of all systems is not completed than how all artillery's are operational, some system's are delivered but numbers are unknown.
- Source -
- 1.https://www.janes.com/defence-news/news-detail/chinas-norinco-delivers-sh-15-howitzers-to-pakistan
- 2.https://www.livemint.com/news/india/china-is-helping-pakistan-army-build-defence-infrastructure-along-loc-officials-11687716143177.html Dl ff (talk) 03:09, 23 July 2023 (UTC)
- Thanks,I was saying the number of M109(self propelled artillery) and A-100(Rocket launchers) are wrong in this page.someone randomly gave random numbers,and other sources who uses Wikipedia as a source also updated their data(based on wiki random numbers) and the same unreliable source people's are citing.I have reliable sources and Numbers of weapons but i don't want to be in the edit war,You test these sources, if you find them reliable, then edit on the basis of them. I think it is at least more reliable than uncited, and random numbers.
July 23
l edited,'pakistan army equipment' page with citation's.You can check all changes,if I made any mistake than correct it. Dl ff (talk) 14:27, 23 July 2023 (UTC)
Wikipedia sandbox "vandalism"
Hi, this message is regarding that IP editor (35.134.216.96) you recently reported to AIV; the Wikipedia sandbox is literally a place where editors can experiment with editing Wikipedia and find out how things work, make test edits, etc. It even says in most user warning templates to use the sandbox for test/experimental edits. They can make pretty much any kind of edits they want. The only exceptions to this are what it says in the bottom of the sandbox header, "Please DO NOT place promotional, copyrighted, offensive, or libelous content in sandboxes.", so if you do come across sandbox edits that blatantly and strongly go against that, then do go ahead and remove them, and I would write a notice on their talk page telling them not to place promotional, copyright, or libellous content in the sandbox. But the edits I've seen from that IP, just look like normal test edits to me and certainly did not need to be immediately reverted, let alone warned for.
For these reasons, your report at AIV of that IP was declined.
So yeah, just thought I'd let you know it's not really necessary to warn and report users over most kinds of sandbox edits. I would save the time and effort for patrolling over other article edits instead. — AP 499D25 (talk) 04:21, 28 July 2023 (UTC)
July 30
User-An asphalt undid cited changes on 'pakistan army equipment page' which was given by (user-Mr khomri),the changes did by Mr khomri includes numbers of artillery's,which was(before mr khomri edited it) uncited,and Randomly put by editors.Also many source's which are present in notes section are dead.The reason why I ask you for help again and again is this - I am not an old or big editor, even if I edit by giving reliable source, still many people revert it without seeing it. It would be better if you solve the problem by visiting this page. Dl ff (talk) 03:39, 30 July 2023 (UTC)
Yadava
Please look at Yadava page & revert to old version. Narayana-Narayana (talk) 14:41, 30 July 2023 (UTC)
Swati Tribe
Why you removed that infobox ? Explain me otherwise I will brought this matter to Noticeboard Khan Of Naral (talk) 08:12, 1 August 2023 (UTC)