→Block evasion: new section |
Student of philosophy (talk | contribs) |
||
Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
Per the [[Wikipedia:Blocking policy|blocking policy]], I have re-set [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special%3ALog&type=block&user=&page=User:194.124.140.39&action=edit your 48-hour block] for block evasion (see [[WP:EVADE]]). See [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Evolutionary_argument_against_naturalism&diff=next&oldid=290079801 this edit] for evidence of the connection between {{User|Student of philosophy}} and {{User|194.124.140.39}} (or simply peruse their editing history). [[User:Guettarda|Guettarda]] ([[User talk:Guettarda|talk]]) 23:54, 3 June 2009 (UTC) |
Per the [[Wikipedia:Blocking policy|blocking policy]], I have re-set [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special%3ALog&type=block&user=&page=User:194.124.140.39&action=edit your 48-hour block] for block evasion (see [[WP:EVADE]]). See [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Evolutionary_argument_against_naturalism&diff=next&oldid=290079801 this edit] for evidence of the connection between {{User|Student of philosophy}} and {{User|194.124.140.39}} (or simply peruse their editing history). [[User:Guettarda|Guettarda]] ([[User talk:Guettarda|talk]]) 23:54, 3 June 2009 (UTC) |
||
:I'd like to mention that the reason for blocking the other ip in the first place was that I made an edit based on an argument and you undid it three times without giving any reason for it. You then blocked me for the second time after I added more content to the history of the argument, fixed footnotes and improved the structure of the article. I'll begin a discussion about your POV once the block expired.--[[User:Student of philosophy|Student of philosophy]] ([[User talk:Student of philosophy#top|talk]]) 20:19, 4 June 2009 (UTC) |
Revision as of 20:19, 4 June 2009
Plantinga and Theistic Evolution
Hi Student of Philosophy,
Personally, I don't want to buy into the debate over whether or not Plantinga's Evolutionary argument against naturalism is, or is not, compatible with Theistic Evolution. However, I have just added links to audio and text of Plantinga's Biola lecture on EAAN where he concludes that a traditional theist (i.e. Jewish, Moslem, or Christian theist) "may indeed endorse some form of evolution; but if she does, it will be a form of evolution guided and orchestrated by God." - see the penultimate paragraph of the [text of the lecture].
As a person who has taken extensive interest in the EAAN article, I thought this may be of interest to you. Muzhogg (talk) 21:23, 30 May 2009 (UTC)
Block evasion
Per the blocking policy, I have re-set for block evasion (see WP:EVADE). See this edit for evidence of the connection between Student of philosophy (talk · contribs) and 194.124.140.39 (talk · contribs) (or simply peruse their editing history). Guettarda (talk) 23:54, 3 June 2009 (UTC)
- I'd like to mention that the reason for blocking the other ip in the first place was that I made an edit based on an argument and you undid it three times without giving any reason for it. You then blocked me for the second time after I added more content to the history of the argument, fixed footnotes and improved the structure of the article. I'll begin a discussion about your POV once the block expired.--Student of philosophy (talk) 20:19, 4 June 2009 (UTC)