→arbitration: new section |
|||
Line 19: | Line 19: | ||
Why on earth would you start that? I hope you realize that ArbCom as a rule does not issue judgments on content (whether or not to put Syrian or Egyptian or whatever) and the only thing that would happen if they accept the case (they shouldn't in my opinion) is the two of you getting banned for some period of time for edit warring and disruption. Arbitration is incredibly tedious with the result not likely to be advantageous to either of you. Its your life so do what you feel you have to, but this was not a wise move in my opinion. <small style="border: 1px solid;padding:1px 4px 1px 3px;white-space:nowrap">'''[[User:Nableezy|<font color="#C11B17">nableezy</font>]]''' - 20:47, 9 September 2009 (UTC)</font></small> |
Why on earth would you start that? I hope you realize that ArbCom as a rule does not issue judgments on content (whether or not to put Syrian or Egyptian or whatever) and the only thing that would happen if they accept the case (they shouldn't in my opinion) is the two of you getting banned for some period of time for edit warring and disruption. Arbitration is incredibly tedious with the result not likely to be advantageous to either of you. Its your life so do what you feel you have to, but this was not a wise move in my opinion. <small style="border: 1px solid;padding:1px 4px 1px 3px;white-space:nowrap">'''[[User:Nableezy|<font color="#C11B17">nableezy</font>]]''' - 20:47, 9 September 2009 (UTC)</font></small> |
||
:I dont know, but if you want people to actually try and help you need to chill out a bit as well. When there is an RfC and there are just 2 editors going back and forth nobody wants to get involved. I aint exactly the most civil person out here but I realize that if you want to get other people involved you have to make it so they arent stepping in shit. Nobody wants to get involved in these types of disputes were people are just arguing with each other, which is why so many of the Arab/Israeli articles are so bad. People see nothing but sniping and realize that it is just not worth their effort to try and help resolve the issues. So nothing gets done, you just have two sides of people arguing and getting more and more angry with the other side. Which is what happened here. If you told me you were thinking about this I would have tried to step in. Two Arabs going at it like this over a friggin category is retarded. I would have told you both that it is retarded. I would have tried to get the two of you to agree to a set of ground rules for what qualifies for the category. Or I would have tried to get Al Ameer to do it instead. If you want I can still try and do that with the two of you maybe not have to go through the hassle of an arbitration case. If you want to see what you are signing up for take a look at a recent case, read these over and let me know if you still want to go through with this. [[WP:Requests for arbitration/West Bank - Judea and Samaria]], [[WT:Requests for arbitration/West Bank - Judea and Samaria]], [[WP:Requests for arbitration/West Bank - Judea and Samaria/Evidence]], [[WT:Requests for arbitration/West Bank - Judea and Samaria/Evidence]], [[WP:Requests for arbitration/West Bank - Judea and Samaria/Workshop]], [[WT:Requests for arbitration/West Bank - Judea and Samaria/Workshop]], [[WP:Requests for arbitration/West Bank - Judea and Samaria/Proposed decision]], [[WT:Requests for arbitration/West Bank - Judea and Samaria/Proposed decision]]. <small style="border: 1px solid;padding:1px 4px 1px 3px;white-space:nowrap">'''[[User:Nableezy|<font color="#C11B17">nableezy</font>]]''' - 07:54, 10 September 2009 (UTC)</font></small> |
Revision as of 07:54, 10 September 2009
Reply
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
Stop it
Cut this crap out. Tan | 39 14:30, 3 September 2009 (UTC)
Your report at AIV
Regarding your report for Edit Warring of User:Arab Cowboy you filed at WP:AIV; AIV is really for vandals and spammers. For edit warring, I would recommend you file it at WP:ANEW where there are administrators who are more experienced in dealing with cases like this. Thanks, Stephen! Coming... 17:20, 3 September 2009 (UTC)
I'll take a look ...
If there is anything I can add to the discussion I will. Thanks for letting me know and happy editing. Tiamuttalk 16:08, 4 September 2009 (UTC)
arbitration
Why on earth would you start that? I hope you realize that ArbCom as a rule does not issue judgments on content (whether or not to put Syrian or Egyptian or whatever) and the only thing that would happen if they accept the case (they shouldn't in my opinion) is the two of you getting banned for some period of time for edit warring and disruption. Arbitration is incredibly tedious with the result not likely to be advantageous to either of you. Its your life so do what you feel you have to, but this was not a wise move in my opinion. nableezy - 20:47, 9 September 2009 (UTC)
- I dont know, but if you want people to actually try and help you need to chill out a bit as well. When there is an RfC and there are just 2 editors going back and forth nobody wants to get involved. I aint exactly the most civil person out here but I realize that if you want to get other people involved you have to make it so they arent stepping in shit. Nobody wants to get involved in these types of disputes were people are just arguing with each other, which is why so many of the Arab/Israeli articles are so bad. People see nothing but sniping and realize that it is just not worth their effort to try and help resolve the issues. So nothing gets done, you just have two sides of people arguing and getting more and more angry with the other side. Which is what happened here. If you told me you were thinking about this I would have tried to step in. Two Arabs going at it like this over a friggin category is retarded. I would have told you both that it is retarded. I would have tried to get the two of you to agree to a set of ground rules for what qualifies for the category. Or I would have tried to get Al Ameer to do it instead. If you want I can still try and do that with the two of you maybe not have to go through the hassle of an arbitration case. If you want to see what you are signing up for take a look at a recent case, read these over and let me know if you still want to go through with this. WP:Requests for arbitration/West Bank - Judea and Samaria, WT:Requests for arbitration/West Bank - Judea and Samaria, WP:Requests for arbitration/West Bank - Judea and Samaria/Evidence, WT:Requests for arbitration/West Bank - Judea and Samaria/Evidence, WP:Requests for arbitration/West Bank - Judea and Samaria/Workshop, WT:Requests for arbitration/West Bank - Judea and Samaria/Workshop, WP:Requests for arbitration/West Bank - Judea and Samaria/Proposed decision, WT:Requests for arbitration/West Bank - Judea and Samaria/Proposed decision. nableezy - 07:54, 10 September 2009 (UTC)