Feedback Request Service notification on a "Biographies" request for comment (1/2 this month). You can unsubscribe at WP:FRS. |
→Feedback request: Biographies request for comment: Out of line |
||
Line 160: | Line 160: | ||
[[File:Internet-group-chat.svg|48px|left|alt=|link=]]Your feedback is requested  at [[Talk:Lana Del Rey#rfc_2CDB58E|'''Talk:Lana Del Rey'''  on a "Biographies" request for comment]]. Thank you for helping out!<br/><small>You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of [[WP:FRS|Feedback Request Service]] subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by [[WP:FRS|removing your name]].</small> <!-- Template:FRS notification --><div class="paragraphbreak" style="margin-top:0.5em"></div> Message delivered to you with love by [[User:Yapperbot|Yapperbot]] :) | Is this wrong? Contact [[User talk:Naypta|my bot operator]]. | Sent at 02:33, 19 January 2021 (UTC) |
[[File:Internet-group-chat.svg|48px|left|alt=|link=]]Your feedback is requested  at [[Talk:Lana Del Rey#rfc_2CDB58E|'''Talk:Lana Del Rey'''  on a "Biographies" request for comment]]. Thank you for helping out!<br/><small>You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of [[WP:FRS|Feedback Request Service]] subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by [[WP:FRS|removing your name]].</small> <!-- Template:FRS notification --><div class="paragraphbreak" style="margin-top:0.5em"></div> Message delivered to you with love by [[User:Yapperbot|Yapperbot]] :) | Is this wrong? Contact [[User talk:Naypta|my bot operator]]. | Sent at 02:33, 19 January 2021 (UTC) |
||
==Out of line== |
|||
You are out of line ([https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Debresser&diff=prev&oldid=1001747825 diff]). I already told Debresser that he needs to provide assurances of being willing to self-correct, if he wishes to avoid the sanction. I don't appreciate you [[WP:ASPERSIONS|casting aspersions]] about me or my motives. Please do not do that again. You should not mistake me as a target for you to attack whenever you disagree with something I do. |
|||
By the way, the appeal is still open. The latest admin to have commented on it was {{u|Thryduulf}}, who writes: {{tq|If anything, a two week block without a topic ban is too lenient given how obvious it should have been that the behaviour was completely inappropriate.}} ([https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia%3AArbitration%2FRequests%2FEnforcement&type=revision&diff=1001365849&oldid=1001320241 diff]). But, no, you go with "punishment." That's just lovely. Please take note and adjust your behaviour accordingly. I would rather not have a repetition of this. [[User:El_C|El_C]] 06:06, 21 January 2021 (UTC) |
Revision as of 06:07, 21 January 2021
The below quote is from someone else:
Anyone who complains of anti-Semitism, while silently ignoring the massive daily evidence of the humiliations, harassment and violence dealt out on a systematic basis in Gaza and the West Bank, is ranting hollowly to my ear.
Admin misconduct links: User_talk:Sir_Joseph/Archive_11#Interaction_ban
Archives
| |||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||
This page has archives. Sections older than 30 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III. |
ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message
Anti-Semetic accusation redux
I received an email from a reporter for a Jewish publication that provided a quote that he says that you personally told him saying that I made anti-sematic posts on Wikipedia. Is this true? If so, I demand an immediate retraction before they publish such egregious slander. Immediate. O3000 (talk) 01:34, 25 November 2020 (UTC)
- Objective3000, don't post on my talk page. I also don't control the press, I am not in charge of other people's comments. Sir Joseph (talk) 15:05, 25 November 2020 (UTC)
Why are you removing information from Wikipedia? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 207.172.170.220 (talk) 20:37, 1 December 2020 (UTC)
New Page Patrol December Newsletter
Hello Sir Joseph,
- Year in review
It has been a productive year for New Page Patrol as we've roughly cut the size of the New Page Patrol queue in half this year. We have been fortunate to have a lot of great work done by Rosguill who was the reviewer of the most pages and redirects this past year. Thanks and credit go to JTtheOG and Onel5969 who join Rosguill in repeating in the top 10 from last year. Thanks to John B123, Hughesdarren, and Mccapra who all got the NPR permission this year and joined the top 10. Also new to the top ten is DannyS712 bot III, programmed by DannyS712 which has helped to dramatically reduce the number of redirects that have needed human patrolling by patrolling certain types of redirects (e.g. for differences in accents) and by also patrolling editors who are on on the redirect whitelist.
Rank | Username | Num reviews | Log |
---|---|---|---|
1 | DannyS712 bot III (talk) | 67,552 | Patrol Page Curation |
2 | Rosguill (talk) | 63,821 | Patrol Page Curation |
3 | John B123 (talk) | 21,697 | Patrol Page Curation |
4 | Onel5969 (talk) | 19,879 | Patrol Page Curation |
5 | JTtheOG (talk) | 12,901 | Patrol Page Curation |
6 | Mcampany (talk) | 9,103 | Patrol Page Curation |
7 | DragonflySixtyseven (talk) | 6,401 | Patrol Page Curation |
8 | Mccapra (talk) | 4,918 | Patrol Page Curation |
9 | Hughesdarren (talk) | 4,520 | Patrol Page Curation |
10 | Utopes (talk) | 3,958 | Patrol Page Curation |
- Reviewer of the Year
John B123 has been named reviewer of the year for 2020. John has held the permission for just over 6 months and in that time has helped cut into the queue by reviewing more than 18,000 articles. His talk page shows his efforts to communicate with users, upholding NPP's goal of nurturing new users and quality over quantity.
- NPP Technical Achievement Award
As a special recognition and thank you DannyS712 has been awarded the first NPP Technical Achievement Award. His work programming the bot has helped us patrol redirects tremendously - more than 60,000 redirects this past year. This has been a large contribution to New Page Patrol and definitely is worthy of recognition.
Six Month Queue Data: Today – 2262 Low – 2232 High – 10271
To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here
18:16, 10 December 2020 (UTC)
Wikitea for you
Benevolent human (talk) 02:48, 14 January 2021 (UTC)
Feedback requests from the Feedback Request Service
Your feedback is requested at Talk:List of people from Ukraine on a "History and geography" request for comment, and at Talk:Arthur Laffer on a "Politics, government, and law" request for comment, and at Talk:Post-classical history on a "History and geography" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.
Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 14:48, 15 January 2021 (UTC)
Feedback request: Biographies request for comment
Your feedback is requested at Talk:Lana Del Rey on a "Biographies" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.
Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 02:33, 19 January 2021 (UTC)
Out of line
You are out of line (diff). I already told Debresser that he needs to provide assurances of being willing to self-correct, if he wishes to avoid the sanction. I don't appreciate you casting aspersions about me or my motives. Please do not do that again. You should not mistake me as a target for you to attack whenever you disagree with something I do.
By the way, the appeal is still open. The latest admin to have commented on it was Thryduulf, who writes: If anything, a two week block without a topic ban is too lenient given how obvious it should have been that the behaviour was completely inappropriate.
(diff). But, no, you go with "punishment." That's just lovely. Please take note and adjust your behaviour accordingly. I would rather not have a repetition of this. El_C 06:06, 21 January 2021 (UTC)