m Signing comment by 86.173.138.5 - "→Zinash Tayachew: " Tag: Reverted |
→Zinash Tayachew: removal of drama Tag: Manual revert |
||
Line 210: | Line 210: | ||
Thank you for your recent thoughts on a deletion I made to an individual on the Moody Wiki famous people. If the majority of Moody individuals do not consider this to be a true candidate for this recognition, how does one edit this. I do not want to be libelous, but this individual is not considered famous at Moody. <!-- Template:Unsigned --><span class="autosigned" style="font-size:85%;">— Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:Dkellswo|Dkellswo]] ([[User talk:Dkellswo#top|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Dkellswo|contribs]]) 21:27, 29 November 2020 (UTC)</span> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> |
Thank you for your recent thoughts on a deletion I made to an individual on the Moody Wiki famous people. If the majority of Moody individuals do not consider this to be a true candidate for this recognition, how does one edit this. I do not want to be libelous, but this individual is not considered famous at Moody. <!-- Template:Unsigned --><span class="autosigned" style="font-size:85%;">— Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:Dkellswo|Dkellswo]] ([[User talk:Dkellswo#top|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Dkellswo|contribs]]) 21:27, 29 November 2020 (UTC)</span> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> |
||
:{{u|Dkellswo}} Hi. To answer your question, if the majority of the people editing the page consider this an individual that is famous, then please respect consensus. We all have our opinions, and you are of course permitted to state them on the relevant talk page, but all major editors of the article will decide together, per [[WP:CONSENSUS]]. In addition to that, the section was alumnus, not faithful, so any and all alumni should be put in that category. I'm also wondering if you have a direct connection to the article's topic, as you have a lot of knowledge on it. |
:{{u|Dkellswo}} Hi. To answer your question, if the majority of the people editing the page consider this an individual that is famous, then please respect consensus. We all have our opinions, and you are of course permitted to state them on the relevant talk page, but all major editors of the article will decide together, per [[WP:CONSENSUS]]. In addition to that, the section was alumnus, not faithful, so any and all alumni should be put in that category. I'm also wondering if you have a direct connection to the article's topic, as you have a lot of knowledge on it. |
||
== Zinash Tayachew == |
|||
Hello - your edits, and associated comments, to this article, are mistaken. |
|||
Your edits |
|||
*Date format - you are trying to force MDY, whereas DMY are appropriate for the country. For example, see [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Date_format_by_country] |
|||
*Puffery. You are trying to force, ([https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Zinash_Tayachew&type=revision&diff=991558636&oldid=991556598])for example |
|||
:-'she works with compassion' This is clearly puffery & non-neutral ... and is certainly in contrast to your wish for other articles to be neutral. For example, see [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk%3AMike_Onoja&type=revision&diff=991557332&oldid=871860929] |
|||
:-'Through her charity work, First Lady Zinash has become a hope for so many' Again, this is clearly puffery & non-neutral. |
|||
*And, this edit is supported by what is clearly a highly biased source. See [https://pmo.gov.et/first_lady/] |
|||
Your comments |
|||
*Please stop making false claims of, For example, see [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk%3A86.173.138.5&type=revision&diff=991556746&oldid=991556146] & [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk%3A86.173.138.5&type=revision&diff=991558651&oldid=991556746] |
|||
*And when other editors reply to your (inappropriate comments) then you should be civil by at least reply to them rather then simply adding a standard (and again inappropriate) comment. |
|||
Revert |
|||
*Your edit has been reverted again: Please do not revert and please do not add further inappropriate 'warnings' to other. Should you wish please start a discussion here or on the relevant talk page. <!-- Template:Unsigned IP --><small class="autosigned">— Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/86.173.138.5|86.173.138.5]] ([[User talk:86.173.138.5#top|talk]]) 18:32, 30 November 2020 (UTC)</small> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> |
|||
:{{ping|86.173.138.5}} Hi, if you wish to see that it isn't neutral, place <nowiki>{{POV|date=November 2020}}</nowiki> on it, as Wikipedia does not delete content that isn't neutral, it rewrites it. Please do not revert again, or there will be a third consecutive warning. [[User:Slykos|Slykos]] ([[User talk:Slykos#top|talk]]) 18:36, 30 November 2020 (UTC) |
|||
::If you breach 3RR by a further mistaken edit then it will be reported to an admin. |
|||
:::{{ping|86.173.138.5}} First, sign your comments with <nowiki>~~~~</nowiki>. Second, Wikipedia has a policy that if I rule is preventing you from stopping vandalism, ignore it. [[User:Slykos|Slykos]] ([[User talk:Slykos#top|talk]]) 18:39, 30 November 2020 (UTC) |
|||
::::Indeed, Wikipedia has a number of policies and guidlines. Amonst these is: |
|||
::::*[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Assume_good_faith Assume good faith] To date you have not shown this by: posting inappropriate warnings; ignoring other's comments to you by simply posting a further standard (and inappropriate) warnings; make false accusations of vandalism. |
|||
::::*On vandalism, including what constitutes and does not constitutes vandalism. At best the issue with the article is a dispute on content; my edits have not been vandalism. See [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vandalism_on_Wikipedia#:~:text=On%20Wikipedia%2C%20vandalism%20is%20editing,a%20hoax%2C%20or%20otherwise%20degrading.] & [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Vandalism#:~:text=Vandalism%20is%20prohibited.&text=Even%20if%20misguided%2C%20willfully%20against,the%20encyclopedia%20is%20not%20vandalism.&text=If%20it%20is%20clear%20that,some%20core%20policy%20of%20Wikipedia.] <!-- Template:Unsigned IP --><small class="autosigned">— Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/86.173.138.5|86.173.138.5]] ([[User talk:86.173.138.5#top|talk]]) 18:47, 30 November 2020 (UTC)</small> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> |
Revision as of 19:24, 30 November 2020
This is my talk page.
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!
Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping.
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 20:42, 23 November 2020 (UTC)
November 2020
Hello. I have noticed that you often edit without using an edit summary. Please do your best to always fill in the summary field. This helps your fellow editors use their time more productively, rather than spending it unnecessarily scrutinizing and verifying your work. Even a short summary is better than no summary, and summaries are particularly important for large, complex, or potentially controversial edits. Thanks! Slykos (talk) 22:54, 28 November 2020 (UTC)
Deletion
Slykos,
Thank you for your recent thoughts on a deletion I made to an individual on the Moody Wiki famous people. If the majority of Moody individuals do not consider this to be a true candidate for this recognition, how does one edit this. I do not want to be libelous, but this individual is not considered famous at Moody. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Dkellswo (talk • contribs) 21:27, 29 November 2020 (UTC)
- Dkellswo Hi. To answer your question, if the majority of the people editing the page consider this an individual that is famous, then please respect consensus. We all have our opinions, and you are of course permitted to state them on the relevant talk page, but all major editors of the article will decide together, per WP:CONSENSUS. In addition to that, the section was alumnus, not faithful, so any and all alumni should be put in that category. I'm also wondering if you have a direct connection to the article's topic, as you have a lot of knowledge on it.